Martin says defamation reforms will happen ‘quickly'
Mr Adams took the BBC to court over a 2016 episode of its Spotlight programme, and an accompanying online story, which he said defamed him by alleging he sanctioned the killing of former Sinn Fein official Denis Donaldson, in which he denies any involvement.
Last month, a jury at the High Court in Dublin found in his favour and awarded him 100,000 euros (£84,000) after determining that was the meaning of words included in the programme and article.
The BBC, which was found by the jury not to have acted in good faith nor in a fair and reasonable way, was also ordered to pay the former Sinn Fein leader's legal costs.
At the time, the director of BBC Northern Ireland Adam Smyth said there were 'profound' implications from the jury's decision.
'As our legal team made clear, if the BBC's case cannot be won under existing Irish defamation law, it's hard to see how anyone's could – and they warned that today's decision could hinder freedom of expression.'
Spotlight reporter Jennifer O'Leary said she had entered the witness box in the trial with 'nothing to hide, only sources to protect and I want to thank them for trusting me'.
The broadcaster's legal team was granted a stay in the payment of the full award as it takes time to consider an appeal.
Asked if he agreed with the BBC's assessment of the case on Thursday, Taoiseach Micheal Martin said: 'I think the defamation laws need to be changed – we're going to change them.'
Mr Martin said the Government would pass the legislation 'as quickly as we can' and paid tribute to Ms O'Leary.
'I think we do need to get it through to create a balanced environment for commentary and for investigative journalism.'
He added: 'Jennifer O'Leary is a first-class journalist.'
Among the key provisions in the Defamation Bill highlighted by government are the abolition of juries in High Court defamation actions, which is hoped to reduce delays and legal costs; and of protections against strategic lawsuits, also known as SLAPPs actions, viewed as having a chilling effect on public interest journalism and press freedom.
The draft laws also include a statutory power for the Circuit Court to issue a 'Norwich Pharmacal' order, allowing a digital services provider to identify an anonymous poster of defamatory statements online.
Mr Martin, who took legal action against Google at the High Court for information about who had financed fake ads which claimed he had endorsed specific cryptocurrencies, added: 'We've published heads of the bill, and (Justice Minister Jim) O'Callaghan is going to proceed, we're going to do it in this Government.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
North Wales Chronicle
24 minutes ago
- North Wales Chronicle
Irish citizens advised against travel to Israel after airstrikes on Iran
The Irish premier and deputy premier said they were 'deeply concerned' after Israel launched strikes on Tehran early on Friday, targeting the country's nuclear programme and rekindling fears of a full-scale conflict. Iran's Supreme Leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, has warned that Israel should expect 'severe punishment' in response, and it was reported on Friday that drones had been launched. The attack appeared to be the most significant Iran has faced since its war with Iraq in the 1980s. Irish premier Micheal Martin said that stability was needed and called for diplomacy. 'I call on all in the Middle East to exercise the utmost restraint and to avoid further escalation,' the Taoiseach said. 'The region and the world need stability. Diplomacy must be the only way forward.' Ireland's deputy premier Simon Harris said the 'alarming' development meant there was a risk of 'regional spillover', which would be 'disastrous'. Mr Harris, who is also the minister for foreign affairs, said they had updated travel advice to warn citizens against travelling to Israel. 'We have already travel advice in place for Irish citizens not to travel to Iran, and today we're extending that travel advice to advise against any travel to Israel,' the Tanaiste said. 'For all Irish citizens, we're keeping in very close contact with our diplomats on the ground in both Iran and Israel, and they're obviously keeping in close contact with the relatively small number of Irish citizens in those countries as well.' He said he hoped the US and Europe would call for a de-escalation. 'We need to find a situation where the whole temperature is de-escalated, and what's happened overnight is extraordinarily alarming, extremely dangerous, and people need to step back from the brink now.' Mr Harris said that the Middle East 'desperately needs peace and stability'. 'Further escalation would bring a very real risk of regional spillover. This would be disastrous for all the peoples of the region. 'I urge restraint and de-escalation by all involved, and for those with influence to use it positively at this critical moment. 'A negotiated solution is needed to address Iran's nuclear programme.'
Telegraph
an hour ago
- Telegraph
The fight against Labour's school VAT raid continues
Those hoping for immediate relief from the courts in relation to the Government's imposition of VAT on school fees yesterday had their short-term hopes dashed. But if you read the judgment and examine what is going on in schools, the Government now has a right mess on its hands. The High Court rightly found that, for the 100,000 or so children in private schools with special education needs who are forced to move into the state sector because they have closed or their parents can no longer afford the fees, their fundamental rights have indeed been interfered with. However, it said that Parliament was entitled to do this because it has very broad powers when it comes to raising new taxes. In this case, what was being sought by the claimants was a 'declaratory remedy' which would have sent the legislation back to Parliament to resolve. So, what happens now? The Chancellor Rachel Reeves and beleaguered Education Secretary Bridget Phillipson are no doubt delighted that they have apparently won. But the truth is, like special needs children themselves, they are not out of the woods. They won by a nose and could yet lose in subsequent contests. The first thing to say is that the special needs system is in total chaos. Since the pandemic, there is a huge backlog of children who do not have 'statements', in other words official education health and care plans, who are in a queue or appealing at tribunals hoping to get one. Local authorities are understandably reluctant to award them, in part because of a questionable previous court ruling, which said they have to pay for taxis for special needs children to get to their school. If you talk to a taxi driver, many of them make a fortune providing this service which, in general terms, seems excessive and incredibly costly. Yet now, parents who previously were paying for their own children's school fees and indeed transport, have had it confirmed that their children have a fundamental right to an appropriate education and their legal claims against local education authorities have now been given additional force. It would have been cheaper and simpler if VAT had not been imposed on school fees and they stayed where they were. Second, thousands of parents were waiting for this judgement, having either given provisional notice to leave private schools or waiting to decide whether to embark on that costly journey in the first place next term. So far, 11,000 children have left private schools because of this measure. My guess is that twice that number, will now not turn up next term. Put all this together and the new taxes on education will raise very little money and might even lose revenue. The reality is that Labour have created a giant and costly mess. An appeal is likely. There is no tax on education in any civilised country and, sooner or later, we must hope that a future government will reverse this cruel and costly measure.
Spectator
an hour ago
- Spectator
Labour MP's migrants claim contradicted by own government data
Uh oh. Chief Secretary to the Treasury Darren Jones has found himself in a tight spot after his Question Time appearance on Thursday night. The Labour MP for Bristol North West told the BBC audience on the issue of Britain's borders that 'the majority of the people in these boats are children, babies and women'. But it appears that data published by, er, his own government contradicts that claim… The government's official statistics for irregular migration to the UK state in black and white that 'since January 2018, 70 per cent of people detected arriving irregularly have been adult males ages 18 and over'. The document notes that in the same time period, 'just under one-fifth of(19 per cent)' of detected arrivals were children. Yet despite this, Jones decided last night to double down on his contradictory claim. Arguing with Reform UK's Zia Yusuf and sceptical audience members, the Treasury man added:
