
Polls show what Trump knew — the Jeffrey Epstein saga is an elite obsession
Judging by mainstream media coverage, podcast chatter, and the comments of politicians on both the left and the right, you'd have thought nothing was more important than the saga of the deceased sexual predator: CNN mentioned Epstein 2,220 times over the last four weeks; MSNBC, 2,871.
And no wonder: It was a way to smear President Donald Trump, after his administration declined to release (despite his campaign promise to do so) what have come to known as 'the Epstein files.'
Advertisement
Trump's term was finished, his coalition fractured, his agenda terminated, shouted pundits from both extremes, after Trump himself dismissed the frenzy as a 'hoax' based on crackpot-generated hype.
But the hysterics were wrong.
Advertisement
Even as the brouhaha was at its height, polling showed the Epstein story was more of a tempest in a Twitter teacup than an actual concern of the American people.
And now it's clear that once again Trump was right — not just about the feelings of his most ardent supporters, but about those of the country at large.
CNN reported this week that Google searches for 'Epstein' are down 89% from three weeks ago — and that it's no longer the top term input alongside 'Donald Trump.'
'This is, from at least a political point of view, quickly turning into a dud of a story,' the network's Harry Enten noted.
Advertisement
Meanwhile, Trump's approval rating has held steady, and is significantly better than it was in August of 2017.
And the percentage of Americans who say the Epstein case is America's 'top issue'? That number in CNN's latest poll was a grand total of . . . zero.
Once again, Trump knew better than the pundits and podcasters and politicians — because he knows why his base voted for him.
He knows this country isn't truly thirsty for a fictional Epstein list, but for a real shot at the American Dream for the hardest-working Americans.
Advertisement
Trump won the 2024 election not with cultural or symbolic issues like releasing Epstein's client list, but on a policy agenda of using the tools at the government's disposal to protect the value of labor.
He promised to end the free flow of illegal immigrants through the southern border, millions of whom secured jobs that drove down the wages of working-class Americans — and he immediately did it.
More than 1 million foreign-born workers have exited the workforce since January, a recent study found, while 2.5 million native-born Americans entered it. Turns out, they were taking American jobs.
As a result, the wages of blue-collar Americans have already started to climb, which makes perfect sense — a tight labor market is always good for workers.
Similarly, Trump's tariff program will incentivize the return of US manufacturing, a stick to prod the corporations whose offshoring destroyed entire Rust Belt counties to reinvest in the American worker.
Who cares about Jeffrey Epstein when you have more money in your pocket each month?
The elites, that's who.
The Epstein scandal is a luxury belief shared by podcasters who make money off content and Democrats who want Trump to fail. (Oh, and Hunter Biden, whose continued accusations could earn him a defamation lawsuit courtesy of Melania Trump.)
Advertisement
It's the equivalent of climate activists blocking traffic or Nancy Pelosi kneeling in kente cloth after George Floyd was killed — something the privileged engage in because they have no real-world problems to worry about.
Democrats hemorrhaged working-class voters for decades as they catered to their base of over-credentialed college-educated elites.
They adopted a series of policies that actively harmed the working class — like open borders that slashed blue-collar wages, or climate standards that drove up the cost of driving and powering homes, or Defund the Police, which sentenced working-class people to live with rising crime.
Advertisement
They could do all this because the well-off were immune from the negative consequences of the Democrats' bad policies, and sometimes even benefited from them.
The same is happening on the right, but in reverse: Podcasters who make loads of money off viral, conspiratorial content are immune to the positive consequences of Trump's economic policy — ergo the luxury of obsessing over Jeffrey Epstein.
Many Americans are still feeling the squeeze of inflation, and the effects of some Trump decisions remain to be seen.
Advertisement
Yet in the last eight months the southern border has been closed, corporations and foreign countries have committed trillions to US manufacturing, Iran has lost its nuclear capabilities for years to come, criminals are being deported, trans athletes are being kicked out of girls' sports, and peace in Eastern Europe could be on the way.
Jeffrey who?
Batya Ungar-Sargon is the author of 'Second Class: How the Elites Betrayed America's Working Men and Women.'

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Indianapolis Star
15 minutes ago
- Indianapolis Star
There's just a month until TikTok could be banned – again. Here's where things stand.
President Donald Trump has one month to finalize the sale of TikTok or the short-form video platform risks going dark in the U.S. – again. For months, Trump has said negotiations for the sale of TikTok have been ongoing with China, as the platform is owned by Beijing-based ByteDance. Since the platform went dark for less than 24 hours in January, Trump has extended the deadline on a ban of TikTok in the U.S. three times. And he may just conduct a fourth. In late July, U.S. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick said in a CNBC interview that if China did not approve a U.S.-drafted deal to sell the platform's American assets, the app would go dark again, once the next ban extension expires on Sept. 17. "If that deal gets approved by the Chinese, then that deal will happen. If they don't approve it, then TikTok is going to go dark," Lutnick previously said. "And those decisions are coming very soon, so let's see what the Chinese do. They've got to approve it. The deal is over to them right now." The White House did not immediately respond for comment when contacted by USA TODAY on Aug. 15. The next deadline for TikTok to be sold by ByteDance is Sept. 17. Some government officials are concerned that TikTok poses a national security threat, believing that ByteDance, which is based in Beijing, is sharing U.S. user data with China. TikTok has repeatedly denied these claims. In January, the platform went dark for less than 24 hours under federal legislation signed into law by former President Joe Biden in 2024. Trump has signed executive orders three times now that push back the deadline for when TikTok must be sold, promising that deals with China are on the horizon. The latest was in early July, when Trump told reporters aboard Air Force One that he was hopeful Chinese President Xi would agree to a deal to see the platform to the U.S.


New York Post
29 minutes ago
- New York Post
Russian reporters whine about conditions at Trump-Putin summit — but Moscow may be to blame
Russian reporters are whining about having to sleep on cots and being served old tuna for breakfast while covering the Trump-Putin summit in Alaska — but their own country may actually be to blame. The Kremlin journalists griped that they've had to rough it on portable beds with no sheets set up at the Alaska Airlines Center sports arena in Anchorage, where they were hardly able to make phone calls. They — gasp — even had to get by without bottled water. Advertisement 4 Russian journalists from the Kremlin press pool, arriving in Alaska, were housed in a stadium converted into a temporary accommodation center, with single bunks separated by curtains. x/DD_Geopolitics 'After being assigned for [Thursday] night to what appeared to be a disaster evacuation zone, Russian journalists were being treated to breakfast of tuna mayo left out overnight, some chips, and an unlimited supply of water (from a drinking fountain),'' wrote an irked Margarita Simonyan, editor in chief of the Russian state-run outlet RT. But critics said Russia is at least partly to blame for what its scribes consider practically Third World conditions. Advertisement 4 Workers set up a sign in front of Air Force One for the arrival of U.S. President Donald Trump at Joint Base Elmendorf Richardson on August 15, 2025 in Anchorage, Alaska. Getty Images The country flew roughly 50 of its own 'reporters' over to supposedly cover the event, and it's lucky so many of them got into the US at all, considering the nation's intelligence services regularly send spies to work as 'journalists,'' a security source told The Post. There wasn't much time to vet them or get enough accommodations for quickly planned summit, the source noted. Many US reporters didn't get hotel rooms in the small capital city of roughly 290,000, either. Advertisement 4 Russia's President Vladimir Putin attends a meeting with Magadan region's Governor Sergei Nosov as he visits the far eastern port city of Magadan on the Sea of Okhotsk, Russia. via REUTERS On Friday, footage showed members of the Russian media receiving stepped-up food including breakfast sandwiches, packaged snacks and beverages at the arena, which hosts basketball games on the University of Alaska Anchorage campus. 'Americans finally provide journalists with proper food,' declared the X account Alaska Summit News First. But in some corners, the Russian journos are in no position to complain about the US. Advertisement 4 Russia flew out 50 people to cover the Trump-Putin Alaska summit. Diana Nerozzi / NYPost 'Sanctions mean roaming doesn't really work, so they are stuck on WiFi, and Russia blocked most calls on WhatsApp and telegram the other day,'' wrote Financial Times' Moscow Bureau Chief Max Seddon on X. Start your day with all you need to know Morning Report delivers the latest news, videos, photos and more. Thanks for signing up! Enter your email address Please provide a valid email address. By clicking above you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Never miss a story. Check out more newsletters Another X user wrote, 'So, better treatment than Ukrainians in the occupied territories. 'You have access to running water, something people in occupied Donetsk don't have.


New York Post
29 minutes ago
- New York Post
Trump reacts to Hillary Clinton saying she'd nominate him for Nobel Peace Prize if he helps end war in Ukraine
During his Air Force One sitdown with Fox News' Bret Baier, President Trump was asked about former rival Hillary Clinton's promise that she would nominate Trump for the Nobel Peace Prize if he could end Russia's invasion of Ukraine without Kyiv being forced to give up territory. Hillary Clinton said she'd nominate her 2016 presidential rival if he brokered a peace deal. Raging Moderates Podcast Trump is attempting to broker a deal between Putin and Zelensky to end the war in Ukraine. REUTERS Advertisement 'Well, uh, that was … very nice,' the president said after a prolonged pause. 'I may have to start liking her again,' Trump added of the former first lady, secretary of state and two-time defeated presidential candidate.