The mirror, megaphone and us
Once limited to radio shows and printed headlines, the media industry has now evolved into an ever-expanding universe of tweets, TikToks, podcasts and 24/7 news cycles.
However, as this universe grows, we are left with important questions: Who holds the mirror? Who controls the megaphone? Are we seeing the truth or just a reflection of what someone wants us to see?
The media industry today is more powerful than ever. Through a mix of traditional formats like television, radio and newspapers and modern platforms such as Instagram, YouTube and online blogs, media reaches billions daily.
Whether it is breaking news or a viral dance challenge, content spreads faster than we can blink. With that speed comes influence over how we think, what we buy and who we trust.
But the power of the media is a double-edged sword. On one hand, it gives voice to the voiceless, sheds light on injustice and connects people across borders. On the other hand, it can distort facts, spread misinformation and create echo chambers that trap us in one- sided views.
The rise of digital media has made everyone a potential journalist, yet not everyone follows journalistic ethics. One viral falsehood can destroy reputations or sway entire elections.
Behind the glossy screens and fast-scrolling feeds are companies, giant tech firms and media conglomerates pulling the strings.
Meta, Google and even lesser-known algorithm-driven news curators have the power to decide what you see and what you don't. That is not always a conspiracy; it is often just business. Their goal is engagement, and outrage engages. Emotional headlines, shocking visuals and controversial opinions get more clicks than calm, balanced reporting.
The real danger? We may not even notice we are being influenced. When our feed agrees with us, we assume it is the truth. When we share a meme, we don't always stop to fact-check. The media does not always tell us what to think but it does a brilliant job of telling us what to think about.
Yet, in this landscape of noise and narratives, there is hope. A new wave of digital literacy is rising. More people are learning to question sources, cross-check facts and explore alternative viewpoints.
Movements like citizen journalism, podcasts by young creators and independent media collectives are reclaiming the media space. These voices may be smaller but they are often more authentic, raw and brave.
In Malaysia, where media freedom is still evolving, the line between regulation and censorship remains delicate. While regulation can shield the public from hate speech and misinformation, excessive control risks silencing dissent.
The challenge lies in creating a media environment that is free and fair. Laws should empower the truth, not shield those in power from accountability.
So, where do we go from here? Perhaps the answer lies in recognising the role we play. We should not be just passive consumers of media, we should be participants, creators and amplifiers. Every share, like or comment is a vote. Every story we believe without question and every post we spread without reading will shape the larger media narrative.
If the media is the mirror and megaphone, then we must become more mindful of what we reflect and what we shout. We must demand more transparency from platforms, support ethical journalism and educate the next generation, not just on how to use media, but how to think in a media-saturated world.
The media industry is not just about technology or profit; it is about people telling stories, sharing truths and shaping the future. Whether that future is informed, inclusive and empowering – or divisive, distorted and dangerous – depends on how we choose to listen and how we choose to speak.
Syarfa Akila Matta is an undergraduate student at Universiti Malaya. Comments: letters@thesundaily.com
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Star
21 hours ago
- The Star
Jack Neo's new music video features AI-generated image of Lee Kuan Yew
The AI-generated image of Lee Kuan Yew appeared in the final scene of Jack Neo's music video for the song, 'We Are Singapore'. Photos: Jack Neo/Instagram Singaporean filmmaker Jack Neo has created a new music video in conjunction with the month of National Day, using artificial intelligence (AI) technology to recreate images such as the appearance of Singapore's founding prime minister Lee Kuan Yew and his voice. Neo, 65, posted the music video for the song, We Are Singapore , on social media on Aug 18. Referring to Prime Minister Lawrence Wong's National Day Rally speech on Aug 17, Neo wrote in Chinese: 'The speech by PM Wong yesterday once again reminded us of the importance of unity among Singaporeans. With this in mind, I would like to share with you a belated SG60 song. Although it was not released on National Day, August remains the month of National Day. It's not too late to express this gesture.' Neo said in an interview with Chinese-language evening daily Shin Min Daily News that it took him about a month to complete the entire song. 'I wrote the lyrics myself, taking two to three weeks to conceptualise them. The arrangement, composition and vocals were generated by AI,' he added. 'The biggest challenge was that AI generated many versions of the song – each of which sounded great – so I had to choose the one I was most satisfied with. I chose this version because it resonated with a more Singaporean feel.' In an interview, Jack Neo says that he would continue to use AI to create songs as well as incorporate AI technology into film production. The AI-generated image of the late Lee appeared in the final scene of the music video. Neo used AI to recreate the iconic voice of Lee, who said: 'I wish Singapore a happy 60th birthday. Happy birthday.' Neo said he believed many people would not forget the contributions made by Lee to Singapore. 'Singapore is now celebrating SG60 with happiness, and I always feel that the nation's prosperity, progress and global standing are inseparably linked to his tireless efforts back then,' he said. 'Using AI to have him join us in the celebration feels very meaningful to me.' Neo also incorporated AI-generated images of historical footage, faces of artistes such as himself, Terence Cao, Collin Chee and Dawn Yeoh, as well as Singapore's Cabinet ministers in the video. 'Actually, what I hoped for was to use AI to generate a version where several Singaporean singers who are well-known internationally, including Stefanie Sun, JJ Lin, A-do, Kit Chan and Tanya Chua, singing this song together,' Neo said. 'I think that would be very interesting, more perfect and and more meaningful.' The filmmaker said he had tried using AI to generate images of these singers and the results were quite good. However, he decided not to use them as he has not sought permission from the singers and due to the tight production schedule. View this post on Instagram A post shared by Jack Neo Ck (@jackneock) Neo's music video received different reactions on social media. Some netizens praised him for his innovation and courage in using AI for the video, while other netizens questioned if it was disrespectful to use Lee's AI-generated image. Neo told Shin Min that he would continue to use AI to create songs as well as incorporate AI technology into film production. He had done so for his most recent movie I Want To Be Boss, which opened in Singapore cinemas in January. He believes that AI will assist humans in many areas in the future, but humans will still be in control. 'Many people are afraid of AI, but I don't think there is a need (to fear it). AI won't replace humans. The only ones who will be replaced are those who don't know how to use it.' – The Straits Times/Asia News Network
The Sun
a day ago
- The Sun
The mirror, megaphone and us
IMAGINE standing in front of a mirror that not only reflects your image but also echoes your voice to millions. That is what the media has become; not just a mirror of society but also a megaphone that can amplify, distort or drown out voices. Once limited to radio shows and printed headlines, the media industry has now evolved into an ever-expanding universe of tweets, TikToks, podcasts and 24/7 news cycles. However, as this universe grows, we are left with important questions: Who holds the mirror? Who controls the megaphone? Are we seeing the truth or just a reflection of what someone wants us to see? The media industry today is more powerful than ever. Through a mix of traditional formats like television, radio and newspapers and modern platforms such as Instagram, YouTube and online blogs, media reaches billions daily. Whether it is breaking news or a viral dance challenge, content spreads faster than we can blink. With that speed comes influence over how we think, what we buy and who we trust. But the power of the media is a double-edged sword. On one hand, it gives voice to the voiceless, sheds light on injustice and connects people across borders. On the other hand, it can distort facts, spread misinformation and create echo chambers that trap us in one- sided views. The rise of digital media has made everyone a potential journalist, yet not everyone follows journalistic ethics. One viral falsehood can destroy reputations or sway entire elections. Behind the glossy screens and fast-scrolling feeds are companies, giant tech firms and media conglomerates pulling the strings. Meta, Google and even lesser-known algorithm-driven news curators have the power to decide what you see and what you don't. That is not always a conspiracy; it is often just business. Their goal is engagement, and outrage engages. Emotional headlines, shocking visuals and controversial opinions get more clicks than calm, balanced reporting. The real danger? We may not even notice we are being influenced. When our feed agrees with us, we assume it is the truth. When we share a meme, we don't always stop to fact-check. The media does not always tell us what to think but it does a brilliant job of telling us what to think about. Yet, in this landscape of noise and narratives, there is hope. A new wave of digital literacy is rising. More people are learning to question sources, cross-check facts and explore alternative viewpoints. Movements like citizen journalism, podcasts by young creators and independent media collectives are reclaiming the media space. These voices may be smaller but they are often more authentic, raw and brave. In Malaysia, where media freedom is still evolving, the line between regulation and censorship remains delicate. While regulation can shield the public from hate speech and misinformation, excessive control risks silencing dissent. The challenge lies in creating a media environment that is free and fair. Laws should empower the truth, not shield those in power from accountability. So, where do we go from here? Perhaps the answer lies in recognising the role we play. We should not be just passive consumers of media, we should be participants, creators and amplifiers. Every share, like or comment is a vote. Every story we believe without question and every post we spread without reading will shape the larger media narrative. If the media is the mirror and megaphone, then we must become more mindful of what we reflect and what we shout. We must demand more transparency from platforms, support ethical journalism and educate the next generation, not just on how to use media, but how to think in a media-saturated world. The media industry is not just about technology or profit; it is about people telling stories, sharing truths and shaping the future. Whether that future is informed, inclusive and empowering – or divisive, distorted and dangerous – depends on how we choose to listen and how we choose to speak. Syarfa Akila Matta is an undergraduate student at Universiti Malaya. Comments: letters@
Focus Malaysia
a day ago
- Focus Malaysia
Siti Kasim dares Malaysians to dump PMX, PH; Zaid nominates Tengku Maimun as next PM
SITI Kasim is rallying Malaysians to think outside the box in view of their constant fear surrounding the question – 'If no Anwar, no PH (Pakatan Harapan), then who else?' This is because such concern drummed up to distance them from the opposition Perikatan Nasional (PN) will eventually prevent Malaysia from having a solid government in the future. 'Many of us are against PN – and that includes me who is never a fan of PAS – to helm the country but if think logically, we're a democratic country with election every five years,' ranted the social activist and lawyer in her latest YouTube video. 'The problem with us is we'll have difficulty to advance in view of our lack of high-level thinking … If we've given PMX (Prime Minister Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim) and his Madani government a chance to shine yet they falter after almost three years, then it's time to boot them out come GE16 (16th General Election). 'We must teach our politicians that there is a price to pay for failing to deliver their promises … We should showcase our power as the rakyat to seek change of government if we're unsatisfied with performance of the PH-BN (Barisan Nasional) led administration.' Siti Kasim further clarified unfounded concerns that 'if PAS rules, Malaysia will become a Taliban or radical Muslim country'. 'We've the Federal Constitution, law and legislations that cannot be arbitrarily amended … It's not easy to make Malaysia a Taliban or Islamic state overnight. 'They can try but there are liberal-thinking people like me and others (political/human rights activists, legal experts, the Malaysian Bar, DAP, etc) who will challenge them in the court of law. 'I've faith on our court system that we still have calibre judges around … More importantly is that we must change our way of thinking that nobody is indispensable – just dump them if they fail to deliver so that in the future, they will be more careful by not making empty promises again.' Tengku Maimn as PM? Added the Orang Asli advocate: 'Who knows if there will be a third force coming up …We must be able to think outside the box by daring to embrace the wind of change rather than to only think of PH day and day out when it's only kowtowing to BN.' Interestingly, former de facto law minister Datuk Zaid Ibrahim picks recently retired chief justice Tun Tengku Maimun Tuan Mat as his choice of PMX successor. Tengku Maimun as next PM Why Tengku Maimun? • Integrity & Independence: As Chief Justice, she displayed uncommon courage ,most notably in upholding the principle that no one, not even powerful politicians, is above the law. That independence is exactly what Malaysia's… — Zaid Ibrahim (@zaidibrahim) August 19, 2025 The opposition-slant UMNO member based his choice on three criteria, namely: Integrity & independence: While serving as chief justice, Tengku Maimun had displayed uncommon courage, most notably in upholding the principle that no one, not even powerful politicians, is above the law. That independence is exactly what Malaysia's political system is starving for. While serving as chief justice, Tengku Maimun had displayed uncommon courage, most notably in upholding the principle that no one, not even powerful politicians, is above the law. That independence is exactly what Malaysia's political system is starving for. Clean image: She is free from the scandals, cronyism and baggage that taint many politicians. A PM who doesn't carry the weight of deals, debts or dynasties would be a reset button for governance. She is free from the scandals, cronyism and baggage that taint many politicians. A PM who doesn't carry the weight of deals, debts or dynasties would be a reset button for governance. Symbolism: The first woman chief justice becoming PM would be a defining moment to project reform, inclusion and moral authority – both domestically and internationally. 'When Madani says 'there's nobody to replace Anwar', the Opposition could respond, 'we've someone better; a courageous former chief justice who served with dignity, applied the law without fear or favour and is untainted by the toxic culture of money politics,' applauded Zaid. 'Tengku Maimun represents the kind of leader Malaysia deserves.' – Aug 20, 2025
