How UW-Madison's aid for Native students addresses history
This report was first published by PBS Wisconsin in collaboration with ICT.
Erica AyisiPBS Wisconsin + ICT
Riley Aguirre understands well the importance of education.
A citizen of the Oneida Nation, she's attending the University of Wisconsin-Madison at no cost to her or her family using the Wisconsin Tribal Education Promise Program.
'It means a lot to me and my people, my community, the Native community. We are still here. We're still fighting for our right to be here,' said Aguirre, a freshman. 'Education was used as assimilation to get rid of our culture, our language, our traditions. But now it's used as a way of teaching.'
How would her family have paid for college otherwise?
'Other scholarships,' said Aguirre. 'Definitely applying for scholarships outside of the school to help me as well, and probably funding through the tribe as well.'
The Wisconsin Tribal Education Promise Program provides financial support for students who are enrolled in one of the state's 11 federally recognized tribes. Carla Vigue, tribal relations director of UW-Madison, said the university wants to make the Madison campus more accessible to Native students.
'We worked with tribal leaders from across the state to create the program, and now we're seeing the fruits of those labors,' she said. 'You know, we're seeing our first class. We've got nearly 80 students in this first class, and we're hoping it will grow from here.'
Tuition, housing, books and all other school related fees — totaling about $30,000 — are covered for Native undergraduate students through the Promise program, which is funded through private donations.
'It's not a taxpayer-funded program,' Vigue said. 'And, you know, we're pretty proud that people want to support this program.'
Vigue said the legal precedent surrounding federally recognized tribes is a specific eligibility requirement for the students applying to the program.
'The federally recognized tribes are sovereign nations who determine citizenship,' she said. 'And so that's a political classification — it's not a race or ethnicity.'
Schools in nearly all 50 states offer some type of financial assistance for Native students.
The program at UW-Madison is unique, as it includes medical students and law students.
'We are hearing from people across the country, even in particular about that law aspect. There's a lot of excitement around the law school,' Vigue said.
'No worries'
Josef Cornelius, Oneida, is an undergraduate at UW-Madison. His father is a University of Wisconsin Law School graduate who was worried about school loans for his son.
'Initially, we were thinking that some of it would probably have to come out of my pockets or his pockets, and the fact that it was just like, 'No worries, you know,'' the younger Cornelius said. 'Now I just have to worry about school, get good grades, and then it's all smooth sailing.'
Undergraduate recipients of the tribal promise are reserved one wing of dorms inside the Smith Residence Hall. There's also an Indigenous Student Center close by that hosts tribal student groups like Wunk Sheek.
'I would say the Wunk Sheek house and the Indigenous program have done a really good job at promoting the diversity here,' Cornelius said.
Vigue said the university wants to do what's right for Wisconsin's Native people, considering the university is on Native land belonging to the Ho-Chunk Nation, also known as the 'People of the Big Voice.'
SUPPORT INDIGENOUS JOURNALISM.
'This is Ho-Chunk ancestral land,' she said. 'And I think there's now some sense of pride in that and wanting to share and celebrate that history. But there's also, you know, with this promise, a chance to give back.'
The UW-Madison campus extends over 900 acres of land, including four miles of shoreline along Lake Mendota.
Through a series of treaties in the 1800s, Ho-Chunk were forced to cede — or give up — their land to the state of Wisconsin and the federal government.
'The 1837 treaty wasn't a revered treaty at all,' said Jon Greendeer, president of the Ho-Chunk Nation. 'These are forced agreements to cede our land — such as that particular treaty move west of the Mississippi — and, you know, we relinquish our ownership of our historic homes.'
He continued, 'We had eight months to vacate. But then we didn't. In the coldest parts of the winter, they shipped us in rail cars across to the neutral ground. And, you know, we suffered a lot for that.'
Greendeer said the final treaty in 1865 with the government was also signed under duress.
Ho-Chunk were given $1.5 million for their land, but the government put most of it into interest-bearing trusts, leaving the Ho-Chunk people next to nothing.
'I don't think there was anywhere at that particular time that any representatives — any representatives of authority — could walk away from one of those agreements and say they were the beneficiary of something,' Greendeer said.
Most of the Wisconsin tribes were forcibly moved to reservations. Ho Chunk people are spread across the state, with over 7,000 currently enrolled members as of 2022. Greendeer said the treaties of the past are significant to their sovereignty of the present.
'The treaties gave way to a lot and substantiated our abilities to negotiate not only with local governments, but also later on with these other governments that were starting up with the education campuses with the UW,' he said.
Ho-Chunk had already surrendered the part of their land in an 1832 treaty — paving the way for UW-Madison to be founded in 1848.
President Abraham Lincoln signed the Morrill Act in 1862 — selling 1.3 million acres of tribal land in Wisconsin and using the proceeds to create so-called land-grant universities. So, today the UW-Madison tuition promise extends to Native students across the state.
Greendeer calls that promise late but fitting.
'I think the Wisconsin promise is a very old promise that is finally getting kept, at least at the UW level, at least at the college level,' he said.
More than 100 after the last Ho-Chunk treaty was signed, Robert Powless, an Oneida man, became the first Native to graduate from UW-Madison. Ada Deer, Menominee, was the first woman.
'Do what's right'
For Aguirre, a free university education on Native soil is personal.
'Our education is not only for me, but for our community and for the resiliency of my ancestors,' she said. 'We fought so long through so many generations of trauma and abuse and neglect. And being here is like resiliency.'
Vigue said the program is an attempt to right some wrongs.
'They were forcibly removed,' Vigue said. 'And this university has spent some time coming to accept and share that story. Part of the reason this promise exists is because there is some recognition that that all happened. But there's also the need and want to do what's right and good for Native people, too.'
A heritage marker titled 'Our Shared Future' was erected on the UW-Madison campus in 2019 to recognize the ancestral home of the Ho-Chunk. It's near Bascom Hill, and sits on top of a burial mound built by Native people more than a thousand years ago.
In another visual recognition, a series of 12 Ho-Chunk Clan Circle sculptures are outside the Bakke Recreation & Wellbeing Center.
'The promise is intended to be forever, right?' Vigue said. 'I mean, Native American students have been around since the beginning of what is now the United States. It's been around since the inception of what is now this country. And I think the goal is to make sure that they're taken care of forever.'
Both Aguirre and Cornelius are looking to use their education to better their communities — and amplify Native voices.
'I kind of want to go into wealth management — or maybe sustainability,' said Cornelius.
'I do want to go into some field where I can be an advocate for possibly my tribe or other people,' Aguirre said, 'but definitely Native people as a whole and getting our voices out there to be heard.'
Erica Ayisi is the Indigenous affairs multimedia reporter for PBS Wisconsin's 'Here and Now' and ICT's North Central Bureau.
This report is in collaboration with our partners at PBS Wisconsin, a service of the University of Wisconsin-Madison and the Wisconsin Educational Communications Board.
Our stories are worth telling. Our stories are worth sharing. Our stories are worth your support. Contribute today to help ICT carry out its critical mission. Sign up for ICT's free newsletter. ICT, formerly Indian Country Today, is a nonprofit news organization that covers the Indigenous world with a daily digital platform and news broadcast with international viewership.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
a day ago
- Yahoo
Civics in the time of MAGA: Junior high kids get right what we adults have gotten wrong
So, I'm sitting here on a Thursday afternoon, watching a bunch of junior-high-school kids answering questions about American government and constitutional rights. And the sad irony is they know more about it than at least 90% of the politicians and elected officials I cover on a daily basis. It's called the National Civics Bee. It's like a spelling bee, but with civics. And Thursday was the state finals, held at the downtown Wichita headquarters of the Kansas Leadership Center. What made this a lot more fun than the usual 'bee' format was it was set up to allow for audience participation. Attendees (in a separate group) could play along with the competitors and test their own knowledge. I talked with Chris Green of the Leadership Center and we both agreed it would be fun to invite some of our elected officials next year to see see how they stack up against the sixth-, seventh- and eighth graders in the contest. I wonder how many would accept the challenge. The questions ranged from fairly easy, like . . . Q: A new education reform bill was introduced in Congress and successfully passed through both the House of Representatives and the Senate. What is the next step before the bill can become law? A: The president must sign the bill into law or take no action for 10 days, after which it will automatically become law. . . . to the detailed and difficult, for example. . . Q: In Federalist number 39, how does Madison distinguish between a federal and national government, and what does this distinction suggest about the nature of the Constitution as a product of the convention? A: Madison claims that the Constitution is both federal and national, with the House of Representatives representing the national and the Senate representing the federal, suggesting that the constitution will balance power between the state and national. (I got that one wrong. I picked the answer with the House representing the federal and Senate national). In addition to the multiple choice, the five finalists had to read from and answer judges' questions on an essay they wrote on a current issue, ranging from saving rural hospitals to reforming state policy on driver's license revocation. When all was said and done, Tanya Ramesh of Wichita won the competition, a $1,000 giant check, and a ticket to Washington for the national finals. Madeline Stewart of Overland Park took second and $500, while Zane Hoff of Salina got third and $250. I thought the Civics Bee was one of the coolest events I've been to in a while, so I hesitate to even bring this up, but some of the questions probably need updating in this era of MAGA. For instance: Q: How did Afroyim versus Rusk in 1967 affect the government's power regarding citizenship revocation? A: It limited the government's ability to to revoke citizenship. Afroyim v. Rusk was a landmark case that ruled: 'Congress has no power under the Constitution to divest a person of his United States citizenship absent his voluntary renunciation thereof. ' The court's revised that stance since, to allow citizenship to be revoked (called denaturalization) if it was granted on false pretenses that would have prevented it in the first place, for example, terrorists or Nazi war criminals living under false identities. Now, denaturalization has become a key part of President Donald Trump's ongoing efforts to deport as many non-white immigrants as possible, whom he accuses (echoing a former world leader named Adolf) of 'poisoning the blood of our country.' During his first term, Trump created 'Operation Second Look,' a program to comb immigrant citizens' paperwork for misstatements or errors that would allow them to be denaturalized. This term, his top immigration advisor, Stephen Miller, has vowed to 'turbocharge' Operation Second Look, which could also lead to denaturalization and deportation of American-born children of immigrants, under Trump's executive order that purports to end birthright citizenship. Another Civics Bee question that caught my attention was this one: Q: Which statement best reflects the application of federalism in the Clean Air Act, considering the following quotation, 'the Clean Air Act represents a partnership between federal and state governments to improve air quality and to protect public health.' A: The federal government sets national standards, while states can implement stricter regulations based on local needs. That's the way it's supposed to work. But it brought to mind a recent press release I got from Kansas 1st District Rep. Tracey Mann, taking a victory lap over Congress rolling back California anti-pollution regulations. At the time, I remember thinking, 'What business is this of Tracey Mann's?' given that he represents a district that sprawls from Colorado to one county away from Missouri, where there are about four times as many cows as people and the largest city, Lawrence, would be a minor suburb of Los Angeles. What he knows of the pollution challenges facing California I'm guessing would fit on a microscope slide, but he couldn't care less as long as he can own some libs and send out a press release titled: 'Rep. Mann Reverses Biden Green New Deal Policies.' When I was growing up, we didn't have civics bees. We barely had any civics education. Truth be told, most of what we ever knew about the workings of government came from 'Schoolhouse Rock,' three-minute educational cartoons sandwiched between Jonny Quest and Scooby-Doo on Saturday mornings. Cue the music: 'I'm just a bill, yes I'm only a bill, and I'm sitting here on Capitol Hill.' I can't help thinking if we'd had civics bees back then, we wouldn't be in this mess we're in today. So it lifts my heart to see these earnest young kids competing over who knows the most about the people and ideals that built America. It gives me great hope that their future will be better than the present that my generation has handed them.

USA Today
a day ago
- USA Today
Native American boarding school funding under scrutiny in lawsuit
Native American boarding school funding under scrutiny in lawsuit The lawsuit filed by the Wichita and Washoe tribes demands an accounting of an estimated $23.3 billion in misappropriated funds. Show Caption Hide Caption US apologizes for the first time for abuses at Native schools President Joe Biden formally apologized for the abuses committed against Native boarding school students over the past century. Two tribal nations are suing the U.S. government for misusing trust funds meant for Native children's education to finance abusive boarding schools. The lawsuit demands an accounting of an estimated $23.3 billion and details of how the funds were used. The lawsuit follows Interior Department reports detailing abuses and deaths within the boarding school system. Two tribal nations are suing the United States government, saying it misappropriated trust funds to finance the Federal Indian Boarding School program, using monies meant to support Native Nations to instead fuel a system of abuse that spawned generations of trauma, despair and social ills. The Wichita and Affiliated Tribes and the Washoe Tribe of Nevada and California say financing for the boarding school program included Native trust funds taken 'for the supposed purpose of providing money to support Native children's education.' The tribes are demanding a federal accounting of an estimated $23.3 billion in funding taken from those funds, saying the government has never detailed how the monies were used. The lawsuit was filed last month in the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania, where one of the boarding school system's most notorious campuses – the Carlisle Indian Industrial School – once operated. 'The United States took upon itself the sacred trusteeship over Native children's education – a trust responsibility that has remained unbroken for 200 years,' said Adam Levitt, founding partner of DiCello Levitt, one of four law firms representing the tribes, in a news release. 'At the very least, the United States has a legal and moral obligation to account for the Boarding School Program, including a detailed explanation of the funds that it took and spent.' Federal trust responsibility 'was born of a sacred bargain,' according to the lawsuit. Through numerous treaties, Native Nations promised peace and ceded land; in exchange, the U.S. would provide for the education of their children. 'The land was ceded; the peace was a mirage,' the lawsuit said. 'And the primary victims of decades of ongoing statutory and treaty violations were the Native Nations' children.' The lawsuit names Interior Secretary Doug Burgum, the Interior Department, the Bureau of Indian Affairs and the Bureau of Indian Education as defendants. Alyse Sharpe, a spokesperson for the Department of the Interior, told USA TODAY the agency as a matter of policy does not comment on litigation. 'The Department of the Interior remains committed to our trust responsibilities of protecting tribal treaty rights, lands, assets, and resources, in addition to its duty to carry out the mandates of federal law with respect to American Indian and Alaska Native tribes and villages,' Sharpe said. A shameful chapter in US history More than 18,000 children, some as young as 4, were shipped off to 417 federal boarding schools, many run by religious organizations, between 1819 and 1969. The system's detrimental effects were both immediate and long-lasting. Under Interior Secretary Deb Haaland, the department's first Native American director, the agency released reports in 2022 and 2024 detailing the program's abuses, including death, forced labor and physical and sexual abuse. The investigation confirmed the deaths of at least 973 American Indian, Alaska Native and Native Hawaiian children in the boarding school system. According to the lawsuit, the program sought to destroy children's links to their Indigenous families, language and cultural practices, depriving them of skills necessary to participate and succeed in their own communities, indoctrinating them into menial positions and more broadly breeding cycles of poverty, violence and drug addiction. 'The Boarding School Program represents one of the most shameful chapters in American history,' Serrell Smokey, chairman of the Washoe Tribe of Nevada and California, said in the news release. 'Our children were taken from us, subjected to unimaginable horrors, and forced to fund their own suffering. This lawsuit seeks to hold the U.S. government accountable for its actions and to ensure that the truth is finally brought to light.' The lawsuit says the program was not only 'a national disgrace' but violated the government's duty to provide Native children with an education, an obligation that continues today based on a 'unique and continuing trust relationship with and responsibility to the Indian people for the education of Indian children.' 'The Boarding School Program inflicted profound and lasting harm on our communities,' said Amber Silverhorn-Wolfe, president of the Wichita and Affiliated Tribes. 'We are seeking justice not only for the survivors but also for the generations that continue to suffer from the intergenerational trauma caused by these schools.' Faith E. Gay of Selendy Gay, another firm representing the tribes, noted the Interior Department reports revealed not only the scale and scope of the government's actions but that key information related to program financing remains under federal control. Those reports said the boarding school system was part of a pattern of forced assimilation policies pursued or allowed by the U.S. for nearly two centuries and recommended an official apology. President Joe Biden formally apologized for the program in October. 'The harm inflicted by the Boarding School Program endures in the broken families and poor mental and physical health of survivors of the Boarding Schools and their descendants,' the tribal lawsuit reads. 'It endures in the cycles of poverty, desperation, domestic violence, and addiction that were born of the Boarding School Program. It endures in the silence of lost language and culture, and … in the missing remains and unmarked graves of the children who died.'
Yahoo
2 days ago
- Yahoo
Trump Is Pleased Because He Finally Agrees With Elizabeth Warren On Something: Scrap The Debt Limit To Prevent An 'Economic Catastrophe'
Benzinga and Yahoo Finance LLC may earn commission or revenue on some items through the links below. President Donald Trump endorsed abolishing the federal debt limit, unexpectedly siding with long-time critic Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) as Congress races to keep the government from hitting its $37 trillion borrowing cap. What Happened: Trump on Wednesday urged Congress to "entirely scrap" the nation's debt limit, echoing a call Warren issued last week. The president said, in a Truth Social post, that leaving the cap in place hands "economic catastrophe" to politicians who weaponize every vote. Warren posted a similar message on May 30, warning that failure to act would "prevent an economic catastrophe." Trending: Start investing with eToro's CopyTrader — . Screenshot From President Donald Trump's Truth Social Account Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent has told lawmakers the government could exhaust its borrowing authority by August, intensifying a partisan clash over Trump's 1,100-page tax-and-spending plan, which already includes a debt-limit increase. The Congressional Budget Office estimates that package would swell federal deficits by $2.4 trillion over 10 years — a projection Warren blasted even as she embraced Trump's call to kill the It Matters: The unusual alignment between Trump and Warren follows years of barbs — Trump once mocked Warren as "Pocahontas" over her Native-American ancestry claims. At the same time, Warren has labeled his economic agenda "textbook corruption." Their latest spat flared again on Tuesday when Warren warned Trump that his 'One Big Beautiful Bill' could fuel rising rents and violate Senate procedural rules. While Trump and Warren now agree on abolishing the limit, they diverge on his broader package. Warren argues it favors the wealthy and piles on debt, citing CBO data. On the other hand, Trump insists the measure delivers growth via tax relief, spending trims, and border security funding. House and Senate leaders must decide whether to keep the limit-scrapping provision in Trump's omnibus bill or stage a separate vote. A failure to strike a deal before August would force the Treasury to deploy "extraordinary measures" — an expensive stop-gap both parties say they want to avoid. Read next: Nancy Pelosi Invested $5 Million In An AI Company Last Year — Here's How You Can Invest In Multiple Pre-IPO AI Startups With Just $1,000. Invest Where It Hurts — And Help Millions Heal: Invest in Cytonics and help disrupt a $390B Big Pharma stronghold. Photo courtesy: / This article Trump Is Pleased Because He Finally Agrees With Elizabeth Warren On Something: Scrap The Debt Limit To Prevent An 'Economic Catastrophe' originally appeared on