
Trump's planned 100% computer chip tariff sparks confusion
'We are still waiting for official guidance," said Limor Fried, founder and engineer at Adafruit Industries, a small electronics maker in New York.
The chips that go into Adafruit's products come through U.S. sales and distribution companies as well as direct from companies in the Philippines and Taiwan.
If those chips aren't exempt from tariffs, 'it would increase the costs that go into our designs as the semiconductors are the most expensive component in our assemblies,' Fried said. "For many of these tariffs, we often have to wait until we get a bill to know our exposure, and then we adjust our pricing to account for the increases.'
The U.S. imports a relatively small number of chips because most of the foreign-made chips in a device — from an iPhone to a car — were already assembled into a product, or part of a product, before it landed in the country.
"The real question everybody in the industry is asking is whether there will be a component tariff, where the chips in a device would require some sort of separate tariff calculation,' said Martin Chorzempa, a senior fellow at the Peterson Institute for International Economics.
Trump said Wednesday that companies that "made a commitment to build" in the U.S. would be spared the import tax, even if they are not yet producing those chips in American factories.
'We'll be putting a tariff of approximately 100% on chips and semiconductors,' Trump said in the Oval Office while meeting with Apple CEO Tim Cook. 'But if you're building in the United States of America, there's no charge.'
Wall Street investors interpreted that as good news not just for U.S. companies like Intel and Nvidia, but also for the biggest Asian chipmakers like Samsung and Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company that have been working to build U.S. factories.
But it left greater uncertainty for smaller chipmakers in Europe and Asia that have little exposure to the artificial intelligence boom but still make semiconductors inserted into essential products like cars or washing machines.
German chipmaker Infineon Technologies, which supplies chips to the auto industry, said in an emailed statement Thursday that it 'can't speculate about potential semiconductor tariffs' and Trump's announcement, 'as no official documents have been published at this point.'
These producers "probably aren't large enough to get on the map for an exemption and quite probably wouldn't have the kind of excess capital and margins to be able to add investment at a large scale into the United States,' Chorzempa said.
It's also not clear how the chip-specific tariffs would apply to trading partners that already made broader deals with Trump — such as agreements with the European Union, Japan and South Korea that tax most goods at 15%.
A trade group, the Semiconductor Industry Association, said Thursday it was 'eager to learn more' about the planned chip tariffs, 'including the scope and structure of exemptions.'
The announcement came more than three months after Trump temporarily exempted most electronics from his administration's most onerous tariffs.
During the COVID-19 pandemic, a shortage of computer chips increased the price of autos and contributed to higher inflation. Chorzempa said chip tariffs could again raise prices by hundreds of dollars per vehicle if the semiconductors inside a car are not exempt.
'There's a chip that allows you to open and close the window," Chorzempa said. "There's a chip that is running the entertainment system. There is a chip that's kind of running all the electronics. There are chips, especially in EVs, that are doing power management, all that kind of stuff.'
Much of the investment into building U.S. chip factories began with the bipartisan CHIPS and Science Act that President Joe Biden signed into law in 2022, providing more than $50 billion to support new computer chip plants, fund research and train workers for the industry.
Trump has vocally opposed those financial incentives and taken a different approach, betting that the threat of dramatically higher chip costs would force most companies to open factories domestically, despite the risk that tariffs could squeeze corporate profits and push up prices for electronics.
Trump's announcement could be a signal for other chipmakers to imitate the investments that companies like South Korea's Samsung are making, said Long Le, a business professor at Santa Clara University.
But with China's SMIC and Huawei unlikely to be exempted, it could also give the Trump administration "more leverage at the trading table" ahead of an upcoming deal with China, he said.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Diplomat
an hour ago
- The Diplomat
China's ‘Wolf Warrior' Diplomacy Persists in Latin America
China's 'wolf warrior' diplomacy gained traction during the COVID-19 pandemic, largely as a result of mounting international criticism toward Xi Jinping's authoritarian governance model and, more specifically, his government's handling of the novel coronavirus, which originated in China. These tensions were compounded by a turbulent period in China-U.S. relations, triggered by the onset of the trade war under Donald Trump's first administration. This hostile climate forced China's Ministry of Foreign Affairs to adopt a reactive stance toward Washington's offensives, one that often deviated from the principles of dialogue and mutual respect. Within this context, Chinese diplomats embraced a combative, nationalistic style aimed at discrediting any narrative that challenged the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) or tarnished China's global image. This approach became known as 'wolf warrior diplomacy,' a reference to the 2017 Chinese action film 'Wolf Warrior 2,' whose tagline warned: 'Even if they're thousands of miles away, anyone who offends China will pay.' A Diplomatic Retreat? With the waning of the pandemic, the era of wolf warrior diplomacy seemed to recede. As COVID-19 death tolls declined, the most intense international outcries over repression in Hong Kong, Tibet, and Xinjiang began to fade. Although U.N. experts and democratic states continued to voice concerns about these issues, the international media response lacked the intensity seen in 2020, with the global uproar over the imposition of the National Security Law in Hong Kong, or in 2022, when a U.N. report detailed 'grave human rights violations' against Uyghurs. Signals of a return to conventional diplomacy became apparent even within the Politburo of the Chinese Communist Party, where Xi urged party members to adopt a more civil tone with foreign counterparts: 'We must pay attention to our tone, be open and confident, modest and humble, and strive to present a credible, lovable, and respectable image of China,' he declared in 2021. Similarly, the resumption of high-level dialogue between Beijing and Washington, particularly following Xi's bilateral meeting with then-U.S. President Joe Biden at the 2024 APEC Forum in San Francisco, offered grounds for pivoting away from aggressive posturing and toward diplomatic engagement between strategic rivals. This shift was reflected in the initial Chinese diplomatic responses to provocations by Trump's second administration. The Chinese foreign service appeared unusually composed amid the uncertainty and bombast of the U.S. president. This was evident in Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi's remarks after the first round of tariffs imposed by the U.S. in March 2025. 'Major powers should fulfill their international obligations… and not seek to bully or take advantage of the weak,' he said. To be sure, certain Chinese diplomats found themselves forced to respond in kind to Trump's attacks. The Chinese embassy in Washington, for instance, stated, 'If what the United States wants is war – be it a tariff war, a trade war, or any other kind of war – we are ready to fight until the end.' Still, such declarations have not signaled a full return to the pandemic-era wolf warrior approach as an official mode of political communication, but rather a reactive strategy in response to certain decisions that undermine China's interests in strategic sectors and regions. Indeed, most Chinese embassies around the world have focused on highlighting the harmful effects of the trade war on global commerce, articulating China's perspective via social media, Chinese state media, and local newspapers. In early 2025, Wang Yi published an op-ed in the Mexican daily La Jornada, asserting: 'We must jointly reject unilateralism and defend the multilateral trading system centered on the World Trade Organization. Together, we must advocate for an equal, orderly multipolar world and a universally beneficial and inclusive economic globalization.' As such, leading analysts like Duan Xiaolin and Tyler Jost have recently stated that the Chinese Ministry of Foreign Affairs is no longer interested in promoting wolf warrior diplomacy. Some take this argument further, suggesting that the torch of (anti-)diplomatic bluster has passed not to China, but to senior figures in the Make America Great Again movement: examples include the Oval Office humiliation of Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy, jabs at the European Union during the Munich Security Conference, or Trump's threats about annexing Canada, Greenland, and the Panama Canal. From Central America to Colombia Nevertheless, in Latin America – particularly in Central America – the wolf warrior spirit remains active and visible. This may be driven by geopolitical pressures, as the U.S. seeks to preserve its hegemony in the region amid China's growing assertiveness and its campaign to win diplomatic recognition from countries like Guatemala, Belize, and Paraguay, which still maintain ties with Taipei. Among the most outspoken wolf warriors in the region is Xu Tiefei, the political counselor at the Chinese embassy in Costa Rica, known for his anti-U.S. rhetoric. In 2020, responding to conspiracy theories about COVID-19's artificial origin, Xu tweeted: 'As far as I know, the most infamous flu virus in recent history is H1N1, which originated in the U.S. in 2009. It killed nearly 20,000 people in that same year and later spread to over 200 countries and regions.' Following U.S. announcements of cooperation with Rodrigo Chaves' government to counter alleged Chinese cybercriminal activity in Costa Rica, Xu tweeted a statement from the embassy with his own mocking comment: 'Guided by the North, it will lose its direction.' In Panama, the Chinese embassy has also continued its offensive tone since the days of Wei Qiang, the first Chinese ambassador to the country. In a recent statement condemning U.S. pressure over the Panama Canal, the embassy remarked: 'It is well known who is orchestrating the global wave of wiretapping and surveillance, and who is the biggest source of cyberattacks' – a not-so-subtle reference to the U.S. The statement added, 'The United States is the country that has inflicted the greatest harm on Panama throughout its history.' In Colombia, Ambassador Zhu Jingyang has likewise adopted a confrontational and undiplomatic tone. His recent social media skirmishes have drawn attention. In response to a Deutsche Welle report on DeepSeek's self-censorship regarding sensitive topics for Beijing – such as the Tiananmen massacre – Zhu snapped: 'We know they're stupid, but not that stupid. Hilarious!' Elsewhere, Zhu accused the local outlet Entorno of spreading 'fake news' – without evidence – after it published a story about the so-called Chinese debt trap in the Global South. These episodes suggest that wolf warrior diplomacy has not entirely vanished, at least not in Latin America. Despite Xi Jinping's attempts to project a more moderate image in recent years, Trump's return to the White House has reactivated confrontational rhetoric on certain fronts. It's no coincidence that Chinese ambassadors in countries like Costa Rica, Panama, and Colombia – where the U.S. has stepped up the pressure on cybersecurity, infrastructure, and trade, respectively – have taken on a combative stance. As long as Latin America remains a strategic battleground in the China-U.S. rivalry, the combative streak in China's diplomacy will linger. This article is part of a research project by the center Expediente Abierto on Chinese digital propaganda in Latin America. The initial findings of the study are available here.


Japan Today
3 hours ago
- Japan Today
Zelenskyy wins EU, NATO backing as he seeks place at Trump-Putin talks
A serviceman of the 115th Separate Mechanized Brigade of the Ukrainian Armed Forces attends a training between combat missions at a training ground, amid Russia's attack on Ukraine, in Kharkiv region, Ukraine August 9, 2025. REUTERS/Sofiia Gatilova By Dan Peleschuk and Mark Trevelyan Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy won diplomatic backing from Europe and the NATO alliance on Sunday ahead of a Russia-U.S. summit this week where Kyiv fears President Vladimir Putin and President Donald Trump may try to dictate terms for ending the 3-1/2-year war. Trump, who for weeks had been threatening new sanctions against Russia for failing to halt the war, announced instead on Friday that he would meet Putin on August 15 in Alaska. A White House official has said Trump is open to Zelenskyy attending but preparations are underway for only a bilateral meeting. Russian strikes injured at least 12 in Ukraine's Zaporizhzhia region, the country's foreign affairs ministry said on Sunday. Zelenskyy, responding to the strike, said, "That is why sanctions are needed, pressure is needed." The Kremlin leader last week ruled out meeting Zelenskyy, saying conditions for such an encounter were "unfortunately still far" from being met. Trump said a potential deal would involve "some swapping of territories to the betterment of both (sides)", compounding Ukrainian fears that it may face pressure to surrender land. Zelenskyy says any decisions taken without Ukraine will be "stillborn" and unworkable. On Saturday the leaders of Britain, France, Germany, Italy, Poland, Finland and the European Commission said any diplomatic solution must protect the security interests of Ukraine and Europe. "The U.S. has the power to force Russia to negotiate seriously," EU foreign policy chief Kaja Kallas said on Sunday. "Any deal between the U.S. and Russia must have Ukraine and the EU included, for it is a matter of Ukraine's and the whole of Europe's security." EU foreign ministers will meet on Monday to discuss next steps, she said. NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte told U.S. network ABC News that Friday's summit "will be about testing Putin, how serious he is on bringing this terrible war to an end". He added: "It will be, of course, about security guarantees, but also about the absolute need to acknowledge that Ukraine decides on its own future, that Ukraine has to be a sovereign nation, deciding on its own geopolitical future." Russia holds nearly a fifth of the country. Rutte said a deal could not include legal recognition of Russian control over Ukrainian land, although it might include de facto recognition. He compared it to the situation after World War II when Washington accepted that the Baltic states of Latvia, Lithuania and Estonia were de facto controlled by the Soviet Union but did not legally recognize their annexation. Zelenskyy said on Sunday: "The end of the war must be fair, and I am grateful to everyone who stands with Ukraine and our people today." A European official said Europe had come up with a counter-proposal to Trump's, but declined to provide details. Russian officials accused Europe of trying to thwart Trump's efforts to end the war. "The Euro-imbeciles are trying to prevent American efforts to help resolve the Ukrainian conflict," former Russian president Dmitry Medvedev posted on social media on Sunday. Russian Foreign Ministry spokeswoman Maria Zakharova said in a vituperative statement that the relationship between Ukraine and the European Union resembled "necrophilia". Roman Alekhin, a Russian war blogger, said Europe had been reduced to the role of a spectator. "If Putin and Trump reach an agreement directly, Europe will be faced with a fait accompli. Kyiv - even more so," he said. CAPTURED TERRITORY In addition to Crimea, which it seized in 2014, Russia has formally claimed the Ukrainian regions of Luhansk, Donetsk, Kherson and Zaporizhzhia as its own, although it controls only about 70% of the last three. It holds smaller pieces of territory in three other regions, while Ukraine says it holds a sliver of Russia's Kursk region. Sergei Markov, a pro-Kremlin analyst, said a swap could entail Russia handing over 1,500 sq km to Ukraine and obtaining 7,000 sq km, which he said Russia would capture anyway within about six months. He provided no evidence to back any of those figures. Russia took about 500 sq km of territory in July, according to Western military analysts who say its grinding advances have come at the cost of very high casualties. Ukraine and its European allies have been haunted for months by the fear that Trump, keen to claim credit for making peace and hoping to seal lucrative joint business deals between the U.S. and Russia, could align with Putin to cut a deal that would be deeply disadvantageous to Kyiv. They had drawn some encouragement lately as Trump, having piled heavy pressure on Zelenskyy and berated him publicly in the Oval Office in February, began criticizing Putin as Russia pounded Kyiv and other cities with its heaviest air attacks of the war. But the impending Putin-Trump summit has revived fears that Kyiv and Europe could be sidelined. "What we will see emerge from Alaska will almost certainly be a catastrophe for Ukraine and Europe," wrote Phillips P. O'Brien, professor of strategic studies at the University of St Andrews in Scotland. "And Ukraine will face the most terrible dilemma. Do they accept this humiliating and destructive deal? Or do they go it alone, unsure of the backing of European states?" Ukrainian political analyst Volodymyr Fesenko said on Sunday that Kyiv's partnership with its European allies was critical to countering any attempts to keep it away from the table. "For us right now, a joint position with the Europeans is our main resource," he said on Ukrainian radio. U.S. Vice President JD Vance said a negotiated settlement was unlikely to satisfy either side. "Both the Russians and the Ukrainians, probably, at the end of the day, are going to be unhappy with it," he said on Fox News' Sunday Morning Futures with Maria Bartiromo. © Thomson Reuters 2025.


Japan Today
3 hours ago
- Japan Today
Commercial fishing in vast Pacific nature area halted after judge blocks a Trump order
President Donald Trump participates in a trilateral signing ceremony with Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan and Azerbaijan President Ilham Aliyev in the State Dining Room of the White House, Friday, Aug. 8, 2025, in Washington. (AP Photo/Mark Schiefelbein) By JENNIFER SINCO KELLEHER and AUDREY McAVOY Commercial fishing that recently resumed in a vast protected area of the Pacific Ocean must halt once again, after a judge in Hawaii sided with environmentalists challenging a Trump administration rollback of federal ocean protections. The remote Pacific Islands Heritage Marine National Monument is home to turtles, marine mammals and seabirds, which environmental groups say will get snagged by longline fishing, an industrial method involving baited hooks from lines 60 miles (about 100 kilometers) or longer. President Donald Trump's executive order to allow this and other types of commercial fishing in part of the monument changed regulations without providing a process for public comment and rulemaking and stripped core protections from the monument, the groups argued in a lawsuit. U.S. District Judge Micah W. J. Smith granted a motion by the environmentalists on Friday. The ruling means boats catching fish for sale will need to immediately cease fishing in waters between 50 and 200 nautical miles (93 kilometers to 370 kilometers) around Johnston Atoll, Jarvis Island and Wake Island, said Earthjustice, an environmental law organization representing the plaintiffs. U.S. Justice Department attorneys representing the government did not immediately return an email message seeking comment on Saturday. Trump has said the U.S. should be 'the world's dominant seafood leader,' and on the same day of his April executive order, he issued another one seeking to boost commercial fishing by peeling back regulations and opening up harvesting in previously protected areas. President George W. Bush created the marine monument in 2009. It consists of about 500,000 square miles (1.3 million square kilometers) in the remote central Pacific Ocean southwest of Hawaii. President Barack Obama expanded it in 2014. Soon after Trump's executive order, the National Marine Fisheries Service sent a letter to fishing permit holders giving them the green light to fish commercially in the monument's boundaries, Earthjustice's lawsuit says. Fishing resumed within days, the group said. Government attorneys say the fisheries service's letter merely notified commercial fishers of a change that had already taken place through Trump's authority to remove the prohibition on commercial fishing in certain areas. Earthjustice challenged that letter, and by granting the motion in their favor, the federal judge found the government had chosen not to defend its letter on the merits and forfeited that argument. Smith also ruled against the government's other defenses, that the plaintiffs lacked standing to challenge the letter and that the court lacked jurisdiction over the matter. David Henkin, an Earthjustice attorney, said Smith's ruling requires the government to go through a process to determine what kind of fishing, and under what conditions, can happen in monument waters in a way that wouldn't destroy the area. Members of Hawaii's longline fishing industry say they have made numerous gear adjustments and changes over the years, such as circle hooks, to avoid that. The lawsuit says allowing commercial fishing in the monument expansion would also harm the 'cultural, spiritual, religious, subsistence, educational, recreational, and aesthetic interests' of a group of Native Hawaiian plaintiffs who are connected genealogically to the Indigenous peoples of the Pacific. © Copyright 2025 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed without permission.