
John Key is right that New Zealand needs to cut interest rates but we need more than that too
The data backs him. Massey University's GDPLive shows GDP growth at just 0.261% for the quarter and down 0.53% annually. It puts inflation at 2.18%. With dairy booming, most of the economy must be in recession.
The Reserve Bank's Nowcast GDP tracker is down 0.288% for the quarter.
Key says that with no sign of wage inflation, the Reserve Bank should cut the Official Cash Rate by 100 basis points – from 3.25% to 2.25%.
The Taylor Rule that central banks use to guide interest rates indicates the OCR is 50 basis points too high.
Key is also right that the central bank's money printing fuelled the inflation that destroyed the last Government. Now, with rates too high, it's strangling growth and may destroy this one.
It seems the Government had no plan for replacing former Reserve Bank Governor Adrian Orr.
I nominate Key. He's qualified and has the judgment the job demands. If appointed and interest rates are cut, the economy would be growing in election year.
If Key is unavailable, appoint the economist who warned that $100 billion in quantitative easing would cause inflation: Auckland University's professor Robert MacCulloch. Internationally recognised for his work on central banking.
If the coalition aspires to more than winning elections, it must do what Key never did: tackle why New Zealand is sliding down the OECD rankings.
It's not that the world doesn't want what we sell. Dairy prices are excellent, meat sales are solid, and tourism is recovering. We're just badly managed.
To lift our standard of living, we must raise our productivity which has been static for a decade.
The Treasury's recent analysis highlights that 'New Zealand has much lower levels of capital per worker than OECD peers'.
We lag Australia because its compulsory superannuation pumps billions into productive investment.
We should have shifted to savings-based super 50 years ago. That's no reason not to do it now.
Last week's abandonment of open-plan classrooms was a good start to lifting education standards. Abandoning pupil-led learning would be even better.
Health is another failure. We have a Soviet-style monopoly with low productivity. Waiting lists grow despite record spending. More money is not the answer. Singapore achieves better outcomes for less – based on compulsory savings, price transparency, and private providers. We should copy it.
One thing Key did achieve was restraining the growth of the civil service. According to the International Monetary Fund, Government expenditure was an estimated 41.39% of GDP in 2023.
The 59% of the economy in private hands just isn't big enough to generate the investment, wealth and exports we need.
We are over-regulated. The OECD's 2023 Government at a Glance ranked New Zealand last in the OECD for barriers to permits, licences and foreign investment. The Regulatory Standards Bill isn't a nice-to-have. It's essential.
Key is also right about the ban on foreign home buyers. Foreigners won't bring their capital or expertise if they're told they can only rent.
There are about 200,000 able-bodied adults on Jobseeker Support. That number has barely moved since Key's time, despite job vacancies and social investment strategies. Australia has had a Work for the Dole scheme since 1997.
Employment Minister Peter McCardle introduced Work for the Dole scheme in 1998. Labour scrapped it. We should try again.
Last year, in an international comparison, New Zealand's economy ranked 33rd out of 37. That makes it a mystery why Luxon waited so long to visit China, our biggest trading partner.
And why did the Prime Minister go to a Nato summit in Europe? Every other Pacific PM stayed away knowing the summit would pledge to spend 5% of GDP on defence and criticise China. As New Zealand is not going to do either a PM focused on growth would have stayed at home.
We have a bloated bureaucracy focused on political correctness rather than the hard work of delivery. An opposition that thinks New Zealand can tax its way to prosperity. An economy that's 41% government, starved of capital, and bound in red tape. Without reform, we will never climb the OECD ladder.
Key's rate cut might win the next election. Only real reform will return New Zealand to the top tier of the OECD.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

NZ Herald
a day ago
- NZ Herald
Letters: We should hang our heads in shame at the state of Auckland's CBD
Complex problems can take time to solve but we could be exploring immediate, relatively cheap short-term options. Figuratively speaking, one or two fewer road speedbumps would go a long way towards restoring a sense of civic pride and economic wellbeing. Perhaps it is time for the famed and under-utilised creatives of New Zealand to play a part. Vacant shop windows could be brimming with hired paintings and sculptures. Ugly external walls – think globally, think Italy and Singapore – could be plant-adorned hanging gardens. Street art could be part of the mix. Think nooks of pavement planters – Dublin-style multi-layered planters of riotously coloured cascading blooms. Think No 8 wire mentality! But also think of putting it out there to the Auckland community – some of whom may want to financially contribute to this essential CBD recovery. And we are the ratepayers – let's insist to our council through the upcoming elections that it has to do better. Angela Yatri, Oratia. Luxon's turnaround job Warren Cossey's letter (August 6) defending Christopher Luxon from the criticism of him and his coalition is timely, given that the previous Government spent six years destroying the economy and causing social division that has only worsened. During those six years we were constantly told to be kind to one another as if we were children in need of some sort of patronising reminder on how to be an adult. Then, when Labour ministers were asked about particular pressing issues, such as migrant exploitation and ram raids, a lot of the time their inevitable response was a rather lame, 'we're looking into it'. At least Luxon and his team appear to be far more forthright and proactive in what they are doing rather than acting like a possum caught in the headlights. Bernard Walker, Mt Maunganui. Razor needs to find innovation Not long ago when the scribes got together to pick their top 15 rugby players for the year, it was dominated by All Blacks. If they were to pick a squad this year, not many All Blacks would be in the running. Ardie Savea and Tamaiti Williams might get a look-in for the forwards and maybe Cam Roigard and Will Jordan in the backs. The All Blacks have certainly gone backwards, and our new coach is struggling to improve the situation. Razor needs to be a bit more innovative like Rassie if he is going to improve. The next few weeks will show if he is on the right track. Jock MacVicar, Hauraki. Tunnels to nowhere? It must be particularly painful and galling for our older residents who have been waiting for years for urgent surgery to observe how $5.5 billion of public money has been squandered on the rail tunnels to nowhere? It is patently obvious that this emerald-plated project has had no independent fiscal scrutiny or cost-benefit analysis. This has allowed a phalanx of assorted consultants and contractors to have a field day paid from the public purse. The pigs-in-the-trough syndrome still appears to be alive and well in Aotearoa. For example, how much has been paid to Mana Whenua in consultancy and other fees? Bruce Tubb, Devonport. Alternative to butter Unlike Wendy Galloway (letters, August 3), I have no qualms about using an alternative to butter to make a white sauce. Indeed, my granddaughter once announced, to her mother's chagrin, that I made the best cheese sauce in the world. Mind you, she was only 4, and hasn't repeated that in the 20 years since, so maybe her palate has become more refined. Or perhaps she was simply currying favour. Peter Jackson, Kaitaia. Not all doom and gloom What a balanced and thoughtful piece by Liam Dann (August 3). In particular it was interesting to learn that Paul Bloxham, HSBC Australia-New Zealand chief economist, while negative about Australian growth, is one of the most positive economists about New Zealand growth. As we continue to consider our economic, political, social, cultural and environmental future, we always need to be mindful of the way in which social and other media distorts the picture of where we are heading. Dann's piece shows the important role of the media in political reporting. As Sir Geoffrey Palmer wrote, 'The media plays a vital role in sending communications from the governors to the governed.' Glennys Adams, Oneroa.

RNZ News
3 days ago
- RNZ News
Six years after referendum, Bougainville's quest for independence still faces roadblocks
Massey University's Anna Powles says Bougainville's independence is an incredibly challenging issue. Photo: BenarNews / Stefan Armbruster As the Papua New Guinea region of Bougainville prepares to elect a new government, front and centre is the issue of independence. There have been plenty of discussions on the matter, most recently when both governments gathered at Burnham in Christchurch. These negotiations come on top of a resounding result in a referendum on independence conducted in Bougainville in 2019. RNZ Pacific spoke with Anna Powles, an associate professor in defence and security studies at Massey University, to get her view on what is going on. (This transcript has been edited for brevity and clarity.) DON WISEMAN: It's coming up to six years since the referendum, and I'm just wondering what sort of progress has been made toward this quest for independence. Has any been made? ANNA POWLES: Well Don, this is an incredibly challenging issue. As you said, we're coming up to the six year anniversary of the referendum, where around 97 percent of Bougainville's population voted for independence. But, as we know, that referendum was not binding and so we now find ourselves in 2025 where Bougainvillean and Papua New Guinean parties met in Burnham army base to work through these issues, and they ultimately came up with the Melanesian Agreement. They signed that in June this year, which really tried to shift the progress forward in terms of trying to seek a solution to an issue which dates back to pre-independence for Papua New Guinea. Photo: Supplied DW: Yes, well, this Melanesian solution that sounds like the solution you have when you haven't got a solution. It doesn't seem to amount to much to me, as an outsider. AP: Well, it was remarkable on a couple of points. Firstly, Papua New Guinean Prime Minister James Marape referred to Burnham as a spiritual home of the Bougainville peace process. And yet, on the other hand, you have the Bougainville President Ishmael Toroama saying very clearly that the independence was non-negotiable, and setting out a number of terms, including the fact that Bougainville was to become independent by the 1st o September 2027. If Papua New Guinea did not ratify that Bougainville would make a unilateral declaration of independence, which is not the first time Bougainville has done that either. In 1990, the Bougainville Revolutionary Army (BRA) made a unilateral declaration of independence, and similarly, back in the 1960s as well. DW: Yes, and they have a habit of not going very well, these unilateral declarations, in various situations around the world. Do they? They don't work. AP: No, and that's where there is effort, through the joint moderation meeting process, to try and find solutions to the question of Bougainville's political status, either within the broader Papua New Guinean state - you currently have the Autonomous Province. There have been a number of options which have been touted, similar to, for instance, free association like Cook Islands' relationship with New Zealand, for example. But none of these options have really gained a lot of ground at all. DW: And they haven't gained ground because they exclude sovereignty, and that's their critical thing. They want to be able to join the UN and bodies like that, don't they? AP: Exactly. And these talks come on the eve of Bougainville's presidential elections, which take place on the fourth of September this year, less than a month away. The question of Bougainville's future, both its political future, but also its economic future, are issues which are top of mind, very much so, as voters go into this election. What is of concern here is that there are still a lot of outstanding issues within Bougainville itself relating to the Bougainville crisis and the years of conflict. It's very hard to see a potential way forward here, as Papua New Guinea has also been fairly clear in terms of its own position of not letting Bougainville break away fully. DW: Yes, PNG has really not given any ground at all have they, since the beginning of this process? AP: No, and they have concerns, that, and these are long standing concerns, and we've seen a number of different Papua New Guinean Prime Ministers reiterate the concern that if Bougainville was to become fully independent, that that could potentially lead to a cascade of claims by other states, for instance. And that has always been very much at the heart of Papua New Guinea's concern. DW: Now one of the key campaigners for the presidential election, veteran politician Joe Lera, who's been the regional MP in the PNG parliament in the past, he says, on the quest for independence that the current government has been far too strident, and he thinks they've got to take a more conciliatory approach towards Port Moresby, and it sort of makes sense, doesn't it? We have had these dramatic statements coming from Ishmael Toroama at the beginning of the various talks that have been held, laying out where they're going, where they want to go, or where they intend going, before anyone's heard from the other side. It seems like a back to front negotiation tactic. AP: Well, it certainly limits the ability for either side to actually negotiate. Lera has made that comment recently that there is strong support for Bougainville and independence. Very, very strong support. We saw that with the 97.7 percent voter turnout in favor of independence for Bougainville, but that the process itself needs to be rethought through. The process needs to allow for far greater negotiation than we're currently seeing with these declaratory declared positions, as you say from the outset. There's not a lot of wiggle room there to move, and this is where there is some source of frustration around that. So while there's a demographic that Toroama is appealing to, in terms of being very strident on independence, there's still a process that needs to be worked through, and for as long as that I can remember, and there has always been discussion about a Melanesian solution to this issue, but these kinds of declarations are not facilitating that. DW: What do they precisely mean by a Melanesian solution? AP: Well, finding a distinctly Melanesian approach or a Melanesian solution to the issue. Now, what that looks like I'm not sure. There's been various discussions over the years about what that would look like - what it would look like for Bougainville to remain part of Papua New Guinea in a way. But Bougainville is already autonomous, although, key areas like foreign policy, for instance, still fall under Papua New Guinean responsibility. It is unclear what that would potentially look like, but finding a way which is ensuring that the process is peaceful to reach that outcome, and that is going to become increasingly challenging.


Otago Daily Times
3 days ago
- Otago Daily Times
Real-time info likely the best info
Real-time data can lead to better decisions, Dennis Wesselbaum writes. In late July, New Zealand was — slowly — receiving economic data from the June quarter. Inflation had hit a 12-month high, for example, confirming what many already suspected. But the country was still nearly two months away from getting figures on economic activity – namely, gross domestic product (GDP). Official statistics such as GDP and inflation have long been delayed, offering a picture of how the economy was, rather than how it is. Stats NZ, for instance, released GDP data for the December 2024 quarter in March 2025, a lag of around three months. As a result, economic decisions and public debate are often based on out-of-date information. One example from last year illustrates how such delays can distort policy. In August 2024, the Reserve Bank of New Zealand cut interest rates a year earlier than markets had expected, despite considering further hikes just months before. With no monthly inflation or GDP data, the Reserve Bank had to rely on private-sector indicators while waiting for official figures, which later confirmed that inflation was indeed easing. This is where "nowcasts" prove useful. Launched in April, the Reserve Bank's "nowcasting" tool — Kiwi-GDP — publishes weekly estimates of economic activity. Using advanced statistical models to estimate current GDP growth, it aims to bridge the gap between real-time developments and the lagging arrival of official statistics. As of mid-July 2025, Kiwi-GDP suggests there may be a decline in economic activity. The model estimated negative GDP growth, figures from July 18 indicating a decline of 0.29%. This marks a sharp reversal from earlier estimates of around 0.8%, and even from late June, when the model still pointed to modest positive growth. The downward revision appears to be driven primarily by weakness in retail and consumption data, as well as survey-based indicators. These early signals suggest that economic momentum may be fading, even before the release of official GDP data for the June quarter. While the tool offers insight, it is not without pitfalls. Politicians and economists must be cautious in interpreting its weekly updates. Tools such as Kiwi-GDP allow policymakers and analysts to synthesise multiple data sources and form an informed view of current conditions. But not all indicators are equal. Some are timely; others are noisy or unreliable. A good "nowcast" weighs data based on its quality and predictive value. The shift in outlook for the New Zealand economy illustrates both the strength and the limitation of these tools: it reacts quickly to new information, but is also prone to significant revision. This volatility poses challenges for policymakers. When monetary policy decisions were made in May, the prevailing "nowcast" pointed to 0.5% growth for the June quarter. If that projection influenced decision-making, the resulting policy would be misaligned with economic reality. Although "nowcasting" improves real-time analysis, its very responsiveness exposes central banks to risk. There are other New Zealand specific concerns. Kiwi-GDP relies on a single model, which comes with inherent limitations. Even in stable conditions, the actual economic process is likely more complex than any model — however flexible — can capture. As the economy evolves, the best models shift with it. These shifts are difficult to detect from past performance alone. Relying on one model increases the risk of blind spots and instability. A better approach would combine forecasts from multiple models. This reduces the impact of individual assumptions and helps smooth out measurement errors. Another drawback is that Kiwi-GDP produces point estimates — a single number for GDP growth — rather than a range of possible outcomes. This assumes the cost of forecast errors are equally likely to be positive or negative, when in fact they are not. Overestimating growth could lead to premature rate hikes and an unnecessary slowdown; underestimating it might result in overly loose policy and rising inflation. For policymakers, the consequences of being wrong vary depending on the direction of the error. To improve decision-making, Kiwi-GDP should make uncertainty more explicit. Presenting a range of outcomes or scenarios would help ensure that risks are properly accounted for. Without such transparency, there is a danger that decisions are made with a false sense of confidence. "Nowcasting" helps bridge the gap between decision-making deadlines and the delayed publication of official data. By leveraging real-time indicators, it offers a clearer picture of where the economy stands. Forecasting the future remains important – but understanding the present is just as crucial. Without an accurate sense of the current state of the economy, informed policy making becomes much harder. — ■ Dennis Wesselbaum is an associate professor, department of economics, University of Otago.