logo
Douglas Murray: A 50-day deadline is 50 days to kill. Force Putin's hand now

Douglas Murray: A 50-day deadline is 50 days to kill. Force Putin's hand now

New York Post3 hours ago
Who would ever have thought that dealing with the Middle East would look easy?
But that is what President Trump has shown since he came into office.
And though there is still needs to be a hostage-return and cease-fire deal in Gaza, the President's strong and decisive action against the mullahs in Iran helped pacify the world's least pacifist region.
By contrast, the other great foreign policy challenge President Trump inherited remains as complicated as hell.
The president and vice president's duffing-up of President Volodymyr Zelensky in the Oval Office in February might have been a low point in US-Ukraine relations.
But in the months since then it is Vladimir Putin who has started to annoy President Trump.
Because it is Putin who has been so completely unwilling to budge.
Every time a cease-fire has looked close, the Russian president has sent even more rocket and drone barrages towards Ukraine.
As the months have progressed Trump has admitted to losing patience with his Russian counterpart.
That culminated this week in the president's announcement of two new steps in his efforts to stop the war.
The first, mentioned alongside NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte in the White House, is for America to sell high-quality US weapons to America's European allies, who will in turn pass them on to the Ukrainians.
This is a clever move on the president's part — making sure that Ukraine continues to be able to defend itself without committing the financial resources that Trump has repeatedly told his voters he wouldn't send.
The second announcement was that America could impose secondary tariffs on Russia.
Again, it is a smart idea.
Every morning, the NY POSTcast offers a deep dive into the headlines with the Post's signature mix of politics, business, pop culture, true crime and everything in between. Subscribe here!
The allegedly 'stringent' sanctions that the Biden administration placed on Russia since the beginning of the invasion of Ukraine in 2022 have failed to work.
The Russian economy has not faltered. It has gone onto a wartime footing and a full armaments-producing capability.
And while America and other Western allies might not have any dealings with the Russian economy, much of the rest of the world still does.
In fact, despite all the tough talk from Europe, there are reports that EU countries bought more Russian natural resources in the past year than they sent in financial aid to Ukraine.
Talk about mixed ­messaging.
But for the past three years, Russia has had plenty of other countries it can still sell its oil and natural gas to.
These include Turkey, India and South Korea.
So Trump suggested this week that he is considering putting secondary tariffs on such countries.
That is, if countries want to help fund Putin's war efforts by buying his natural resources then they will have to pay at least 100% tariffs when dealing with the United States.
In effect these countries would have to choose which market they'd rather operate in.
Would they rather have access to the greatest market in the world — the US — or would they like to continue to barter at Vladimir Putin's decrepit trade stall?
It's a smart policy, and we'll see if the president follows through on it.
But in the meantime there is one vast, looming problem.
The president has given Russia 50 days' notice on the secondary tariffs issue.
As President Zelensky said in an exclusive sit-down with The Post this week, this gives Putin 50 days to continue escalating the conflict.
As Zelensky said to Caitlin Doornbos, 'Fifty days, for us, is just — every day is scary.'
He is right. It is hard to communicate to readers living in the realm of peace just what a 'normal' night is like even in the capital of Kyiv these days.
Even a quiet night will include the sound of multiple Russian drones and UAVs flying at the city, plus the bursts of gunfire as under-equipped Ukrainian forces try to shoot the Russian weapons down from the sky.
Putin has shown before that he likes to 'outsmart' Trump.
In March, the two leaders agreed to an immediate cease-fire against all energy and infrastructure.
Within hours, Putin carried out one of his biggest attacks to date on Ukraine's energy facilities.
It is almost certain that if Putin thinks he has 50 days before anything happens he will use those 50 days to up his attacks and then stall for more time.
Perhaps Trump can do with Putin what he so successfully did with the Iranian mullahs.
Which was to offer to count to 10 and then go ahead and surprise them.
We'll see.
The battle is not just a fight for Ukraine's survival.
It is also a battle of nerves between two of the most steel-nerved leaders in the world.
How many voters really care about Epstein?
Twitter (X) is not the real world.
Who knew?
If you were on the social media site for the past week you'd have thought that the most important issue to American voters is the dead criminal Jeffrey Epstein.
There´s a huge amount we still don't know about the convicted sex offender.
And there's plenty about him — the sources of his wealth, high-profile connections, and manner of his death — the public deserve to know about.
But outside the Twitter-sphere Epstein isn't the story at the moment.
Some MAGA influencers have decided that the release or otherwise of all known information about Epstein is a 'make or break' issue between them and the President.
The President has expressed understandable frustration that he should be distracted from matters like, say, the economy, and keep getting asked about Epstein.
Online personalities threaten that Trump is going to lose all support from his base unless every file relating to Epstein is released.
And yet despite this bragging threat, the polls show otherwise.
President Trump's approval rating among Republican voters actually went up this week, according to two separate polls.
So whether or not the administration is right in its attitude towards the files, Trump himself is absolutely wise to look at his Twitter critics and say, 'Oh yeah, you and whose online army?'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump's name on 2003 birthday letter to Epstein, Wall Street Journal reports
Trump's name on 2003 birthday letter to Epstein, Wall Street Journal reports

Yahoo

time20 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Trump's name on 2003 birthday letter to Epstein, Wall Street Journal reports

(Corrects paragraph 14 to say 'after,' not 'before' book was compiled) (Reuters) -Donald Trump's name appeared on a risque 2003 personal note to Jeffrey Epstein, the Wall Street Journal reported on Thursday. The president responded that the letter was fake. The Journal reported that the letter was one of several included in a leather-bound album meant to celebrate Epstein's 50th birthday, about three years before sex-abuse allegations emerged against the financier. Reuters could not immediately confirm the authenticity of the letter. Trump quickly responded to the story on his Truth Social platform, saying he would sue the newspaper and Rupert Murdoch, who controls its publisher, News Corp. "The Wall Street Journal, and Rupert Murdoch, personally, were warned directly by President Donald J. Trump that the supposed letter they printed by President Trump to Epstein was a FAKE and, if they print it, they will be sued," Trump wrote. "President Trump will be suing The Wall Street Journal, NewsCorp, and Mr. Murdoch, shortly." A spokesperson for the Wall Street Journal and its parent company, Dow Jones & Co, declined to comment on its story or Trump's threat to sue. Representatives for News Corp and Murdoch could not immediately be reached for comment. The White House did not immediately respond to a request for comment from Reuters. The White House has been roiled by questions about disgraced financier and convicted sex offender Epstein, after the Justice Department this month concluded that there was no evidence to support a number of long-held conspiracy theories about his clients and 2019 death in prison. Attorney General Pam Bondi had pledged months earlier to reveal major revelations about Epstein, including "a lot of names" and "a lot of flight logs." Some Trump supporters have demanded the release of more information on Epstein, causing a rare fracture within his base of support. Trump has pushed back. "It's all been a big hoax," Trump told reporters in the Oval Office on Wednesday, as calls increased for the release of more information on Epstein's clients. The Journal said the letter, bearing Trump's name, contains several lines of typewritten text framed by the outline of a naked woman, which appeared to be hand-drawn with a heavy marker. The newspaper said the letter concludes 'Happy Birthday — and may every day be another wonderful secret," and featured the signature "Donald." Vice President JD Vance responded to the story on X, saying, "Forgive my language but this story is complete and utter bullshit. The WSJ should be ashamed for publishing it." Allegations that Epstein had been sexually abusing girls became public in 2006 - after the birthday book was compiled - and he was arrested that year before accepting a plea deal. Epstein died in 2019 in jail after he was arrested a second time and charged with sex-trafficking conspiracy. (Reporting By Jarrett Renshaw; Additional reporting by Dawn Chmielewski; Editing by Scott Malone and William Mallard)

What's in the Republican bill cutting $9 billion from public broadcasting and foreign aid
What's in the Republican bill cutting $9 billion from public broadcasting and foreign aid

Chicago Tribune

time22 minutes ago

  • Chicago Tribune

What's in the Republican bill cutting $9 billion from public broadcasting and foreign aid

WASHINGTON — The Republican-led Congress is testing the popularity of Department of Government Efficiency spending cuts this week by aiming to pass President Donald Trump's request to claw back about $9 billion in public broadcasting and foreign aid spending. Trump's Republican administration is employing a rarely used tool that allows the president to transmit a request to cancel previously approved funding authority. Democrats are trying to kill the measure but need some Republicans uncomfortable with the president's effort to join them. The Senate approved the vast majority of Trump's request in the early morning hours Thursday, 51-48. Another House vote is needed because senators changed the legislation. The House passed an earlier version of the bill on a mostly party line vote. Here's a closer look at what's in the bill: Trump has asked lawmakers to rescind nearly $1.1 billion from the Corporation for Public Broadcasting, which represents the full amount it's due to receive during the next two budget years. The White House says the public media system is politically biased and an unnecessary expense. The corporation distributes more than 70% of the money to more than 1,500 locally operated public television and radio stations, with much of the remainder assigned to National Public Radio and the Public Broadcasting Service to support national programming. The potential fallout from the cuts for local public media stations has generated concerns on both sides of the political aisle. Sen. Mike Rounds, R-S.D., said he secured a deal from the White House that some funding administered by the Interior Department would be repurposed to subsidize Native American public radio stations in about a dozen states. But many lawmakers say that won't help a large number of local broadcasting stations. Sen. Tammy Baldwin, D-Wis., unsuccessfully sought to take out the public broadcasting cuts. 'If we don't adopt this amendment, local television and radio stations will shut down and it will be rural stations that will be the first to close,' Baldwin said. To justify the spending cuts, the Trump administration and Republican lawmakers have cited certain activities they disagree with to portray a wide range of a program's funding as wasteful. In recent testimony, Office of Management and Budget Director Russ Vought criticized programming aimed at fostering diversity, equity, and inclusion. He said NPR aired a 2022 program entitled 'What 'Queer Ducks' can teach teenagers about sexuality in the animal kingdom.' He also cited a special town hall that CNN held in 2020 with 'Sesame Street' about combatting racism. As part of the package, Trump asked lawmakers to rescind about $8.3 billion in foreign aid programs that aim to fight famine and disease and promote global stability. A Senate amendment knocked the foreign aid cuts down to about $7.9 billion when Republicans agreed to remove what would have been a $400 million cut to PEPFAR, the politically popular program that began under President George W. Bush to combat HIV/AIDS. The program is credited with saving millions of lives. Among the targets: The Trump administration also said some cuts, such as eliminating funding for UNICEF, would encourage international organizations to be more efficient and seek contributions from other nations, 'putting American taxpayers first.'

House Republicans grasp for response to demands for transparency in Epstein case
House Republicans grasp for response to demands for transparency in Epstein case

San Francisco Chronicle​

time22 minutes ago

  • San Francisco Chronicle​

House Republicans grasp for response to demands for transparency in Epstein case

WASHINGTON (AP) — House Republicans were grasping late Thursday to formulate a response to the Trump administration's handling of records in the Jeffrey Epstein sex trafficking case, ultimately putting forward a resolution that carries no legal weight but nodded to the growing demand for greater transparency. The House resolution, which could potentially be voted on next week, will do practically nothing to force the Justice Department to release more records in the case. Still, it showed how backlash from the Republican base is putting pressure on the Trump administration and roiling GOP lawmakers. The House was held up for hours Thursday from final consideration of President Donald Trump's request for about $9 billion in government funding cuts because GOP leaders were trying to respond to demands from their own ranks that they weigh in on the Epstein files. In the late evening they settled on the resolution as an attempt to simultaneously placate calls from the far-right for greater transparency and satisfy President Donald Trump, who has called the issue a 'hoax' that his supporters should forget about. Yet the House resolution was the latest demonstration of how practically no one is moving on from Attorney General Pam Bondi's promises to publicly release documents related to Epstein. Since he was found dead in his New York jail cell in August 2019 following his arrest on sex trafficking charges, the investigation into the well-connected financier has loomed large among conservatives and conspiracy theorists who have now lashed out at Trump and Bondi for declining to release more files in the case. 'The House Republicans are for transparency, and they're looking for a way to say that they agree with the White House. We agree with the president. Everything he said about that, all the credible evidence should come out,' House Speaker Mike Johnson said Thursday afternoon. Democrats vehemently decried the resolution's lack of force. They have advanced their own legislation, with support from nine Republicans, that would require the Justice Department to release more information on the case. Rep. Jim McGovern, who led the Democrats' debate against the Republican resolution Thursday night, called it a 'glorified press release' and 'a fig leaf so they can move on from this issue.' Under pressure from his own GOP members, Johnson had to demonstrate action on the Epstein files or risk having Republicans support the Democratic measures that would force the release of nearly all documents. 'The American people simply need to know the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth,' House Democratic Leader Hakeem Jeffries said at a news conference. 'Democrats didn't put this into the public domain. The conspiracy theory provocateur-in-chief Donald Trump is the one, along with his extreme MAGA Republican associates, who put this whole thing into the public domain for years. And now they are reaping what they have sown.' Still, Democrats, who hold minorities in both chambers, have relished the opportunity to make Republicans repeatedly block their attempts to force the Justice Department to release the documents. Trump in recent years has suggested he would release more information about the investigation into Epstein, especially amid speculation over a supposed list of Epstein's clients. In February, the Justice Department released some government documents regarding the case, but there were no new revelations. After a months-long review of additional evidence, the department earlier this month released a video meant to prove that Epstein killed himself, but said no other files related to the case would be made public.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store