‘Bengal Cops Didn't Answer Our Calls, BSF Reached Hours Before Them': Murshidabad Villagers Reveal Their ‘Saviour'
Murshidabad: On ground zero, the BSF, which has been vilified by the Mamata Banerjee-led Bengal government, is seen as a 'saviour'
As violence hit Murshidabad on April 8, West Bengal Chief Minister (CM) Mamata Banerjee accused the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) and the Border Security Force (BSF) of fuelling tension. 'I came across news claiming the role of elements from across the border in the Murshidabad unrest. Is it not the role of the BSF to guard the border? The BSF is under the Ministry of Home Affairs (MHA). The state government does not guard the international border. The Central government can't evade responsibility. I will find the local youths the BSF paid to throw stones during the violence," the CM had said, addressing a meeting with Muslim religious leaders in Kolkata, last Wednesday.
On ground zero, however, the much vilified BSF is seen as a 'saviour".
'POLICE WERE TOO LATE'
Jaffrabad village in Murshidabad's Shamsherganj area is still coming to terms with the murders of 72-year-old Haragobinda Das and his 40-year-old son Chandan. Locals, however, allege, the BSF personnel reached the affected village at least two hours before the local police, turning out to be the first responders.
'We fought the attackers for hours. We were tired of resisting them. We called the police a hundred times. They didn't pick up the calls. When they did answer, the police told us, 'Jaan bachake bhaago (Save yourselves and run)'. Around 2 pm, a BSF vehicle reached here, giving us the much-needed comfort," says Ranjit Kumar Pal.
He adds that around 4 pm, the local police came to the village. Mandal claims the build-up for the mayhem started around 9 am as an anti-Waqf protest turned communal and violent.
Ranjit has taken refuge at his uncle's house in the next village until they have a roof on their heads.
Swarup Das, the nephew of Haragobinda Das, echoed the sentiment. 'We were calling the police since 8.30 or 9 am. But the police turned up at 4 or 5 pm."
By the time the police reached the area, it was too late for the family, as two of them had become victims of a frenzied mob. 'We don't trust the state authorities. We need the Centre…The Centre should set up a BSF camp here. Otherwise, we won't be able to live here," adds Swarup.
Meanwhile, six locals — Babul Sk, 24, Abdul Khalek, 24, Saba Karim, 25, Roni Sheikh, 23, Manarul Sheikh, 54, and Azfarul Sheikh, 21, — who had fled to Odisha and were involved in the killing of the father and son have been arrested by the West Bengal Police STF. All are from Sulitala, which is very close to Jaffrabad, as opposed to claims of a ' Bangladeshi hand". These arrests take the total count to 10.
'THERE WAS NEVER ANY TENSION IN THIS VILLAGE BEFORE'
Remembering Haragobinda Das, his childhood friend, Sishir Das says, 'Why would anyone do this to him? He was the most amicable person. He was equally good to people of both communities, Hindus as well as Muslims. I have never heard him utter a single abuse for anyone in my life."
Das, whose house too was burnt, says, 'There was never any tension in this village. In fact, it was so peaceful that the elections were conducted with security by just civic volunteers here." He, too, agrees with Ranjit and Balaram's charge of police turning up very late.
The distrust for the local law enforcement machinery was palpable even in the voice of the widow of Haragobinda Das. She expressed her faith in the BSF over state law enforcement. 'We want a BSF camp here. A state police camp won't do." When asked why, her reply was clear, 'After so many calls for so long, the police did not turn up".
Earlier, News18 met the family of Lily Pal in Degri village, which was caught fleeing their ancestral house in search of safety. For her as well, it is the BSF that inspires a sense of safety and instils hope. 'We want a BSF camp here. We demand the President's Rule in Bengal," she had told News18.
'My request to the Prime Minister is that we should have a BSF camp in Jaffrabad. We will not survive if the BSF doesn't stay here… Otherwise, the attackers will kill us. Nothing will be left," urges Ranjit.
Unperturbed by political allegations and not burdened by local expectations, the BSF personnel quietly march through the serpentine roads, by the ponds, crossing orchards in violence-torn Murshidabad.
News18 India delivers breaking news, top headlines, and live updates on politics, weather, elections, law and crime, much more. Stay informed with real-time coverage and in-depth analysis of current events across India.
tags :
Border Security Force (BSF) Mamata Banerjee murshidabad Murshidabad ground report news18 specials
Location :
Murshidabad, India, India
First Published:
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hindu
21 minutes ago
- The Hindu
Tamil Nadu's share higher than Union government's in funding for 6 Central schemes
The Tamil Ndau government's contributes more monetarily compared to the Union government for the implementation of six Central schemes, according to a perusal of documents of the Central and State governments. There are three schemes under the umbrella of the National Social Assistance Programme (NSAP) — Indira Gandhi National Old Age Pension Scheme (IGNOAPS), Indira Gandhi National Widow Pension Scheme (IGNWPS), and the Indira Gandhi National Disability Pension Scheme (IGNDPS). The remaining three schemes are the Pradhan Mantri Awas Yojana (PMAY)-Rural, Pradhan Mantri Matsya Sampada Yojana (PMMSY), and the Jal Jeevan Mission (JJM). On Thursday, Chief Minister M.K. Stalin, in his speech at a government event in Salem, referred to these schemes and said that with the contribution of the Union government, it was not possible to implement them, be it housing or water supply. 'Even in the case of the schemes named after the Prime Minister, the State government, by providing more than 50% [of the scheme cost], has been implementing them,' he observed. Fully funded by the Centre, the NSAP was launched in August 1995. However, the State government has been a pioneer in this area and started implementing an old age pension scheme since January 1962. It extended the scope of the welfare measure to four categories of destitute persons — persons with disabilities, widows, agricultural labourers, and destitute or deserted women following marriage — between 1974 and 1984, all of which were subsumed into the all-India programme after November 2007. In respect of the Old Age and Widow Pension schemes under the NSAP, the Union government's share is ₹200 or ₹300 for those up to 79 years and ₹500 for those aged 80 and above. It is the State government that provides the enhanced top-up — ₹1,000 or ₹900 or ₹ 700, as the case may be — so that the beneficiary eventually gets ₹1,200. As for the beneficiaries under the IGNDPS, they receive ₹1,500, of which ₹300 or ₹500 comes from the Centre, depending on the age group, while the rest is contributed by the State government. In addition, Tamil Nadu funds its own scheme for persons with disabilities, under which beneficiaries are paid ₹1,500. Regarding the PMAY (Rural), the unit cost of a house is shared between Central and State governments in the ratio 60:40 in plain areas. As pointed out by the Chief Minister, the State government's share is perceptibly higher than that of the Centre. In the State, the unit cost of a house under PMAY-R is ₹2,83,900, which is inclusive of the State support cost for reinforced cement concrete (RCC) roofing and the convergence with the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Scheme and the Swachh Bharat Mission (Rural) for the purpose of the construction of toilet. Of this amount, the Union government's share is ₹1,11,100 and the State government's ₹1,72,800. Effectively, the ratio of cost sharing is 39:61. As for PMMSY, which follows different funding patterns, 60% of the cost is to be borne by the Union government and the rest by the State. But, in practice, the Centre's share is 27% and the State's 73%. In the case of the JJM, the cost sharing is to be done equally between the two. But, when it comes to implementation, the State's contribution works out to 55%.
News18
34 minutes ago
- News18
Watch: Kids Remove Nuts And Bolts From Rs 422-Crore Patna Flyover Like It's A Toy
Last Updated: The children, as seen in the viral video, were stealing nuts and bolts from Patna's new double-decker flyover. Soon after Bihar got its first double-decker flyover, an unsettling video surfaced online. The video showed a group of children parts on the newly-constructed bridge. The bridge was recently built to decongest traffic in the state capital, but the video has now raised concerns over infrastructure safety and supervision. An Instagram user shared the video on their social media page, saying that the incident sparked 'serious concerns over public safety and infrastructure security". In the video, which seems to have been captured by a bystander, a group of children can be seen tampering with nuts and bolts of the newly constructed bridge in broad daylight. The scene escalated after the children fled from the spot. The camera then panned to reveal the items they had stolen from the structure. 🚨 Patna's double-decker flyover was opened on June 11, and these kids are seen removing its nuts and bolts. A Serious Safety Hazard!They don't appear local, possibly Bangladeshi! — Gems (@gemsofbabus_) June 13, 2025 The incident has triggered a storm of reactions online. While some social media users expressed shock and disappointment, others resorted to trolling Bihar. Many of them claimed to come from Bihar, which was not surprising. Taking to the comment section, one user wrote, 'Thore din Ruko, bridge bhi nahi dikhega (Wait for some time, they will 'steal' the bridge too)." Another user quipped, saying, 'Humara Bihar badal raha hai (Our Bihar is changing)." As of now, the local administration and law enforcement agencies have not released an official statement. More on Patna's Double-decker Bridge Bihar Chief Minister Nitish Kumar inaugurated the Rs 422-crore double-decker flyover built to decongest the Ashok Rajpath corridor that connects a wide array of popular locations in areas such as NIT, PMCH, and Patna University, stated an Indian Express report. Completed in just over three years by Bihar Rajya Pul Nirman Nigam Limited, the two-lane elevated corridor runs along a 2.2 km stretch from Kargil Chowk to the Science College. The new flyover has two separate decks, one for each one-way road, allowing for added passage for commuters, students, and patients travelling to the area, as well as connecting with the upcoming metro in Patna. First Published: June 13, 2025, 18:47 IST
&w=3840&q=100)
First Post
37 minutes ago
- First Post
Why is Israel's attack on Iran being called biggest in region since it's war with Iraq? What happened then?
Israel's latest strike on Iran — targeting nuclear and military infrastructure — has been dubbed the largest assault on the country since the brutal Iran-Iraq war of the 1980s. As the conflict escalates with retaliatory drone strikes, experts are drawing parallels to a time when Iran faced an existential threat in an eight-year war that shaped the region today read more People attend an anti-Israeli protest following the Israeli strikes on Iran, in Tehran, Iran, June 13, 2025. WANA via Reuters On Friday, Israel launched what is being described as its in recent history — targeting nuclear and military installations deep within the Islamic Republic. Explosions rocked Tehran as Israel stated it was aiming at facilities tied to Iran's controversial nuclear programme. Among the fatalities reported by Iranian state media were senior members of the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC), the head of Iran's missile programme and two top nuclear scientists. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD This major offensive has quickly escalated the longstanding shadow conflict between the two regional powers into a more direct and dangerous confrontation. In response, Iran reportedly deployed over 100 drones towards Israeli territory, most of which were intercepted. Military operations in Iran were still reported to be underway as of Friday afternoon. Israeli officials have framed the attack as a preventive measure against Iran's growing nuclear capabilities. 'The attack was aimed at preventing Iran from acquiring a nuclear bomb,' an Israeli leader stated, as Iran's uranium enrichment approaches levels considered dangerously close to weapons-grade. Iran maintains that its nuclear programme is intended solely for peaceful purposes — a position also echoed in past assessments by US intelligence, which have found no definitive evidence of Iran building a weapon. Talks involving US and Iranian officials, intended to resume shortly, may now be jeopardised. The Israeli strikes are described by observers as the most substantial assault on Iranian soil since the devastating Iran-Iraq war of the 1980s. What was the Iran-Iraq War? The reference to the Iran-Iraq war reflects the magnitude of Israel's latest operation. That war, lasting from September 1980 to August 1988, was one of the most protracted and destructive interstate conflicts of the late 20th century. It began when Iraq, led by Saddam Hussein, invaded western Iran, citing border disputes and fears of revolutionary influence spreading from Iran's new theocratic leadership. Underlying the conflict were deep-rooted tensions over territorial control, particularly over the Shaṭṭ al-ʿArab waterway — a crucial maritime route for oil exports — and fears of Iran exporting its revolutionary ideology into Iraq's Shiite majority population. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD These factors, compounded by the recent upheaval of Iran's Islamic Revolution, created a volatile regional atmosphere that Saddam Hussein exploited to assert dominance and reclaim previously conceded territories. The war's early stages saw Iraq capturing key Iranian cities such as Khorramshahr, though their offensive stalled due to unexpectedly strong Iranian resistance. In 1981, Iran's Revolutionary Guard emerged as a decisive military force, reversing some of Iraq's gains. By 1982, Iran had reclaimed lost territory and began its own incursions into Iraqi land, pushing the war into a prolonged stalemate. How did the Iran-Iraq war end? Despite Iraq's initial advances, the conflict soon devolved into years of trench warfare, failed offensives and human wave attacks. Iran, under the leadership of Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini, refused ceasefire offers and continued its military campaigns in Iraq, aiming to remove Saddam Hussein from power. Both sides engaged in sustained air and missile strikes on urban centers and oil infrastructure. The 'Tanker War' phase that began in 1984 had global repercussions, with both nations attacking oil tankers in the Persian Gulf. These actions eventually prompted intervention by Western naval forces to safeguard energy routes. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD By the mid-1980s, Iraq had rebuilt a large and technologically advanced military, heavily funded by Gulf Arab states and supported logistically and diplomatically by powers including the United States, the Soviet Union and France. Iraq also developed chemical weapons, which it employed against both Iranian troops and Kurdish civilians. The turning point came in 1988. Iraq's chemical weapons campaign, most notably the Halabjah attack which killed thousands of civilians, and military advances into Iranian territory prompted Iran to reconsider its position. A group of prisoners arrive in Mundharieh on the border between Iran and Iraq, June 29, 2000. The prisoners arrived home from Iran nearly 13 years after the end of the 1980-88 war between the Iraq the Gulf neighbours. File Image/Reuters Weary from years of war, casualties, and economic strain, Iran accepted United Nations Security Council Resolution 598, bringing the war to a formal ceasefire in August 1988. What was the toll of the Iran-Iraq war? The toll of the war was staggering. Estimates of casualties range from one million to two million, with at least half a million believed to have died. Iran is thought to have suffered the highest number of losses. The conflict left both countries economically battered, with combined financial damages surpassing one trillion US dollars. Despite the prolonged fighting, the war concluded without significant territorial changes or reparations. Diplomatic relations between Iran and Iraq were not fully restored until 1990, with the final exchange of prisoners of war occurring as late as 2003. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD The recent Israeli strike on Iran is being measured against the scale and impact of the Iran-Iraq war due to its significance. As Israel asserts that the operation was aimed at preventing Iran from achieving nuclear weapon capability, and Iran retaliates through drone warfare, the current scenario brings back the spectre of broader confrontation. Just as the 1980s war reshaped alliances in the region, this modern-day escalation could similarly alter the strategic calculus in West Asia. With inputs from agencies
