Union minister Bandi Sanjay slams Congress & BRS; calls Kaleshwaram project ‘KCR's ATM'; alleges Rs 1.2 lakh crore scam
HYDERABAD: Union minister of state for home affairs Bandi Sanjay on Sunday accused the
Congress
and the BRS of spreading false propaganda against the BJP over the Kaleshwaram project.
Addressing the media in Karimnagar, Bandi Sanjay Kumar alleged that the Congress govt is trying to shield former chief minister K Chandrasekhar Rao's family.
"Congress and BRS are two sides of the same coin. Despite having evidence, KCR has not been arrested for corruption. The BJP's stand on Kaleshwaram is very clear and aligns with Prime Minister Narendra Modi's position. The BJP is not a party that changes its stance like a chameleon," Bandi Sanjay said.
He alleged that the Kaleshwaram project turned into an 'ATM' for KCR's family. Sanjay described the Kaleshwaram project as entirely corrupt, claiming that while it was initially estimated at Rs 38,000 crore, the cost was inflated to Rs 1.2 lakh crore - an amount he alleged was embezzled by KCR.
He urged the public to consider the extent of alleged corruption, stating that some officials involved in the project amassed hundreds of crores. He added that people are aware of the political collusion between the Congress and BRS.
Bandi Sanjay recalled Congress senior leader Rahul Gandhi's demand for a CBI investigation into the Kaleshwaram project and questioned why the govt has not disclosed any evidence so far, despite the BRS claiming the project was approved based on the recommendations of the cabinet and sub-committee.
He further claimed that phone tapping occurred while he was
Telangana BJP
state president and said that even now, as a Union minister, his position remains consistent and aligned with the BJP's stand.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hans India
21 minutes ago
- Hans India
Congress Condemns Trump's Iran Airstrikes, Criticizes Modi Government's Silence
The Indian National Congress has strongly criticized US President Donald Trump's decision to launch airstrikes against Iran's nuclear installations, describing the military action as contradictory to his previous diplomatic overtures toward Tehran. The opposition party has simultaneously condemned the Modi government for its perceived inaction regarding American bombardments and Israeli military operations in the region. Congress General Secretary for Communications Jairam Ramesh expressed his party's disapproval through social media, emphasizing the urgent need for diplomatic engagement with Iran rather than military confrontation. He characterized Trump's use of American air power against Iranian nuclear sites as undermining the President's own public statements advocating for continued negotiations with the Islamic Republic. The senior Congress leader reinforced his party's position calling for immediate diplomatic intervention and meaningful dialogue with Iran to address escalating regional tensions. He argued that military strikes represent a fundamental departure from peaceful conflict resolution mechanisms that should guide international relations in the volatile Middle East landscape. As persources, Ramesh directed sharp criticism toward the Indian government's response to the unfolding crisis, describing the administration's silence as deeply troubling. He accused the Modi government of failing to condemn or even criticize American bombing campaigns and Israeli military aggression, suggesting that India's foreign policy stance lacks moral clarity during this critical period. The Congress spokesperson extended his critique to encompass the broader humanitarian crisis affecting the region, particularly highlighting what he termed India's "deafening silence" regarding the situation in Gaza. He characterized the ongoing conflict as constituting genocide against Palestinian populations, arguing that the Indian government has failed to take a principled stand on this humanitarian catastrophe. These statements emerged following American military strikes targeting three significant Iranian nuclear facilities located at Fordow, Natanz, and Isfahan. The attacks effectively drew the United States directly into the escalating confrontation between Israel and Iran, raising concerns about broader regional destabilization and potential for expanded conflict. Despite the opposition's criticism, Prime Minister Narendra Modi engaged in diplomatic outreach by conducting a telephone conversation with Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian on Sunday. During this discussion, the Prime Minister expressed India's profound concern regarding mounting tensions between Iran and Israel, while advocating for immediate de-escalation of hostilities through peaceful means. Modi emphasized the importance of resolving the crisis through diplomatic channels and constructive dialogue rather than military escalation. In his subsequent social media communication, the Prime Minister detailed their comprehensive discussion of current regional developments and reiterated India's commitment to promoting peace, security, and stability throughout the Middle East. The Prime Minister's diplomatic engagement represents India's attempt to maintain balanced relationships with all parties while advocating for peaceful resolution of conflicts. However, the Congress party's criticism suggests ongoing political disagreement regarding the appropriate level of Indian involvement and public positioning on these complex international issues. This controversy reflects broader debates within Indian politics about the country's foreign policy approach toward Middle Eastern conflicts and the balance between strategic interests and moral positioning on international humanitarian concerns.
Hans India
22 minutes ago
- Hans India
Karnataka Introduces Stringent Anti-Hate Speech Legislation Targeting Digital Platforms
The Karnataka government has unveiled comprehensive draft legislation aimed at combating hate speech and identity-based violence, with particular focus on digital platforms and enhanced enforcement mechanisms. The Karnataka Hate Speech and Hate Crimes (Prevention and Control) Bill, 2025, establishes severe penalties including up to three years imprisonment and Rs 5,000 in monetary fines for individuals found guilty of violations under the proposed law. According to sources, under the draft framework, hate speech and hate crimes will be classified as non-bailable and non-cognisable offenses, significantly strengthening the legal response to such incidents. The legislation defines hate crimes as any actions causing harm, inciting violence, or promoting hatred based on various identity characteristics including religion, caste, gender, sexual orientation, tribal affiliation, language, or disability status. The bill's definition of hate speech encompasses all forms of communication whether verbal, written, visual, or digital that intentionally promotes hostility or encourages harmful actions against individuals or groups. Notably, the law extends to content shared in both public and private forums, making even the act of providing access to such material subject to legal prosecution. A groundbreaking aspect of the proposed legislation involves holding digital intermediaries directly accountable for content hosted on their platforms. Social media companies, search engines, telecommunications operators, online marketplaces, and internet service providers could face identical penalties including imprisonment and financial sanctions if they knowingly or unknowingly facilitate the spread of hate content. This represents a significant expansion of platform responsibility beyond current regulatory frameworks. The bill also targets individuals who enable hate speech and hate crimes through various forms of support. Those providing financial backing, offering platforms, or otherwise assisting in the commission of such offenses may receive the same penalties as the primary perpetrators, creating a comprehensive network of accountability. District magistrates will receive substantial preventive powers under the proposed law, allowing them to issue orders in regions where communal disturbances appear likely. These authorities can prohibit public gatherings, processions, loudspeaker usage, or any activities deemed capable of inciting fear or violence. Initial restrictions may last up to 30 days with possible extensions reaching 60 days based on assessed necessity. The legislation introduces victim impact statements as a formal legal mechanism, enabling affected individuals or their representatives to submit sworn testimonies detailing psychological, physical, social, or financial damages experienced. Courts will be mandated to consider these statements when determining appropriate sentencing for convicted offenders. While establishing strict penalties, the bill includes specific exemptions for protected speech categories. Genuine artistic expression, academic research, scientific analysis, factual journalistic reporting, and religious discourse remain protected provided such content does not actively incite violence or promote hatred against targeted groups. Implementation of the legislation will require comprehensive awareness campaigns, specialized training programs for government officials, and extensive public education initiatives. These responsibilities may be delegated to existing state commissions including the Human Rights Commission or the Commission for Women, ensuring institutional support for the law's objectives. The draft provides legal protection for government officials acting in good faith while implementing the bill's provisions, safeguarding them from retaliatory legal action. Additionally, the state government will possess authority to develop detailed rules and regulations for enforcement, subject to oversight by the state legislature to ensure democratic accountability in the law's application. This legislative initiative represents Karnataka's ambitious attempt to address growing concerns about hate speech proliferation, particularly in digital spaces, while balancing free expression rights with community safety and social harmony objectives.
Indian Express
24 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Samajwadi Party expels 3 MLAs over a year after ‘cross-voting' in Rajya Sabha polls
More than a year after several Samajwadi Party MLAs allegedly cross-voted in the Rajya Sabha elections, the party on Sunday expelled three of them — Abhay Singh (Gosaiganj, Ayodhya), Rakesh Pratap Singh (Gauriganj, Amethi), and Manoj Kumar Pandey (Unchahar, Rae Bareli), a former Chief Whip in the Assembly — for 'supporting a divisive and communal' ideology, which the party said was contrary to its 'harmonious socialist ideology'. The SP in a statement said the three had been given a 'grace period' in the hope that they would have a 'change of heart', which, it said, has ended. In Uttar Pradesh's Rajya Sabha polls held in February last year, seven SP MLAs voted in favour of BJP and NDA-backed candidates, and many of them had since been seen attending BJP events and meeting senior party leaders. On Sunday, while taking action against three, the SP warned the remaining four, stating that no action had been taken against them yet 'because of their good conduct'. 'Samajwadi Party, in the public interest, expels the… MLAs due to their communal, divisive, negative ideology and supporting anti-farmer, anti-women, anti-youth, anti-business, anti-working professionals as well as 'anti-PDA' ideology, as opposed to the politics of harmonious, positive, socialist ideology,' the party said in its statement. It further warned that there would be 'no place for 'jan virodhi' (anti-people) leaders' in the future, and that any 'activities against the basic ideology of the party' would be treated as 'unpardonable'. According to sources, last month, Abhay Singh, Rakesh Pratap Singh, and Vinod Chaturvedi had also met Union Home Minister Amit Shah in Delhi, along with BJP Rajya Sabha MP Sanjay Seth. Among those expelled, Manoj Kumar Pandey (57) is a three-time MLA from Unchahar and was once considered close to SP chief Akhilesh Yadav. He had also served as a cabinet minister during the previous SP government in the state. He was removed as Chief Whip in the Assembly after the Rajya Sabha cross-voting incident, and has since reportedly been supporting the BJP, including during the last Lok Sabha elections. Abhay Singh (50), a second-term MLA from Gosaiganj in Ayodhya, is known as a muscleman-turned-politician and is considered close to another strongman and former minister Raghuraj Pratap Singh alias Raja Bhaiya, who now heads the Jansatta Dal (Loktantrik). Rakesh Pratap Singh (48) is a three-time MLA from Gauriganj in Amethi. He too had rebelled during the Rajya Sabha polls and has since publicly backed the BJP.
