Vietnam brands human rights organisation as terrorist group
Vietnam 's ministry of public security added Boat People SOS to its list of terrorist groups and doxxed the private information of the group's president.
The ministry said in a press release BPSOS "operates under the guise of 'refugee relief' but in fact, it uses this activity to connect with and assist organisations and individuals in carrying out anti-Vietnam activities".
It claimed the group and its leadership assisted a "number of individuals participating in the organisation Montagnards [Stand] for Justice (MSJ)".
The government has accused the MSJ – an organisation that advocates for the religious freedom of ethnic minorities – of carrying out terrorist attacks on two People's Commune headquarters in Vietnam's Central Highlands in June 2023.
At least 10 defendants were sentenced to life in prison on terrorist charges and others were awarded jail between four years to 20 after 100 individuals were tried in the case.
The government subsequently designated MSJ as a 'terrorist organisation' – a move that was criticised by UN experts for failing to "meet the requirements of due process and judicial protection under international human rights law".
The Vietnamese government has escalated its clampdown on dissent by arresting activists, journalists, lawyers and critics with large followings on social media along with banning rights groups.
Founded in the 198Os, BPSOS was set up to help so-called boat people flee Vietnam by sea and now aids victims of religious persecution and human trafficking in Vietnam, according to its website.
Nguyen Dinh Thang, the executive director of BPSOS, said the terrorist designation was meant to intimidate those who spoke out against repression.
'The international community knows very well who has cooperated with the Boat People SOS committee for the past several decades, including the US government, more than 40 countries in the International Religious Freedom or Belief Alliance and the human rights institutions of the United Nations,' he told Radio Free Asia.
He said by putting the terrorist designation, the Vietnamese government was hoping to frighten those who speak out to the international community to denounce religious repression in the country.
'They expected that people in the country would not dare to contact us or provide information about violations for us to transfer to the international community,' Nguyen Dinh Thang added.
Christian Solidarity Worldwide (CSW), a UK-based rights group, criticised the Vietnamese government's move to designate BPSOS as a terror group.
Nguyen Dinh Thang is "a champion of human rights, in particular the right to freedom of religion or belief", said Mervyn Thomas, founder president of CSW.
"The fact that he has been targeted like this is a sign that his voice is reaching the ears of the Vietnamese authorities, who are now attempting to silence and intimidate him."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
9 minutes ago
- The Independent
Minister admits government hasn't tackled small boats crisis as crossings set to hit 50,000
A minister has admitted that the government has so far failed to tackle the small boats crisis, as the number of people who have crossed the Channel since Labour took power looks set to surpass 50,000. Home office minister Baroness Jacqui Smith said the number of people coming to the UK after making the dangerous crossing is 'a problem that, up to this point, we haven't managed to tackle' – but insisted that it was the fault of the previous government. 'The last government enabled this hideous criminal activity to really get its roots across Europe', she said, adding that there is now 'really important action being taken to tackle it.' It comes as the government ramps up its efforts to bring down migration amid growing public anger over the issue, announcing on Friday that the new 'one in, one out' returns deal with France was up and running. The Home Office has also expanded its 'deport now, appeal later' scheme, which sees foreign criminals deported before their appeals have been heard. But the government is yet to get a grip on the numbers of people making the dangerous crossing, with the latest Home Office figures showing that 49,797 people have arrived on British shores by small boat since Labour won last year's general election. It took Rishi Sunak 603 days in office to surpass the 50,000 milestone, while it took Boris Johnson 1,066 days - a figure which spanned over the Covid-19 pandemic. When the figure was put to the home office minister on Sky News, she said: 'This is a problem that has, up to this point, we haven't managed to tackle in terms of the numbers who are coming here. 'But it is a completely legitimate claim to say that is happening is the result of the last government who chose to focus on gimmicks, the Rwanda scheme which returned four volunteers.' She added: 'We're taking responsibility. I don't believe it was our fault that it was enabled to take root in the way in which it has done by a government who failed to do what was necessary.' But asked at what point in Labour's government the numbers of boat crossings would become their fault, Baroness Smith declined to say. 'What I'm pointing out is that we've taken our responsibility to work internationally, to change the law... the last government did none of those things and focused on gimmicks', she said. 'It's because of that that the crime behind this got embedded in the way in which it did and that won't be solved overnight. And we're absolutely clear about that responsibility.' Labour has put a pledge to crack down on the number of people coming to the UK on small boats at the centre of its plan for government. But with boat crossings at a record high, and the asylum backlog still above 75,000, there is mounting pressure on ministers to take more drastic action, pressure which is exacerbated by the success of Reform UK in the polls. The government is hoping its latest measures will turn the tide on the numbers of people arriving in the UK after crossing the Channel, amid mounting tensions over the issue in recent days. There have been protests across the UK opposing the use of hotels to house asylum seekers, with a number of people arrested. Figures from last month showed that the number of migrants arriving in the UK after crossing the English Channel topped 25,000 – the earliest point in a calendar year at which the 25,000 mark has been passed since data on Channel crossings was first reported in 2018.
BBC News
9 minutes ago
- BBC News
Man faces jail in US for shipping 850 turtles in socks to Hong Kong
A Chinese man has pleaded guilty in a US district court to exporting around 850 protected turtles wrapped in socks and falsely labelled as toys, the US Department of Justice August 2023 and November 2024, Wei Qiang Lin exported to Hong Kong more than 200 parcels containing the turtles, according to a Justice Department statement on boxes packed with the turtles had been labelled as "containing 'plastic animal toys', among other things", the authorities primarily shipped eastern box turtles and three-toed box turtles. Both species are native to the US and highly prized by some pet owners. The turtles have unique markings on their shells, and are seen as a status symbol in China where they are often kept as pets. US authorities estimated that Lin's seized turtles had a combined market value of $1.4m (£1m). He was caught when the animals were intercepted by law enforcement during one border species, which were smuggled in large quantities in the 1990s, are protected by the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora. Trade of the turtles can only be authorised with export permits or re-export eastern box turtle is also deemed vulnerable by the International Union for Conservation of the turtles, Lin also exported 11 other parcels filled with reptiles, including venomous snakes, according to the Justice who is set to be sentenced on 23 December, faces up to five years in March, another Chinese national was sentenced to 30 months in prison for smuggling more than 2,000 eastern box turtles. The amphibians were also wrapped in socks and packed in boxes, which were labelled as containing almonds and chocolate cookies. US authorities estimated at the time that each turtle could have been sold for $2,000 (£1,500).
Daily Mail
9 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Telling a female colleague they dress conservatively could get you fired for sexual harassment
Telling a female colleague that she dresses conservatively compared to her co-workers could be heard as a 'slur' and get you fired for sexual harassment, a tribunal has ruled. Describing a colleague as 'conservative' could be interpreted as 'frumpy' and a male employee who makes such a remark is guilty of 'objectifying' his co-worker, the employment judge explained. The ruling came in the case of Jessie Danquah, a business consultant at Shell, who told Naima Masud on a work night out that she was 'conservative compared to other woman at the social who have their boobs out'. Mr Danquah claimed that his comment was 'objectively true', however, employment Judge Adam Leith said the comment was 'objectively inappropriate' and likely to be a breach of workplace equality laws. Judge Leith told the tribunal in Croydon, London: 'It was objectively capable of having the effect of violating Ms Masud's dignity, and creating a degrading and humiliating environment for her. 'That was two-fold - firstly, his comments comparing Ms Masud to other colleagues suggested a degree of objectification of other female colleagues. 'And secondly, we consider that it would have been objectively reasonable for the recipient of the comment describing Ms Masud as 'conservative' and contrasting her with other female colleagues would hear that as a slur. 'When [he] used the word "conservative", that could, objectively speaking, be heard as "frumpy" or any number of other adjectives that could reasonably be regarded as somewhat less than complimentary. 'It does not matter that that was not what [he] intended, since the test for harassment looks at either purpose or effect.' Mr Danquah began working as a business consultant for FDM group, a business support services supplier in April 2022 and in August was sent on placement to Shell. The following month, he went to a work social organised by the oil and gas giant at Bar Elba, a cocktail bar in London. The hearing was told that during the evening he made a series of alleged comments to Ms Masud including telling her: 'I didn't expect people like you to be out that late'. 'When asked what he meant, he responded "Muslim girls",' the tribunal heard. Mr Danquah admitted the 'conservative' remark, telling the tribunal it was 'intending to affirm my belief that she carried herself modestly'. A few days after this incident, Ms Masud told Mr Danquah that she thought his behaviour had been 'unprofessional' and that his comments about her being conservative were 'inappropriate'. He denied acting unprofessionally, and responded 'You are conservative compared to other women at the social who have their boobs out'. Ms Masud reported the remarks to HR and when Mr Danquah found out he sent an email saying he would 'voluntarily suspend' his own work with Shell and FDM. Later that month he was suspended. In an investigation meeting Mr Danquah apologised for the 'conservative' remark but said 'It's objectively true on how someone dresses and it wasn't meant to demean her'. Bosses decided that he wouldn't return to his placement at Shell. Following this, he was found to have been 'aggressive' or even 'bullying' towards Ms Masud as he emailed her about his intention to sue her for defamation, copying in various other employees. He also 'indicated that if Ms Masud did not acknowledge receipt of his letter before claim within less than 24 hours, he would message all of her managers and colleagues with details of the investigation'. In November, he attended a disciplinary meeting in which it was found that this email was 'gross misconduct'. He was subsequently fired. Mr Danquah was separately told that his 'conservative' comment was a breach of the 'Bullying and Harassment policy and was associated with Ms Masud's sex, religion and belief'. He then sued FDM for race, sex and belief discrimination claiming that he held a 'philosophical belief in modesty'. Dismissing his claims, EJ Leith said: 'Based on the evidence before us, we are not satisfied that [Mr Danquah] genuinely held the belief he professed to believe at the relevant times. 'He may hold the belief now; the belief may even have developed as a result of his view of the events of September to December 2022. 'But there is simply no evidence before us on which we can be satisfied that he genuinely held a cogent philosophical belief at the relevant times.'
