Oil set to rise again amid Israel-Iran conflict
Brent crude futures fell $1.57 cents, or 2 per cent, to $77.28 a barrel. On a weekly basis, it was up 3.9 per cent.
The US West Texas Intermediate crude for July - which did not settle on Thursday as it was a US holiday and expires on Friday - was up 86 cents, or 1.1 per cent, to $76. The more liquid WTI for August rose 0.7 per cent, or 50 cents to $74.
Prices jumped almost 3 per cent on Thursday as Israel bombed nuclear targets in Iran, and Iran fired missiles and drones at Israel after hitting an Israeli hospital overnight.
"Oil prices remain high due to doubled tanker rates and ships avoiding the Strait of Hormuz," said Phil Flynn, analyst at The Price Futures Group.
"The risk to supply is keeping them on edge while there have been no major disruptions of Iranian exports," Flynn said.
Iran is the third-largest producer among members of the Organisation of the Petroleum Exporting Countries, extracting about 3.3 million barrels per day (bpd)of crude oil.
About 18 million to 21 million bpd of oil and oil products move through the Strait of Hormuz along Iran's southern coast, and there is widespread concern the fighting could disrupt trade flows in a blow to supplies.
There was no sign of an exit strategy from either side, as Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said Tehran's "tyrants" would pay the "full price" and Iran warned against a "third party" joining the attacks.
The White House said on Thursday that President Donald Trump will decide whether the US will get involved in the Israel-Iran conflict in the next two weeks.
"The "two-week deadline" is a tactic Trump has used in other key decisions. Often these deadlines expire without concrete action,.. which would see the crude oil price remain elevated and potentially build on recent gains," said Tony Sycamore, analyst at IG.
Oil prices were on track to rise for the third straight week, with investors on edge as the week-old war between Israel and Iran showed no signs of either side backing down.
Brent crude futures fell $1.57 cents, or 2 per cent, to $77.28 a barrel. On a weekly basis, it was up 3.9 per cent.
The US West Texas Intermediate crude for July - which did not settle on Thursday as it was a US holiday and expires on Friday - was up 86 cents, or 1.1 per cent, to $76. The more liquid WTI for August rose 0.7 per cent, or 50 cents to $74.
Prices jumped almost 3 per cent on Thursday as Israel bombed nuclear targets in Iran, and Iran fired missiles and drones at Israel after hitting an Israeli hospital overnight.
"Oil prices remain high due to doubled tanker rates and ships avoiding the Strait of Hormuz," said Phil Flynn, analyst at The Price Futures Group.
"The risk to supply is keeping them on edge while there have been no major disruptions of Iranian exports," Flynn said.
Iran is the third-largest producer among members of the Organisation of the Petroleum Exporting Countries, extracting about 3.3 million barrels per day (bpd)of crude oil.
About 18 million to 21 million bpd of oil and oil products move through the Strait of Hormuz along Iran's southern coast, and there is widespread concern the fighting could disrupt trade flows in a blow to supplies.
There was no sign of an exit strategy from either side, as Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said Tehran's "tyrants" would pay the "full price" and Iran warned against a "third party" joining the attacks.
The White House said on Thursday that President Donald Trump will decide whether the US will get involved in the Israel-Iran conflict in the next two weeks.
"The "two-week deadline" is a tactic Trump has used in other key decisions. Often these deadlines expire without concrete action,.. which would see the crude oil price remain elevated and potentially build on recent gains," said Tony Sycamore, analyst at IG.
Oil prices were on track to rise for the third straight week, with investors on edge as the week-old war between Israel and Iran showed no signs of either side backing down.
Brent crude futures fell $1.57 cents, or 2 per cent, to $77.28 a barrel. On a weekly basis, it was up 3.9 per cent.
The US West Texas Intermediate crude for July - which did not settle on Thursday as it was a US holiday and expires on Friday - was up 86 cents, or 1.1 per cent, to $76. The more liquid WTI for August rose 0.7 per cent, or 50 cents to $74.
Prices jumped almost 3 per cent on Thursday as Israel bombed nuclear targets in Iran, and Iran fired missiles and drones at Israel after hitting an Israeli hospital overnight.
"Oil prices remain high due to doubled tanker rates and ships avoiding the Strait of Hormuz," said Phil Flynn, analyst at The Price Futures Group.
"The risk to supply is keeping them on edge while there have been no major disruptions of Iranian exports," Flynn said.
Iran is the third-largest producer among members of the Organisation of the Petroleum Exporting Countries, extracting about 3.3 million barrels per day (bpd)of crude oil.
About 18 million to 21 million bpd of oil and oil products move through the Strait of Hormuz along Iran's southern coast, and there is widespread concern the fighting could disrupt trade flows in a blow to supplies.
There was no sign of an exit strategy from either side, as Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said Tehran's "tyrants" would pay the "full price" and Iran warned against a "third party" joining the attacks.
The White House said on Thursday that President Donald Trump will decide whether the US will get involved in the Israel-Iran conflict in the next two weeks.
"The "two-week deadline" is a tactic Trump has used in other key decisions. Often these deadlines expire without concrete action,.. which would see the crude oil price remain elevated and potentially build on recent gains," said Tony Sycamore, analyst at IG.
Oil prices were on track to rise for the third straight week, with investors on edge as the week-old war between Israel and Iran showed no signs of either side backing down.
Brent crude futures fell $1.57 cents, or 2 per cent, to $77.28 a barrel. On a weekly basis, it was up 3.9 per cent.
The US West Texas Intermediate crude for July - which did not settle on Thursday as it was a US holiday and expires on Friday - was up 86 cents, or 1.1 per cent, to $76. The more liquid WTI for August rose 0.7 per cent, or 50 cents to $74.
Prices jumped almost 3 per cent on Thursday as Israel bombed nuclear targets in Iran, and Iran fired missiles and drones at Israel after hitting an Israeli hospital overnight.
"Oil prices remain high due to doubled tanker rates and ships avoiding the Strait of Hormuz," said Phil Flynn, analyst at The Price Futures Group.
"The risk to supply is keeping them on edge while there have been no major disruptions of Iranian exports," Flynn said.
Iran is the third-largest producer among members of the Organisation of the Petroleum Exporting Countries, extracting about 3.3 million barrels per day (bpd)of crude oil.
About 18 million to 21 million bpd of oil and oil products move through the Strait of Hormuz along Iran's southern coast, and there is widespread concern the fighting could disrupt trade flows in a blow to supplies.
There was no sign of an exit strategy from either side, as Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said Tehran's "tyrants" would pay the "full price" and Iran warned against a "third party" joining the attacks.
The White House said on Thursday that President Donald Trump will decide whether the US will get involved in the Israel-Iran conflict in the next two weeks.
"The "two-week deadline" is a tactic Trump has used in other key decisions. Often these deadlines expire without concrete action,.. which would see the crude oil price remain elevated and potentially build on recent gains," said Tony Sycamore, analyst at IG.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Perth Now
3 hours ago
- Perth Now
Hezbollah warns disarmament plan could spark civil war
Hezbollah has raised the spectre of civil war with a warning there will be "no life" in Lebanon if the government seeks to confront or eliminate the Iran-backed group. The government wants to control arms in line with a US-backed plan following Israel's military campaign against Hezbollah, which was founded four decades ago with the backing of Tehran's Revolutionary Guards. But the group is resisting pressure to disarm, saying that cannot happen until Israel ends its strikes and occupation of a southern strip of Lebanon that had been a Hezbollah stronghold. "This is our nation together. We live in dignity together, and we build its sovereignty together - or Lebanon will have no life if you stand on the other side and try to confront us and eliminate us," its leader Naim Qassem said in a televised speech on Friday. Israel has dealt Hezbollah heavy blows in the past two years, killing many of its top brass including former leader Hassan Nasrallah and 5000 of its fighters, and destroying much of its arsenal. The Lebanese cabinet last week tasked the army with confining weapons only to state security forces, a move that has outraged Hezbollah. Qassem accused the government of implementing an "American-Israeli order to eliminate the resistance, even if that leads to civil war and internal strife". However, he said Hezbollah and the Amal movement, its Shi'ite Muslim ally, had decided to delay any street protests while there was still scope for talks. "There is still room for discussion, for adjustments, and for a political resolution before the situation escalates to a confrontation no one wants," Qassem said. "But if it is imposed on us, we are ready, and we have no other choice ... At that point, there will be a protest in the street, all across Lebanon, that will reach the American embassy." The conflict between Hezbollah and Israel, which left parts of Lebanon in ruins, erupted in October 2023 when the group opened fire at Israeli positions along the southern border in solidarity with its Palestinian ally Hamas at the start of the Gaza war. Hezbollah and Amal still retain influence politically, appointing Shi'ite ministers to cabinet and holding the Shi'ite seats in parliament. But for the first time in years, they do not hold a "blocking third" of cabinet, enabling them to veto government decisions in the past. Hezbollah retains strong support among the Shi'ite community in Lebanon, but calls for its disarmament across the rest of society have grown.
West Australian
4 hours ago
- West Australian
PM clashes with top US diplomat over Australia's ‘ill-timed', ‘not okay' recognition of Palestinian statehood
Anthony Albanese and a top US diplomat in Israel have clashed over Australia's engagement with the Trump Administration over its decision to recognise Palestinian statehood. Washington's ambassador to Israel said the White House was 'disappointed' by Australia's pledge on Palestine, adding it was made worse by Canberra failing to provide a 'heads-up' on the landmark policy shift. Mike Huckabee claimed Donald Trump and US Secretary of State Marco Rubio were furious about the upcoming policy shift and labelled it 'not okay' and 'ill-timed' in an interview on ABC's 7.30 program on Thursday night. 'There's an enormous level of disappointment and some disgust,' Mr Huckabee said. 'It's not okay, and it was ill-timed. I think the timing has been very hurtful to any prospects of negotiating a settlement in Gaza with Hamas. 'We would have expected that there would have been some heads-up. There wasn't. There was no communication with the United States.' When asked if the matter had been discussed with the US President, Mr Huckabee said 'absolutely'. But the Prime Minister and his team denied the assertion that there was no forewarning in Friday's media appearances, saying US memos released contradicted Mr Huckabee's claim. Senior Labor Minister Mark Butler pointed to a US State Department release minutes before Mr Albanese's announcement on Monday as proof Australia had prior communication with Washington. In the same press conference, Foreign Minister Penny Wong had flanked the PM and said as a courtesy to the ally she'd told Secretary of State Marco Rubio prior the announcement. 'There is a read-out from the state department about that conversation. So, I am not quite sure why the Ambassador to Israel says that,' Mr Butler told Sunrise on Friday morning. 'This is the US Ambassador to Israel. His job is to manage the relationship between America and Israel, not the Ambassador to Australia.' Mr Albanese also cast aside the criticisms and questioned what weight Mr Huckabee's words carried. 'He is an ambassador of a country, not Australia… Israel. My job is to represent Australia's interests,' he said. 'We're a sovereign nation, and he's entitled to put his views, but we're also entitled to put our views. We didn't do it shyly.' He added that he had also flagged his intentions with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu in a half-hour phone call last Thursday in which he said the foreign leader had offered up 'no political solution'. The PM said he hoped the 'huge momentum' to recognise an independent Palestinian state at the 80th General Assembly of the UN in New York next month would be a 'circuit breaker'. 'The whole world — Australia, along with like-minded countries — is combining to say we need to advance that. It can't continue to just keep going. 'You break the cycle of violence by isolating Hamas, by not continuing to just do what has been happening since October 7.' The PM's Palestine declaration had prompted a political storm in the days that followed, including sharp criticisms from the Opposition and Jewish groups. A string of contradictory statements released from several senior figures in the listed terrorist group Hamas only added fuel to the political fire. Nine newspapers had published a statement from imprisoned Hamas co-founder Hassan Yousef on Wednesday, hailing the PM as a hero after the government's recognition of Palestine. But a post to the group's official Telegram channel later disavowed the statement, saying Yousef had been detained in an Israeli jail since October 19, 2023 with no communication. Nine later clarified the endorsement had been released by his office, which often issues statements on his behalf. The denial was backed by Hamas foreign relations chief, Istanbul-based Basem Naim on Thursday afternoon, who doubted the statement in an interview with AAP. By the evening, Hamas media director Ismail Al-Thawabta had clarified the group's position to ABC, saying the group did praise the PM's recognition move. 'We welcome Australia's decision to recognise the state of Palestine, and consider it a positive step towards the legitimate rights of the Palestinian people,' Mr Al-Thawabta said. The PM seized on the confusion, accusing the media and the Opposition of feeding into Hamas 'propaganda'. But Opposition leader Sussan Ley had claimed the Hamas endorsement had shown Mr Albanese was the one who was 'making a real mess of this'. Shadow Defence Minister Angus Taylor on Friday added that being 'praised by a terrorist organisation' was 'not a good endorsement' of Australia's foreign policy. 'This is the wrong policy, the preconditions have not been met. We all want to see peace in the Middle East, but frankly, this is not the pathway to get there,' he told 2GB. Mr Huckabee also defended the Israeli Defence Force's military conduct as 'the most ethical' despite claims of mass starvation, displacement and people being killed while searching for aid. Instead, he claimed Hamas was putting 'its civilians in front of targets that the Israelis announced in advance they're going to hit'. It comes as deputy Israeli Foreign Minister Sharren Haskel on Friday denied reports of starvation in Gaza, saying Palestinian funeral congregants were not 'looking as if they're starving' and 'actually look quite well'. 'When you look at those images . . . you see well-fed people. I'm not saying there isn't a humanitarian crisis, but there's a long way to go and describe it as a famine or starvation,' she told ABC radio. Ms Haskel went on to criticise the 'extreme' protesters and 'useful idiots' who protested Israel's military actions in Gaza during the Sydney Harbour Bridge March for Humanity.
Sky News AU
5 hours ago
- Sky News AU
Former Home Affairs boss says Albanese's recognition of Palestine may backfire as Hamas remains entrenched
Former Home Affairs Secretary Mike Pezzullo has raised serious concerns over Australia's decision to recognise a Palestinian state, suggesting the move could backfire by undermining the hopes for a two-state solution. Speaking to Sky News, Pezzullo said that far from bringing peace closer, the push for international recognition may in fact strengthen the hand of Israeli factions seeking to permanently sever the West Bank. 'In the aftermath of the events of 7 October, it struck me that we're further away from a two-state solution and I don't think anything that we've seen in the last little while has changed that assessment,' he said. 'As we come up to the two-year anniversary of that dreadful Hamas attack, you'd have to think that the prospects of a two-state solution are receding even more into the distance.' Pezzullo pointed to recent developments such as the announcement by Israeli Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich regarding the controversial E1 settlement, which critics say would divide the West Bank and make a contiguous Palestinian state virtually impossible. 'People said that that is likely to happen. It's going to embolden those in the Israeli government who want to kill off the idea of a two-state solution, and I fear that is indeed what's occurring,' he said. Despite Prime Minister Anthony Albanese's push to support Palestinian statehood as a way to advance peace and pressure Hamas, Pezzullo cast doubt on the effectiveness of such a strategy without concrete shifts in reality on the ground. 'Notwithstanding the laudable goal of trying to keep the two-state solution idea alive, Marco Rubio is correct. It's got to be circumstances on the ground that are going to drive that,' he said. And if the two parties, the Palestinian Authority and the Israeli government, can't come to terms on the two-state solution, it's just simply not going to happen.' Pezzullo did acknowledge a new dynamic emerging in the region with the Arab League playing a more assertive role, particularly in distancing itself from Hamas following the October 7 attacks. 'I think in the aftermath of the shock of 7 October, the Arab nations started to come together to say, 'Look, if we don't get involved, there's no prospect of this getting settled'. So I think that has been a significant change,' he said. However, he warned that the problem remains fundamentally unresolved, especially with Hamas still active in Gaza and no coordinated international plan to remove them from power. 'Everyone wants Hamas out of the equation, but no one's got a plan to achieve it,' he said. 'At least if you give the Israeli government the benefit of some doubt, they're now down to the most dug-in, the most hard-to-get-to elements of Hamas. Regrettably, sometimes with a really well-dug-in enemy, aerial strikes and other forms of military activity just simply don't cut it.' Pezzullo also warned that even a total military defeat of Hamas would not necessarily end the underlying extremism driving the conflict. 'Even if in formal terms you get to say the last headquarters cell, you defeat them in the last trench and victory is declared . . . A new group emerges with a different name, a splinter group that then becomes the main group.' He proposed that only a long-term, international governance arrangement, possibly involving the Arab League, Europe, Israel and a new generation of Palestinian leadership, could create the conditions for peace. 'Perhaps some kind of supervised administration that might have to be there for decades . . . actually rebuilds all the schools, clears out the sanitation issues, rebuilds the health system and basically educates a whole new generation of people to live in peace,' he said. 'I can't see any of that happening anytime soon. It's going to be a multi-decade effort.'
