
Trump's Tariffs and the Risk of Reverse Friendshoring
Over the past few years, the United States has embraced the concepts of nearshoring and friendshoring – relocating supply chains away from China and toward the U.S., its allies, or nearby countries. The goal was to reduce dependence on a strategic rival, strengthen domestic industry, and align supply chains with geopolitical partners.
Initially, this strategy showed promise. Investments flowed into Mexico, Vietnam, and India as Washington offered incentives and business executives recalibrated risk maps.
But now, with the resurgence of tariff wars and mounting protectionist pressure, especially under President Donald Trump's renewed rhetoric, this strategy faces a paradoxical risk: a reversal. In other words, what if companies begin to do the opposite of what the U.S. intended? What if firms, rather than moving away from China, begin repositioning themselves closer to it?
There is a growing concern among multinationals that the U.S. market may become more volatile and less accessible if tariffs persist. If the cost of operating or exporting into the United States rises significantly, some companies might start to see Asia not only as a manufacturing base but as the main market to bet on. In this context, companies may decide to expand operations near China, taking advantage of mature supply chains and the opportunity to serve a vast, growing consumer market.
Several cases already hint at this trend. One major firm that previously relied on U.S. ports to access North America shifted its operations to Canada to avoid compounded tariffs. Another company had invested heavily in Mexico as part of its strategy to reduce exposure to China. However, when Mexico was suddenly targeted by new Trump-era tariffs, the firm pivoted. Rather than using its Mexican facility to serve the U.S., it redirected its exports to Latin American and South American markets.
The logic is simple: when the U.S. becomes a bottleneck, companies diversify away from it. The unintended consequence is a reverse friendshoring, one that pushes supply chains back toward Asia.
This phenomenon is more than a tactical response. It could represent a structural shift in global trade. If U.S. tariffs become a long-term reality, many multinationals will strengthen their presence in Asia, including in China-adjacent economies. This would be a strategic setback for the United States, which originally aimed to 'decouple' from Chinese influence.
It's worth remembering that this aggressive protectionism is not historically American. For decades, especially after World War II, the U.S. championed open markets, leading the creation of GATT, the WTO, and free trade agreements across the globe. It saw liberal trade as a source of strength and leadership. The shift toward 'America First' protectionism, especially under Trump, disrupted this legacy. And while some short-term political gains were achieved, the long-term costs, especially in credibility and stability, are becoming more visible.
Protectionism may offer a temporary illusion of control, but in the long run, it risks pushing businesses away. If global firms come to see the U.S. as unpredictable or commercially hostile, they will turn to where predictability and demand still thrive. Asia, with its integrated supply chains and pro-business environments, becomes the natural alternative.
But there's a deeper irony. By pushing companies back toward Asia, especially China, the U.S. may be reinforcing the very dependency it sought to undo. While relocating closer to China may offer efficiencies, it also strengthens Beijing's strategic hand. China has long made it clear: its goal is to make the world more dependent on it while reducing its own vulnerabilities. That's a dangerously asymmetric relationship. As Europe learned with Russian gas, overdependence on an authoritarian power can quickly turn into leverage used against you.
This is why Southeast Asia and Central Asia are positioning themselves aggressively. Vietnam has already emerged as a winner of the China-U.S. trade war, becoming one of America's top trade surplus partners. Indonesia, Thailand, and Malaysia are rapidly improving infrastructure, workforce readiness, and regional trade deals like the RCEP to attract more industrial investment. Central Asian countries like Kazakhstan and Uzbekistan, long dominated by Russia and China, now see an opening. By offering access to emerging supply corridors like the Trans-Caspian route, they aim to attract diversified Western investment.
In short, if the United States doubles down on isolation, others will gladly step in. The global gameboard is shifting. Reverse friendshoring is no longer a hypothetical – it's a scenario being quietly sketched out in boardrooms from Singapore to São Paulo.
The question is no longer whether the U.S. can bring supply chains back home. The question is: will its current posture drive them even further away?
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Mainichi
31 minutes ago
- The Mainichi
Isuzu mulls moving small truck production to US for 2028
TOKYO (Kyodo) -- Japanese truck maker Isuzu Motors Ltd. is considering moving the production of light-duty trucks from its factory near Tokyo to the United States for 2028 to reduce the effect of tariffs imposed by U.S. President Donald Trump, its president said. Shinsuke Minami, 65, told Kyodo News last week he hopes the move will cater to the growing demand of trucks amid the proliferation of online shopping and necessary delivery services, adding that the production capacity of the Fujisawa plant in Kanagawa Prefecture will not be cut as the company aims to expand its global market share. "Although there are some parts we will have to export from Japan when manufacturing in the United States, we hope to increase our local procurement rate," Minami said. "We need to carefully review the effects of tariffs on our profits." The number of units sold by Isuzu in the United States annually hovers between 30,000 to 40,000, of which the production of around 20,000 is outsourced to a local company, while the remaining vehicles are exported from its factory in Fujisawa. Isuzu is currently constructing a factory in South Carolina for the manufacture of mid-size and electric trucks that will cost about 43 billion yen ($290 million). It is slated to begin operations in 2027, incorporating the production of small trucks in 2028, and is aiming to manufacture a total 50,000 units per year by 2030. The truck maker also plans to spend approximately 7 billion yen in creating a test course in Mukawa, Hokkaido, to trial autonomous driving technology, set to begin in fiscal 2027, according to Minami.


Nikkei Asia
an hour ago
- Nikkei Asia
Korean battery firms grow US market share as restrictions on China tighten
An LG Energy Solution electric-vehicle battery pack at the InterBattery exhibition in Seoul on March 5. South Korean battery manufacturers are expanding their presence in the U.S. market. PAK YIU NEW YORK -- South Korean and Japanese battery companies are set to expand their market share in the United States as regulations increasingly restrict Chinese competitors' foothold. South Korea's LG Energy Solution, Samsung SDI and SK On have been scaling up their local production and strengthening partnerships, while Japanese tech giant Panasonic recently began local production of its lithium-ion batteries. These developments come even as U.S. President Donald Trump's spending legislation pares back tax incentives for wind, solar and electric vehicles.


NHK
3 hours ago
- NHK
Top US, China officials to begin trade talks in Stockholm
Top officials of the United States and China will start trade talks on Monday in Stockholm, Sweden. US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent and Chinese Vice Premier He Lifeng, who oversees his country's economic policy, will attend the talks. The US and China have continued negotiations since they agreed in May to significantly cut additional tariffs on each other and pause a 24 percent portion of the slashed duties for 90 days. The two countries signed a document last month agreeing to measures such as easing restrictions on rare earth elements exports. Bessent stressed on Bloomberg TV last Wednesday that expansion of US agricultural exports to China is among the key issues. Aiming to reduce trade deficits, the US side will likely demand China open its market. China is expected to demand that tariff measures by the administration of President Donald Trump be abolished. The US set August 12 as the deadline for the pause on the 24 percent tariff. Bessent indicated that the Trump administration could extend the deadline by another 90 days. Extending the deadline is also expected to be discussed at the trade talks.