Sales of new homes tanked in May, pushing supply up to a 3-year high
That sales total was 6.3% lower than May 2024 and well below both the 6-month average of 671,000 and the one-year average of 676,000. It also lags the pre-pandemic average in 2019 of 685,000 units sold.
Wall Street analysts were expecting May new home sales of 695,000, according to estimates from Dow Jones.
This count is based on signed contracts, so people out shopping in May, when mortgage rates remained stubbornly high.
The average rate on the 30-year fixed mortgage started May at 6.83%, rose steadily to just over 7% and then settled back at 6.95% by the end of the month, according to Mortgage News Daily.
"The large fall in new home sales in May cancels out all of the positivity of the past couple of months and serves as a valuable reminder that buyer activity can only rise so far with mortgage rates hugging 7%," wrote Bradley Saunders, an economist with Capital Economics.
Home builders who reported quarterly earnings recently noted high rates cutting into affordability.
"The macro economy remains challenging, as mortgage interest rates have remained higher while consumer confidence has been challenged by a wide range of uncertainties, both domestic and global," said Stuart Miller, co-CEO of Lennar, on a call with analysts following the company's second-quarter earnings release. "Across the housing landscape, actionable demand has been diminished by both affordability and consumer confidence, and therefore has continued to soften."
Lennar reported lowering prices, but KB Home, which reported its quarterly earnings this week, raised prices.
Nationally, the median price of a new home sold in May was $426,600, according to the Census report, 3% above the year-earlier price.
Slower sales resulted in a significant bump higher in supply. There were 507,000 new homes for sales at the end of May. This represents a 9.8-month supply at the current sales rate, which is 15% higher than May 2024.
The last time supply was that high was briefly in the summer of 2022, after the Federal Reserve first started raising interest rates post-pandemic. Before that, supply hadn't been this high since 2009, amid the subprime mortgage crisis and the great recession.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Newsweek
an hour ago
- Newsweek
Former Treasury Secretary Says Trump Is Trying to 'Scapegoat' Jerome Powell
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Former U.S. Treasury Secretary Larry Summers warned that President Donald Trump may be trying to "scapegoat" Federal Reserve chair Jerome Powell in the event the economy slows down enough to hit a recession. "He's looking to set up a scapegoat if the economy performs badly," Summers said during an appearance on ABC News' This Week. "That's what this attacking chairman Powell is really about. It's not really about trying to change policy." Newsweek reached out to the White House by email outside of normal business hours on Sunday morning for comment. Why It Matters Trump has made tariffs the centerpiece of his economic and foreign policy plans, using trade negotiations to try and end conflicts and completely reshape the international trade landscape to more heavily favor the United States. However, many economists and business leaders have warned that Trump's plan will cause a recession as the tariffs raise prices for Americans, which could deter buying and prompt more Americans to hold onto their money. Trump has therefore urged Powell to cut the interest rate in order to spur the economy and get people to spend more money, but Powell has resisted—much to Trump's frustration. What To Know The stock market took a hit on Friday after Trump signed a series of executive orders to impose tariffs on over 90 countries, ranging from 10 to 41 percent. The July Jobs report showed that growth had slowed, showing just 73,000 new jobs—well under the projected 100,000 that the Dow Jones had estimated. Additionally, the jobs reports for May and June were hit with significant revisions that showed very weak growth across those months. Trump fired Dr. Erika McEntarfer, the Commissioner of the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS), and accused her of manipulating the reports for "political purposes." Summers, who served in former presidents Bill Clinton's and Barack Obama's administrations, suggested on Sunday that Trump is likely also trying to line up Powell as a scapegoat should the economy continue to struggle, even though Trump appointed Powell during his first term in office. "I think that this kind of political Fed bashing is a fool's game," Summers said. "The Fed doesn't listen, so short-term interest rates aren't going to be different because of it." He continued: "The market does listen, and so longer-term rates are going to go higher, which is going to make it more expensive to buy a house. This is hurting the economy, not helping. I think the president understands that and what the president is doing is recognizing that, for all kinds of reasons, of which his policies are very important ones, the economy is at a lot of risk." Summers also expressed surprise that more people hadn't responded within the administration to McEntarfer's firing, saying that the decision to remove her "is way beyond anything that Richard Nixon ever did." When Nixon dismissed special prosecutor Archibald Cox during the Watergate Scandal, it prompted several officials to resign rather than fire Cox, causing what was known as the "Saturday Night Massacre." Trump faced a similar issue in February, which has been likened to Nixon as the "Thursday Night Massacre," when Department of Justice (DOJ) officials resigned rather than execute an order to dismiss federal corruption charges against New York City Mayor Eric Adams. No one has yet resigned in response to McEntarfer's firing, but Summers indicated that he sees the firing as a scapegoating as well, saying: "These numbers are put together by teams of literally hundreds of people following detailed procedures that are in manuals." "There's no conceivable way that the head of the BLS could have manipulated this number," he added. "The numbers are in line with what we're seeing from all kinds of private sector sources." Summers remains cautious about suggesting the economy is headed for a recession. Instead, he said the economy is at "stall speed," which "could tip into recession," but that "wouldn't be my prediction right now." Former U.S. Treasury Secretary Larry Summers speaks during the World Economic Summit in Washington, D.C., on April 17, 2024. Former U.S. Treasury Secretary Larry Summers speaks during the World Economic Summit in Washington, D.C., on April 17, 2024. Mandel Ngan/AFP via Getty Images What People Are Saying President Donald Trump in a post on Truth Social on Saturday wrote: "'Too Late' Powell should resign, just like Adriana Kugler, a Biden Appointee, resigned. She knew he was doing the wrong thing on Interest Rates. He should resign, also!" In a post from Friday, Trump wrote: "Jerome 'Too Late' Powell, a stubborn MORON, must substantially lower interest rates, NOW. IF HE CONTINUES TO REFUSE, THE BOARD SHOULD ASSUME CONTROL, AND DO WHAT EVERYONE KNOWS HAS TO BE DONE!" Ernie Tedeschi, the former head of Yale University's Budget Lab, wrote on X on Friday about McEntarfer's firing: "I've worked closely with Erika. I know of no economist who is more data-focused & devoted to truth in statistics. She never shied from speaking truth to power when the data were disappointing. Nothing would be worse for US credibility than political meddling in our economic data."
CNBC
2 hours ago
- CNBC
'The revisions are hard evidence': White House struggles to justify firing of BLS chief over weak jobs numbers
National Economic Council Director Kevin Hassett on Sunday defended President Donald Trump's sudden decision to fire the Bureau of Labor Statistics commissioner, without citing specific evidence. Hassett repeatedly pointed to the revisions in Friday's employment data to justify Trump's firing of BLS Commissioner Erika McEntarfer, but did not provide data showing the latest jobs report was "rigged," as Trump claimed. "I mean, the revisions are hard evidence," he said on NBC News, adding that there "have been a bunch of patterns that could make people wonder." Trump on Friday fired McEntarfer, accusing her of manipulating the jobs numbers for political purposes after the latest report included downward revisions to job growth data for two previous months. Hassett argued that the revisions are a "historically important outlier," saying they raise broader doubts about the data. He also rejected claims that Trump was shooting the messenger for the weaker-than-expected jobs numbers. Instead, he said, the president "wants his own people there," suggesting that the data would be "more transparent and more reliable" with a Trump appointee. "And if there are big changes and big revisions, we expect more big revisions for the jobs data in September, for example, then we want to know why, we want people to explain it to us," he continued. Hassett did not say whether the White House had asked McEntarfer to explain the reason for the revisions in the data before she was fired. McEntarfer's ouster drew sharp backlash from economists and others, fearing that such a move could undermine trust in the government's data in the future. Former BLS Commissioner William Beach, whom Trump appointed, said the commissioner's firing was "totally groundless," which "sets a dangerous precedent and undermines the statistical mission of the Bureau." McEntarfer's firing came after the BLS reported weaker-than-expected jobs figures. Nonfarm payrolls rose 73,000 in July, above the prior month's 14,000 jobs but below even the meager Dow Jones estimate for a gain of 100,000. June and May totals were revised sharply lower, down by a combined 258,000 from previously announced levels. Trump has often praised strong jobs reports during periods of growth.
Yahoo
8 hours ago
- Yahoo
Wall Street's Biggest Showdown -- Donald Trump vs. Jerome Powell -- Has Likely Already Been Decided but Not for the Reason You Might Think
Key Points The S&P 500, Nasdaq Composite, and Dow Jones Industrial Average have endured heightened volatility in 2025, with President Trump's tariff policy whipsawing Wall Street. Trump continues to pressure Fed Chair Jerome Powell to lower interest rates, with some media outlets suggesting the president could "fire" him. However, data from the June inflation report suggests the battle between Trump and Powell has already been decided. 10 stocks we like better than S&P 500 Index › Though volatility is a given when putting your money to work on Wall Street, it's been an exceptionally wild ride for investors through the first seven months of 2025. During the first week of April, uncertainty crescendoed following President Donald Trump's tariff and trade policy announcements. This led the benchmark S&P 500 (SNPINDEX: ^GSPC) to its fifth-steepest two-day percentage decline since 1950 and pushed the iconic Dow Jones Industrial Average (DJINDICES: ^DJI) and growth stock-powered Nasdaq Composite (NASDAQINDEX: ^IXIC) into correction territory and a bear market, respectively. However, all three indexes have enjoyed an equally robust three-plus-month rebound in the wake of President Trump pausing higher "reciprocal tariffs" on select countries. For only the sixth time in its storied history, the S&P 500 gained at least 25% in a three-month period. But just because the S&P 500 and Nasdaq Composite have hit new highs doesn't mean Wall Street's biggest showdown -- Donald Trump vs. Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell -- is taking a back seat. While Trump is insistent that the central bank needs to lower interest rates, this ongoing battle between two key figures has, in all likelihood, already been decided -- and it may not be for the reason you're thinking. Can Fed Chair Jerome Powell be fired? Interest rates are at the heart of this Wall Street clash. When U.S. money supply skyrocketed at its fastest pace in history on a year-over-year basis during the COVID-19 pandemic, it sparked the highest prevailing rate of inflation in four decades. In response to rapidly rising prices, the Fed kicked off its most aggressive rate-hiking cycle in decades, with the fed funds rate (the overnight lending rate between U.S. banks) moving up 525 basis points between March 2022 and July 2023. Adjusting the fed funds rate influences everything from lending rates to yields on savings accounts. During tightening cycles, which is where the central bank increases the fed funds rate, the Fed is usually attempting to cool down the prevailing rate of inflation. In comparison, it tends to lower the fed funds rate during shock events and/or economic downturns to encourage borrowing, which can lead to corporate hiring, acquisitions, and innovation -- i.e., catalysts that can drive corporate growth and consumption. Thus far, Fed Chair Jerome Powell has balked at Trump's stern requests to lower the fed funds rate, with some media outlets suggesting the president may "fire" the central bank chief. But can Powell actually be fired? Truth be told, no one knows with 100% certainty, because there's no historical precedent to such an act, nor any legal clarity. Although the Federal Reserve Act of 1913 allows members of its Board of Governors to be "removed for cause by the president," there's no definition of what justifies cause. The assumption would be that Trump's administration would have to prove Powell neglected his duties as Fed Chair or was somehow negligent and caused irreparable harm to the U.S. economy. It's a tall order for which no precedent exists. Furthermore, a ruling from the Supreme Court in May intimates that America's highest court views members of the Board of Governors as having unique protections. Specifically, the Supreme Court ruling noted, "The Federal Reserve is a uniquely structured, quasi-private entity that follows in the distinct historical traditional of the First and Second Banks of the United States." Without justifiable cause, it would appear Donald Trump has little chance of removing Powell from office prior to the end of his four-year term as Fed Chair in May 2026. But what if I told you this Wall Street showdown has likely been decided -- and it has absolutely nothing to do with the legality of whether or not Fed Chair Powell can be fired? President Trump's tariff policy has made this battle a moot point While all eyes are on interest rates, the foundation of this rivalry between Donald Trump and Jerome Powell boils down to inflation. The key inflationary measure here is the Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers (CPI-U), which takes into account more than 200 specific spending categories, each of which has its own unique percentage weighting. These percentage weightings allow the CPI-U to be expressed as a single figure each month, which makes it incredibly easy to decipher if prices are, collectively, rising (inflation) or falling (deflation) on a month-to-month or year-over-year basis. While there's some level of subjectivity introduced by the Fed when making its interest rate decisions, there's more of an impetus to reduce the fed funds rate when the prevailing rate of inflation is declining. Traditionally, the Fed has targeted an arbitrary long-term inflation rate of 2%. Although the prevailing inflation rate has come way down from a peak of 9.1% on a trailing-12-month basis in 2022, it's still above the central bank's long-term target of 2%. More importantly, inflation appears to be reaccelerating due to the implementation of Donald Trump's tariff and trade policy. On April 2, Trump unveiled a 10% base global tariff, as well as introduced aforementioned reciprocal tariffs on dozens of countries that have historically run adverse trade imbalances with America. With the president pausing and/or adjusting these reciprocal tariff rates on numerous occasions since his initial announcement, there's been a bit of lag in determining whether or not these tariffs are having an inflationary impact. Following the release of the June inflation report from the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, it's pretty evident that Trump's tariff and trade policy is providing upward pressure on prices. Between May 2025 and June 2025, the trailing-12-month CPI-U inflation rate jumped by 32 basis points to 2.67%. Core inflation, which excludes volatile food and energy costs, climbed to 2.9%. This represents the fastest uptick in core inflation since February 2025. In other words, Trump's tariff and trade policy looks to be ending this Wall Street face-off before it has a chance to ramp up. The June inflation data strongly suggests there's no immediate catalyst to lower the fed funds rate. The uncertainty created by Trump's tariffs, including the lack of differentiation between input and output tariffs, which threatens to further drive up the prevailing rate of inflation, implies that pricing pressures will persist for the foreseeable future. The narrative investors should be monitoring isn't whether or not the Fed's monetary policy is hindering corporate growth. Rather, it's whether Trump's tariffs will adversely impact corporate hiring, labor productivity, sales, and profits as they did when the president implemented tariffs on China in 2018 to 2019. Last week, the S&P 500 hit its third-priciest valuation during a continuous bull market when back-tested 154 years (based on the Shiller price-to-earnings ratio), which means there's virtually no margin for error on Wall Street. With more businesses alluding to tariff-related uncertainty in their sale and profit forecasts, it's crystal clear that attention needs to be paid to the inflationary impact(s) of Trump's tariff policy on Wall Street's most influential companies. Should you invest $1,000 in S&P 500 Index right now? Before you buy stock in S&P 500 Index, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the for investors to buy now… and S&P 500 Index wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $624,823!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $1,064,820!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 1,019% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 178% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join Stock Advisor. See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of July 29, 2025 Sean Williams has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. Wall Street's Biggest Showdown -- Donald Trump vs. Jerome Powell -- Has Likely Already Been Decided but Not for the Reason You Might Think was originally published by The Motley Fool Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
