Buttigieg DOT ignored safety issues to build dozens of windmill projects near highways, railroads
At least 33 safety recommendations to place wind turbines well clear of the critical infrastructure were overruled in 2023 and 2024, according to a current department official, permitting the projects to be built close enough to possibly interfere with vital radio communications.
In March 2023, for example, the Commerce Department's National Telecommunications Information Administration informed an Illinois wind farm seeking regulatory approval that 'the turbine locations that fall within the one-to-three-mile boundary of these rails may be problematic for train communications in this area and present an undue risk.'
Advertisement
The Heritage Prairie Wind Energy Project had been under review for 45 days before DOT flagged the problem.
Nine months later, however, the Commerce Department issued another letter withdrawing the Transportation Department's previous concerns without explanation.
5 At least 33 safety recommendations originally made to place wind turbines farther away from the critical infrastructure were overruled between 2023 and 2024.
CAROLINE BREHMAN/EPA-EFE/Shutterstock
Advertisement
'DOT continues to review and analyze the potential for harmful interference that might result from turbines placed within close proximity of rail, highway, and other transportation infrastructure, and reserves the right to make setback recommendations, or any other recommendation deemed necessary by the Department, on future projects,' the January 2024 letter stated.
The about-face came as the Biden administration was approving hundreds of billions of dollars in green energy tax credits for wind projects through one of the 46th president's signature legislative achievements, the 2022 Inflation Reduction Act.
Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy is now launching a department-wide review of any wind farms near transportation infrastructure — and is accusing Buttigieg and former President Joe Biden of having let green energy objectives override safety concerns.
5 The Department of Transportation under then-Secretary Pete Buttigieg waived concerns to help approve dozens of windmill projects near America's highways and railroads, current DOT officials told The Post.
Getty Images
Advertisement
'Joe Biden and Pete Buttigieg put climate religion ahead of safety — blatantly ignoring engineers who warned of the danger of constructing wind turbines near railroads and highways,' Duffy said.
'That's why I'm immediately implementing a higher standard of safety. What the past administration did is a shame, but it's a pattern for Biden and Buttigieg.'
Reps for Biden and Buttigieg did not immediately respond to requests for comment.
5 At least 1.2 miles of distance will now observed between wind farms and railroads or highways.
Getty Images
Advertisement
Current federal rules mandate at least 1.2 miles between wind farms and train tracks or roads after an independent study found that the former interfered with radio signals necessary to operate transportation infrastructure.
The Federal Aviation Administration will also start looking into potential affects on US airspace, which the Commerce Department's letter also referenced as a potential issue.
5 'Joe Biden and Pete Buttigieg put climate religion ahead of safety — blatantly ignoring engineers who warned of the danger of constructing wind turbines near railroads and highways,' Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy said.
AP
Another 140 wind projects were never given a safety recommendation at all by Buttigieg's DOT, a current department official noted, though it's not clear how many of those would have been placed within the 1.2-mile buffer.
The Post exclusively reported last week that the Transportation Department under Buttigieg approved more than $80 billion in diversity, equity and inclusion initiatives, with Duffy charging his predecessor wanted to implement a DEI agenda 'while safety was ignored.'
In an interview with NPR Monday, Buttigieg defended his record as 'a tough regulator of airlines' after The Post also reported that industry officials claimed his department ignored their pleas to modernize air traffic control systems and address staffing shortages to improve safety.
5 The DOT's Office of Transportation for Research and Technology, then-headed by principal deputy assistant secretary Robert Hampshire, supported the changes involving wind projects, the pair of letters showed.
Christopher Sadowski
The DOT's Office of Transportation for Research and Technology, then-headed by principal deputy assistant secretary Robert Hampshire, supported the wind projects, the pair of letters showed.
Advertisement
In his June 2021 Senate confirmation hearing, Hampshire stated a primary policy goal of the department would be to 'advance equity by providing better jobs and better transportation options to underserved communities — including communities of color and rural communities.'
He added that the DOT would focus on ways to 'reduce the impacts of climate change by using more sustainable materials.'
Hampshire did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Epoch Times
30 minutes ago
- Epoch Times
Trump Admin Restores Long‑Standing Ban on Taxpayer‑Funded Abortions at VA Hospitals
The Trump administration has announced a proposal to rescind a Biden-era rule and bar medical centers operated by the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) from performing taxpayer-funded abortions except when the mother's life is in danger. The regulatory change will be formally proposed by VA in the Aug. 4 edition of the Federal Register, with a 30-day public comment period before it can enter into force.
New York Post
an hour ago
- New York Post
Secret Service halts ex-director Kimberley Cheatle's security clearance renewal
Former Secret Service Director Kimberly Cheatle — under fire over the Pennsylvania assassination attempt against President Trump — won't have her top-level security clearance renewed, The Post has learned. The Secret Service decided not to extend Chealte's clearance after opposition from Republicans in Congress, namely Sen. Ron Johnson (R-Wis.). 'Director [Sean] Curran has been modernizing the intelligence apparatus within the agency,' a spokesperson told The Post. 'During that process, he has determined that not all former directors will have their clearances renewed.' Advertisement The decision to end Cheatle's security clearance came after RealClearPolitics inquired about Johnson's opposition to renewal, claimed the outlet, which was the first to report the change. Johnson, who helms the Senate Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations, had probed the Secret Service's failures leading up to the Trump assassination attempt in Butler, Pa. 3 Former Secret Service Director Kimberly Cheatle was at the center of controversy over the security failures preceding the assassination attempt against President Trump. The Washington Post via Getty Images Advertisement 3 Sen. Ron Johnson had opposed Kimberly Cheatle getting her security clearance renewed. AP He had been fiercely critical of Cheatle, who led the agency from 2022 to 2024, before resigning about 10 days after a bullet grazed the president's right ear during a rally in July of last year. 'The U.S. Secret Service sponsors security clearances for all the former directors for their knowledge of operational and national security matters,' a Secret Service spokesperson explained. 'The purpose for this was so the agency could maintain formal and protected communication, including potentially sensitive and classified matters with former officials.' Advertisement Trump later tapped Curran, who previously led his detail, to helm the agency. Cheatle, who was picked by former first lady Jill Biden, has taken heat for a variety of security failures leading up to the chilling attempt on Trump's life. Multiple GOP-led probes into the assassination attempt cited sources who alleged Cheatle's team had turned down Curran's petitions for more security assets during the 2024 cycle. Last month, on the first anniversary of the July 13, 2024, assassination attempt, Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) accused her of lying to Congress when she denied accusations she turned down requests for more resources for Trump's security. Advertisement 'Any assertion or implication that I provided misleading testimony is patently false and does a disservice to those men and women on the front lines who have been unfairly disciplined for a team, rather than individual, failure,' she fired back in a statement provided by her attorney. During his second term, Trump has repeatedly moved to ax security clearances for former officials in key posts. In most cases, he's gone further than Curran and outright revoked access. This includes his January executive order to revoke clearances for the infamous 'spies who lied' — the 51 intelligence officials who signed onto a letter claiming The Post's bombshell story on Hunter Biden's laptop had the 'classic earmarks of Russian disinformation.' 3 The Butler, Pa., rally attack marked the closest a gunman had gotten to killing a US president since 1981. AP Despite his terrifying brush with death, Trump has taken a charitable approach to the Secret Service. 'They should have had communications with the local police, they weren't tied in, and they should have been tied in. So there were mistakes made,' Trump told his daughter-in-law Lara Trump on Fox News' 'My View' last month. 'But I was satisfied in terms of the bigger plot, the larger plot, I was satisfied,' he added. 'And I have great confidence in these people. I know the people. And they're very talented, very capable.' Advertisement 'But they had a bad day. And I think they'll admit that. They had a rough day.' Last month, the Secret Service faced another security snafu when an agent attempted to sneak his wife onto an Air Force One jet during Trump's trip to Scotland.
New York Post
an hour ago
- New York Post
Queen's ‘Garden of Hate' taking case to federal court, rips judge and ‘scurrilous' NY Post coverage
The fight over a community garden in Queens is getting thornier. The attorney for the anti-Israel leaders of Sunset Community Garden in Ridgewood withdrew their state lawsuit against the city and the Parks Department — to make a federal case out of the issue. Since last fall, Jewish Ridgewood residents haven't felt welcome at Sunset Community Garden, thanks to the garden group's pro-Palestinian rhetoric, which included a special section labeled 'Poppies for Palestine.' 4 Some local residents said they do not feel welcome in the community garden, whose leaders asked incoming members to pledge 'solidarity' with the people of Palestine. Instagram @sunsetgardenridgewood Incoming members are also made to pledge 'solidarity with the oppressed and marginalized people' of Palestine' by the garden's management. The Parks Department wanted the group out by June 6 for 'violat[ing] the terms of their license' with the 'unconstitutional wording' of their 'ideological litmus test' for membership, according to court documents. The group responded with a state lawsuit in early June to block the eviction, and The Post was in the courtroom when attorneys for both sides met in court this month. But Jonathan Wallace, the garden leaders' attorney, withdrew the state lawsuit Monday, and told the city he plans to refile the case in federal court, a source said. In a letter this week, the lawyer accused Judge Hasa Kingo of allowing the 'scurrilous' New York Post's coverage to guide his rulings in court. 'The plaintiffs in this case are a community group composed largely of trans people of color, many of whom are immigrants, and who share a powerfully-rooted moral opposition to the horrifying violence committed by a political entity, the nation-state Israel, against the people of Gaza,' the letter read. 4 Attorney Jonathan Wallace objected to coverage from The Post. Michael Nagle 4 The garden's leaders are fighting the city's efforts to oust them. Helayne Seidman 'We could not be further from the ideals and goals stated by Justices Holmes and Brandeis when the Post appears to be influencing outcomes in judicial proceedings,' he added. 'As an old white, proudly Jewish attorney (something that in a 43-year career I never thought until now I would need to mention) I like and am content to be associated with' the garden leaders, Wallace concluded in his letter to Kingo. Christina Wilkinson — a Ridgewood resident who worked to secure funding for the green space, but is now one of its most vocal critics — said the switch to federal court a 'stall tactic,' and believes 'Parks must now remove the violators and find a community partner that will make Sunset Garden an open and inclusive place for all.' 4 Members planting in the garden in June 2024. Instagram @sunsetgardenridgewood She added, 'You have to love the irony of an attorney arguing that the City violated his clients' First Amendment rights, then turning around and complaining about [a Post reporter] being present in the courtroom.' Wallace did not respond to multiple requests for comment. The Parks Department refused to respond to requests for comment.
