Community come together to reopen Ladies' Pool diving platform in Guernsey following safety concerns
The board, installed in the 1920s at La Vallette Bathing Pools, was closed and due to be removed in February after it failed a health and safety assessment.
Hundreds of local people came out to protest the decision and stood around Ladies' Pool, leading the Government to pause its removal.
Officials said the necessary changes to increase the water depth and stop leaks would cost £1 million and even then, the area would need to be supervised at all times.
Since then, politicians have worked with the community, businesses and the Health and Safety Executive (HSE) to find a solution.
A large amount of silt, rubble and bedrock has been cleared to increase the pool's depth to 3.5 metres around the platform - above the minimum 3.2-metre clearance required by World Aquatics and British Standards.
Adrian Sarchet is part of the working group to reopen the platform and adds: "We should all feel blessed to live in a place where magic like this can happen.
"The community spoke, government listened, and local business facilitated a solution largely for free.
"The cast of faces that has made this happen is too large to thank individually here, but each and every one of you has my thanks."
The States says further safety improvements will be made over the summer, including better steps and non-slip surfaces, leading to sign-off from the HSE to reopen it straight away for public use.
Infrastructure Committee President, Deputy Lindsay de Sausmarez, explains: "This has been a fantastic example of Guernsey's incredible community spirit ... As a keen swimmer myself, it's brilliant that we can now continue to enjoy this feature of our wonderful bathing pools."
Want the inside track on the key issues that will shape Guernsey's Election this June? Listen to Guernsey Votes, an ITV Channel podcast packed with expert guests, local insight and analysis you can trust...
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Telegraph
12 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Starmer's ‘one in, one out' migrant deal has already failed, evidence suggests
Fifty per cent more migrants have crossed the Channel since Sir Keir Starmer agreed his 'one in, one out' deal with France than in the same period last year, analysis shows. The deal, struck with Emmanuel Macron, the French president, last month means Britain will detain illegal migrants and send them back to France in return for taking a similar number of asylum seekers from France. The agreement is meant to deter migrants from making the Channel crossing because those who reach Britain are likely to be sent back. Sir Keir unveiled the scheme at a joint press conference with Mr Macron on July 10, four weeks before the scheme began, and said it would 'show others trying to make the same journey that it will be in vain'. The Prime Minister wrote on X last month: 'For the very first time, migrants arriving via small boat will be detained and returned to France in short order. This Government is breaking the business model of criminal smuggling gangs and securing our borders.' But analysis by The Telegraph suggests the announcement did not have a deterrent effect. It has found that, between July 10 and last Sunday, the most recent day for which the Home Office has published figures, 5,438 migrants crossed the Channel in small boats. This is more than 50 per cent higher than the 3,581 who made the journey over the same period last year, which was the first month of the Government's Border Security Command. It is also 78 per cent greater than the 3,055 arrivals under Rishi Sunak in the summer of 2023, and narrowly beats the previous record of 5,360, set in 2022 when Boris Johnson was prime minister. It is believed that the trial scheme, which began on Wednesday, will return about 50 migrants a week to France, which will mean about 800 over the course of a year. The weather is a significant factor in the number of people crossing the Channel, with conditions good so far this year. Chris Philp, the shadow home secretary, said: 'These figures show that the Government's so-called deal is no deterrent at all. 'I saw this with my own eyes on the Channel last week. If only 6 per cent of the illegal immigrants are removed and 94 per cent can stay in the UK, that is no deterrent at all. We need every single illegal immigrant to be removed upon arrival. That would be a real deterrent.' He added that he believed the Government was 'too weak to do it, and as a result, this year so far has been the worst in history' for migrant crossings. The Government hopes that the number of returns to France will quickly increase after the trial period of the scheme is over. The Home Office released footage of migrants being detained on the first day that the scheme was running, with the first men arrested at Dover harbour. The number of migrants to cross the English Channel since Labour came to power last summer is expected to hit 50,000 this week. Kemi Badenoch, the leader of the Conservatives, has claimed that she would reduce the number to zero 'quickly' if she entered No 10. A Home Office spokesman said: 'This analysis does not represent the effectiveness of our ground-breaking pilot scheme to detain and return migrants to France, which was implemented just last week. 'We all want to end dangerous small boat crossings, which threaten lives and undermine our border security, and break the business model of vile people-smuggling gangs. 'So far this year, 15,000 crossing attempts have been stopped, and we know more needs to be done to build on this. 'Alongside our pilot scheme, the French authorities are also working to amend their operational policy to allow maritime forces to intervene at sea.'
Glasgow Times
38 minutes ago
- Glasgow Times
Large drop in number of pupils studying Welsh at A-level since 2005, data shows
More than 500 fewer students studied Welsh to a high level this year than in 2005, the latest data shows. The drop has come despite the Welsh Government having set a target of one million Welsh speakers by 2050. Around 538,000 people can speak the language in Wales. Data examined by the PA news agency shows some 372 students took Welsh as a first or second language at A-level this year, down from 927 in 2005. The lowest year on record was 2023, when just 353 pupils took the subject. This year has been the lowest year for people taking Welsh as a first language, with 185 entries, compared with 260 in 2020. Some 187 pupils took the subject as a second language, with 209 having taken it in 2020. Efa Gruffudd Jones, the Welsh Language Commissioner – an officer appointed by the Welsh Government to oversee an independent body aiming to promote the use of the Welsh language – described the drop as a 'matter of concern'. Speaking to PA, Ms Gruffudd Jones said she supported calls from the Coleg Cymraeg Cenedlaethol (Welsh National College) for Welsh to become a protected subject. She said: '(This would) make sure that every educational institution post-16 offers the course. 'What I hear from people who get in touch with my office, if only you know three or four people want to study it, then schools don't offer the subject at all. 'I believe they need 12 before they decide to run the course. I don't think that's right. 'I think it should be offered at every educational institution post-16.' Ms Gruffudd Jones also said the qualification itself is under review, and the content needs to be made more attractive and relevant to students. She added: 'The other thing is that you can study many more courses through the medium of Welsh now than you used to be able to. 'You can study psychology, criminology, etc, through the medium of Welsh. 'Maybe people in the past who would have wanted to study through the medium of Welsh chose Welsh, but now they have a wider range of choice.' The commissioner stressed that Welsh is not the only language to have seen a decline, with many European languages having seen a drop across the UK. Total entries for French, German, and Spanish were down by 20% from 443 to 352 in Wales this year, with Ruth Cocks, director of British Council Wales, describing the drop in interest in international languages as a 'concerning story'. Ms Gruffudd Jones said the reason for the move away from studying languages was unclear, but may be due to pupils being encouraged to study more Stem subjects. 'I understand that we need people with technical ability, but I would argue that you also need linguistic ability in order to communicate with people in workplaces, to articulate yourself well in future,' she said. 'I would argue that literature gives you some insight into the world. 'I don't think really that it should be either or. 'What's important is that it doesn't go any lower, and we continue to make efforts to attract people to learn Welsh to a high standard.' The Welsh Government's aim to have one million Welsh speakers by 2050 was first set out in 2017. Earlier this year, a new five-year plan was unveiled by the commissioner to help achieve the goal. And the Welsh Language and Education (Wales) Bill, which aims to close the gap in Welsh speaking ability among pupils from different schools, passed in the Senedd. Figures from the 2021 census showed a decline in the number of people who can speak Welsh compared with a decade earlier. Around 538,000 people in Wales – roughly 17% of the population – said they could speak Welsh, compared with 562,000 in 2011, around 19% of the population. Recent years have seen Welsh place names take prominence over English as the default, with Eryri replacing Snowdonia on official communications from the national park authority. In response to the decline in A-level entries, a Welsh Government spokesperson said: 'We would like more learners to take Welsh as a subject. 'A consultation is taking place to look at creating new Welsh AS and A-levels, making them engaging and attractive to learners. 'We see the Welsh Language and Education (Wales) Act 2025 as a means to provide more children and young people with access to the language within the education sector than ever before. 'We want all young people to leave school with better Welsh skills, regardless of whether they do A-level Welsh or not.'
Telegraph
an hour ago
- Telegraph
Labour's prisons gamble has made our streets less safe
When Labour came to power they inherited a justice system in crisis. Our prisons, awash with violence and drugs, were almost full. The country was weeks away from running out of jail cells, then running out of court and police cells in short order. So Labour gambled. They chose more controlled early releases under 'SDS40', under which certain prisoners would be released 40 per cent of the way through their sentence. The Government's aim was to buy enough time for prison-building, the Sentencing Review and Courts Review to avert catastrophe. Now, a year later, thanks to Charles Hymas's reporting, we know that gamble is failing. For every four prisoners released in the first three months of the year, three have been 'recalled' to prison. This happens either when an offender commits another offence, fails to attend meetings with probation officers or 'breaches their licence' – breaking conditions designed to prevent future offending and protect victims. The data from the Ministry of Justice covers the first quarter of this year and shows that recalls are up 36 per cent. The statisticians explicitly blame SDS40 and a 2024 change to recall rules for the increase, saying that the 'combined effect expected from these changes is… more opportunities for offenders to be recalled'. In theory prison should rehabilitate inmates, making them less likely to offend after release, and then the probation service should manage those people in the community, keeping them out of trouble. The reality is very different. We know that offenders who leave prison with a job, a home and a good social network are much less likely to reoffend. However, fewer than a third of prisoners have a job six months after release while over a quarter don't have a stable home three months after release. Part of the problem is overcrowding. When prisons have no room, they are often more violent and drug-filled, meaning staff struggle to maintain order. Often the first thing to go is 'purposeful activity' – work, study and training – which might help prisoners avoid crime on release. This is why the Government announced a significant prison-building programme last year, but it has admitted this week it is 'unachievable'. Meanwhile the probation service, desperately understaffed and struggling to retain experienced officers, is being asked to do more and more. If people spend just 40 per cent of their sentence in prison then that means they are supervised by probation for longer, meaning more work. Despite being a crucial part of the justice system and doing difficult, complex work, officers have seen their pay collapse both in real terms and in comparison to other public sector workers. In 2004 a probation officer's pay was equivalent to that of a police sergeant's whereas now it is equivalent to a police constable's. Staff often describe a management culture of fear and excessive demands. As a result of these pressures, Napo, the probation union, are balloting for strike action. The result will be known on August 22, and may herald another headache for Labour. More risks are on their way. In June, in a desperate attempt to delay prisons running out of space again, the Government announced a change meaning that most offenders recalled to prison would be sent back for a shorter 'fixed-term' recall of 28 days, rather than a much longer 'standard recall'. The idea is that with recalled prisoners spending less time back in jail, the prison population should fall. However, this may have the opposite effect. Probation officers may feel that recalling someone for just 28 days is less serious, and so may be more willing to use the power. Short recalls are also the worst of all worlds – 28 days is enough time for someone to lose any employment or home they may have, but provides no time for any real rehabilitation to take place. When the recall policy was announced in the spring, a Ministry of Justice spokesperson acknowledged that they had not conducted any modelling to estimate these risks. So this policy too is a gamble. When Parliament returns the Sentencing Review will begin its journey into law. This, along with the Courts Review, will increase the use of non-prison punishments, placing yet more pressure on probation. If the gamble goes wrong we may well see soaring reoffending, yet more recalls, and an ever more lawless Britain.
