logo
CNN's Jake Tapper rips media smear campaign against Hur, WSJ report on Biden decline without mentioning own network

CNN's Jake Tapper rips media smear campaign against Hur, WSJ report on Biden decline without mentioning own network

New York Post04-06-2025
CNN anchor Jake Tapper has taken aim at the media's treatment of those who sounded the alarm about former President Joe Biden's cognitive decline before it was fully exposed at the now-infamous presidential debate, despite the fact that his own network was guilty of lobbing such attacks.
As Biden was actively seeking reelection, there were two explosive moments that drew attention to his mental acuity before the debate.
The first was in February 2024 with the release of the Hur report, which determined the Justice Department would not seek criminal charges over the then-president's mishandling of classified information, in part because a jury would deem him as a 'sympathetic, well-meaning elderly man with a poor memory.'
The report also revealed Biden couldn't remember key dates, such as when he was in office and when his son Beau died.
The second was in June 2024, weeks before the debate, when The Wall Street Journal published a bombshell report titled, 'Behind Closed Doors, Biden Shows Signs of Slipping,' a months-long investigation by reporters Annie Linskey and Siobhan Hughes involving more than 45 sources who were either directly involved or briefed on meetings with Biden, who they said 'appears slower now, someone who has both good moments and bad ones.'
5 Jake Tapper appears during a book conversation in New York City on May 27, 2025.
Getty Images
On Bari Weiss' 'Honestly' podcast Thursday, Tapper spoke about how the Biden White House went to 'war' with Special Counsel Robert Hur, who he described to Weiss as a 'serious civil servant,' and how members of the media participated.
'A lot of people in the media are very complicit and part of the smear machine against Robert Hur,' Tapper told Weiss. 'Robert Hur is smeared and cannot get a job for months. And he was – honestly, if you look back at what he said, that was polite!'
He also praised 'great reporters' Linksey and Hughes, noting they, too, were viciously attacked.
'[They] are garroted by the Democratic Party and by journalists and by media critics, and by journalism professors and this whole industry of people who claim to be non-partisan assessors of truth… that had to have been traumatizing for them,' Tapper said.
5 President Joe Biden is helped up by Secret Service and Air Force Academy officials after falling on stage during the Air Force Academy graduation in Colorado Springs on June 1, 2023.
AFP via Getty Images
What Tapper failed to mention was that CNN was among those 'complicit' in Team Biden's attacks on Hur and The Wall Street Journal.
im Acosta, who at the time was Tapper's CNN colleague, wondered aloud if Hur's assessment was 'out of bounds,' while CNN commentator and former Biden White House communications director Kate Bedingfield accused Hur of 'editorializing' his report, and then-CNN political analyst John Avlon wondered why 'some spin on the ball' was included.
One of CNN's go-to legal experts, Jeffrey Toobin, scolded Hur for making 'unnecessary points' about Biden's advanced age, characterizing the special counsel as a 'Republican partisan' who 'trashed' the president despite not bringing charges.
'Part of that report was an outrage, was a disgrace,' Toobin said at the time. 'I mean, the idea that they that he would make such a big point of Biden being elderly is not something a prosecutor needed to do.'
CNN liberal pundit Paul Begala similarly attacked the 'partisan Trumper' for 'editorializing way out of his league,' even suggesting Hur was motivated to seek revenge on Biden for voting against William Rehnquist, for whom Hur had clerked, during his Supreme Court confirmation as Chief Justice in 1986 when Biden served as a senator.
'This guy has donated to Republicans. He is a partisan,' Begala said. 'The only job he had was to indict or not indict, and to add all this — the only thing he didn't add was the legal disclaimer that this is a political ad in support of Donald Trump. It was a total cheap shot.'
CNN's then-senior political analyst Gloria Borger immediately took Biden's side, insisting, 'This is not a man who's going to forget the day his son died' and echoed Biden's falsehood that Hur was the one who brought up Beau's death in the interview when, in fact, it was the president.
5 US State's Attorney Robert Hur speaks to the press after a court hearing in Baltimore on Nov. 21, 2019.
TNS via Getty Images
Perhaps Biden's biggest defender at CNN at the time was its media reporter, Oliver Darcy (who has since left the network), who declared Hur's depiction of Biden's mental state 'didn't match reality.'
'The acknowledgement from some, but not all, news outlets on Tuesday about the true nature of Biden's deposition marked another embarrassing moment for the national press, which has floundered at pivotal moments in the lead up to the crucial 2024 presidential election,' Darcy wrote in March 2024. 'The deposition transcripts not only indicated that Biden appeared fairly sharp during his testimony, joking with investigators and retelling stories with granular detail, but that Hur was misleading in how he presented some of the information included in his report.'
'Hur chose to portray the president as a mentally diminished elderly man who struggled to recall basic information during his deposition, raising alarm bells about whether he had the fitness to serve in the nation's highest office. Hur's characterization of Biden played directly into a years-long campaign waged by Biden's political opponents and the powerful right-wing media machine to depict the president as a senile, aloof man,' he continued.
5 President Joe Biden stumbles up the stairs of Air Force One at Joint Base Andrews.
C-SPAN
Following The Wall Street Journal's report, several CNN anchors stressed that the paper's story heavily relied on Republican criticism of Biden and called out former House Speaker Kevin McCarthy, who gave the only on-the-record statement, for appearing to flip-flop on Biden's sharpness in previous comments (the Journal reporters later explained it as a tactical PR move at the time for McCarthy to bolster cooperation with the Biden White House).
CNN's Boris Sanchez grilled Hughes over Democratic allegations that her story was 'slanted,' a question that would be unfathomable to a journalist covering Donald Trump.
Darcy erupted at The Wall Street Journal, insisting its reporting 'suffers from glaring problems,' lecturing the paper it 'owes its readers — and the public — better.'
'It is difficult to imagine that the newspaper, or any outlet, would run a similar story declaring that Trump is 'slipping' behind the scenes based on the word of top Democratic figures — despite the fact that the Democratic leadership has demonstrated a much stronger relationship with the truth in recent years than their Republican counterparts,' Darcy wrote.
5 President Joe Biden makes the sign of the cross during a meeting with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu in New York City.
Reuters
'More broadly speaking, The Journal's piece pointed to a continued problem roiling the news media as it covers the 2024 election. Trump is permitted to fall asleep in court and make nonsensical public statements on a routine basis without any serious questions raised about his mental acuity,' the ex-CNN pundit continued. 'Meanwhile, Biden is judged on an entirely different standard.'
A spokesperson for CNN declined to comment.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

The week in whoppers: Bernie Sanders defends Hamas, Chicago Mayor Brandon Johnson's nutty hit on Trump and more
The week in whoppers: Bernie Sanders defends Hamas, Chicago Mayor Brandon Johnson's nutty hit on Trump and more

New York Post

time28 minutes ago

  • New York Post

The week in whoppers: Bernie Sanders defends Hamas, Chicago Mayor Brandon Johnson's nutty hit on Trump and more

Diary of disturbing disinformation and dangerous delusions This response: CNN's Dana Bash, Sunday: 'Would you say that Hamas has some culpability in people starving?' Sen. Bernie Sanders: 'No.' Advertisement We say: Huh? Hamas started the war that's led to Gaza's suffering. It steals food from civilians. It could end the war, and food shortages, tomorrow — by releasing hostages and surrendering. But, no, per Sanders, the terror group has zero culpability for starvation in Gaza. What's wrong with this guy? Advertisement This remark: 'I don't want to hear about this bulls–t about what y'all's constitutions [say about redistricting].' — Rep. Marc Veasey (D-Texas), Saturday We say: Oops. In urging 'blue states' to ignore their constitutions' rules on redistricting and 'redraw [GOPers'] asses out,' Veasey accidentally confirmed what Republicans have long charged: Democrats don't care about law and democracy; they just want power. And will do whatever it takes to get it, legal or not. Advertisement This claim: 'Trump . . . has always been intimidated by the intellectual prowess of black men.' — Chicago Mayor Brandon Johnson, Wednesday We say: Wow, Johnson sure pulled this out of nowhere — except maybe his own obsessions with race. Get opinions and commentary from our columnists Subscribe to our daily Post Opinion newsletter! Thanks for signing up! Enter your email address Please provide a valid email address. By clicking above you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Never miss a story. Check out more newsletters Advertisement Anyway, Trump took a bullet and never lost a beat, was hit with 91 criminal charges plus a civil fine of nearly a half billion bucks — and won the presidency decisively. He doesn't seem 'intimidated' by anyone. This statement: 'Frankly, I don't care if al-Sharif was in Hamas or not.' — Foreign Press Association president Ian Williams, Tuesday We say: Williams only cares that Anas al-Sharif was a journalist, as if that makes a crime out of the IDF attack that killed him. As for Israel saying he was a Hamas member, Williams blurs that 'Hamas is a political organization — as well as a terrorist organization, perhaps.' Perhaps? Hamas massacred 1,200 innocent Israelis in a single day; there's no doubt it's a terrorist group, and al-Sharif was fair game. — Compiled by The Post Editorial Board

Polls show what Trump knew — the Jeffrey Epstein saga is an elite obsession
Polls show what Trump knew — the Jeffrey Epstein saga is an elite obsession

New York Post

time28 minutes ago

  • New York Post

Polls show what Trump knew — the Jeffrey Epstein saga is an elite obsession

One month ago, Jeffrey Epstein appeared to be the most important electoral player in the United States of America. Judging by mainstream media coverage, podcast chatter, and the comments of politicians on both the left and the right, you'd have thought nothing was more important than the saga of the deceased sexual predator: CNN mentioned Epstein 2,220 times over the last four weeks; MSNBC, 2,871. And no wonder: It was a way to smear President Donald Trump, after his administration declined to release (despite his campaign promise to do so) what have come to known as 'the Epstein files.' Advertisement Trump's term was finished, his coalition fractured, his agenda terminated, shouted pundits from both extremes, after Trump himself dismissed the frenzy as a 'hoax' based on crackpot-generated hype. But the hysterics were wrong. Advertisement Even as the brouhaha was at its height, polling showed the Epstein story was more of a tempest in a Twitter teacup than an actual concern of the American people. And now it's clear that once again Trump was right — not just about the feelings of his most ardent supporters, but about those of the country at large. CNN reported this week that Google searches for 'Epstein' are down 89% from three weeks ago — and that it's no longer the top term input alongside 'Donald Trump.' 'This is, from at least a political point of view, quickly turning into a dud of a story,' the network's Harry Enten noted. Advertisement Meanwhile, Trump's approval rating has held steady, and is significantly better than it was in August of 2017. And the percentage of Americans who say the Epstein case is America's 'top issue'? That number in CNN's latest poll was a grand total of . . . zero. Once again, Trump knew better than the pundits and podcasters and politicians — because he knows why his base voted for him. He knows this country isn't truly thirsty for a fictional Epstein list, but for a real shot at the American Dream for the hardest-working Americans. Advertisement Trump won the 2024 election not with cultural or symbolic issues like releasing Epstein's client list, but on a policy agenda of using the tools at the government's disposal to protect the value of labor. He promised to end the free flow of illegal immigrants through the southern border, millions of whom secured jobs that drove down the wages of working-class Americans — and he immediately did it. More than 1 million foreign-born workers have exited the workforce since January, a recent study found, while 2.5 million native-born Americans entered it. Turns out, they were taking American jobs. As a result, the wages of blue-collar Americans have already started to climb, which makes perfect sense — a tight labor market is always good for workers. Similarly, Trump's tariff program will incentivize the return of US manufacturing, a stick to prod the corporations whose offshoring destroyed entire Rust Belt counties to reinvest in the American worker. Who cares about Jeffrey Epstein when you have more money in your pocket each month? The elites, that's who. The Epstein scandal is a luxury belief shared by podcasters who make money off content and Democrats who want Trump to fail. (Oh, and Hunter Biden, whose continued accusations could earn him a defamation lawsuit courtesy of Melania Trump.) Advertisement It's the equivalent of climate activists blocking traffic or Nancy Pelosi kneeling in kente cloth after George Floyd was killed — something the privileged engage in because they have no real-world problems to worry about. Democrats hemorrhaged working-class voters for decades as they catered to their base of over-credentialed college-educated elites. They adopted a series of policies that actively harmed the working class — like open borders that slashed blue-collar wages, or climate standards that drove up the cost of driving and powering homes, or Defund the Police, which sentenced working-class people to live with rising crime. Advertisement They could do all this because the well-off were immune from the negative consequences of the Democrats' bad policies, and sometimes even benefited from them. The same is happening on the right, but in reverse: Podcasters who make loads of money off viral, conspiratorial content are immune to the positive consequences of Trump's economic policy — ergo the luxury of obsessing over Jeffrey Epstein. Many Americans are still feeling the squeeze of inflation, and the effects of some Trump decisions remain to be seen. Advertisement Yet in the last eight months the southern border has been closed, corporations and foreign countries have committed trillions to US manufacturing, Iran has lost its nuclear capabilities for years to come, criminals are being deported, trans athletes are being kicked out of girls' sports, and peace in Eastern Europe could be on the way. Jeffrey who? Batya Ungar-Sargon is the author of 'Second Class: How the Elites Betrayed America's Working Men and Women.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store