House GOP moves Trump's agenda forward after all-night committee debate
The House Ways & Means Committee advanced its portion of Trump's "one big, beautiful bill," one of 11 committees working on the effort that will then be part of one massive piece of legislation.
It happened despite a barrage of protest amendments lobbed by Democratic lawmakers in a bid to slow proceedings down and make Republicans take politically tricky votes.
The Energy & Commerce Committee and the Ways & Means Committee both held meetings through the night to debate and advance key parts of Trump's bill.
The former's meeting is expected to go into Wednesday afternoon after beginning Tuesday at 2 p.m. The Ways & Means Committee advanced its portion early on Wednesday morning in a party-line 26 to 19 vote.
The House Agriculture Committee, another critical panel, began working on its portion on Tuesday evening and paused proceedings around midnight. That committee is expected to resume later Wednesday morning.
Democrats on each committee, meanwhile, have prepared a barrage of attacks and accusations against GOP lawmakers looking to gut critical welfare programs. The committee meetings have lasted hours because of left-wing lawmakers offering what seemed at times to be an endless stream of amendments that Republicans routinely shot down.
Sparks flew early at the Energy & Commerce Committee meeting with protesters both inside and outside the room repeatedly attempting to disrupt proceedings – with 26 people arrested by Capitol Police.
Protesters against Medicaid cuts, predominately in wheelchairs, remained outside the budget markup for several hours as representatives inside debated that and other critical facets under the committee's broad jurisdiction.
Inside the budget markup, Democrats and Republicans sparred along party lines over Medicaid cuts. Democrats repeatedly claimed the Republican budget proposal will cut vital Medicaid services.
Many Democrats shared how Medicaid services have saved their constituents' lives and argued that millions of Americans could lose coverage under the current proposal.
Meanwhile, Republicans accused Democrats of lying to the American people about Medicaid cuts – a word Kentucky Republican Rep. Brett Guthrie, Chairman of the Energy and Commerce Committee, deterred his colleagues from using. Tensions arose when the word was repeated as Democrats called it a mischaracterization of their testimonies.
Republicans have contended that their bill only seeks to cut waste, fraud, and abuse of the Medicaid system, leaving more of its resources for vulnerable populations that truly need it.
That committee was tasked with finding $880 billion in spending cuts to offset Trump's other funding priorities. Guthrie told House Republicans on a call Sunday night that they'd found upwards of $900 billion in cuts.
Democrats have seized on Republican reforms to Medicaid, including heightened work requirements and shifting more costs to certain states, as a political cudgel.
At one point late in the evening, House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries, D-N.Y., made an appearance at the Energy & Commerce panel's meeting.
"I just want to mention our Democratic Leader Hakeem Jeffries is here because of his concern about Medicaid. Thank you," the committee's top Democrat, Rep. Frank Pallone, D-N.J., said.
But tensions remain between moderate Republicans and conservatives about the level of cuts the committee is seeking to the former Biden administration's Inflation Reduction Act (IRA) green energy tax subsidies.
Several Democratic amendments were also offered throughout the night to preserve the green energy bill, but all were shot down.
By early Tuesday morning, the Energy & Commerce Committee had advanced portions of its bill, rolling back significant chunks of the IRA and setting standards for telecommunication – including a decade-long moratorium on state-level laws dealing with artificial intelligence (AI).
The meeting at the Ways & Means Committee had relatively little fanfare but was equally contentious as Democrats attempted to offer amendments to preserve Affordable Care Act tax credits, cap tax cuts for the wealthy, and changes to the state and local tax (SALT) deduction cap.
At one point, Reps. Beth Van Duyne, R-Texas, and Tom Suozzi, D-N.Y., got into a heated exchange over SALT, with Suozzi pushing Van Duyne on whether she'd ever been to New York.
Van Duyne earlier called Texas a "donor state" in terms of taxes, arguing, "We should not have to pay to make up for the rich folks in New York who are getting raped by their local and state governments."
Suozzi later pointed out Van Duyne was born and went to college in upstate New York – leading to audible gasps in the room.
Van Duyne said there was "a reason" she left.
"We're sorry you left New York, but in some ways it may have worked out better for all of us," Suozzi said.
The SALT deduction cap, however, is still a politically tricky issue even as House lawmakers debate what Republicans hoped would be the final bill.
The legislation would raise the $10,000 SALT deduction cap to $30,000 for most single and married tax filers – a figure that Republicans in higher cost-of-living areas said was not enough.
Rep. Mike Lawler, R-N.Y., threatened to vote against the final bill if the new cap remains.
As the committee's marathon meeting continued, a group of blue state Republicans huddled with House GOP leaders to find a compromise on a way forward.
Rep. Nick LaLota, R-N.Y., hinted at tensions in the meeting when he posted on X that Rep. Nicole Malliotakis, R-N.Y., a member of the SALT Caucus and Ways & Means Committee, "wasn't involved in today's meeting" because her district required "something different than mine and the other most SALTY five."
Malliotakis previously told Fox News Digital she was supportive of the $30,000 cap. She's also the only member of the SALT Caucus on the critical tax-writing panel.
As morning rose on House lawmakers, Rep. Greg Murphy, R-N.C., quipped at the tax meeting, "I see the light coming in from the East…I think it's going to be a Disney day."
The Agriculture Committee, which began its meeting on Tuesday evening, saw Democrats waste no time in accusing Republicans of trying to gut the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP), colloquially known as food stamps.
Rep. Adam Gray, D-Calif., accused Republicans of worrying that "somebody is getting a meal they didn't deserve or kids are getting too fat" instead of more critical issues.
Republicans, like Rep. Randy Feenstra, R-Iowa, touted the bill's inclusion of crop insurance for young farmers, increasing opportunity for export markets, and helping invest in national animal disaster centers aimed at preventing and mitigating livestock illness.
He also said Republicans were working to "secure" SNAP from waste and abuse.
House and Senate Republicans are working on Trump's agenda via the budget reconciliation process, which allows the party in power to sideline the minority by lowering the Senate's threshold for passage to a simple majority, provided the legislation at hand deals with spending, taxes or the national debt.
Trump wants Republicans to use the maneuver for a sweeping bill on his tax, border, immigration, energy and defense priorities.
Two sources familiar with the plan said the House Budget Committee intends to advance the full bill, the first step to getting the legislation to a House-wide vote, on Friday.
Wednesday will be a critical day to see if that timeline holds. Eleven different House committees, seven of which have already finished their work, must each pass portions of the legislation before they're all fitted into a massive bill that must pass the House and Senate before getting to Trump's desk.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
4 minutes ago
- Yahoo
US-Mexico border wall to be painted black to stop climbers
The entire US-Mexico border wall will be painted black to make it hotter and harder to climb, Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem has said, crediting the idea to President Donald Trump. While domestic detentions and deportations have been the primary focus of the current immigration crackdown, Trump's policy bill passed earlier this summer also allocated $46m (£34m) for additional wall construction. About a half mile (0.8km) of wall is going up each day along the nearly 2,000 mile (3,218km) border, according to Noem. The number of border crossings has plummeted in recent months, and the Trump administration says sweeping arrests and detentions are acting as a deterrent to illegal migration. Speaking to reporters along a section of the border in New Mexico, Noem said on Tuesday that the black paint was "specifically at the request of the president". "[He] understands that in the hot temperatures down here, when something is painted black it gets even warmer and it will make it even harder for people to climb," she added. Border Patrol officials also say that black paint will help prevent the wall from rusting. Additionally, Noem said the administration is planning to install more "waterborne infrastructure" along the Rio Grande, which makes up more than half of the border between the two countries. While Noem did not provide any more details on those projects, Texas authorities have previously installed floating barriers - large orange buoys - and fortified riverbank fencing guarded by state troopers, local police officers and the Texas National Guard along parts of the river. Crossings and detentions of undocumented immigrants have plummeted since Trump returned to the office, with record lows of approximately 4,600 in July and 6,000 in June - a 92% year-on-year reduction. During the Biden administration, detentions sometimes spiked to averages of 6,000 per day. Earlier in August, Noem said that a total of 1.6m undocumented immigrants have left the US during the first 200 days of the Trump administration, although she did not specify how many have been deported and how many left on their own. White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt said earlier in August that a total of 300,000 undocumented immigrants had been detained in the interior of the US since January. While the administration continues to say it is prioritising those with criminal histories, immigration advocates have warned that many with no criminal charges or only minor infractions have been caught up in the sweeps. White House officials also contend that increased border security and mass deportations have been deterrents, saying they are the primary reason for plummeting figures at the US-Mexico border. US strikes deportation deals with Honduras and Uganda US offers up to $50k bonus for would-be ICE deportation officers Watch: US builds new wall at Mexico border
Yahoo
4 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Texas county cuts over 100 polling sites as Trump attacks mail-in voting nationally
Officials in a large North Texas county decided this week to cut more than 100 Election Day polling sites and reduce the number of early voting locations, amid growing concern about GOP efforts to limit voting access ahead of next year's midterm elections. The 3-2 vote on Tuesday by commissioners in Tarrant County, which includes Fort Worth, came one day after President Donald Trump vowed to end the use of mail-in ballots. The president lacks the unilateral power to decide how individual states run elections, but his declaration speaks to long-brewing and unfounded claims by some conservatives that the country's electoral system is insecure and vulnerable to widespread fraud. Trump has repeatedly and falsely asserted that he won the 2020 presidential election instead of Joe Biden. Tarrant County Judge Tim O'Hare, who heads up the commissioners court, has also raised numerous questions about the security of local elections, helping to launch an electoral integrity unit in the county after he became judge in 2022. As of last summer, however, the unit had received fewer than 100 allegations of voter fraud. He and fellow Republican commissioners also cut funding to provide free bus rides to the polls for low-income residents. 'I don't believe it's the county government's responsibility to try to get more people out to the polls,' O'Hare said at the time. And commissioners prohibited outside organizations from registering voters inside county buildings after Tarrant County GOP leaders raised concerns about what they said were left-leaning groups holding registration drives. (ProPublica and The Texas Tribune have previously written about O'Hare's political influence in North Texas.) On Tuesday, O'Hare voted with the two Republican commissioners on the court to reduce the number of polling sites in the county to 216, down from 331 in 2023. The decision also cut down the number of early voting sites. County officials said the move was to save money, as they historically see low voter turnout in nonpresidential elections. Throughout the meeting, O'Hare repeatedly emphasized that the cuts were intended to make the election more efficient. He argued that both the switch to county-wide voting in 2019, which allows voters to cast a ballot at any polling site in the county, and the expected low turnout made the cuts appropriate. "I would venture to guess 99% of the public cannot name a single thing on (the 2025 ballot),' he said during the meeting. Fewer voting sites means fewer voters, Brandon Rottinghaus, a political science professor at the University of Houston, told the Report. 'If you move a polling place farther away from someone's house, then they're less likely to vote because you've increased the cost of voting,' said Rottinghaus, who has studied poll placement and its impact on turnout. 'The cost can be your time. It can be your gas.' The county's move falls in line with a national trend that generally sees Republican-led states and localities 'restrain and restrict' how voting operates — often in the name of discouraging illegal voting or, in Tarrant County's recent case, cutting costs, Rottinghaus said. This could look like reducing voting locations or shortening early voting hours, he said. Texas has led multiple efforts to make going to the polls more difficult, he said, such as making mail-in ballots harder to obtain and requiring photo IDs when casting a ballot. No single law dramatically impacts voter turnout, Rottinghaus said, rather, it's the collective of ever-changing policies that can discourage people from voting. 'The more you move around how voting occurs, like the hours and the locations, the harder it is for voters to understand exactly what they're supposed to do and when,' he said. 'A confused voter is usually a nonvoter.' This is not the first time Tarrant County has been at the forefront of changing political headwinds. Earlier this summer, the commissioners, led by O'Hare, voted along party lines to redraw the county precincts; such changes usually happen after the decennial census rather than in the middle of the decade. O'Hare admitted the goal of the redrawn maps was to favor Republican candidates. 'This is about Republican versus Democrat, period,' O'Hare told Dallas television station WFAA ahead of the commissioners' June 3 vote. 'If it passes with one of the maps that I would want to see pass, it's a very strong likelihood that we will have three Republicans on the Commissioners Court.' In July, Gov. Greg Abbott added redistricting to the agenda of a special legislative session — a step he was apparently reluctant to take until he received a call from Trump to discuss the issue, the Tribune reported. The proposal has sparked a national fight over the redrawing of congressional maps. On Wednesday, the GOP-led Texas House took an initial vote adopting a new map designed to increase the number of Republican seats in the U.S. Congress. Abbott has also fanned concerns about allegations of illegal voting, last year announcing the removal of more than 1 million ineligible voters from the state's rolls, including more than 6,500 potential noncitizens. An investigation by ProPublica, the Tribune and Votebeat, however, found that the number of alleged noncitizens the governor cited was likely inflated and, in some cases, wrong. Concerns about the cuts More than three dozen speakers at Tuesday's meeting denounced the move to cut polling sites and early voting locations, with some raising concerns that it amounted to the suppression of Black, Hispanic and college-age voters. Several speakers called the cuts a more extreme version of O'Hare's failed effort to remove eight early voting locations at colleges last year. Only one person spoke in favor of the reductions. Sabrina Ball, who opposed reducing the polling sites, said she has worked as an election judge in Republican Commissioner Manny Ramirez's district in northwest Tarrant County. She said she's seen firsthand people working hard to find the time to get to a polling location and vote. 'You're not saving money. You're sacrificing democracy to save a buck,' she said. The two Democratic commissioners, Roderick Miles Jr. and Alisa Simmons, voted against the changes after unsuccessfully trying to delay the decision. 'Everybody deserves the right to have a place that they are comfortable with and familiar with to go and to cast their vote,' said Miles, who represents predominantly Black neighborhoods that saw a reduction in voting locations. He later added, 'To dismantle or take those rights away from us that we worked hard to get is unacceptable at any level.' Simmons said it was inappropriate to reduce voting locations as Tarrant County's population grows. She pointed out that the Republican members of the Commissioners Court used that growth as a reason to redistrict the county's precincts midcycle this year — a change that would significantly increase the chances of a GOP candidate defeating her in 2026. A Texas law passed in May reduces the county's minimum Election Day voting locations to 212 — rolling back a 2023 requirement of 347. Tarrant County Election Administrator Clinton Ludwig said the sites meet the state's new 'bare minimum,' with 'a little bit of wiggle room' in case certain planned locations fall through. He told commissioners that the initially proposed cuts aimed to save about $1 million. He said he based the reductions on voter turnout in 2023, which saw about 12.5% registered voters cast ballots, he said. Locations' accessibility and ability to securely store voting information were also considered, Ludwig said. He said that no commissioner had any influence on the list and that no partisan analysis was taken into account. Ludwig and O'Hare's office did not immediately respond to requests to comment following the vote. O'Hare has also not responded to ProPublica and the Tribune's previous reporting about him, declining multiple interview requests and refusing to answer questions, though a spokesperson sent the newsrooms a list of eight of his major accomplishments, including cutting county spending and lowering local property tax rates. Rottinghaus said some counties 'yo-yo' year to year in the number of polling places they have. Elections such as November's typically have fewer locations than presidential and midterm ones, he said. Still, Tarrant County's reduction seems 'aggressive,' he said. Once the number of polling places goes down, it usually stays down, Rottinghaus said. 'You're going to generally see that same number continue for at least the near term,' he said. Though he ultimately voted to reduce polling locations, Ramirez pushed back on the initial list of cuts to early voting sites, some of which he said were established and popular with voters. Ramirez said the county must balance access and efficiency. Commissioners then added back nine early voting locations. O'Hare was the lone vote against that move, saying some of those sites had historically low turnout. 'The formula for where you put these voting sites has to be scientific,' Ramirez told the Report ahead of the vote. 'It should be population-based and proximity to additional site-based.' Several Fort Worth City Council members urged their constituents to speak against the effort in the lead-up to the vote. Council member Carlos Flores, who represents parts of northwest Fort Worth, issued a statement against the vote, saying fewer sites negatively impact diverse communities. In a statement to the Report, he added that limited polling locations and inconvenient voting procedures contribute to low turnout. Mia Hall, who represents southwest Fort Worth, sent a news release to her district on Monday, decrying the proposed cuts in parts of her district that are predominantly Black or Hispanic. 'These communities have long fought for equitable access to the ballot box, and removing their polling locations is simply unacceptable,' Hall wrote. 'While I understand the pressures of state regulations and budgetary constraints, disenfranchising entire communities is not an acceptable response.' Drew Shaw is a government accountability reporter for the Fort Worth Report. Contact him at Disclosure: The University of Houston has been a financial supporter of The Texas Tribune, a nonprofit, nonpartisan news organization that is funded in part by donations from members, foundations and corporate sponsors. Financial supporters play no role in the Tribune's journalism. Find a complete list of them here. More all-star speakers confirmed for The Texas Tribune Festival, Nov. 13–15! This year's lineup just got even more exciting with the addition of State Rep. Caroline Fairly, R-Amarillo; former United States Attorney General Eric Holder; Abby Phillip, anchor of 'CNN NewsNight'; Aaron Reitz, 2026 Republican candidate for Texas Attorney General; and State Rep. James Talarico, D-Austin. Get your tickets today! TribFest 2025 is presented by JPMorganChase.
Yahoo
4 minutes ago
- Yahoo
James Carville Advises Dems To 'Kick The S**t' Out Of This Republican On Every Occasion
James Carville on Wednesday called on Democrats to focus their attention on Vice President JD Vance after his European holiday gone wrong. 'Use JD Vance and just kick the shit out of him every chance you get,' said the longtime Democratic strategist on his 'Politics War Room' podcast with co-host Al Hunt. Moments earlier, Hunt turned to Vance's recent Georgia visit where he ripped Sen. Jon Ossoff (D-Ga.) — who is up for reelection in next year's midterms — for voting against President Donald Trump's 'big, beautiful bill,' which has been signed into law and cuts taxes for wealthy Americans while slashing health and food aid. Related: Vance used his visit to claim that the legislation delivered tax cuts to the 'working class.' Carville advised Ossoff to let Vance 'frame the debate' around the law, which he described as the 'most unpopular piece of legislation in recent times.' He urged the senator to proudly own up to his vote against the legislation. 'When you get a gift, take the goddamn gift!' Carville stressed. He turned to Vance's recent decision to take a family summer vacation to the English countryside, a journey that was met with backlash, much likeothertrips he's taken since January. Carville noted that Vance's trip came at a time when American tourism is struggling. He also blasted Vance's choice to head to the Cotswolds in the United Kingdom, which he described as the 'Martha's Vineyard of England.' Related: 'Why didn't the tourist association of the Florida Panhandle blow this up? The Las Vegas people, the California people, the Wyoming people. You mean you can't vacation — and your wife and kids — in his own country?' asked Carville, noting that he's about to go on a trip to Lake George, New York. He continued, 'People in Upstate New York would have been glad to have his money but what does he do? He goes to a tony English Village.' Related... Smithsonian Has 'Overemphasis On Slavery,' Says Trump Aide Leading Audit Jeanine Pirro's Texts Reveal She Called Fellow Fox News Host An 'Egomaniac' Rock Star Calls Trump 'A Danger' To 'The Entire World' In Fiery Instagram Post
