
Israeli airstrike kills two Al Jazeera correspondents in Gaza City
11 Aug 2025 11:22am
This photograph shows the Al Jazeera logo on the facade of the Al Jazeera Balkans Television Network HQ building in Sarajevo on July 18, 2025. Photo by Elvis Barukcic/AFP
ISTANBUL - Al Jazeera correspondents Anas al-Sharif and Mohamed Qraiqea were killed Sunday along with three other journalists in an Israeli strike targeting a journalists' tent near the Al-Shifa Hospital in western Gaza City, according to the Gaza Media Office.
Anadolu Ajansi citing the Qatar-based channel quoted the director of the Al-Shifa Medical Complex in Gaza who said, "Al Jazeera correspondents Anas al-Sharif and Mohamed Qraiqea were martyred in an Israeli strike on their tent,' without providing details.
The channel later confirmed that al-Sharif and Qraiqea were killed in an Israeli strike. This screen grab taken from AFPTV on Aug 11, 2025 shows Al-Jazeera's Anas al-Sharif speaking during an AFP interview in Gaza City on Aug 1, 2024. Photo by various sources/AFP
The Gaza Media Office announced in a statement that the number of journalists killed since the start of Israel's genocide in Gaza on Oct 7, 2023, has risen to 237, following the killing of al-Sharif and Qraiqea, along with three other journalists.
It identified the other journalists killed as photojournalists Ibrahim Dahir and Moumin Alaywa and an assistant photojournalist Mohammed Noufal.
"The assassination was carried out with premeditation and deliberation, through a deliberate, intentional, and direct targeting of the journalists' tent in the vicinity of Al-Shifa Hospital in Gaza City. This heinous crime also resulted in the injury of several other fellow journalists,' it added
The Director of the Al-Shifa Medical Complex in Gaza City, Dr. Mohammed Abu Salmiya, told Anadolu that the deaths from the strike on the tent in front of the complex's gate have risen to seven, including five journalists.
Meanwhile, the Israeli army admitted in a statement to killing al-Sharif in Gaza City, while ignoring the killing of Qraiqea and the three other journalists in the same strike.
In his will, which he requested be published after his death, Al Jazeera correspondent Anas al-Sharif wrote: "This is my will, and my final message. If these words reach you, know that Israel has succeeded in killing me and silencing my voice.'
"Allah knows that I gave all the effort and strength I had to be a support and a voice for my people, ever since I opened my eyes to life in the alleys and streets of Jabalia refugee camp,' he said.
"I have lived pain in all its forms, and tasted grief and loss many times. Yet I never hesitated to convey the truth as it is, without distortion or falsification, hoping that Allah would bear witness against those who remained silent, those who accepted our killing, those who suffocated our breath, and whose hearts were unmoved by the scattered bodies of our children and women, and who did not stop the massacre our people have been subjected to for more than a year and a half.'
Israel is facing mounting condemnation for its genocidal war on Gaza, where it has killed more than 61,000 victims since October 2023. The military campaign has devastated the enclave and brought it to the verge of famine.
Last November, the International Criminal Court issued arrest warrants for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and his former Defense Minister Yoav Gallant for war crimes and crimes against humanity in Gaza.
Israel also faces a genocide case at the International Court of Justice for its war on the enclave. - BERNAMA-ANADOLU
More Like This

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


New Straits Times
2 hours ago
- New Straits Times
'BN rural, PH urban' formula not foolproof, says analyst
KUALA LUMPUR:The electoral formula that Barisan Nasional (BN) should concentrate on rural seats while Pakatan Harapan (PH) focuses on urban areas may sound practical, but it is not a foolproof strategy for the Sabah state election. Universiti Malaya socio-political analyst Datuk Professor Dr Awang Azman Awang Pawi said while BN's deep-rooted grassroots networks and PH's stronger traction among urban, younger and middle-class voters made the division of focus appear realistic, Sabah's voting patterns were far more fluid compared to Peninsular Malaysia. "Fundamentally, this division of focus appears realistic because it takes into account Sabah's demographic reality. "However, voters can easily shift support based on current issues, candidate personalities, and local sentiments. "Thus, the formula is not foolproof," he said when contacted. He added that the BN–PH strategy carries both the potential to complement each other and the risk of creating friction, depending on how it is managed. "If BN focuses on rural seats and PH on urban ones, both sides can avoid clashing and work together more effectively against Warisan and Perikatan Nasional (PN). "But this only works if there is a clear seat-sharing deal and strong candidates. "Problems may also arise in semi-urban or mixed seats, where support overlaps. Umno's rejection of Gabungan Rakyat Sabah (GRS) could also put PH in a difficult position, forcing it to choose between siding more with BN or with GRS," he said. On Sunday, Umno Supreme Council member Datuk Seri Ahmad Maslan announced that BN is expected to dominate rural seats while PH will take charge of urban constituencies under a seat-sharing agreement finalised for the upcoming Sabah state election. Previously, BN chairman Datuk Seri Dr Ahmad Zahid Hamidi said the coalition's pact with PH for the upcoming Sabah election was final, but that they remained open to cooperation with other Sabah-based parties or coalitions. Zahid also said that while the cooperation between PH and GRS was a mutual agreement between the two coalitions, the partnership between BN and PH was now officially confirmed. Commenting further, Awang Azman said BN's refusal to work with GRS may strengthen PH's position as the balancing force, but it could also weaken the unity government if not managed carefully. He added that the refusal could indirectly strengthen GRS's reliance on PH, positioning the coalition as the "bridge" to ensure state–federal stability. "However, this may also open BN to accuse PH of betraying its interests, which could strain relations within the unity government.


New Straits Times
3 hours ago
- New Straits Times
Thousands of Palestinians leave Gaza City fearing Israeli offensive
CAIRO: Fearing an imminent Israeli ground offensive, thousands of Palestinians have left their homes in eastern areas of Gaza City, now under constant Israeli bombardment, for points to the west and south in the shattered territory. Israel's plan to seize control of Gaza City has stirred alarm abroad and at home, where tens of thousands of Israelis on Sunday held some of the largest protests since the war began, urging a deal to end the fighting and free the remaining 50 hostages held by Palestinian fighters in Gaza since Oct 7, 2023. The planned offensive spurred Egyptian and Qatari ceasefire mediators to step up efforts to forge a deal between Israel and Hamas fighters in Gaza, and a Hamas official said on Monday the group had approved the latest ceasefire proposal. The official did not provide further details, and it was not immediately clear what they accepted. Hamas has responded positively in the past while proposing amendments unacceptable to Israel. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has described Gaza City as Hamas's last big urban bastion. But, with Israel already holding 75 per cent of Gaza, the military has warned that expanding the offensive could endanger hostages still alive and draw troops into protracted and deadly guerrilla warfare. Dani Miran, whose son Omri was taken hostage on Oct 7, said he feared the consequences of an Israeli ground offensive in Gaza City. "I'm scared that my son would be hurt," he told Reuters in Tel Aviv on Monday. In Gaza City, many Palestinians have also been calling for protests soon to demand an end to a war that has demolished much of the territory and wrought a humanitarian disaster, and for Hamas to intensify talks to avert the Israeli ground offensive. An Israeli armoured incursion into Gaza City could displace hundreds of thousands of people, many of whom have been uprooted multiple times during the war. Ahmed Mheisen, Palestinian shelter manager in Beit Lahiya, a war-devastated suburb abutting eastern Gaza City, said 995 families had departed the area in recent days for the south. With the Israeli offensive looming, Mheisen put the number of tents needed for emergency shelter at 1.5 million, saying Israel had allowed only 120,000 tents into the territory during a January–March ceasefire. The UN humanitarian office said last week 1.35 million people were already in need of emergency shelter items in Gaza. "I am heading south because I need to ease my mental state," Mousa Obaid, a Gaza City resident, told Reuters. "I do not want to keep moving left and right endlessly. There is no life left, and as you can see, living conditions are hard, prices are high, and we have been without work for over a year and a half. It is very, very difficult." A protest by unions is scheduled for Thursday in Gaza City, and people took to social media platforms vowing to participate, which will raise pressure on Hamas. Diplomatic Deadlock The last round of indirect ceasefire talks ended in deadlock in late July, with the sides trading blame for its collapse. Israel says it will agree to cease hostilities if all the hostages are released and Hamas lays down its arms – the latter demand publicly rejected by the Islamist group until a Palestinian state is established. A Hamas official told Reuters on Monday the group rejects Israeli demands to disarm or expel its leaders from Gaza. Sharp differences also appear to remain over the extent of an Israeli withdrawal from Gaza and how humanitarian aid will be delivered around the enclave, where malnutrition is rife and aid groups warn of unfolding famine. Underscoring the gaps in talks on a ceasefire, US President Donald Trump wrote on his social media platform on Monday: "We will only see the return of the remaining hostages when Hamas is confronted and destroyed!!! The sooner this takes place, the better the chances of success will be." On Saturday, the Israeli military said it was preparing to help equip Gazans with tents and other shelter equipment ahead of relocating them from combat zones to the south of the enclave. It did not provide further details on quantities or how long it would take to get the equipment into the enclave. "Existing tents where people are living (in the south) have worn out and won't protect people against rainwater. There are no new tents in Gaza because of the Israeli restrictions on aid at the border crossings," Palestinian economist Mohammad Abu Jayyab told Reuters. He said some Gaza City families had begun renting property and shelters in the south and moved in their belongings. "Some people learned from previous experience, and they don't want to be taken by surprise. Also, some think it is better to move earlier to find a space," Abu Jayyab added. The war began when Hamas-led fighters stormed across the border into southern Israel, killing 1,200 people and taking 251 hostages back to Gaza, according to Israeli tallies. More than 61,000 Palestinians have since been killed in Israel's ensuing air and ground war in Gaza, according to local health officials, who do not distinguish between fighters and non-combatants. Five more Palestinians have died of malnutrition and starvation in the past 24 hours, the Gaza health ministry said on Monday, raising the number of people who have died of those causes to 263, including 112 children, since the war started. Israel disputed the figures provided by the health ministry in the Hamas-run territory.


New Straits Times
4 hours ago
- New Straits Times
New alliance emerging to challenge Western accounts of Gaza
AMID the rubble of journalists' tents and the unceasing wail of ambulances, the world is witnessing not merely death but also the murder of meaning. Israel's assault on Gaza can no longer be concealed behind euphemisms like "conflict" or "retaliation". However, Western mainstream media continues to deploy language that obscures the crime. In a world flooded with information, the denial of meaning is the most insidious and dangerous form of violence. Mainstream alternative media such as Middle East Monitor, Al Jazeera and TRT World have consistently rejected this narrative. Journalists like Anas al-Sharif were killed not because they bore arms, but because they bore witness — reviving Gaza's sufferings for the world to see. The world is no longer reliant on the Western media's selective framing as a new narrative alliance is emerging. From the Islamic world, BRICS, Africa, Latin America and digital activists, a coordinated media movement is reshaping the global map of meaning. Outlets such as RT (Russia), PressTV (Iran), TRT World (Turkiye) and networks across Africa and Latin America portray Palestinian suffering as a symbol of resistance against Western hegemony and moral hypocrisy. Beyond the established alternative media platforms such as Democracy Now, The Intercept, and Grayzone, more contrarian outlets like Unz Review have also entered the fray, amplifying voices that frame Israel's actions in Gaza as genocidal and morally indefensible. This reflects the widening spectrum of dissent in Western discourse. On digital platforms, influencers like Motaz Azaiza and thousands of activists have become "field journalists" who build global empathy. They stream live footage, testimonies and humanitarian appeals that transcend linguistic and cultural boundaries. Hashtags like #GazaGenocide, #EndIsraeliApartheid and #FreePalestine have become narrative battlegrounds that rival official propaganda. In Australia, a historic wave of mobilisation has swept across Sydney and Melbourne. Up to 300,000 people recently joined the "March for Humanity" across Sydney Harbour Bridge to demand a ceasefire, sanctions on Israel and recognition of Palestinian statehood. Writers like Omar El Akkad and activists like Nidzara Ahmetasevic have criticised the moral duplicity of the West, which failed to learn from the genocide in Bosnia. Malaysian media has the potential to bridge the voices of the Global South with Western consciousness. On the issue of Palestine, we must no longer rely on Western news agencies whose coverage often favours Israel and marginalises the Global South. Renowned academic and thinker Professor Datuk Dr Ahmad Murad Merican has urged Malaysian media to lead efforts in declaring Asean a "Genocide-Free Zone", with deep reporting and regional advocacy. Our media can elevate historical witnesses like Gaza's journalists as icons of humanity; embed narratives of compassion, inclusivity and sustainability in its coverage; and build regional networks that unite voices from Asean, BRICS+, D-8 and the Global South. Thus, Malaysia joining The Hague Group and supporting South Africa's legal action against Israel at the International Court of Justice is not merely a diplomatic gesture, it is also a narrative declaration that Malaysia stands with truth. The genocide in Gaza is not just a humanitarian tragedy — it is also a test of global honesty, media courage and the resilience of meaning. The multipolar media alliance — rising from the Islamic world, BRICS, Africa and Latin America — has forged a battleground not of weapons, but of witness, empathy and interpretation. They do not merely report — they resurrect the meaning that was meant to be erased.