Trump sent military to ‘silence' LA protests, says California as judge questions president's authority on troop deployment
The landmark trial against the federal government began on Monday and California's lawyer presented evidence that showed soldiers of Nationals Guard and Marines, deployed in Los Angeles in June by the Trump administration, violated a 19th century law that restricts the military from civilian law enforcement.
According to lawyer Meghan Strong of the California Attorney General's Office, 'The government wanted a show of military force so great that any opposition to their agenda was silenced,' Reuters reported.
He was just getting warmed up in Los Angeles.
He will gaslight his way into militarizing any city he wants in America.
This is what dictators do. https://t.co/IPvx9Hrp0q
— Gavin Newsom (@GavinNewsom) August 11, 2025
Defending the federal government's move, Justice Department attorney Eric Hamilton said that there was 'substantial violence' in Los Angeles that merits the deployment of military and said that National Guard and Marines troops were in the city only to protect federal agents and property.
In June, Trump had ordered the deployment of 4,000 National Guard troops and 700 Marines to Los Angeles in order to contain days of protests and unrest triggered by mass immigration raids carried out by the US Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE).
California Governor Gavin Newsom opposed the federal government's move and alleged it violates prohibitions on the use of the military in law enforcement, while suing the Trump administration.
US District Judge Charles Breyer in San Francisco is hearing the arguments and has not revealed when he would rule in the matter. Breyer will determine whether the Trump administration violated the Posse Comitatus Act (PCA).
A Reuters report stated that Judge Breyer appeared skeptical whether President Trump had the sole discretion to decide when troops were needed. 'Is it a 'rebellion' because the president says it is a 'rebellion'?' Breyer asked Justice Department's attorney Hamilton during the government's closing argument.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
India.com
20 minutes ago
- India.com
DNA Decodes: From Alaska To Washington – Trump's Plan To End Ukraine War
The much-anticipated meeting between US President Donald Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin in Alaska has generated intense global debate. The two leaders held a three-hour-long discussion followed by a 12-minute joint press conference. Trump rated the meeting "10 out of 10," raising questions over whether the objectives behind the summit were achieved and if it could pave the way for an end to the ongoing Russia-Ukraine war. In today's DNA, we analysed the outcomes of this high-profile meeting, the pressure it places on Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky, and its wider geopolitical consequences for NATO, Europe, and global trade. #DNAWithRahulSinha #DNA #DonaldTrump #Putin #Alaska #AlaskaSummit @RahulSinhaTV — Zee News (@ZeeNews) August 16, 2025 Trump Briefs Zelensky, Sets Stage For Peace Talks Following the Alaska summit, Trump immediately called Zelensky and briefed him for 90 minutes on the substance of his three-hour talks with Putin. Soon after, Trump invited the Ukrainian leader to Washington, with the meeting scheduled for August 18. Trump has made it clear that instead of a temporary ceasefire, he will push Zelensky towards a permanent peace deal with Russia. Trump has also indicated that once the Washington meeting takes place, he will facilitate direct talks between Zelensky and Putin, setting the stage for what could be a decisive peace summit between Ukraine and Russia. The White House talks will be their second encounter in six months. Zelensky still remembers his last visit in February 2025, which ended on a bitter note after public disagreements with Trump and Vice President JD Vance. This time, however, the stakes are even higher, with Trump openly stating that "agreement now depends on Zelensky." Economic and Geopolitical Challenges Facing Ukraine The analysis also highlights Ukraine's fragile economy, its heavy dependence on US and EU aid, NATO's role, and Trump's growing scepticism towards the alliance. With over $350 billion already poured into Ukraine by the US and Europe, any shift in American support could dramatically alter the war's trajectory. Trump's Reception of Putin Stokes Speculation Trump's warm reception of Putin in Alaska, complete with a red carpet, joint appearances, and symbolic military salutes, has further fuelled speculation of a new understanding between Washington and Moscow. Observers believe Trump may leverage peace in Ukraine for gains in energy, trade, and arms control negotiations, while sidelining NATO. As the world waits for Trump-Zelensky talks in Washington, the key question remains: Will Zelensky accept Trump's terms for a Russia-Ukraine peace deal, or risk being left isolated by the US? ALSO READ: Trump Says Xi Jinping Assured Him China Will Not Invade Taiwan During His Presidency
New Indian Express
20 minutes ago
- New Indian Express
Trump backs Putin plan for Russia to take full control of Donbas, freeze frontline in Ukraine: Report
WARSAW: US President Donald Trump backs a Russian proposal for Moscow to take full control of two Ukrainian regions and freeze the front line in two others which Moscow only partially controls, a source told AFP. The source with knowledge of the matter said Russian President Vladimir Putin "de facto demands that Ukraine leave Donbas", an area consisting of the Donetsk and Lugansk regions in eastern Ukraine. "Trump is inclined to support it," the source said. Trump on Saturday spoke to Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky and European leaders about his talks Friday with Russian President Vladimir Putin. "The Ukrainian president refused to leave Donbas," the source said. Zelensky has rejected any territorial concessions, saying he is bound by Ukraine's constitution. But he has not ruled out discussing the issue at a trilateral meeting with Trump and Putin. The New York Times also cited two senior European officials saying Trump supported Putin's plan "to end the war in Ukraine by ceding unconquered territory to the Russian invaders, rather than try for a ceasefire".
Hindustan Times
20 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
West Virginia sends hundreds of National Guard members to Washington after Trump's request
After United States President Donald Trump's request, West Virginia is sending 300 to 400 National Guard personnel to Washington, DC to assist in the federal takeover of the city's police department. West Virginia's decision to assist the Trump administration was announced by Governor Patrick Morrisey on X. (AP) Trump, earlier this week, activated hundreds of District of Columbia National Guard to back up local law enforcement, while calling a 'crime emergency' in the US capital. While announcing the decision of federal takeover and deploying 800 National Guards at DC, Trump alleged that crimes in the capital had gone up. West Virginia's decision to assist the Trump administration was announced by Governor Patrick Morrisey on X. 'At the request of the Trump administration, I have directed the @WVNationalGuard to support the President's initiative to make D.C. safe and beautiful. We are deploying 300-400 skilled personnel to the nation's capital, reflecting our commitment to a strong and secure America,' Morrisey wrote on X. The deployment comes under the comment of the state's adjutant general, Maj. Gen. Jim Seward, who said that West Virginia was ready to support its 'partners in the National Capital Region and contribute to the collective effort of making our nation's capital a clean and safe environment.' 'The National Guard's unique capabilities and preparedness make it an invaluable partner in this important undertaking,' Seward said in a statement. Meanwhile, DC challenged the takeover of its police department in court on Friday. This came hours after the Trump administration took a major step, naming a federal official as the new emergency head of police the department, with all the powers of a police chief. The fresh lawsuit, filed by District of Columbia Attorney General Brian Schwalb, said that the US President had gone far beyond his power under the law. Schwalb asked a judge to find that in such cases, the power remains with the police department and also sought an emergency restraining order. 'The administration's unlawful actions are an affront to the dignity and autonomy of the 700,000 Americans who call D.C. home. This is the gravest threat to Home Rule that the District has ever faced, and we are fighting to stop it,' Shwalb said.
