logo
We are Indian, employees are Indians, Turkey-linked Celebi Aviation tells court

We are Indian, employees are Indians, Turkey-linked Celebi Aviation tells court

India Today21-05-2025
"We are an Indian company. Our employees are Indian," argued Celebi Aviation Services India Pvt Ltd in the Delhi High Court on Wednesday as the firm challenged the Bureau of Civil Aviation Security's (BCAS) decision to revoke its security clearance earlier this month in the "interest of national security".Senior Advocate Mukul Rohatgi, appearing for Celebi Aviation, told Delhi High Court that the company has been operating in India for 17 years without a single blemish and that the move to revoke security clearance was arbitrary and in violation of the principles of natural justice.advertisement"This is a matter of grave importance. My contracts with airport operators are being cancelled," he submitted.
Justice Sachin Datta-headed High Court bench is hearing Celebi's petition against the May 15 order, which came shortly after Turkey publicly backed Pakistan and criticised India's strikes on terror camps, raising questions about whether the regulatory action was politically motivated. Rohatgi, however, confined his arguments to legal grounds and the procedural lapses in the government's decision.Citing the evolution of aviation security regulations, Rohatgi argued that the legal framework has changed significantly since earlier precedents. "Justice Kurian Joseph's judgment dealt with the Aircraft Rules of 1937, which are no longer applicable. There were new rules in 2011, and the current position is governed by Rule 12," he said.He insisted that Rule 12 mandates a hearing before any drastic decision such as revocation of security clearance is taken.advertisement"Wherever such decisions are made, the principles of natural justice kick in. I wasn't even given notice, even though the rule says I have to be given one. I am not insisting on a copy of the reasons. I'm saying I was handicapped because the material wasn't supplied to me," the senior advocate pointed out.At one point, the bench asked whether the rules allowed courts to direct the authorities to share documents. Rohatgi pointed to Rule 12 again, stating that an accused party must at least have an idea of what they are being accused of. "If I had known about the accusation, some solution could have been found. If the problem is that some of the people are from Turkey, I'll replace those people. What more can I say?" Rohatgi added.The counsel also emphasised that Celebi does not operate shops or duty-free zones, but handles passengers, luggage, and check-ins at airports. "What they've done now is shifted my 10,000 employees to work under other ground handlers. The employees are still there, it's the company that's being thrown out," he said.CENTRE DEFENDS MOVE Meanwhile, the central government defended its move, claiming that the decision was taken in the interest of national security in light of certain inputs that continuing the services of Celebi Aviation and other such companies would be hazardous in the current scenario.advertisement"I am saying that it is a national security issue and the order (revoking clearance) reflects the same. Enemy can make 10 attempts and has to succeed in one. While security agencies have to succeed on all 10 occasions. National security based upon civil aviation security has to be placed on the highest pedestal," Centre's Solicitor General Tushar Mehta argued.CELEBI INDIA BUSINESSFounded in Istanbul, Celebi operates across nine major Indian airports — including Mumbai, Delhi, and Bangalore — handling around 58,000 flights and 5.4 lakh tonnes of cargo annually.At Mumbai's Chhatrapati Shivaji Maharaj International Airport alone, it controls nearly 70 per cent of the ground-handling operations.Its responsibilities include ground handling, cargo transport, and airside services — all tightly regulated due to the high-security nature of airport operations.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

GST rationalisation impact on inflation depends on the effect on CPI components: Bank of Baroda Economist
GST rationalisation impact on inflation depends on the effect on CPI components: Bank of Baroda Economist

United News of India

timean hour ago

  • United News of India

GST rationalisation impact on inflation depends on the effect on CPI components: Bank of Baroda Economist

Chennai, Aug 16 (UNI) The impact of the proposed rationalisation of the Goods and Services Tax (GST) on inflation would depend on the effect on the consumer price index (CPI) components, said a top economist at Bank of Baroda. He also said the impact on investment will be driven by the final effect on consumption. If consumption increases, it can spur more investment in specific products. The Indian government has announced the idea of having two major GST slabs viz., 5% (merit) and 18% (standard). 'The highest slab of 28% would be abolished and all goods and services in this bracket moved to the 18% rate. 99% of goods in the 12% rate will move to 5%. The balance 1% would go to 18%. The existing 40% rate would hold for tobacco and other sin goods. The exempted and special rates of 0.25% and 3% rate goods would remain unchanged,' Madan Sabnavis, Chief Economist said. 'The impact on inflation would depend on how various components of the CPI index are impacted by the new rates. While it has been projected as lowering the tax burden there can be a tendency for inflation to come down. But the extent will depend on the individual tax rates,' Sabnavis said. However, at the micro level, any reduction in GST as it is expected for goods like hair oil, toothbrush, pencils and others may not exactly increase consumption but will release resources of households that can be spent on other products and services. 'Impact on investment will be driven by the final effect on consumption. If consumption increases, it can spur more investment in specific products,' Sabnavis remarked. Having fewer slabs certainly makes the system simpler and leads to better compliance and removal of ambiguity. But it needs to be seen whether or not the final effect is tax neutral. If movement of goods across slabs provides a net gain on the fiscal side, then it would not change much from the consumption point of view, he said. 'On the whole it has been projected to provide support to consumption which is positive for the consumer goods segments. The ultimate impact has to be gauged from the point of view of fiscal impact given that any restructuring has to be a zero-sum game – if the consumer is to gain, there has to be some let off on the budget. This however, can get corrected once the economy grows at a faster rate in the coming years,' Sabnavis said. The GST Council is to meet in Sept-Oct and deliberate on this proposal. The compensation cess is to be phased out and it is possible that goods and services with 40% slab would take in this effect. UNI VJ GNK

"No agreements that would go against the farmers": Shivraj Singh Chouhan on US's demand amid tariff talks
"No agreements that would go against the farmers": Shivraj Singh Chouhan on US's demand amid tariff talks

Time of India

timean hour ago

  • Time of India

"No agreements that would go against the farmers": Shivraj Singh Chouhan on US's demand amid tariff talks

Live Events New Delhi: Union Agriculture Minister Shivraj Singh Chouhan on Friday firmly stated that India will not enter into any agreements that could harm the interests of its farmers, emphasising the paramount importance of safeguarding their rights amidst ongoing trade talks with the US, especially regarding the tariff issues in the country's agricultural and dairy a gathering of farmers in the national capital, the Union Minister noted that there were global voices that had shown concern about India's rapid progress, especially in the context of trade agreements and acknowledged that while India seeks to maintain friendly relations and create fair trade agreements with countries across the world, the spirit of these agreements must be grounded in fairness and equality."In our country, the right of the farmer is paramount, and the right of the citizen is paramount. You know, there are many people in the world who are jealous of our progress. 'What if India makes great progress? Make an agreement with them.' We do make agreements because we see the world as one family. But the spirit of agreement is based on fairness, on equality," he highlighted the agreement made with the UK, where Indian agricultural products would be allowed to enter the UK without tariffs, benefiting Indian farmers . However, he was cautious about any potential trade deals that could jeopardise Indian agriculture."We made an agreement with the UK on equal terms so that the produce of our farmers can go to England without any tax. Many agricultural products will now reach England without tax. But if someone suggests an agreement that allows another country's goods to flood our markets, we cannot compete with them," he Union Minister pointed out the disparity in the scale of farming between India and many foreign countries, stating, "Their farms are massive--10,000, 15,000, or even 20,000 hectares--while our farmers often have just one or two acres, or maybe up to five acres, which is rare. There is no comparison."He also warned that an agreement that allows foreign agricultural products to flood Indian markets could severely harm domestic farmers, driving down prices and depriving them of fair returns."If such an agreement happens, it would kill Indian farmers. Cheap foreign produce will flood the market. If we sell our produce at lower prices, farmers will not get a fair return," he a strong reaffirmation of India's stance, Chouhan echoed the words of Prime Minister Narendra Modi , asserting that no agreement would be signed at the expense of Indian farmers."But PM Modi said there will be no agreements that would go against the farmers. Their rights will be paramount," he Prime Minister Narendra Modi while addressing the nation on the 79th Independence Day, reaffirmed his support to protect farmers, saying that he is "standing tall like a wall against policies which are against farmer interest.""If any policy is against India's farmers, fishermen, cattle rearers, Modi is standing like a wall," PM Modi about standing his ground in the era of 'economic selfishness,' he added, "I say this with great experience. Kisi doosre ki lakeer chhoti karne ke liye, apni oorja hamein nahi khaphai. Hamein poori oorja ke saath hamari lakeer ko lamba karna hai. If we do that, the world will admit our strength."These remarks come during a time when India is actively involved in the discussions on the Bilateral Trade Agreement with the US, which the two sides could not conclude due to the American demand to get comprehensive access to the Indian agriculture and dairy US is pressuring India to open its agricultural market and subsequently imposing a 25 per cent additional tariff, with Washington calling it a 'penalty' for buying Russian oil. (ANI)

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store