Operation Sindoor was a win for PM Modi. His colleagues in BJP are undoing it
Kharge and his party colleagues had better listen to the CDS again: 'The good part is that we were able to understand the tactical mistake we made, remedy it, rectify it, and then implement it again after two days and flew all our jets, again targeting at long range.'
The CDS' admission was not a slip of tongue. He must have anticipated this question. He chose to be transparent, unlike the Pakistanis who 'celebrated' their loss to salve their wounded pride.
Congress president Mallikarjun Kharge was ostensibly outraged to learn that some Indian fighter aircraft might have been downed by Pakistanis on the first night of Operation Sindoor. He was reacting to Chief of Defence Staff General Anil Chouhan's recent admission about India's aircraft losses during the conflict. Kharge accused the Narendra Modi government of misleading the nation and demanded a special session of Parliament as 140 crore 'patriotic Indians' deserved answers to 'some very important questions'.
Yes, there was a 'tactical mistake' and there were some losses. That is, however, par for the course in military conflicts. What matters is how quickly our Air Force rectified it striking back in just 48 hours as the CDS said. It rained fury on Pakistani airbases, rendering them dysfunctional and forcing the country's military to seek a ceasefire.
So, what's Mallikarjun Kharge outraged about? About the government not breaking the news and thereby misleading the country? Well, the government couldn't have shared operational details in the middle of a conflict. Some of our aircraft might have gone down but nothing happened to our fighter pilots. For a $4 trillion economy, the loss of military hardware worth a few million dollars is hardly worth the bother. Talk to people on the streets. The Indian Air Force pulverising Pakistan into submission is the only thing that matters to them.
If that's the 'important question' the Congress intends to raise, it's unlikely to bother the Modi government much. Going by Opposition leaders' statements so far, the second question they'd likely ask during the special session is how Donald Trump 'mediated' or 'forced' the ceasefire. Their idea is to try and puncture PM Modi's projected global stature. They would like people to believe that Modi's effervescence in hugging global leaders is a mere optic for domestic audiences, and leaders like Trump really don't care.
Former finance minister P Chidambaram almost outlined the Congress' attack in his column in The Indian Express on Sunday: 'Despite the dosti, America deported Indian 'illegal' immigrants in handcuffs and leg chains. Not a word of protest from the prime minister…steep tariffs were imposed on imports from India; not a word. The US voted in favour of IMF's loan to Pakistan; not a word. Foreign students, including Indians, were barred from Harvard University; not a word. Indian students face the threat of revocation of their visas; not a word. Student visa interviews have been suspended; not a word. The dosti lies in a shambles.'
Basically, Congress leaders would have the people believe that Vishwaguru is a hollow rhetoric. Well, some of these barbs may sting PM Modi a little. But people in India also have a fair idea about Trump by now. In his book Rage, Bob Woodward, quoting Trump's son-in-law Jared Kushner, writes that one of the best ways to understand Trump is to study the Cheshire cat in Alice in Wonderland: 'If you don't know where you're going, any path will get you there.'
Also read: Op Sindoor setting the tone for Bihar polls—yet enemies & frenemies have Nitish Kumar on edge
Military wins matter
Modi is not the only leader in the world who has been stumped by Trump. So, even though the Congress has a bit of fun at PM Modi's expense by reminding him of his 'friendship' with the American president, that's not something Modi would lose sleep over. A trade deal here and a good night of sleep there, Trump may soon be hugging Modi again. The Opposition would likely rake up the issue of 'international isolation'—citing the International Monetary Fund's bailout package for Pakistan and no global condemnation of the country for the Pahalgam terror attack. But these are issues that are usually debated in urban elite circles. The BJP knows that for common Indians, the visuals of Indian missiles hitting terror infrastructure and military installations in Pakistan are good enough to make Modi's popularity rating soar again. For them, he has vanquished Pakistan yet again. And that's all that matters.
So, it's not the Opposition that Modi would be bothered about as he goes on roadshows and addresses rallies in different corners of India to tell people how bold and decisive their PM is. He wouldn't let himself or his government be subjected to any questioning about Operation Sindoor in any special session of Parliament. But he would enjoy seeing the principal Opposition party deal with Shashi Tharoor and Salman Khurshid after their return from abroad. How will the Congress deal with them for endorsing the government line on Operation Sindoor and Article 370 respectively?
Also read: Congress says Modi govt 'misled' nation on Op Sindoor losses, demands Kargil-like review
Modi's worries
What must, however, worry the Prime Minister more is his own party, the Bharatiya Janata Party. His colleagues have just spoiled the victory celebrations. First, Madhya Pradesh minister Vijay Shah made an odious remark against Colonel Sofiya Qureshi, calling her Pahalgam terrorists' sister. Madhya Pradesh deputy chief minister Jagdish Devda then hurled another insult at the armed forces, saying that the country's army is bowing at the PM's feet—unke charnon mein natmastak hai.
BJP's Rajya Sabha member from Haryana, Ram Chander Jangra, said that the tourists died in Pahalgam 'with folded hands' because they had not taken training under the PM's Agnipath scheme. He even took a swipe at their grieving wives, saying that they 'did not show bravery'.
BJP MLA from Udhampur East, RS Pathania, called the Air Force personnel at the Udhampur airbase 'nalayak (incompetent)' and said that they were 'sleeping' during Operation Sindoor.
What was more pathetic was that the national BJP and its top leaders didn't think it necessary to take action against any of these leaders – or even condemn their insulting remarks against the armed forces and victims of the Pahalgam attack. How could the world's largest party, led by as powerful a leader as Narendra Modi, not punish these motormouths? These leaders are obviously political assets that the BJP doesn't want to offend or lose. Or maybe BJP doesn't bother because it is convinced that people will vote for Narendra Modi anyway.
The problem is that, when people hear Modi talk about how India vanquished Pakistan and avenged Pulwama, the voices of Shah, Devda, Jangra and Pathania play alongside in their heads. And because the BJP has refused to take any action against these leaders, similar voices will emerge.
PM Modi has got his mojo back after Operation Sindoor. We know it when Modi starts talking about Modi. He has every reason to feel proud about his bold and decisive leadership. The only regret he must have, perhaps, is why he allowed his party colleagues to malign and denigrate our armed forces with impunity. Was politics worth it? This question will haunt him forever.
DK Singh is Political Editor at ThePrint. He tweets @dksingh73. Views are personal.
(Edited by Zoya Bhatti)
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indian Express
21 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Back in public eye: Madhya Pradesh minister who put party in a spot with remarks on Col Sofiya Qureshi
After his remarks on Operation Sindoor caused an uproar, Madhya Pradesh Tribal Welfare Minister Vijay Shah made his first public appearance in 17 days when he visited the family of a rape-murder victim in Khandwa. Shah was booked by the Madhya Pradesh Police last month after saying in a public meeting in Mhow on May 11 that India taught a lesson to those responsible for the Pahalgam terror attack using 'their own sister'. While he did not name anyone, it has been alleged that he was alluding to Colonel Sofiya Qureshi, who had briefed the media when Operation Sindoor was underway. The minister is now under investigation by a Supreme Court-ordered special investigation team (SIT), and had not been seen in public until May 28, when he visited the grieving family of a woman who was gangraped and murdered in Khandwa district's Khalwa region. Both the Madhya Pradesh High Court and the Supreme Court have reprimanded the minister for his statement, and Shah has apologised for the comments three times. The ruling BJP went into damage control mode, and the central leadership of the party is yet to take a call on Shah's future. While his visit to Khandwa on May 28 marks his first public outing since the backlash, he did not speak to the media. Local BJP sources said Shah spent over two hours with the victim's family and promised both financial support and systemic interventions. He reportedly handed over a Rs 60,000 cheque, committed to building a tin roof for the family's house, and promised further financial assistance, sources said. 'He also said that a young girl in the family who had dropped out of school would be re-enrolled. Monthly monitoring meetings are to be initiated in the area to track school dropouts,' a BJP leader said. The Opposition Congress had launched a sarcastic 'missing minister' campaign, plastering posters across Indore and Bhopal with his photograph and a mock reward of Rs 11,000 for anyone who could find him. During this period, Shah skipped the special Cabinet meeting in the historic Rajwada palace to commemorate regional icon, Ahilyabai Holkar, on May 20 and another special Cabinet meeting hosted in the scenic town of Pachmarhi on Tuesday, to honour tribal icon and freedom fighter, Raja Bhabhoot Singh. Shah had also skipped the 300th birth anniversary events of Ahilyabai Holkar, for which Prime Minister Narendra Modi had arrived in Bhopal on May 31. The Supreme Court has extended the operation of its interim order protecting Shah from arrest. It also closed the suo motu proceedings pending before the Madhya Pradesh High Court as it is already seized of the matter. The SIT had submitted its report to the Supreme Court, which contained investigation details like forensic evidence, and sought more time for the probe.
Hindustan Times
21 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
HC orders release of 18-year-old daughter of Bangladeshi national from detention
MUMBAI: The Bombay high court on Tuesday ordered the Mankhurd police to release the 18-year-old daughter of a Bangladeshi national who was detained by the Nirbhaya Cell of the police station for inquiry regarding his citizenship and was later deported to the neighbouring country. A vacation bench of justices Neela Gokhale and Firdosh P Pooniwalla ordered the police to release the teenager immediately, saying her detention was not necessary for the purpose of the inquiry. The court was hearing a petition filed by the 18-year-old girl and her two younger siblings aged 16 and 8 years, who contended that they were born in India and had all requisite documents to prove their Indian citizenship. According to their petition, their father, Dadamiya Khan, had been residing in India for over 37 years. He had married an Indian woman named Mariyam Khan and was working as a cab driver. While all three children were detained by Mankhurd police following a special drive to identify foreign nationals staying illegally in India, the two younger siblings were handed over to their mother after they filed the Habeas Corpus petition. The children's counsel, advocate Siddha Pamecha, submitted their birth certificates showing they had been born in India and said they could not have been detained by the police over their father's allegedly circumspect citizenship. Even Dadamiya Khan was an Indian citizen and had all identity documents like PAN card, ration card and voters' identity card issued by the Election Commission of India, the lawyer said. Advocate Manisha Jagtap, representing the central government, pointed out that in the inquiry conducted by police, Khan had conceded that he was Bangladeshi national and he had illegally entered India as there were no sources of livelihood in his country. While he had been deported, an inquiry was underway regarding his citizenship under relevant provisions of the Foreigners Act, 1946 as well as the central government's order dated May 2, 2025, the lawyer said, explaining the grounds for which his 18-year-old daughter was detained. The judges, however, felt that it was not necessary for the police to keep the 18-year-old in custody and ordered her immediate release. The court restrained the girl and her two siblings from leaving the court's jurisdiction without prior permission and directed them to be available as and when called by the investigating officer.
Mint
26 minutes ago
- Mint
MAGA policies would make America mediocre
'MAGA" was always an insult to the United States. Make America great again? Wasn't this country great when Donald Trump rode down that escalator in 2015? Now, as Trump 2.0 unfolds, the president seems intent on turning this insult into a reality by damaging or destroying much of what has made America great over 2½ centuries—including the rule of law. The survival of our republic is at stake. But since I'm an economist, I'll stick to how MAGA policies are undermining America's economic greatness. Topping the list of what made our economy great is relatively free-market capitalism, supported by the rule of law. The U.S. has no monopoly on capitalism, but our version has traditionally been freer from regulation and taxed more lightly than, say, Europe's. Our sturdy rule of law has been a huge strength, attracting capital and brain power. The word 'relatively" does a lot of work, however. Every economy needs some regulation for health, safety, and other reasons. Every country needs to levy taxes to pay its bills. Democrats and Republicans have argued for decades over how much (and how) to regulate and tax, and those battles will continue long after MAGA is a bad memory. But when the White House begins telling companies like Walmart when it may raise prices, or Apple where it should make phones, that's not normal capitalism. America's economic greatness has also relied, among other things, on what might be called the federal-industrial-university complex in science and engineering. This engine of growth has been central to American economic exceptionalism. No other nation comes close. Yet each piece is now being undermined by MAGA. The U.S. government has been promoting scientific advances at least since Vannevar Bush, the engineer whose scientific leadership helped win World War II. He convinced President Harry S. Truman and Congress that such advances were crucial to national security and economic growth. Some of the research is done directly by the government in national laboratories such as Brookhaven and Los Alamos. Some is done at the National Institutes of Health. Some is done cooperatively between government and private companies, such as the life-saving mRNA vaccines for Covid-19. And a great deal is done at research universities, typically with federal grants. Importantly, the funding hasn't been politically based. Until now. Elon Musk's chainsaw approach has decimated or eliminated entire scientific units within the federal government. Green technology and anything that smacks of DEI are particular targets. But when you cut with a chainsaw rather than scissors, accidents happen. Remember those nuclear-safety employees? The national labs, the National Science Foundation and even the NIH are all looking at serious budget cuts nowadays. Will these make our nation greater? America's universities, the best in the world, merit special discussion because Mr. Trump has declared war on them, starting with Columbia and Harvard. First a small point: University education is an export industry for the U.S. In the president's distorted view of international trade, we are supposed to export more than we import. Well, the higher education industry does exactly that. Vastly more (paying) foreign students come here than American students go abroad. And it's not because our universities are cheaper. It's because they are better. But the main point is about science, and the extensive cooperation among research universities, government and private industry. America's universities employ many thousands of scientists, including some of the best. Will taking their grants away, sometimes in midproject, make our country greater? Our universities also teach many other subjects, some of which Mr. Trump doesn't like. Classroom discussions in these 'other" subjects may sometimes veer in anti-MAGA directions. That seems to upset the president. But should the federal government try to stop that by, for example, threatening to ruin the universities financially? The First Amendment has a clear answer: No. And so does any effort to keep America great. Universities are unusual 'businesses." While most aren't run for profit, they do need to pay their bills, including for research support. A few, like Harvard, are very wealthy. Most aren't. But even the richest universities are poorly positioned to withstand a major withdrawal of federal funds. Research and much else will suffer. Too few Americans, I fear, see the attack on universities as an attack on scientific and therefore economic progress. Maybe it's hard to generate sympathy for Harvard. But do we really want to make America mediocre again? Mr. Blinder is a professor of economics and public affairs at Princeton. He served as vice chairman of the Federal Reserve, 1994-96.
