logo
Amid severe heat wave, EU pitches flexible 2040 climate goal – DW – 07/02/2025

Amid severe heat wave, EU pitches flexible 2040 climate goal – DW – 07/02/2025

DWa day ago
The EU has unveiled its new climate target, a 90% reduction in emissions by 2040. But not all member states are on board, while a provision to outsource part of the climate efforts abroad has generated controversy.
With large parts of Europe gripped in a record-breaking heat wave, the European Commission has proposed that the bloc reduce its net greenhouse gas emissions 90% by 2040. That's in comparison to levels back in 1990, and on track to meet the target of net-zero emissions by 2050.
The binding emissions reduction target was first proposed last year, and came after months of tough negotiations among member states. The existing target requires the EU to reduce net emissions by at least 55% by 2030; in May, the Commission said the bloc had already cut climate-warming emissions by 37%.
The new target will give certainty to investors, "strengthen industrial leadership of our businesses, and increase Europe's energy security," the commission said in a statement on Wednesday.
But not all member states are on board with the plan, and a controversial flexibility clause on buying carbon credits on international markets has activists crying foul.
Under the proposal, EU member states could purchase international carbon credits on green projects in third countries from 2036 onward, using them to offset up to 3% of the benchmark 1990 emissions.
"This can provide a safety-net to ensure a 90% target is achievable as we are closing on climate neutrality," the commission said.
But activists have said the flexibility clause was included due to pressure from member states like France and Germany, along with major industry lobbyists, at the cost of reduced investments at home.
To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video
Mathieu Mal, a climate and agriculture expert at the European Environment Bureau, said the 3% flexibility clause was a "bad idea" for a variety of reasons.
"What this means is that the EU would be investing in other countries outside the bloc to reduce their emissions, and that's problematic because we need these investments within the EU. We also have our sectors to decarbonize and we need funds for energy transformation here," he said.
"Every country across the world needs to commit to climate action. If the EU counts these carbon credits towards its own goals then what about the countries who also need to reduce their emissions and achieve their own targets?"
In May, the European Scientific Advisory Board on Climate Change advised against outsourcing part of the bloc's climate efforts, saying it "risk[s] diverting resources from domestic investments and could undermine environmental integrity." It called on all reduction toward net zero to be "achieved through domestic action."
Critics of the clause have called it a ruse for heavy polluters who find it cost intensive to decarbonize in Europe and easier to invest in projects abroad that lack sufficient oversight.
"The use of carbon credits is simply magical thinking for a bloc unwilling to live up to its responsibility for causing the climate catastrophe we're already living through," said Friends of the Earth Europe. "Carbon credits have a long record of failure and ultimately do not stop Europe emitting more than its fair share of carbon emissions."
Speaking with DW, Mal highlighted previous concerns about green investments in third nations. "There have been lots of issues in the past. Projects carried out in some countries often don't have high standards, they often remain just on paper. There are questions if they were ever materialized," he said.
To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video
The Commission's new target has the backing of at least some of the EU member states.
As Denmark takes over the EU's rotating presidency this week, it has listed the 2040 target as one of its top priorities. "Anyone who says that the green transformation cannot be achieved with high ambition and social justice at the same time should come to Denmark," said Villy Sövndal, a lawmaker with the European Greens group and Denmark's former foreign minister.
"Competitiveness in the 21st century is not linked to fossil fuels but to the advancement of the energy transition," Pedro Sanchez, Spain's socialist prime minister, said last week at the EU summit in Brussels.
But other countries consider the 2040 target to be too ambitious. Italy has said an 80-85% target for 2040 would be more realistic, and the Czech Republic said Wednesday it disagreed with the commission's proposal.
Speaking at the EU summit, French President Emmanuel Macron also indicated it was still too early to agree to setting the target for 2040. "The reality is that I want to get my 2030 target right first," he said, "and take the democratic and political time to convince others to get to 2040."
While Germany and France both back the 3% flexibility clause, France expects an even higher percentage of the overall goal to be met by purchasing international carbon credits, with some reports suggesting up to 10%.
According to Teresa Ribera, the EU's green transition chief, some political groups in the EU continue to deny climate change whereas others lack courage in confronting their constituents about steps required to combat the problem.
"Political courage is needed to understand that there is a difficulty," she said in an interview with on Wednesday. "You need to face it with honesty."
The EU's climate plans have raised concerns around the costs of green transition and disruption to industrial growth and livelihood, if decarbonization is carried out without adequate support. However, Ribera believes there is no time to waste.
"Sorry, but it'll be much more expensive if we don't act," she said.
According to a Eurobarometer survey released this week, 85% of Europeans believe climate change is a serious problem and tackling it should be a priority, while 77% agreed that the cost of damage due to climate change is much higher than the investment needed for a net-zero transition.
"As European citizens increasingly feel the impact of climate change, they expect Europe to act," the European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen said on Wednesday.
The proposal still needs the stamp of approval from the European Parliament and member states, and Climate Commissioner Wopke Hoekstra said he hoped an agreement could be reached before the UN climate change conference in Brazil in November. But time is short, and there are still doubts as to whether the proposal in its current form will be adopted as law.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Where Do Trade Talks Stand In The Rush To Avert Higher US Tariffs?
Where Do Trade Talks Stand In The Rush To Avert Higher US Tariffs?

Int'l Business Times

time4 hours ago

  • Int'l Business Times

Where Do Trade Talks Stand In The Rush To Avert Higher US Tariffs?

As a Wednesday deadline approaches for steeper US tariffs to hit dozens of economies ranging from the EU to India, trade negotiations with President Donald Trump's administration are coming down to the wire. The levies taking effect July 9 were announced in April, with the White House citing a lack of "reciprocity" in trade relations. But they were swiftly halted, allowing room for talks. Days before their reimposition, where do things stand? The European Union said it is "ready for a deal" with Washington, with the bloc's trade chief meeting his US counterparts Thursday. European Commission president Ursula von der Leyen said the EU was targeting an "agreement in principle" when it came to the July 9 cutoff. With no deal, the US tariff on EU goods doubles from the "baseline" of 10 percent to 20 percent -- with Trump previously threatening a 50 percent level. Washington and Hanoi unveiled a trade pact Wednesday with much fanfare and few details, but it allowed Vietnam to avoid Trump's initial 46 percent tariff. Under the agreement, Vietnamese goods face a minimum 20 percent tariff while products made elsewhere face a 40 percent levy -- a clause to restrict "transshipping" by Chinese groups. But there remain questions on how the higher levy would apply to products using foreign parts. There is also a risk that Beijing will adopt retaliatory measures, analysts warned. Despite being a close US ally and major source of foreign investment, Japan might not escape Trump's tariff hike. Tokyo's trade envoy Ryosei Akazawa has made numerous trips to Washington through the end of June. But Trump recently criticized what he described as Japan's reluctance to open up further to US rice and auto exports. "I'm not sure we're going to make a deal," Trump said, adding that the country could pay a tariff of "30 percent, 35 percent, or whatever the number is that we determine." Indian manufacturers and exporters want to believe they can avoid a 26 percent tariff. Negotiations between both countries have been going well for weeks, and Trump himself suggested at the end of June that a "very big" agreement was imminent. Ajay Sahai, director general of the Federation of Indian Export Organisations, said the feedback he received "suggests positive developments." But he maintained that the situation was fluid. Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman has stressed that agriculture and dairy products remain "very big red lines." Seoul, which is already reeling from US tariffs on steel and autos, wants to avert a sweeping 25 percent levy on its other exports. Cooperation in shipbuilding could be a bargaining chip, but "at this stage, both sides still haven't clearly defined what exactly they want," said new President Lee Jae Myung on Thursday. "I can't say with confidence that we'll be able to wrap everything up by July 8," he added. Other Asian economies including Indonesia, Thailand and Cambodia, which faces a 49 percent tariff, wait with bated breath. Indonesia has indicated willingness to boost energy, agriculture and merchandise imports from the United States. Bangladesh meanwhile is proposing to buy Boeing planes and step up imports of US agriculture products. Taiwan, for whom Washington is a vital security partner, faces a 32 percent duty without a pact. Although both sides have faced bumps along the way, Taiwanese Vice President Hsiao Bi-khim said "negotiators from both sides are working diligently" to find a path forward. Switzerland's government said Washington has acknowledged it was acting in good faith, and assumes its tariff level will remain at 10 percent on July 9 while negotiations continue. But without a decision by the president as of the end of June, Switzerland did not rule out that levies could still rise to a promised 31 percent.

Russia first country to recognize Taliban rule – DW – 07/04/2025
Russia first country to recognize Taliban rule – DW – 07/04/2025

DW

time4 hours ago

  • DW

Russia first country to recognize Taliban rule – DW – 07/04/2025

The Taliban government said Russia has made a "brave decision" and set an example for others. Moscow said it wants to boost economic cooperation and help Kabul tackle drug-trafficking and terrorism. Afghanistan's Taliban government said on Thursday Russia had become the first nation to recognize its rule. The announcement came after Aghanistan's Foreign Minister Amir Khan Muttaqi met the Russian ambassador to Afghanistan, Dmitry Zhirnov, in Kabul on Thursday. "This brave decision will be an example for others... Now that the process of recognition has started, Russia was ahead of everyone," Muttaqi said in a video posted on X. "We believe that the act of official recognition of the Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan will boost the development of productive bilateral cooperation between our countries in several areas," Russia's foreign ministry shared on the Telegram app. The Russian Foreign Ministry also said it would help Kabul tackle terrorism and drug-trafficking, while also boosting economic cooperation. "The move signals that strategic interests will always outweigh human rights and international law," said Mariam Solaimankhil, a former member of Afghanistan's parliament and critic of the Taliban. Afghanistan has seen decades of instability, including a 20-year war conducted by the US and other forces. This ended when the US withdrew its troops in 2021. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video The Taliban grabbed back power in 2021 after ousting the government and have since then imposed strict Islamic law. Moscow had earlier removed the Taliban from their list of terrorist organizations, and accepted an ambassador from their government. Russian President Vladimir Putin in 2024 referred to the Taliban as "allies in the fight against terrorism." They previously ruled the country during 1996-2001, when they were only recognized by Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirate and Pakistan. During this stint, some states such as China and Pakistan have accepted Taliban ambassadors without officially recognizing the Islamic Emirate, as the country is officially known. The Taliban government has clamped down on civil liberties of Afghans, especially on women and girls for which they have received international condemnation. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video

Trying to get aid in Gaza: Killed while lining up for food – DW – 07/03/2025
Trying to get aid in Gaza: Killed while lining up for food – DW – 07/03/2025

DW

time11 hours ago

  • DW

Trying to get aid in Gaza: Killed while lining up for food – DW – 07/03/2025

With hundreds of civilians shot and killed near aid distribution centers in Gaza in recent weeks, allegations mount over Israeli military tactics. A little over a week ago, Mahmoud Qassem lost his son, Khader. The 19-year-old had been trying to reach a food distribution center run by the US-backed Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF) in central Gaza. "The last time his mother and I heard from him was at 11 p.m. that night. He told me he was in a safe place — he had gone to the Netzarim distribution center — and I told him to take care," Qassem told DW from a tent in Gaza City, where the family has been displaced."At 1 a.m., I tried calling him again, but his phone wasn't receiving calls. I started to feel anxious. There was no word the whole time, and I waited until 2 p.m. on Friday. I felt like a fire was burning inside me," said the 50-year-old. On Friday, Qassem went to central Gaza and checked the hospitals until he discovered that Khader had been killed. When the body was eventually recovered, after coordination with the Israeli military, it showed that his son had died from several gunshot wounds. "A 19-year-old boy who hadn't even begun to live his life, all for fetching a box," he said, barely holding back tears. He added that he hadn't wanted Khader to go, but his son had felt that he needed to provide for his family. "The situation here is beyond description. People are sacrificing themselves to make it. Only God knows what we are going through. No one feels for us — not Hamas, not Israel, not the Arab countries, not anyone." To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video Almost daily reports of violence, injuries and killings tied to food and aid distribution highlight the unbearable reality facing Gaza's 2.3 million residents, who have become almost completely dependent on supplies entering through the crossings with Israel. Nearly the entire population has been displaced, and around 57,000 Gazans, many of them women and children, have been killed in Israeli attacks since October 2023, according to the Palestinian Ministry of Health. An analysis in May found that 93% of the remaining population is experiencing acute food insecurity. Food and other supplies are extremely scarce in Gaza, even with the resumption of aid deliveries by the UN and new distribution centers — three of which are currently open — run by the GHF, a US-Israeli organization, after an almost three-month Israeli blockade. Israeli officials justified the blockade by claiming that Hamas is stealing aid and using it to finance its operations. This claim has been rejected by the UN and other international and local aid groups, which have had a well-established network and distribution mechanism in Gaza for many years. But aid trucks have repeatedly been looted, either by armed gangs or by ordinary people desperately trying to get hold of food. Meanwhile, the Israeli army has intensified its airstrikes, issuing widespread evacuation orders for large parts of northern and southern Gaza. Saeed Abu Libda, a 44 year-old father of five, recently managed to pick up one sack of flour when a truck passed by near Khan Younis. "I know it was risky but we need to eat," he told DW by phone, since foreign journalists are not allowed in Libda said there were thousands of people waiting for the trucks, when suddenly he heard two shells being fired. "I saw people on the ground, some were injured, some were cut to pieces. I was injured by a shrapnel in my abdomen, but luckily it was a light injury." The Health Ministry in Hamas-ruled Gaza has put the number of people killed in recent weeks by Israeli airstrikes, shootings and bombardments at more than 500. Most of these victims were waiting at food distribution sites or trucks carrying aid, or nearby, health officials said. The Israeli Foreign Ministry dismissed these claims in a post shared on X on Tuesday, and accused Hamas of firing on civilians. It claimed that testimonies from Gaza residents showed that Hamas "spreads false claims blaming the IDF, inflates casualty numbers, and circulates fake footage." On Tuesday, about 130 of the world's largest charities and NGOs, including Oxfam and Save the Children, urged that the GHF be shut down. They said the foundation forced thousands of starving people into militarized zones, where they faced gunfire while trying to access lifesaving aid. GHF's chairman Johnnie Moore stated on Wednesday during a press conference in Brussels that GHF would not cease operations. He said the foundation had delivered more than 55 million meals to date and was willing to work with the UN and other aid agencies. He added that the Gazan health ministry "every single day issues a statistic of civilian casualties and simultaneously attributes 100% of those civilian casualties to waiting for aid — virtually every time, waiting for our aid." The Israel Defense Forces (IDF) has on multiple occasions stated that it has fired "warning shots" at individuals approaching military positions near aid distribution sites. It has not released any information on casualty on June 27, left-leaning Israeli newspaper published an article alleging Israeli soldiers had been given the green light to open fire on crowds near food distribution sites, in order to keep them away from Israeli positions within the militarized zones. Unnamed soldiers interviewed in the article said they had used lethal force against unarmed individuals who posed no threat. also reported that the military was investigating whether these actions breached international law and constituted potential war a joint statement, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and Defense Minister Israel Katz swiftly dismissed the article, accusing the newspaper of "malicious falsehoods designed to defame the IDF, the most moral military in the world." The IDF also rejected the accusations, saying in a statement carried by Israeli media that no forces had been ordered "to deliberately shoot at civilians, including those approaching the distribution centers." But three days later, on Monday, the Israeli military said that in light of "lessons learned," the IDF had decided to reorganize access roads and aid centers, establish new checkpoints and warning signals to "reduce friction with the population and to maintain safety of troops operating on the ground." The Gaza Humanitarian Foundation has repeatedly claimed that there has been no violence at its sites, instead accusing foreign media outlets of not reporting the truth. "We have not had a single violent incident at our distribution sites. We haven't had a violent incident in close proximity to our distribution sites," Moore said. Following the allegations raised in , however, the GHF said these were "too grave to ignore" and called for an investigation. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video Meanwhile, desperate Palestinians often have to walk for hours through war-torn terrain to reach distribution centers located in Israeli-declared military zones. These centers are usually open for only a short time, and it's often unclear where people can safely gather and wait for hours."The road there is very dangerous, and I try hard not to deviate from the main road to get there," Ahmed Abu Raida told DW by phone from in Mawasi in southern Gaza, where he now lives in a tent with his extended family. "We wait for the announcement to open the centers, and during the long hours of waiting, there is heavy gunfire from several directions." To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video Abu Raida said he went to a GHF site in Rafah several times, and managed to get a prepackaged box containing flour, lentils, pasta, tea, cooking oil. "When we enter the place, there is great chaos due to the large number of people," he said, calling the distribution process random. "There is no inspection or limit to the number of boxes one can take."Like the other people interviewed for this article, Abu Raida felt that in general, the process was humiliating and unfair. Elderly people, women or those needing help don't stand a chance. "What can we do? We don't have enough food or income to buy from the markets where prices are insanely high," he said. "So all we receive is just enough to keep us alive."

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store