logo
Karnataka High Court finds no fault in government's policy of not providing roster-based reservation for honorary posts of anganwadi workers

Karnataka High Court finds no fault in government's policy of not providing roster-based reservation for honorary posts of anganwadi workers

The Hindu16 hours ago
The High Court of Karnataka said that the policy of the State government in not providing roster-based reservation for the posts of anganwadi workers is not contrary to constitutional provisions as these posts are not civil but only honorary.
'...the post of the anganwadi worker is honorary and persons selected to these posts will be paid a honorarium and they are not entitled to a salary... hence it is not required for the State government to follow the reservation roster,' the court observed.
Justice M.I. Arun passed the order while dismissing a petition filed by 28-year-old Vijayalakshmi of Vijayapura district. The petitioner, who belongs to the Scheduled Tribe community and an aspirant to the post of anganwadi worker, had questioned the government's action of not providing caste-based reservation while appointing persons as anganwadi workers.
However, the government said that it is appointing persons from Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes as anganwadi workers if the population of these communities in the area of the anganwadi centre is more than 40%.
The population of the ST community in the area of the centre to which the petitioner is seeking appointment is very low, and hence the government has not provided posts for persons from this community, the court said, while pointing out that the petitioner, who may not be meritorious to secure honorary posts, had raised the issue of reservation.
The government also pointed out to the court that anganwadi workers are required to inspire confidence of all the villagers and care for all the children irrespective of the community, and a person is chosen to these posts taking all these factors into consideration.
'Courts should be reluctant to interfere with the legislation or policy on reservation of the State unless it is shown that they are ultra vires the provision of the Constitution,' the court said, while pointing out that the government's policy on not providing roster-based reservation for the post of anganwadi workers is not contrary to the Constitution.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

No farmer will be left out of Annadata Sukhibhava – PM Kisan: Collector
No farmer will be left out of Annadata Sukhibhava – PM Kisan: Collector

Hans India

timean hour ago

  • Hans India

No farmer will be left out of Annadata Sukhibhava – PM Kisan: Collector

Tirupati: Tirupati District Collector Dr S Venkateswar has assured that every eligible farmer in the district will receive the benefits under the Annadata Sukhibhava–PM Kisan scheme. Speaking at the launch of the 2025–26 first phase of the programme held at the AP Seeds office in Srikalahasti on Saturday, he underlined the government's commitment to farmer welfare. The Collector, alongside local MLA B Sudhir Reddy, highlighted that the combined benefit of the Central PM-Kisan and State Annadata Sukhibhava schemes will provide Rs 20,000 annually to each farmer family in Andhra Pradesh. This amount will be disbursed in three instalments – Rs 7,000 in the current phase, another Rs 7,000 in October before the Rabi season, and the final Rs 6,000 during harvest time in January. While the Central government contributes Rs 6,000 under PM-Kisan, the remaining Rs 14,000 will come from the State government. In Tirupati district alone, Rs 105 crore has been credited on Saturday to the accounts of 1,54,908 farmers. The Collector announced the provision of 90 per cent subsidised urea and the setup of a dedicated grievance cell at the AP Seeds office to support farmers with information related to the scheme. MLA Sudhir Reddy noted that over 27,000 farmers in Srikalahasti constituency are availing the scheme. He criticised the previous government, saying farmers had suffered under YSRCP rule, and praised the present government for introducing initiatives such as farm mechanisation, subsidised drones, and storage godowns in every mandal to help farmers fetch better prices. District Agriculture Officer S Prasada Rao advised farmers to complete Aadhaar-bank linking for smooth benefit transfer and to visit nearby Rythu Seva Kendras if funds are not credited. Farmers can also get updates via WhatsApp on 9552300009. Later, a mega cheque was handed over to farmers by the Collector and MLA. AP Greenery and Beautification Corporation Chairperson M Sugunamma, several officials and farmer association representatives attended the event.

Rahul's actions dangerous, says BJP; calls Aug 5 protest anti-democratic
Rahul's actions dangerous, says BJP; calls Aug 5 protest anti-democratic

New Indian Express

time2 hours ago

  • New Indian Express

Rahul's actions dangerous, says BJP; calls Aug 5 protest anti-democratic

BENGALURU: Opposition BJP leaders in Karnataka have accused Leader of Opposition in Lok Sabha Rahul Gandhi of attempting to create distrust in the democratic system by making baseless allegations against the Election Commission. The BJP leader termed Congress' decision to protest against the ECI as 'absurd and height of frustration.' Karnataka BJP president BY Vijayendra told reporters that to inform the public about Congress' 'misleading stand', BJP is staging a protest demonstration at the Mahatma Gandhi statue near Vidhana Soudha in Bengaluru at 10 am on August 5. On the same day, Congress leaders are also staging a protest at Freedom Park in Bengaluru. Vijayendra said Rahul's remarks about electoral fraud are an insult to the voters of the country and against the Constitution. The BJP MPs, MLAs, MLCs, former MPs, and legislators will take part in the protest. They would submit a formal memorandum to the Governor, he added. Vijayendra described Rahul's actions as dangerous and anti-democratic. He said that DK Suresh lost in Bengaluru Rural, and that is why his brother and DyCM DK Shivakumar is alleging election fraud there. In Bengaluru Central, BJP MP PC Mohan won, and the BJP received maximum leads from Mahadevapura and Rajajinagar, he said. He questioned whether the Chief Minister and Deputy CM do not trust their own officers who conducted the election duties, and whether they have control over their own administration. 'Rahul is frustrated after losing elections consecutively for third term starting 2014, and he cannot digest the fact that Narendra Modi has become the Prime Minister for the third time,' the BJP leader said.

Madras HC: Remand orders against BJP lawyers' wing secy illegal
Madras HC: Remand orders against BJP lawyers' wing secy illegal

New Indian Express

time2 hours ago

  • New Indian Express

Madras HC: Remand orders against BJP lawyers' wing secy illegal

CHENNAI: The Madras High Court has held illegal the remand orders issued by the respective judicial magistrates in Coimbatore and Thirukazhukundram against advocate D Alexis Sudhakar, the state secretary of BJP's lawyers wing. Justice GK Ilanthiraiyan passed the orders recently on the criminal revision petitions filed by Sudhakar who was arrested on the charges of possession of weapons and cheating. Senior counsel Abudu Kumar Rajaratnam, appearing for Sudhakar, submitted that he was falsely implicated in a series of criminal cases by the police out of political vendetta and was arrested last year. The remand orders issued by the judicial magistrates were arbitrary and in violation of Article 22 (1) of the Constitution which guarantees the right to be informed of the grounds of arrest and the right to consult and be defended by a lawyer of one's choice. He also submitted that mandatory statutory safeguards including service of ground and reasons of arrest and intimation to family members were disregarded by the police officers while arresting Sudhakar. Justice Ilanthiraiyan held that a perusal of the arrest memo reveals the ground arrest and reasons for arrest were not stated. That apart, there is no record to show the petitioner's family was informed of the arrest. The non-compliance of the mandatory provisions is a clear violation, the judge said in the order. He held the remand itself is illegal when the petitioner was not informed of the reasons and the grounds for the arrest.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store