
MindsEye review - the worst game of 2025 is a shockingly bad GTA clone
From the producer of GTA 5 comes one of the most badly made video games of all time, that's somehow even worse than its reputation suggests.
Most games these days would love to be compared to Cyberpunk 2077, given it's now completed its redemption arc and is regarded as a modern classic. Unfortunately for MindsEye, the similarities between the two games – including Sony offering owners a full refund – are based purely on Cyberpunk's original release, when it was a broken, unplayable disaster.
Unlike Cyberpunk 2077, it's very hard to imagine MindsEye ever being set right. More importantly, while the issues with Cyberpunk were almost solely technical, that's only a small part of the problem when it comes to MindsEye.
MindsEye has a long and complicated history, that we don't want to get into too much here, not least because the juicier details are likely to come out over the next few months. But in short, it was originally intended to be part of the heavily delayed Everywhere game creation tool, that was being positioned as a sort of adult version of Roblox. Things started to go wrong though and so MindsEye was released first.
Exactly what happened with Everywhere is still unclear, but considering it was first announced in 2017 the answer seems to be 'a lot.' There's been talk of sky high budgets, with investors attracted by the fact that the director is Leslie Benzies, the unsung hero behind Grand Theft Auto – who acted as producer on everything from GTA 3 onwards but left Rockstar Games in 2016, under acrimonious circumstances.
One of the main problems for MindsEye is the fact that it's clearly been released long before it's finished. We imagine there was some sort of financial deadline that had to be met but after all this time its release date couldn't have been more poorly chosen, coming right in the middle of the Switch 2 launch and Summer Game Fest week.
Needless to say, the reason this review is so late, is because copies were not sent out to press ahead of time. That left many wondering if the game's failures had been exaggerated but we're here to tell you that's not the case at all.
Sign up to the GameCentral newsletter for a unique take on the week in gaming, alongside the latest reviews and more. Delivered to your inbox every Saturday morning.
MindsEye is what GTA would be if it still took place in an open world city, but the game itself was entirely linear. That means it's essentially a third person shooter, with a lot of driving missions and other asides. Despite what you might imagine, the story is pure sci-fi shlock, as you play an amnesiac former soldier who discovers a planet-threatening conspiracy that we suppose we shouldn't spoil – for those of you that are perverse enough to seek the game out, despite everyone telling you not to.
Set in the near future, the game touches upon themes like unchecked military and police powers, as well as AI being relied upon for life and death decision making, but the story never engages with these ideas, which seems all the more disappointing given how timely it could have been. The characters are deeply disappointing, given Benzies' background, with no one, including the protagonist, making any kind of impression – positive or otherwise.
Rather than GTA, the game we kept being reminded of is the original Driver from 1999. Not in terms of any of the positives of that game, or the absurd difficulty of some of its missions, but how linear and restrictive it was, despite the pretence of being open world. MindsEye doesn't let you explore its off-brand version of Las Vegas until you've beaten the game and so instead almost every mission involves just driving somewhere (in a car you don't get to pick) and if you dare to start exploring the mission fails.
As an extra bonus, the driving is awful, with no sense of weight to the cars, as if their tyres are filled with helium. It's better than the cover-based combat though, which is ruined by clearly broken AI, which has no idea what's going on most of the time. The animation system for enemies is completely broken and often has them firing in a different direction to the way they're facing, with bullets that move so slowly you can literally walk between them.
On PlayStation 5, the game is capped at 30fps but rarely even gets that high, so all the impressive looking screenshots you see here are turned into a stuttering sideshow in real life. There's also a weird blurriness to everything that may be some sort of upscaling effect but whatever it is, it's distracting and ugly.
We assume none of this is supposed to be how the game works but there are other baffling issues that are part of the intended design, including the complete lack of melee combat or any kind of dodge or roll. The broken AI and awful frame rate are bad enough, but in terms of design the game feels decades out of date.
The missions are uniformly bland, as you spend longer driving to gun battles than you do taking part in them. Sometimes you have to drive somewhere just to trigger a cinematic, as if you're a taxi service for cut scenes.
There is some minor variation, with an early 2000s style stealth sequence and a few goes with a drone, but every new idea only seems to make things worse, including such banalities as a safe cracking minigame. More Trending
There's also a breed of non-story mission that is the remaining vestige of the Everywhere concept. The original idea was that you were supposed to be able to design these yourself but while that option isn't available in the console version the examples included here, of bare bones shooting galleries and checkpoint races, are so utterly banal it beggars' belief.
MindsEye is only around 10 hours long, but for obvious reasons we're not going to count that as a negative, even though the asking price is outrageous for a game with absolutely no replay value at all. The short length is because the game was originally intended as episodic content (another old-fashioned idea) but we're going to take a wild guess and imagine the story is not going to be continued.
It certainly has been a busy few weeks for gaming, but we never expected we'd be reviewing another game so soon, that was even worse than Nintendo Switch 2 Welcome Tour. And yet here we are. MindsEye is a terrible game. But it's not so bad it's good, it's so bad it's insulting.
In Short: One of the worst video games of the modern era, that clearly isn't finished – but just as clearly wouldn't be worth even a moment of your time if it was.
Pros: The open world design is okay, even though there's nothing in it. The graphics would probably be quite good if they worked properly.
Cons: Old-fashioned, linear, and highly repetitive mission design married to terrible third person combat and tedious driving. Terrible performance problem, banal story, and it feels overly long at 10 hours.
Score: 2/10
Formats: PlayStation 5 (reviewed), Xbox Series X/S, and PCPrice: £54.99Publisher: IO Interactive PartnersDeveloper: Build a Rocket BoyRelease Date: 10th June 2025
Age Rating: 18
Email gamecentral@metro.co.uk, leave a comment below, follow us on Twitter.
To submit Inbox letters and Reader's Features more easily, without the need to send an email, just use our Submit Stuff page here.
For more stories like this, check our Gaming page.
MORE: Nintendo Switch 2 owner loses 20 years' worth of save data in botched transfer
MORE: All 30 Mario Kart World racetracks ranked from worst to best
MORE: Borderlands 4 price revealed and the most expensive edition is £120
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
Hollywood star makes thinly veiled dig at Dakota Johnson whining over Madame Web
One year ago, Russell Crowe called out Dakota Johnson by name for bad-mouthing her superhero box office bomb Madame Web, and now another movie star has made a thinly-veiled dig at her. Rachel Brosnahan - who plays Lois Lane in the upcoming Superman reboot - doesn't understand 'why people say yes' to these sort of projects 'only to then turn around and complain about it.' 'Look, I don't want to s*** on other actors,' the 34-year-old Marvelous Mrs. Maisel alum vented to Amanda Seyfried via Interview on Monday. 'But there was a minute where it was cool to not like superhero movies and to look back on projects like this and pooh-pooh them. Do it or don't do it, and then stand by it.' Seyfried replied: 'I honestly don't think you should call it a superhero movie ever again, because it isn't just that, and I think people are going to see that. It's really important to have this kind superhero, this guy who's just trying to do his best.' The 35-year-old nepo baby of Don Johnson and Melanie Griffith took on the role of clairvoyant paramedic Cassandra Webb in S. J. Clarkson's movie from Sony's Spider-Man Universe, which only earned $100.5M back from its $100M budget. Madame Web also had a dismal 11% critic approval rating (out of 265 reviews) and a 53% audience score on Rotten Tomatoes. 'I had never done anything like it before. I probably will never do anything like it again because I don't make sense in that world. And I know that now,' Dakota scoffed to Bustle last year. 'But sometimes in this industry, you sign on to something, and it's one thing and then as you're making it, it becomes a completely different thing, and you're like, '"Wait, what?"' Three months after Johnson's comments, Russell Crowe - who acted in Man of Steel and Thor: Love and Thunder - felt the urge to respond. 'You're telling me you signed up for a Marvel movie, and some f***ing universe for cartoon characters … and you didn't get enough pathos?' the 61-year-old Oscar winner told British GQ. 'These are jobs. Here's your role, play the role. If you're expecting this to be some kind of life-changing event, I just think you're here for the wrong reasons.' Earlier this month, the Materialists actress - who claimed the script went through 'drastic changes' - blamed Madame Web's poor performance on the fact that 'creative decisions are made by committee' and declared: 'It wasn't my fault.' 'Or made by people who don't have a creative bone in their body. And it's really hard to make art that way. Or to make something entertaining that way,' Dakota told the Los Angeles Times. 'Unfortunately, with Madame Web, it started out as something and turned into something else. And I was just sort of along for the ride at that point. But that happens. Bigger-budget movies fail all the time.' Seyfried replied: 'I honestly don't think you should call it a superhero movie ever again, because it isn't just that, and I think people are going to see that. It's really important to have this kind superhero, this guy who's just trying to do his best' (pictured June 2) Madame Web also had a dismal 11% critic approval rating (out of 265 reviews) and a 53% audience score on Rotten Tomatoes Dakota scoffed to Bustle last year: 'I had never done anything like it before. I probably will never do anything like it again because I don't make sense in that world. And I know that now. But sometimes in this industry, you sign on to something, and it's one thing and then as you're making it, it becomes a completely different thing, and you're like, '"Wait, what?"' Three months after Johnson's comments, Russell Crowe - who acted in Man of Steel and Thor: Love and Thunder (pictured) - responded in British GQ, 'You're telling me you signed up for a Marvel movie, and some f***ing universe for cartoon characters and you didn't get enough pathos?' Johnson shaded the film, yet again, during last Thursday's webisode of Hot Ones after host Sean Evans told her he was 'no superhero' and she wisecracked: 'I am also not a superhero. Tried, failed.' Other celebs who've starred in superhero fare then publicly criticized the genre include Thor: Love and Thunder alum Christian Bale, Thor alum Anthony Hopkins, The Amazing Spider-Man alum Sally Field, Moon Knight alum Ethan Hawke, Blade alum Stephen Dorff, and Iron Man 2 alum Mickey Rourke. Meanwhile, Rachel couldn't be more thrilled to showcase her take on the pretty Daily Planet reporter previously portrayed by Amy Adams, Kate Bosworth, Erica Durance, Teri Hatcher, Margot Kidder, and Phyllis Coates. 'I've never done something that has a baked-in fan base already,' Brosnahan said. 'People have such strong feelings about [Superman] and the world and whoever's in charge of it. It's cool to be a part of something that people are so passionate about. It's definitely intimidating, too.' The Emmy winner teased some sort of special stunt she got to perform on the set: 'I got to do a different thing, which I'm not really allowed to talk about, that didn't involve wires but felt like maybe it should have. It was nuts!' James Gunn's $225M-budget reboot of Superman - hitting US theaters July 11 - also stars David Corenswet, Nicholas Hoult, Nathan Fillion, Edi Gathegi, Anthony Carrigan, and Isabela Merced. Rachel's other upcoming projects include the second season of Apple TV+ thriller Presumed Innocent, Bernard Rose's King Lear adaptation Lear Rex for Dali Films, and Halina Reijn's small-screen adaptation of Lisa Taddeo's 2019 novel Lois & Varga for Amazon Studios. On the personal front, Brosnahan and husband Jason Ralph just celebrated their ninth wedding anniversary on June 6.


Metro
3 hours ago
- Metro
Bungie delays Marathon to next year - developers only found out today
The makers of Destiny have announced that beleaguered online shooter Marathon is to be delayed beyond this autumn, in Sony's latest live service disaster. It's been predicted for some time now, given the poor response to its various playtests, but developer Bungie has now confirmed that Marathon will miss its previously announced release date of September 23. The extraction shooter has been widely criticised for not being as challenging as leading genre titles such as Escape From Tarkov but at the same time being too much for casual fans, effectively pleasing no one. Bungie has acknowledged this, saying: 'We know we need more time to craft Marathon into the game that truly reflects your passion.' There's no new release date but with no more news updates planned until the autumn, it seems to have missed its chance to launch in 2025. 'The Alpha test created an opportunity for us to calibrate and focus the game on what will make it uniquely compelling – survival under pressure, mystery and lore around every corner, raid-like endgame challenges, and Bungie's genre-defining FPS [first person shooter] combat,' reads the official annoucement. 'We're using this time to empower the team to create the intense, high-stakes experience that a title like Marathon is built around. This means deepening the relationship between the developers and the game's most important voices: our players.' More closed tests are planned 'over the next few months', with Bungie focusing on 'upping the survival game' with new loot and more challenging AI encounters, in an attempt to make combat 'more tense and strategic'. Sign up to the GameCentral newsletter for a unique take on the week in gaming, alongside the latest reviews and more. Delivered to your inbox every Saturday morning. They're also promising a better experience for solo and duo players, as well as proximity chat. The visuals will also be improved, with a darker tone that 'delivers on the themes of the original trilogy.' The original three Marathon games were Mac exclusives, released in the mid-90s, before Bungie hit it big with Halo. Although there's no formal connection with the Xbox games, the gameplay and multiplayer modes are similar, with the concept of AI rampancy shared between both series. At the moment, there's little obvious connection between the new Marathon and the old ones, while there's been considerable controversy over Bungie plagiarising an online artist for the game's distinctive art style. Although Bungie is currently owned by Sony the game is intended to be released simultaneously on Xbox Series X/S, PlayStation 5, and PC. More Trending Marathon is the latest in a long line of live service failures for Sony, who once claimed they would release at least 10 such titles by 2026. The only success they've ever had is Helldivers 2, with everything else either being delayed or cancelled – with Concord being the most infamous failure. Despite so many disasters, Sony has repeatedly insisted that live service titles will remain a major focus, at the continuing costs of its single-player output. Since Sony acquired Bungie to not only make its own live service games, but to help advise on other studios' titles, the continued problems have raised concerns about the future of Bungie itself. Poor management has consistently been blamed for the problems at Bungie, with Forbes contributor Paul Tassi suggesting that many Bungie developers only found out about the Marathon delay at the same time as fans. Email gamecentral@ leave a comment below, follow us on Twitter. To submit Inbox letters and Reader's Features more easily, without the need to send an email, just use our Submit Stuff page here. For more stories like this, check our Gaming page. MORE: Xbox AMD deal confirms next gen home and portable consoles are coming soon MORE: Xbox ROG Ally handheld prices could be as high as £800 claims leaker MORE: The highest rated Metacritic game of 2025 actually came out in 2023


Scottish Sun
9 hours ago
- Scottish Sun
Sony issues update on PS6 following reports release date could be ‘sooner' than we thought
Plus why Sony has given out refunds to gamers GAME ON Sony issues update on PS6 following reports release date could be 'sooner' than we thought SONY has issued an update on PS6 following reports that the release date could be 'sooner' than we thought. And gamers can't wait to get their hands on the new exciting console. 2 Sony has issued an update on PS6 following reports that the release date could be 'sooner' than we thought Credit: Getty 2 The upcoming Blade Runner game due for 2027 was axed Credit: Getty The Sun revealed that court documents from Microsoft, which owns Xbox, previously revealed that the tech giant was expecting a 2028 launch for next-gen consoles. That included its own top-secret Xbox successor as well as Sony's unnamed next-gen PlayStation. But countering that was a new report from Insider Gaming that suggested an upcoming Blade Runner game due for 2027 has been cancelled. The report noted that the game was due to land on next-gen consoles that are yet to be released. This unannounced game was reportedly due to be called Blade Runner: Time To Leave. It entered pre-production in September 2024 with a budget of around £33 million / $45 million. But the game has supposedly been canned by the Guildford, UK-based studio. However, it was a major hint that the PS6 might land in 2027 rather than 2028. Now, Sony Interactive Entertainment's new president and CEO, Hideaki Nishino, was asked during a meeting about the future of PlayStation console hardware, and whether it could be superseded by cloud gaming. He said: 'Cloud streaming is progressing well from a technical standpoint, as we have demonstrated with [our] offerings, but end-to-end network stability is not in our control. Watch trailer for free Samurai game for PlayStation fans in May 2025 'And the higher cost per playtime compared to the traditional console model remains a challenge. 'Cloud gaming is increasingly providing an additional option for players to access content, "But our belief is that the majority of players continue to want to experience gaming through local execution without dependency on network conditions. "And PS5 and PS5 Pro have validated this thesis, I believe," reports Video Games Chronicle. Sony PlayStation Release Dates Here's a quick history of the main models released. Sony PlayStation: Japan – December 3, 1994 North America – September 9, 1995 Europe – September 29, 1995 Sony PlayStation 2: Japan – March 4, 2000 North America – October 26, 2000 Europe – November 24, 2000 Sony PlayStation 3: Japan – November 11, 2006 North America – November 17, 2006 Europe – March 23, 2007 Sony PlayStation 4: North America – November 15, 2013 Europe – November 29, 2013 Japan – February 22, 2014 Sony PlayStation 5: Japan – November 12, 2020 North America – November 12, 2020 Europe – November 12, 2020 The CEO continued to explain how Sony's console business has evolved into a 'multi-faceted platform', with a significant portion of its 124 million monthly active users still playing on PlayStation 4. 'We now have a large ecosystem of highly engaged players across both the PlayStation 5 and the PlayStation 4 generations. "So naturally, therefore, there's a huge interest in our next generation console strategy,' he said. 'While we cannot share further details at this stage, the future of the platform is top of mind. "We are committed to exploring a new and enhanced way for players to engage with our content and services.' SVP of finance and corporate development, Lynn Azar, was then asked if Sony expects to see higher profits in the year its next console launches, like it has before. Azar emphasized that Sony's players are now engaged across multiple platforms, including PS4, PS5 and PC. And explained that the vast majority of its revenue now comes from subscriptions and microtransactions, which should provide protection during any future platform migration. She added: 'PS5 represents our most engaged players, with the highest spend per player versus prior generations. "Our PS4 players as well are still active and spending as well. 'So, by providing players with increasing options of how to access the platform, we're able to better target the different play patterns and monetization profiles of different customer segments. "And as we continue to drive a multi-generational ecosystem into the future, we'll provide new ways for players to access the platform and experience our content and services.' WHAT DO WE KNOW ABOUT THE PS6 LAUNCH WINDOW? Sony hasn't explicitly confirmed a launch timeline for the PS6 but the company has released plenty of consoles in the past, giving us some useful data. Just last year, we asked AI to predict the PS6 release date, based on Sony's PlayStation release history. And it came up with Thursday, November 11, 2027 – fitting in with this latest leak. Here's a list of previous PlayStation release dates, as well as the days of the week that those consoles launched on: PlayStation – Saturday, December 3, 1994 (1st Saturday) PS One – Friday, July 7, 2000 (1st Friday) PlayStation 2 – Saturday, March 4, 2000 (1st Saturday) PS2 Slimline – Friday, October 29, 2004 (5th Friday) PlayStation 3 – Saturday, November 11, 2006 (2nd Saturday) PS3 Slim – Thursday, August 27, 2009 (4th Thursday) PS3 Super Slim – Tuesday, September 25, 2012 (4th Tuesday) PlayStation 4 – Friday, November 15, 2013 (3rd Friday) PS4 Slim – Thursday, September 15, 2016 (3rd Thursday) PS4 Pro – Thursday, November 10, 2016 (2nd Thursday) PlayStation 5 – Thursday, November 12, 2020 (2nd Thursday) PS5 Slim – Friday, November 10, 2023 (2nd Friday) PS5 Pro – Thursday, November 7, 2024 (1st Thursday) That would suggest that Sony would work towards a 2027 launch. November is usually favoured by Sony for PlayStation launches, especially in recent years. That means the console is out just in time for Christmas and the Black Friday spending season. But of course, it's all guesswork - so watch this space. In the meantime, PlayStation owners are having to pay extra for consoles after a recent PS5 price hike. And a shooter game loved by 10million is closing in days – as fans are warned they'll have to pay for an upgrade to keep playing. Plus, Sony has announced that it will be issuing refunds over a gaming blunder. The gaming giant had to issue an apology after gamers experienced significant problems with one if its new releases.