Hamas in talks on final details of Gaza ceasefire
Gaza's ruling militants are expected to agree to the latest proposal for a ceasefire and the release of hostages, but the group is seeking clarification about some outstanding issues, the sources said as the talks take place in Cairo on Thursday.
'Hamas has agreed to about 90 per cent of the provisions of the proposals,' said one source. 'It's searching for details and clarifications before it gives it final agreement to the plan.'
The main provisions in the proposed deal are a 60-day truce during which Hamas will release 10 living hostages as well as the remains of half those who died in captivity in return for about 1,200 Palestinians detained in Israel.
The proposal also envisions negotiations between Israel and Hamas on ending the war and an Israeli withdrawal from Gaza.
Mediators from Egypt, Qatar and the US would provide assurances about those negotiations, but Israel is not committing to that part, according to an Egyptian official quoted by the Associated Press on Thursday.
Israeli National Security Minister Itamar Ben-Gvir, who has bitterly opposed any deal throughout the war, called on political ally Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich to 'join forces' to stop a 'reckless deal'. Mr Smotrich this week promised to oppose any deal that ended fighting in the strip.
'We must not stop the war without victory,' Mr Ben-Gvir told Israel's public broadcaster. 'What do you think will happen if we stop the war now? That Hamas will hand out flowers?'.
US President Donald Trump has said Israel has agreed the terms of the 60-day ceasefire and that Washington would work with both sides during that time to try to end more than 20 months of war.
If Hamas does not accept what is on offer, Mr Trump warned, its prospects will get worse.
The renewed efforts to reach a Gaza truce are taking place in the aftermath of US and Israeli strikes on nuclear sites in Iran, Hamas's chief foreign backer. They also come ahead of Mr Trump's meeting with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu in Washington on Monday.
The sources said senior Hamas leaders were in Cairo on Thursday for talks with Egyptian officials to iron out details and timelines of a range of issues, including the withdrawal of the Israeli military from areas in Gaza it seized after a previous ceasefire collapsed in March.
Also under review by the two sides are the mechanics of the resumption and distribution of humanitarian aid for Gaza, where hundreds of thousands are facing hunger and the acute shortage of essential life items.
It is not immediately clear how the proposal addresses Hamas's long-standing conditions, chiefly an end to the war and an Israeli withdrawal from Gaza.
Also not clear are the terms that Israel has accepted and whether it offered any concessions on its often repeated assertion that Hamas must dismantle its military and governance capabilities and free all the hostages before the war can end.
The Egyptian official quoted by AP said both sides have agreed that the UN and the Palestinian Red Crescent would lead aid operations in Gaza and that the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation, which is backed by Israel and the US, would also continue to operate in the enclave.
The Hamas and Egyptian officials are also discussing details of the proposed departure from Gaza of wounded Palestinians for treatment as well as senior Hamas officials who are expected to live in exile abroad.
The precise mandate of a council of independent Palestinian technocrats expected to run the coastal territory when the proposed 60-day truce goes into effect is also being negotiated, according to the sources.
Also under discussion is the storing of weapons to be laid down by Hamas as part of the deal and the return by Israel of the bodies of the group's late Hamas leader, Yahya Sinwar, and his brother, military commander Mohammed Sinwar. Both were killed by Israel.
But Mr Ben-Gvir's call highlights how easily a deal could still be derailed despite apparent recent progress, particularly if Israel's leading hardliners band together.
Mr Ben-Gvir removed his Jewish Power party from the coalition in January in anger about a short-lived hostage deal. He rejoined the government when the war resumed in March.
His manoeuvres have prompted Israel's opposition to offer Mr Netanyahu a safety net, in case the government lacks the votes to pass a deal. Opposition leader Yair Lapid wrote on X that he was willing to offer his 23 seats to get a hostage deal. 'We need to bring them all home now,' he said.
Despite potential difficulties for Mr Netanyahu, senior ministers in the coalition appear to be supporting the push for an agreement. 'There is a large majority in the government and among the people for the plan to release hostages,' Foreign Minister Gideon Sa'ar said on Wednesday. 'If there is an opportunity to do so, it must not be missed!'
A forum representing the families of most Israeli hostages have published a clip in which two captives still held in Gaza described themselves as 'dead men walking'. Maxim Herkin and Bar Kuperstein told the camera they 'don't feel like human beings'.
The full video calls for one overall deal, as opposed to a series of staggered releases, the format for two previous deals. The Hostages and Missing Families Forum said its members 'demand a comprehensive agreement that will ensure the return of every last hostage'.
The Gaza war broke out in October 2023, when Hamas-led militants attacked southern Israel, killing 1,200 people and taking roughly 250 hostages. The group is believed to still have some 50 hostages, with fewer than half of them thought to be alive.
The attack drew a devastating military campaign by Israel that has to date killed more than 56,000 Palestinians and wounded more than twice that number, according to health authorities in Gaza.
The war has also displaced, more than once in many case, the majority of Gaza's estimated two million residents and destroyed large swathes of built-up areas.
Mediators from the US, Qatar and Egypt have been trying in vain since March to broker a pause in the war and the release of hostages.
The only other truce in Gaza since the war began came in November 2023. It lasted a week.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Zawya
2 hours ago
- Zawya
IMF to combine reviews of Egypt's $8bln loan program
WASHINGTON: The International Monetary Fund on Thursday said it would combine the fifth and sixth reviews of Egypt's $8 billion support program this fall to give authorities more time to meet critical objectives of its economic reform program. IMF spokeswoman Julie Kozack told a regular briefing that IMF staff were working with Egyptian authorities on finalizing key policy measures, particularly on the state's role in the economy. A decision to combine the reviews, first reported by Reuters on Tuesday, could delay a new disbursement of funds to Egypt by half a year. Kozack said it was premature to discuss the level of any expected disbursement related to the combined reviews. The International Monetary Fund approved its fourth review of the program in March, unlocking a disbursement of $1.2 billion and bringing total disbursements to about $3.5 billion. The 46-month facility was signed in March 2024 following more than a year of severe foreign currency shortages and inflation that peaked at 38% in September 2023. Kozack said an IMF team met with Egyptian officials in Cairo May 6 to 18 for what she called "productive" discussions. "Egypt continues to make progress under its macroeconomic reform program, and we can say that there's been notable improvements in inflation and in the level of foreign exchange reserves, which have increased," she told reporters. However, she said, Egypt needed to deepen its reforms, reduce the state's footprint in the economy and improve the business environment to safeguard macroeconomic stability and bolster resilience. "Key priorities are advancing the state ownership policy and asset diversification program in sectors where the state has committed to withdraw," she said, adding such steps were critical to enabling the private sector to drive stronger and more sustainable growth. Staff discussions with authorities suggested that "more time is needed to finalize the key policy measures, particularly related to the state's role in the economy," Kozack said. (Reporting by Andrea Shalal; Editing by Cynthia Osterman)
Khaleej Times
2 hours ago
- Khaleej Times
'A serious escalation': UAE condemns Israeli minister's call for annexing occupied West Bank
The UAE has strongly condemned statements made by an Israeli minister regarding imposing sovereingty over the occupied West Bank. Yariv Levin, Israel's Minister of Justice, has called for expanding the scope of Jewish settlements in the occupied Palestinian West Bank. Cabinet ministers in Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's Likud party also called on Wednesday for Israel to annexe the Israeli-occupied region before the Knesset recesses at the end of the month. 'The task must be completed, the existential threat removed from within, and another massacre in the heart of the country must be prevented,' the petition stated. In a statement issued by the UAE's Ministry of Foreign Affairs, the nation affirmed that such statement constitute "a serious escalation and a blatant violation of resolutions on international legitimacy". It also expressed "its categorical rejection of all provocative statements and measures aimed at altering the legal status of the Occupied Palestinian Territory, as well as all practices that threaten further escalation and instability in the region and impede endeavours to achieve peace and stability". Calling on the international community to intensify efforts to reach an immediate ceasefire to avoid further loss of life, the UAE clarified that it is steadfast in its commitment to reinforcing peace and justice, and safeguarding the legitimate rights of the Palestinian people. Gulf countries like Saudi Arabia, Kuwait and Qatar condemned and denounced statements made by the Israeli minister calling for annexation of the occupied West Bank. Most countries regard Jewish settlements in the West Bank, many of which cut off Palestinian communities from one another, as a violation of international law. With each advance of Israeli settlements and roads, the West Bank becomes more fractured, further undermining prospects for a contiguous land on which Palestinians could build a sovereign state long envisaged in Middle East peacemaking.
The National
3 hours ago
- The National
A volatile Middle East cannot afford more games of tactical ambiguity
It has been less than a fortnight since what US President Donald Trump dubbed the ' 12-day war ' between Israel and Iran came to an end. Despite the acute relief felt by most people across the Middle East, especially civilians in Iran and Israel, the atmosphere is tense and the situation remains volatile, with the war in Gaza ongoing, the Israeli government threatening more strikes and Iran's nuclear programme raising concerns. Such unpredictability is not helped by this week's decision by Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian to approve a law suspending the country's co-operation with the International Atomic Energy Agency. The UN nuclear watchdog has effectively been left in the dark and is awaiting further official information from Tehran, an IAEA spokesman told The National. It should not be surprising that Iran – already formally in breach of its non-proliferation obligations – sees little value in acquiescing to demands for greater transparency over its nuclear programme. Israel chose to unilaterally strike targets across the country, killing hundreds of civilians in the process. The US later joined this assault, dropping several of its largest non-nuclear bombs on Iran's nuclear facilities. Nevertheless, for Tehran to cut ties with the IAEA would be a strategic mistake. The agency remains the only trust-building mechanism for Iran to assuage international concerns about its nuclear programme, the condition of which is now shrouded in uncertainty. Threatening to walk away is not leverage, nor would it restore deterrence against further attack. In fact, Iran's going dark would achieve the opposite effect; disengaging from the IAEA would generate more distrust and increase the speculation surrounding the country's nuclear intentions. This does not negate the need to address Israel's nuclear capabilities which are arguably more opaque than Iran's. The need for a region free of nuclear weapons has never been greater. Iran's unprecedented strike on Qatar's Al Udeid air base upped the stakes for Tehran's near neighbours The current situation leaves the rest of the Middle East in a difficult position. Iran's unprecedented strike on Qatar's Al Udeid air base upped the stakes for Tehran's near neighbours by demonstrating that Tehran's relationship with its GCC partners would come second to its perceived need for retaliation. Indeed, although some reports have suggested that Iran's missile salvo was choreographed so as to reduce the risk of casualties, Qatar's Foreign Ministry spokesman, Majed Al Ansari, rightly noted on Monday that Tehran's attack was not 'harmless', having forced the country to close its airspace for several hours, activate its air-defence systems and experience 'reputational damage when it comes to safety and security". All sides should be aware that the stakes are too high for further games of tactical ambiguity. More strategic nous by Israel and Iran is required. For Iran, there is a path to security and a truly civilian nuclear programme, but it will require Tehran to co-operate with the international community through bodies such as the IAEA, not abandon them. Meanwhile, Israel continues to fuel regional anger and frustration through the appalling violence being meted out by its forces to Palestinian civilians in Gaza and the West Bank even as Iranian missiles struck Tel Aviv and other cities. Agreeing to a ceasefire would be an important step to reducing the volatility gripping much of the Middle East, and starting to work on a long term peace plan for the region.
