Major city set to tap into limitless underground energy source — here are the details
A city in Spain is launching the largest geothermal plant in its region in a project that could offer a blueprint for urban energy systems around the globe, Renewable Energy Magazine reported.
The scheme in Valencia will use geothermal energy to heat and cool part of its City of Arts and Sciences, a cultural complex, dramatically cutting energy use and pollution at the site.
Geothermal energy uses Earth's natural thermal energy and is renewable. Unlike solar or wind power, it provides consistent output, and it can also lower energy bills for buildings and cities.
Valencia will use a closed-loop geothermal system to transfer heat between its Museum of Sciences and underground aquifers, which maintain a stable temperature of around 20 degrees Celsius (68 degrees Fahrenheit) year-round.
In summer, warm water from the museum will be cooled underground before cycling back. In winter, the process reverses, pulling heat from below to warm the building.
Once operational, the project is expected to save over 1 million kilowatt-hours of electricity and eliminate 335,000 kilograms of carbon dioxide annually.
The power source isn't new — humans have used these geothermal features for thousands of years to stay warm and clean — but these days it is also used to heat and cool homes and buildings through technologies such as heat pumps.
This project stands out for applying the tech at scale in an urban, public setting. It also builds on Valencia's existing network of geothermal installations in public buildings, including its La Petxina sports complex.
For cities looking to cut costs and carbon, geothermal systems are long-lasting and low-maintenance, helping to provide consistent savings by reducing dependence on dirty fuels and grid power. They also contribute to cleaner air, a direct win for public health.
The project in Valencia is part of a broader €16 million ($18.5 million) overhaul of the City of Arts and Sciences to make it more sustainable, including with solar panels, air system upgrades, and water-efficiency measures.
Do you think our power grid needs to be upgraded?
Definitely
Only in some states
Not really
I'm not sure
Click your choice to see results and speak your mind.
Join our free newsletter for good news and useful tips, and don't miss this cool list of easy ways to help yourself while helping the planet.
Solve the daily Crossword
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Vox
2 hours ago
- Vox
The health risks from climate change that almost no one talks about
is a staff writer at Grist covering climate change and its effects on human health. Her work can also be found in Wired, Rolling Stone, the Associated Press, and other outlets. A woman and her child on the Panbari tea estate in Assam, India. Over years, pregnant women working on the plantations have been subjected to long hours with little to no accommodation of their basic needs for food, hygiene, latrines, and lesser work story is a collaboration between Vox and Grist and builds on Expecting worse: Giving birth on a planet in crisis, a project by Vox, Grist, and The19th that examines how climate change impacts reproductive health — from menstruation to conception to birth. Explore the full series here. Climate change poses unique threats to some of the most foundational human experiences: giving birth and growing up. That's the conclusion of a recent summary report compiled by researchers at the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, which shows that climate change is exposing tens of millions of women and children to a worsening slate of physical, mental, and social risks — particularly if they live in the poorest reaches of the globe. Extreme heat, malnutrition linked to crop failures, and air pollution caused by the burning of fossil fuels are driving higher rates of preterm birth and infant and maternal death, undermining many countries' efforts to improve public health. Already, 1 billion children experience a level of risk that the report characterizes as extreme. 'We're still just beginning to understand the dangers,' the authors wrote in their review of the limited existing scientific literature on the subject, 'but the problem is clearly enormous.' Here are the 5 biggest takeaways: Extreme heat is particularly dangerous for pregnant women and newborns. High temperatures are linked to premature births, stillbirths, low birth weight, and congenital defects, the report said, pulling from a study conducted by Drexel University researchers in Philadelphia who found that, for every 1.8 degrees that the city's daily minimum temperature rose above 75 degrees Fahrenheit, the risk of infant death grew about 22 percent. 'Whatever associations we're seeing in the U.S. are much, much greater in other areas, particularly the areas of the world that are most impacted by heat and then also already impacted by adverse birth outcomes,' said Rupa Basu, chief science advisor for the Center for Climate Health and Equity at the University of California, San Francisco. 'This is the tip of the iceberg,' added Basu, who was not involved in the new report. Heat waves also raise the odds of early birth by 16 to 26 percent, according to the report, and women who conceive during the hottest months of the year are at higher risk of developing preeclampsia, a pregnancy complication that can become dangerous if left untreated. In The Gambia, where 70 percent of the agricultural workforce is female, a survey of pregnant farmers conducted by London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine researchers found that women were being exposed to conditions that overwhelmed their capacity to regulate their internal temperatures 30 percent of the time. Up to 60 percent of women exhibited at least one symptom of heat stress and heat-related illness, such as vomiting and dizziness. Diagnostic tests showed that a third of pregnant farmers showed signs of acute fetal strain. Air pollution is a silent killer. The burning of fossil fuels — and a related surge in wildfires burning over the earth's surface — are likely linked to a staggering proportion of low birth weight cases globally: 16 percent, according to the report. That's because the combustion of fossil fuels such as coal, oil, and gas produces tiny toxic molecules, and wildfire smoke contains fine particulate matter that is infamous for causing a slew of adverse health effects. At least 7 million children in the U.S. are exposed to wildfire smoke every year, and that number is rising quickly as rising temperatures have driven a doubling of extreme wildfire activity around the globe over the past 20-some years. In 2010, researchers linked 2.7 to 3.4 million preterm births around the world to air pollution exposure. 'Risky, sublethal effects of air pollution are also coming into focus,' the report continues. One study conducted using data on 400,000 births in southern California found that a woman's exposure to fine particulate matter during pregnancy may increase her odds of spontaneous preterm birth by 15 percent, especially if that exposure happens during the second trimester. Mothers may face mental health burdens as a result of air pollution, too: The odds of postpartum depression rose 25 percent in women exposed to a range of different types of air pollution in their second trimester. Pregnant people march during a rally for climate action in Sydney, change is already causing serious and measurable harm to children. One billion children worldwide are at 'extremely high risk' from the effects of climate change — meaning they live in areas prone to sudden, disruptive environmental shocks and already experience high levels of poverty, food insecurity, and lack of access to medical infrastructure. The African continent, which is home to countries with some of the highest mortality rates for children under 5 years old in the world, saw a 180 percent increase in flooding between 2002 and 2021. And a study of 37 African countries published last year identified a steep rise in infant mortality due to drowning and waterborne diseases caused by flooding in the past five years. (Exposure to repeated flooding can overwhelm sewage systems and contaminate drinking water supplies with fecal matter and other pollutants that can lead to disease.) Climate-driven drought in Africa is contributing to another adverse health outcome: malnutrition. Since 1961, climate change has led to a 34 percent decrease in agricultural productivity across the continent, according to the report. A deadly cycle of drought and flooding has wiped out crop yields, contributing to stubbornly high rates of infant malnutrition in many sub-Saharan African countries. These problems will get worse, but how much worse depends on how much global emissions continue to rise. The report modeled what different emissions scenarios would mean for maternal and child health in two countries: South Africa and Kenya. In a low emissions scenario, in which average warming is limited to 1.5 degrees Celsius — or 2.7 degrees Fahrenheit — globally, childhood mortality in both countries would decline between 2040 and 2059, thanks in large part to projected gains in safeguarding public health that are already in the works. Those gains, however, are predicated on sustained aid from developed countries like the U.S., which have produced the lion's share of emissions driving the climate crisis. The Trump administration has made seismic changes to America's international funding infrastructure in recent months, including effectively eliminating the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) and its related aid programs. A medium emissions scenario, where average global temperatures increase by 2.5 degrees to 3 degrees Celsius, would override that expected progress, leading to a 20 percent increase in child mortality rates in South Africa and stable rates in Kenya, where there has been much investment in protecting child health. Preterm birth rates in both countries would also rise substantially even with low rates of planetary warming. Worldwide, climate-driven malnutrition could lead to an additional 28 million underweight children over the next 25 years. Regardless of which emissions path the world ends up following, a shift toward a more isolationist approach among the world's richest countries threatens to exacerbate the risks pregnant women and children already face. As the planet continues to warm, those risks will keep multiplying. We don't have to wait for global warming to stop to save lives. Much can be done to prevent suffering right now. Solutions range from the straightforward to the complex: City planners can plant more trees in urban areas to keep pregnant people and children, whose internal systems are prone to overheating, cool. Organizations can identify ways to get public health data from the most underresourced parts of the globe. And nations can take steps to incorporate maternal and child health into their climate plans. Both sets of solutions are achievable, and there are precedents. Since 2013, for example, local air pollution strategies in Chinese megacities have been forcing rates of respiratory illness down dramatically, an echo of what happened in the U.S. after the passage of Clean Air Act amendments in 1970. To combat climate-driven harm today, nations can direct resources to maternal health wards, cooling technologies for buildings, and flood-resistant infrastructure. They can also update building codes to make sure hospitals and other health facilities are keeping their patients safe from extreme weather events. Getting nutritional supplements to pregnant people in countries dealing with high rates of food insecurity can offset some of the dangers of malnutrition; researchers have found that reducing vitamin deficiency in pregnant mothers slashed neonatal mortality by nearly 30 percent. In Philadelphia, city leaders implemented a $210,000 early warning system for extreme heat in 1995. It saved the city nearly $500 million in diverted costs over its first three years of operation. The new report argues that more cities in the U.S. and around the world should implement similar measures.
Yahoo
17 hours ago
- Yahoo
Major city set to tap into limitless underground energy source — here are the details
Major city set to tap into limitless underground energy source — here are the details A city in Spain is launching the largest geothermal plant in its region in a project that could offer a blueprint for urban energy systems around the globe, Renewable Energy Magazine reported. The scheme in Valencia will use geothermal energy to heat and cool part of its City of Arts and Sciences, a cultural complex, dramatically cutting energy use and pollution at the site. Geothermal energy uses Earth's natural thermal energy and is renewable. Unlike solar or wind power, it provides consistent output, and it can also lower energy bills for buildings and cities. Valencia will use a closed-loop geothermal system to transfer heat between its Museum of Sciences and underground aquifers, which maintain a stable temperature of around 20 degrees Celsius (68 degrees Fahrenheit) year-round. In summer, warm water from the museum will be cooled underground before cycling back. In winter, the process reverses, pulling heat from below to warm the building. Once operational, the project is expected to save over 1 million kilowatt-hours of electricity and eliminate 335,000 kilograms of carbon dioxide annually. The power source isn't new — humans have used these geothermal features for thousands of years to stay warm and clean — but these days it is also used to heat and cool homes and buildings through technologies such as heat pumps. This project stands out for applying the tech at scale in an urban, public setting. It also builds on Valencia's existing network of geothermal installations in public buildings, including its La Petxina sports complex. For cities looking to cut costs and carbon, geothermal systems are long-lasting and low-maintenance, helping to provide consistent savings by reducing dependence on dirty fuels and grid power. They also contribute to cleaner air, a direct win for public health. The project in Valencia is part of a broader €16 million ($18.5 million) overhaul of the City of Arts and Sciences to make it more sustainable, including with solar panels, air system upgrades, and water-efficiency measures. Do you think our power grid needs to be upgraded? Definitely Only in some states Not really I'm not sure Click your choice to see results and speak your mind. Join our free newsletter for good news and useful tips, and don't miss this cool list of easy ways to help yourself while helping the planet. Solve the daily Crossword


Atlantic
2 days ago
- Atlantic
Who's Afraid of Peak Mineral?
In 1956, the American geologist M. King Hubbert made a startling prediction: In a matter of decades, the supply of fuel on which so much of modern society depended would dwindle. Dubbed the 'peak oil' theory, the concept held sway for decades as U.S. production of crude topped out in 1970, then declined. By 2009, however, the numbers started to turn, thanks to offshore drilling and new fracking technology, until U.S. crude oil output surpassed not just the country's 1970 peak but that of every other crude-pumping nation throughout all of history. Now, as the emissions spewed by burning all that crude help roast the planet, a new anxiety has started to grip energy policy: the possibility of peak mineral. The technologies the world is banking on to wean us off fossil fuels all depend on minerals, in various quantities: the so-called white gold of lithium and the bluish metal cobalt needed for batteries; the brittle metalloid tellurium used in solar cells and microchips; the tin for the soldering that forms a grid of cells on a panel; the soft, silvery cadmium and indium that formulate special kinds of thin-film photovoltaic equipment. Because renewables now make up the fastest-growing source of power generation worldwide, investors have been trying to bolster supplies of these minerals. A new study published Thursday in Nature Climate Change tried to look more comprehensively than any previous effort at the world's mineral future, considering 557 energy-transition scenarios that might keep the world from warming beyond 2 degrees Celsius, the target set as the maximum amount of allowable warming by the Paris climate accords. The researchers, a team of Chinese scientists led by the Beijing Institute of Technology, found that, even given moderate emission-reduction, the world would face shortages of up to 12 minerals by 2100 in every energy-transition scenario. In some regions of the world, such as the Middle East, twice as many minerals could be in shortfall. But clean-energy technologies are advancing rapidly enough that trying to imagine the industry's needs 75 years from now is a very theoretical exercise. Just as fears of peak oil were eventually mooted by technology, fears of peak mineral very well could be too. It's true that the world cannot currently meet humanity's growing need for energy while phasing out fossil fuels. As Ashley Zumwalt-Forbes, a petroleum engineer who previously worked as the Department of Energy's deputy director for batteries and critical materials, put it to me bluntly: 'We need more mines.' Known mineral reserves are limited, but the financial gymnastics necessary to open a mine are also a major barrier to increasing supply. These projects take decades to go from conception to operational; investors want to mine minerals that are cheap enough to be widely available (and therefore used in mass-market products), but expensive enough to make the new venture profitable. If the price of a mineral remains too high, though, the market for it won't grow fast enough to make new mines worthwhile. That's what made the Trump administration's decision last month to buy a big stake in MP Materials, the only active rare-earths mining company in the United States, so notable. It's the first time since World War I, when the federal government nationalized the railroad system, that Washington has directly intervened in the private sector. The U.S. was certainly motivated by competition with China, which has gobbled up the world's market share for mining and processing minerals needed for batteries and microchips, and recently slapped trade restrictions on exports of key metals. But because the Department of Defense now sets the price at which it will buy MP Materials' minerals and is its largest shareholder, MP Materials is also insulated from the ups and downs of commodity trading. In this still-early stage of the world's clean-energy boom, though, mineral needs are shifting quickly and opening up opportunities for substitutes. Silver demand grew over the past two decades thanks to solar cells, which today make up nearly 14 percent of global usage of the precious metal. While demand is growing as more panels are produced, improvements in the technology have slashed silver usage per unit by more than half in the past 15 years, Seaver Wang, the director of the climate and energy team at the Breakthrough Institute think tank in California, told me. Substitutes such as copper that has been electroplated are becoming more common. Alloys used in the control rods in nuclear reactors—such as indium and cadmium—are already substitutable too, he said: Boron-carbide rods are at no risk of shortages, and even available 'off the product catalog at Westinghouse.' (Wang served as a peer reviewer on the Nature Climate Change study.) Companies have rolled out alternatives to lithium too—most notably batteries that use the far more abundant sodium. And because cobalt, a key ingredient in batteries, is primarily extracted in the Democratic Republic of the Congo, where labor practices are difficult to trace and often include child workers and slaves, manufacturers have in recent years commercialized new chemistries that completely forgo that metal. Five years ago, the energy consultancy BloombergNEF forecast demand for cobalt to hit 300,000 metric tons a year by 2030, according to Kwasi Ampofo, the consultancy's head of metals and mining. 'Now it's 100,000,' he told me. 'Battery companies realized they don't need cobalt in large quantities anymore. They got smarter on the material composition of these technologies.' The speed of innovation occurring now only points to how hard it is to predict 'mineral requirements for global-warming scenarios out to 2100,' Cameron Perks, a director at the London-based battery-materials consultancy Benchmark Mineral Intelligence, told me. The Nature Climate Change study forecasts, for instance, that Africa will be a major source of lithium. 'While I don't claim to know what will happen in 75 years, I know this is not going to be true anytime soon,' Perks said. The study's authors recognize these limitations. 'These findings underscore the complex and interconnected nature of mineral demands in low-carbon transitions,' they wrote in an email. 'While shifting technologies may relieve certain resource pressures, they can intensify others.' One of the study's clear limits is that the researchers based their calculations on high future growth rates for thin-film solar panels, which depend heavily on indium, cadmium, tellurium, and tin. As a result, those minerals most frequently came up short in the findings. But thin-film panels are also outdated technology. They have the advantage of generating more power in the dawn or late evening than crystalline silicon panels, which also require more steps to manufacture. Still, silicon panels have benefited from the scale of the solar-panel industry in China, and require less complicated chemistry; they have dominated the market since the early 2000s. In the email, the researchers acknowledged that thin-film solar panels losing market share might ease some shortages, but noted that that shift increases demand for other metals, particularly tin. Their goal, they wrote, was to 'encourage systemic thinking in designing sustainable energy transitions.' Substitution is just part of that equation. Oil supplies went up in part because natural gas became a viable alternative once technology to super-chill the fuel into its liquid form became an option. Unconventional drilling technology entered the mix after oil prices surged to record highs in the 2000s, making new and more expensive up-front projects economically viable. If new types of traditional nuclear reactors take off in the 2030s, that could radically alter the world's forecasted mineral needs. If nuclear fusion finally becomes a reality, that could upend all the projections. Artificial intelligence could achieve breakthroughs in material science; mining asteroids may become a source of minerals. If the old adage proves true that change is the only certainty in an more unpredictable future, that bodes well for adaptation.