Those with taxable incomes over RM100,000 a year contributed to 86% of individual income tax collected in 2023, says Finance Ministry
It said this contribution formed part of the RM37.77bil in individual income tax collected by the government for that year, which represented 22% of the total direct tax collection of RM171.34bil.
"Of this, the top 20% of taxpayers, with taxable incomes over RM1mil, played a substantial role in bolstering Malaysia's fiscal resources.
"Their contributions are crucial in maintaining economic stability and supporting national development," said the ministry in a written Parliament reply on Aug 11 (Monday).
Aminolhuda Hassan (PH-Sri Gading) had inquired about the number of individuals in Malaysia with net wealth exceeding RM100mil and their tax contributions.
The ministry said such specific data was unavailable in the Inland Revenue Board's (LHDN) records, as net wealth does not directly correlate with income tax liabilities.
"Certain assets are not subject to income tax unless sold or disposed of, such as real estate or specific investments," it said.
The government, it added, appreciates the role of high-income taxpayers in bolstering economic stability and strengthening the country's fiscal position.
"The government remains committed to enhancing tax compliance and addressing tax leakage issues, particularly among high-income individuals with assets and wealth not aligning with reported taxes.
"This includes income kept in offshore accounts, cross-border transactions, domestic transfer pricing, online activities and shadow economy cases," it added.
In addition to tackling tax leakage, the government is focused on improving tax administration efficiency through digitalisation and encouraging tax compliance via ongoing awareness efforts.
"We are continually refining the structure and treatment of income tax to ensure a fair and progressive taxation system in Malaysia," it added.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Malaysian Reserve
an hour ago
- Malaysian Reserve
ARK Resources proposes private placement to raise RM1.9m
ARK Resources Holdings Bhd has proposed a private placement of up to 9.05 million new shares, representing not more than 10% of its issued share capital, to independent investors at a price to be determined later. Based on an indicative issue price of 21 sen per share, an 8.7% discount to its five-day volume-weighted average price of 23 sen, the exercise is expected to raise gross proceeds of about RM1.9 million. The construction and property development company plans to allocate RM1.21 million of the proceeds to set up a new 7,000 sq ft corporate office in Bayan Lepas, Penang, which will also serve as a sales and marketing gallery for a planned high-rise residential project in the area. Another RM595,000 will be used for working capital, mainly to hire new staff for the office, while RM100,000 will cover placement expenses. M&A Securities Sdn Bhd has been appointed as the principal adviser and placement agent for the exercise, which is expected to be completed by the fourth quarter of 2025. The group said the placement will allow it to raise funds quickly without incurring interest expenses and strengthen its capital base. — TMR
The Star
2 hours ago
- The Star
Hup Seng cautious on 2H25 amid rising raw material costs
KUALA LUMPUR: Hup Seng Industries Bhd will maintain a cautious stance for the second half of 2025 amid continuing geopolitical uncertainties. The food and beverage company noted that key raw materials costs remained sensitive to supply and regulatory developments, with upward price pressures anticipated 'Nevertheless, the group will continue to focus on operational efficiency to help mitigate the impact of rising costs and will closely monitor market conditions to remain competitive and sustain stable performance,' Hup Seng said. In the second quarter ended June 30, Hup Seng's net profit fell 5.7% to RM8.5mil, or earnings per share of 1.06 sen compared with RM9.03mil, or 1.13 sen in the year-ago quarter. The lower profit was primarily due to an increase in certain raw material costs, which offset the positive impact of higher sales. Revenue, however, rose 5.7% to RM84.8mil against RM80.2mil achieved a year ago. Hup Seng said its domestic sales increased by 9%, or RM5.5mil, compared to the previous corresponding period, driven mainly by growth in East Malaysia as well as wholesale, supermarket, and hypermarket channels. However, this gain was partially offset by a 5% decline in export sales, amounting to RM900,000, primarily from Indonesia and Myanmar. In the first six months, it posted a net profit of RM19.1mil, down 16.9% from RM23mil while revenue rose to RM176.6mil against RM173.8mil a year prior. The board of directors has recommended a first interim single-tier dividend of 2 sen per ordinary share for the financial quarter ending Dec 31, 2025. The entitlement date will be announced later.
![[UPDATED] Court reserves ruling in Indira Gandhi's RM100mil missing daughter suit](/_next/image?url=https%3A%2F%2Fassets.nst.com.my%2Fimages%2Farticles%2FHQ2402058532_1754905553.jpg&w=3840&q=100)
![[UPDATED] Court reserves ruling in Indira Gandhi's RM100mil missing daughter suit](/_next/image?url=https%3A%2F%2Fassets.nst.com.my%2Fassets%2FNST-Logo%402x.png%3Fid%3Db37a17055cb1ffea01f5&w=48&q=75){kind=small}
New Straits Times
2 hours ago
- New Straits Times
[UPDATED] Court reserves ruling in Indira Gandhi's RM100mil missing daughter suit
PUTRAJAYA: The Court of Appeal has reserved judgment on kindergarten teacher M. Indira Gandhi's appeal to reinstate her RM100 million lawsuit against the police and government over their alleged failure to locate her daughter, Prasana Diksa. A three-member Court of Appeal panel, chaired by Datuk Mohamed Zaini Mazlan made the decision after hearing lengthy submissions from both parties today. Zaini said the court needed time to deliberate on the arguments and examine the records before delivering its decision. Other members of the bench were Datuk Faizah Jamaludin and Datuk Mohd Radzi Abdul Hamid. Indira filed the lawsuit on Oct 28, 2020, naming former inspector-general of police (IGP) Tan Sri Abdul Hamid Bador, the police, Home Ministry, and the government as defendants. Indira's daughter, Prasana Diksa, was taken by her ex-husband, K. Pathmanathan, 15 years ago. Pathmanathan is reported to have taken Prasana away after unilaterally converting all three of their children to Islam in 2009. Prasana was 11 months old at the time. Earlier, Indira's lawyer Rajesh Nagarajan submitted that the police refused to arrest Pathmanathan despite knowing his whereabouts. He said Pathmanathan also known as Muhammad Riduan Abdullah had several outstanding traffic summonses and was found to have paid them in 2020. He said Abdul Hamid had publicly said that he knew where Muhammad Riduan was and had been trying to locate him since he went missing in 2009 with the couple's youngest child, who is now 17. "The then IGP admitted knowing the whereabouts of the appellant's former husband but failed to comply with a court order to trace, arrest, and return her daughter. "Even though he knew the location, he refused to apprehend and bring the man to justice. He failed to do what was necessary. "How can the police allow him to move freely in this country?" he submitted. Rajesh said Indira's ex-husband had yet to comply with a High Court mandamus order to return Prasana to her mother, who has legal custody of the child. He said it was "illogical" for the police to assign the Special Task Force on Organised Crime (STAFOC) (now restructured) to locate her former husband. "STAFOC is for organised crime. It makes no sense because Muhammad Riduan is not part of any organised criminal group, but merely a disgruntled father. "This is the first time I have heard of STAFOC being used to track down a father who ran away with his daughter," he said. Meanwhile, senior federal counsel Nur Ezdiani Roleb argued that the appellant had failed to show that all respondents had neglected to take reasonable action in tracing and arresting Pathmanathan. She said police had carried out various efforts to find him, including tapping into investigative resources from STAFOC at the time. On the traffic summonses claim, Ezdiani said the appellant had never filed an application to verify the matter or to seek disclosure of related records. The court also fixed Aug 25 for the next case management. On June 28 last year, the High Court dismissed Indira's suit, saying that the plaintiff must prove malice or bad faith to establish the tort of nonfeasance. In his ruling, Judge Datuk Raja Ahmad Mohzanuddin Shah Raja Mohzan said that the police had used all available resources to locate the wanted man. The court said the evidence suggests that all the efforts made by the IGP and the police were not indicative of any neglect of their duties.
