Taiwan votes to decide whether to oust lawmakers from pro-China party in closely watched poll
The independence-leaning ruling Democratic Progressive Party won last year's presidential election, but the China-friendly Nationalists, also known as the KMT, and the smaller Taiwan People's Party have enough seats to form a majority bloc.
Those who support removing the 24 lawmakers are angry that the KMT and its allies have blocked key legislation, especially the defense budget, and passed controversial changes that are seen as diminishing the power of the executive and favoring China, which considers the island its own territory.
The opposition parties' actions sparked concerns among some Taiwanese about the island's democratic integrity and its ability to deter Chinese military threats, leading to the recall campaigns.
The scale of the recall elections is unprecedented, with another seven KMT lawmakers facing similar votes on Aug. 23. But the KMT alleged the ruling party was resorting to political retaliation after it lost the legislative majority, saying the recalls were undermining and challenging Taiwan's democratic system.
The KMT holds 52 seats, while the ruling DPP holds 51 seats.
For the DPP to secure a legislative majority, at least six KMT lawmakers would need to be ousted, and the ruling party would need to win all by-elections, which would need to be held within three months following the announcement of results.
For the recall to pass, more than a quarter of eligible voters in the electoral district must vote in favor of the recall, and the total number of supporters must exceed those against.
If KMT loses its seats in the recall elections, the party can file new candidates for the by-elections and may be able to win back the seats.
Outside a Taipei polling station, voters old and young were waiting in line to cast their ballots. The poll will close at 4 pm local time, with results expected on Saturday night.
The elections have intensified tensions between those backing the status quo and those favoring improved ties with Beijing. Critics accuse China-friendly politicians of compromising Taiwan and take issue with their meetings with mainland Chinese politicians. But these Taiwanese politicians claim their connections are vital for dialogue given Beijing's refusal to interact with the DPP.
When asked about the recall election, China's Taiwan Affairs Office spokesperson Zhu Fenglian said in June that since the administration of Taiwan President Lai Ching-te came into power, it has sought to achieve 'one-party dominance' and practiced 'dictatorship' under the guise of 'democracy," state broadcaster CCTV reported.
She was quoted as saying that Lai's government has spared no effort in suppressing opposition parties and those who supported the development of cross-strait relations.
Taiwan's mainland affairs council said on Wednesday that the Chinese authorities and state media had tried to blatantly interfere with the vote.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
India Today
28 minutes ago
- India Today
Trump weighs US stake in Intel to boost Ohio chip plant: Report
The Trump administration is in talks with Intel over a potential US government stake in the chipmaker, Bloomberg News reported, citing people familiar with the move could help shore up Intel's long-delayed factory complex in Ohio, which the company once promised would become the world's largest chipmaking site. Bloomberg said the size of the possible stake remains unclear. The White House and Intel did not issue any comment on the The idea emerged after President Donald Trump met Intel CEO Lip-Bu Tan earlier this week. "I met with Mr. Lip-Bu Tan, of Intel, along with Secretary of Commerce, Howard Lutnick, and Secretary of the Treasury, Scott Bessent," Trump wrote on Truth Social on Monday. "The meeting was a very interesting one. His success and rise is an amazing story."TRUMP CRITICISES INTEL CEO OVER CHINESE INVESTMENTSTrump has publicly targeted Tan in the past, even calling for his resignation over previous investments in Chinese tech firms, some tied to the Chinese military. Tan, who became CEO in March after joining Intel's board in 2022, now faces the challenge of reviving the company's fortunes in the booming AI chip sector dominated by said in a statement it is "deeply committed to advancing US national and economic security interests and is making significant investments aligned with the President's America First agenda."Tan, a veteran of the global semiconductor industry, founded Walden International in 1987, backing firms including Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company and China's state-owned SMIC. Chinese state media once described him as "actively" engaged in advancing the country's chipmaking capabilities.- EndsWith inputs from agencies Tune InMust Watch
Time of India
2 hours ago
- Time of India
Talks on to resume border trade with China: Govt
NEW DELHI: India on Thursday said it remained engaged with China to facilitate the resumption of border trade through designated transit points. The border trade between the two countries was stopped in view of the eastern Ladakh military standoff in 2020. "We have remained engaged with the Chinese side to facilitate the resumption of border trade through all the designated trade points, namely Lipulekh Pass in Uttarakhand, Shipki La Pass in Himachal Pradesh, and Nathu La Pass in Sikkim," external affairs ministry spokesperson Randhir Jaiswal said. It is learned that India and China are at an "advanced stage" of negotiations to resume direct flight services between the two countries soon. In the last few months, India and China have initiated a number of measures to repair the bilateral ties that had severely nosedived following the deadly clashes between the two militaries in June 2020. Last month, India announced resumption of issuance of tourist visas to Chinese nationals. The military standoff in eastern Ladakh began in May 2020 and the clashes at the Galwan Valley in June that year resulted in a severe strain in ties between India and China.
NDTV
2 hours ago
- NDTV
Exclusive - "India Shouldn't Allow Itself To Be Used By US Against China": Top Economist On Tariffs
New Delhi: India should not allow itself to be used by the US in the West's misguided trade war with China, a top American economist told NDTV. Professor Jeffrey D Sachs, who teaches at Columbia University, also pointed at huge flaws in how US President Donald Trump worked on issues like tariffs. "Well, in general, a one-person rule in the United States determining which countries pay which tariffs is absolutely beyond the law in the US. If you look at our Constitution, Article 1, Section 8, it says tariffs are the responsibility of the US Congress. But Trump declares emergency after emergency that are, from a legal point of view, outrageous and invalid. We should not have a one-person rule in the US," said Mr Sachs, who has advised governments in Latin America, Eastern Europe, the former Soviet Union, Asia, and Africa. He agreed the 50 per cent tariff imposed by Mr Trump on India may affect bilateral ties which have been assiduously built up over the last several decades. "Of course it has a negative consequence, but it merely bears out what I have been saying to dear Indian friends for years, which is that the United States uses other countries. It does not act responsibly towards other countries, so be careful. India should not allow itself to be used by the US, for example, as somehow in the US' misguided trade war with China," said Mr Sachs. "India, I think according to at least some people, was going to become the replacement for China. The US would fight China, and it would welcome India to replace the Chinese supply chains. I said that I regarded that as unrealistic, that the US would not allow a major expansion of exports from India anymore than it would allow them from China today. "I think that these events should give warning or pause to Indian officials. Yes, I'm not saying to arbitrarily break relations with the US, but also don't rely on them. India needs to rely on a diversified base of partners - Russia, China, ASEAN, Africa, and elsewhere, and not see itself as mainly focusing on the US market, which is going to be unstable, slow-growing, and basically protectionist," said the economist most famous for his work on reforms and with international agencies to promote poverty reduction, disease control, and debt reduction of poor countries. According to him, a strong India-China trade and investment in technology relations would be very beneficial for both the neighbours. "So if you look at green energy or at digital or at AI or at advanced chips, China is a good partner for India. Of course, I would be told immediately, yes, but India-China relations are strained for other reasons. But my own view is, solve those, because the benefits of the two giants really having good economic and trade and investment and finance relations would be wonderful for the two, and I think very good for the world," Mr Sachs told NDTV. Prime Minister Narendra Modi will be going to China soon to attend the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation (SCO) summit, which marks a kind of thaw in ties since the Galwan face-off. Mr Trump is also meeting his Russian counterpart Vladimir Putin today. On whether Mr Trump's move to push 50 per cent tariffs on India might end up bringing India and China closer, Mr Sachs there is a real possibility. "Absolutely. I think Trump is the great unifier of the rest of the world, that is. I think Trump is the greatest friend of the BRICS. By attacking Brazil, Russia, India and China simultaneously, he has brought all of the leaders together. There have been a flurry of calls between Lula, Putin, Prime Minister Modi, President Xi in recent days because of Trump. So he's played a very constructive role. Not the one he thought he was playing, but a very constructive role in my view," the professor said. On the sensitive issue of India buying Russian oil, Mr Sachs said the whole point is that one person should not decide who trades with whom. "The unilateral US measures are illegal under international law. That may sound a little quaint these days, but we actually have rules. We have international law... I don't think what Trump's doing is legal from the point of view of American law, nor do I think it's legal from the point of view of international law. Nor should the US tell India with whom to trade, nor is the whole premise correct that the US has the right to punish Russia and its partners because of the war in Ukraine. That's another issue, but the war in Ukraine in my view was caused by the United States, not caused by Russia. "This is a war over NATO enlargement. This is very important to understand. This war goes back to 30 years of US provocation because America is very arrogant, not only Trump, the whole political class. "And for 30 years they've said we can go where we want, when we want, how we want in security terms, including putting military bases on Russia's borders. That's why there's a war in Ukraine. And then to sanction India because of US provocations, well, the whole thing's absurd. "So I think we went down a very bad road. The US is flailing around because Russia's winning on the battlefield, and Russia said no to the US, you don't dictate to us our security terms," Mr Sachs said.
