logo
Transgender pilot Jo Ellis breaks silence on false rumors linking her to Black Hawk helicopter crash

Transgender pilot Jo Ellis breaks silence on false rumors linking her to Black Hawk helicopter crash

Express Tribune31-01-2025
Jo Ellis, a transgender U.S. Army Black Hawk pilot, has addressed false rumors circulating on social media that she was one of the pilots involved in a deadly mid-air collision between an American Airlines flight and a military helicopter near Washington, D.C. on Wednesday evening.
The crash tragically resulted in the deaths of 67 people—60 passengers and four crew members aboard the American Eagle flight, and three soldiers onboard the Black Hawk helicopter.
The collision occurred as American Eagle Flight 5342, a regional jet traveling from Wichita, Kansas, collided with the Black Hawk, which was on a routine training mission. The impact caused both aircrafts to plummet into the Potomac River near Ronald Reagan Washington National Airport. Recovery operations continued into Thursday, with at least 40 bodies recovered, though many victims remain unidentified.
While authorities have not yet released the names of the soldiers aboard the Black Hawk, social media users wrongly speculated that Jo Ellis was among the victims. Ellis, a pilot with the Virginia Army National Guard, quickly refuted these claims.
On Friday morning, Ellis took to Facebook to address the misinformation. "Some craziness has happened on the internet, and I'm being named as one of the pilots of the DC crash," she wrote. "Please report any accounts or posts you see. It's insulting to the victims and families of those lost, and they deserve better than this BS from the bots and trolls of the internet."
In addition to her post, Ellis shared a video with the caption "Proof of life and statement." In the video, she clarified that she had no connection to the crash. "This is Jo Ellis. I am a Black Hawk pilot with the Virginia Army National Guard. I understand some people have associated me with the crash in D.C., and that is false," she said. "It is insulting to the families to try to tie this to some sort of political agenda. They don't deserve that. I don't deserve this." She also explained that the Department of Defense handles casualty notifications and confirmed that no Virginia National Guard personnel were involved in the Black Hawk collision.
The speculation surrounding Ellis's involvement in the crash gained traction partly due to her history of making anti-Trump statements on social media. President Donald Trump weighed in on the tragedy, raising questions about the role of diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) programs in federal hiring. He suggested, without evidence, that lower hiring standards for air traffic controllers during the Obama and Biden administrations may have contributed to the crash. Trump's comments sparked further political debate, though no direct connection between DEI policies and the crash has been established.
The Black Hawk involved in the collision was a Sikorsky H-60 from the U.S. Army's 12th Aviation Battalion, based at Fort Belvoir, Virginia. The American Eagle flight, operated by PSA Airlines, was en route to Washington, D.C. from Wichita, Kansas. A livestream camera at the Kennedy Center in Washington, D.C. captured the explosion from the crash around 9 p.m. Wednesday evening.
As investigations into the cause of the collision continue, authorities have not yet officially identified the victims aboard the helicopter. However, the false rumors surrounding Ellis have sparked broader conversations about the tragedy and the importance of respecting the victims and their families during such a difficult time.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

78 killed in Afghanistan bus crash
78 killed in Afghanistan bus crash

Express Tribune

time2 hours ago

  • Express Tribune

78 killed in Afghanistan bus crash

Security personnel stand guard at the site of a bus crash in Guzara district of Herat province on August 20, 2025. The death toll from a collision between a bus carrying Afghan migrants returning from Iran and two other vehicles in western Afghanistan has risen to 76, a provincial official said on August 20. Photo: AFP The death toll from a collision between a bus carrying Afghan migrants returning from Iran and two other vehicles in western Afghanistan has risen to 78, provincial officials said on Wednesday. Seventy-six people died in the accident in Herat province's Guzara district on Tuesday night when the passenger bus hit a motorcycle and a truck transporting fuel, causing an explosive fire, officials and eyewitnesses said. Two of the three survivors later died of their injuries, officials said on Wednesday. "Two injured individuals from last night's incident succumbed to severe injuries, increasing the number of victims to 78," a statement by the provincial information department said, citing representatives of the military hospital that received victims. Read More: Trump rules out US troops for Ukraine Seventeen children were among those killed, according to army spokesman Mujeebullah Ansar, though a provincial police source put the number at 19. Many of the bodies were "unidentifiable", said Mohammad Janan Moqadas, chief physician at the military hospital. "There was a lot of fire... There was a lot of screaming, but we couldn't even get within 50 metres (160 feet) to rescue anyone," 34-year-old eyewitness Akbar Tawakoli told AFP. "Only three people were saved from the bus. They were also on fire and their clothes were burnt." Clean-up teams worked to remove the torched shell of the bus and twisted wreckage of another vehicle on the roadside early on Wednesday, an AFP journalist saw. "I was very saddened that most of the passengers on the bus were children and women," another eyewitness, 25-year-old Abdullah, who like many Afghans only uses one last name, told AFP. The bus was carrying Afghans recently returned from Iran to the capital Kabul, Herat provincial government spokesman Mohammad Yousuf Saeedi told AFP. Also Read: 'Bandits' kill 13 in Nigeria despite recent peace deals The central Taliban government called for an investigation into the accident. "It is with deep sorrow that we mourn the loss of numerous Afghan lives and the injuries sustained in a tragic bus collision and subsequent fire in Herat province last night," it said in a statement. At least 1.5 million people have returned to Afghanistan since the start of this year from Iran and Pakistan, both of which have sought to force migrants out after decades of hosting them, according to the UN migration agency. Many of those returning spent years outside the country and arrive without a place to go and carrying few belongings, facing steep challenges to resettle in a country gripped by endemic poverty and high unemployment. The state-run Bakhtar News Agency said Tuesday's accident was one of the deadliest in the country in recent years. .Read: UN slams Israel's curbs on Gaza aid Deadly traffic accidents are common in Afghanistan, due in part to poor roads after decades of conflict, dangerous driving on highways and a lack of regulation. In December last year, two bus accidents involving a fuel tanker and a truck on a highway through central Afghanistan killed at least 52. In March 2024, more than 20 people were killed and 38 injured when a bus collided with a fuel tanker and burst into flames in southern Helmand province. Another serious accident involving a fuel tanker took place in December 2022, when the vehicle overturned and caught fire in Afghanistan's high-altitude Salang Pass, killing 31 people.

Forces regain extended detention powers with Senate nod
Forces regain extended detention powers with Senate nod

Express Tribune

time13 hours ago

  • Express Tribune

Forces regain extended detention powers with Senate nod

The Pakistan armed forces reiterated their commitment to eradicating terrorism, emphasising their solidarity with the nation in this ongoing fight. SCREENGRAB Following its passage in the National Assembly, the Senate on Tuesday approved the Anti-Terrorism (Amendment) Bill 2025, restoring powers that allow law enforcement agencies and the armed forces to detain suspects for up to three months, a move that sparked uproar from the opposition benches. Minister of State for Interior and Narcotics Control Muhammad Talal Badar tabled the bill, which amends sub-section (1) of Section 11EEEE of the Anti-Terrorism Act, 1997. According to the amendment, "the government or, where the provisions of Section 4 have been invoked, the armed forces or civil armed forces for a period not exceeding three months and after recording reasons thereof, issue order for the preventative detention of any person." The bill states that persons suspected of activities against national security, including target killing, kidnapping for ransom and extortion, can be detained for three months, adding that it applies "against whom sufficient grounds exist of his having been so concerned, for purpose of inquiry". Detentions extending beyond this threshold will be subject to Article 10 of the Constitution, which provides safeguards with respect to arrest and detention. Under the new arrangement, if a detention order is issued by the army or civil forces, the investigation will be handled by a joint investigation team. "The inquiry will be conducted by no police officer below the rank of Superintendent of Police, Intelligence agencies, civil armed forces, armed forces, and other law enforcing agencies," the bill adds. While JUI-F's Senator Kamran Murtaza attempted to move amendments, they were rejected by majority vote as the House passed the law clause-by-clause. According to its statement of objects, the current security outlook requires "a robust response that goes beyond the existing legal framework". The bill explains that previous powers under Section 11EEEE, which lapsed in 2016 due to a sunset clause, needed to be "re-inserted to empower the government, Armed Forces and Civil Armed Forces with the necessary authority to detain individuals who pose a significant threat to national security". The government contends the provision would allow for preventive detention based on credible information or reasonable suspicion, enabling authorities to disrupt terror plots before they mature. 'Urgency must not eclipse wisdom' Defending the legislation, Law Minister Azam Nazeer Tarar told senators, "Currently, the country is facing the menace of terrorism and amendments proposed by Syed Naveed Qamar have already been incorporated to make it more effective." He pointed out the bill had passed judicial scrutiny and included a three-year sunset clause. He further clarified that under Clause 2 of the amendment, the detainee would have presented before the Magistrate within 24 hours. However, PTI's Barrister Syed Ali Zafar urged caution, stating: "Some of its clauses are against the law and Constitution, so the bill should be referred to the committee." "Today we are being asked to amend one of the most powerful — and most controversial — laws in our statute book: the Anti-Terrorism Act," the opposition lawmaker said, adding that the law first came into being under extraordinary circumstances to protect Pakistan from extraordinary threats. "But as lawmakers, we must always remember: every extraordinary power given to the state can both be used and misused," he cautioned. He acknowledged that the anti-terrorism act was made to get rid of the menace of terrorism, which had destroyed the peace of the nation. "There is no doubt that we have to eradicate terrorism from the country and punish the terrorists. There is also no doubt that we will fight against terrorism till the last and that together we will win this battle." However, he cautioned that "urgency must not eclipse wisdom". Barrister Ali Zafar further pointed out that the Supreme Court had examined the provisions of the existing anti-terrorism act and decided that many of its provisions were against the constitution. "It was only after that that the present law was passed, and hence there is no room for any changes in it. By adding any provision in the existing law and making it more draconian, it will only become unconstitutional." He lamented that the amendment proposes that even an SHO and detain anybody for a period of three months in prison, and the person in prison will have no recourse to the courts. "The government can call anyone a terrorist on the grounds of public order and imprison them," he warned. "We must ask ourselves: will this amendment make Pakistan safer, or will it weaken the constitutional rights we swore an oath to protect?" "Our duty is twofold: on the one hand, to protect the lives of our citizens from the scourge of terrorism; on the other, to defend those constitutional freedoms without which Pakistan cannot remain a democratic state," he stressed. "We have to do a balancing act. Security will have to be balanced against liberty and power against accountability," he added. 'No softness toward militancy' PML-N Senator Irfanul Haque Siddiqui argued that no softness could be shown toward armed militancy. "We do not want terrorists roaming freely while innocent people are slaughtered... These acts weaken our federation and create mistrust between the people and the state." He said lawmakers must either surrender to militants or legislate to resist them, arguing such measures can "prevent crime and also curb forced disappearances and arbitrary detentions". Siddiqui appealed for viewing anti-terror legislation in good faith rather than as a political stick, stressing the need for transparent government-opposition communication with the public and media.

Senate passes Anti-Terrorism Bill amid opposition walkout
Senate passes Anti-Terrorism Bill amid opposition walkout

Business Recorder

time17 hours ago

  • Business Recorder

Senate passes Anti-Terrorism Bill amid opposition walkout

ISLAMABAD: Amidst strong opposition, the Senate, Tuesday, passed three government bills including the Anti-Terrorism (Amendment) Bill, 2025, that allows detention of suspects at the hands of law enforcement agencies for more than three months. On the last day of the 353rd session, State Minister for Interior Talal Chaudhry presented the bill in the House that met strong opposition. Last week, the bill was passed by the National Assembly where it faced strong opposition too. In the Senate meeting, Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) Parliamentary Leader Ali Zafar criticised the powers given to the law enforcement agencies to detain any suspect without presenting them in a court of law for three months. 'The country is burning in the fire of terrorism,' responded Law Minister Azam Tarar, defending the bill, saying it aimed at countering terrorism. Kamran Murtaza from Jamiat Uelma-e-Islam Fazal (JUI-F) criticised the treasury side for presenting the bill for passage without having it referred to the relevant committee first. 'Heavens would not have fallen had this bill been referred to the committee,' he said. The bill was finally passed by the House by majority vote following which the PTI staged a walkout from the House in protest. The Section 3(a)(1) of the Anti-Terrorism (Amendment) Bill 2025 provides that the government or— the armed forces or civil armed forces - for a period not exceeding three months - issue an order for the preventative detention of any person who has been concerned in 'any offence under this Act relating to the security or defence of Pakistan or any part thereof, or public order relating to target killing, kidnapping for ransom, and extortion, bhatta, or the maintenance of supplies or services, or against whom a reasonable complaint has been made or credible information has been received, or a reasonable suspicion exists of his having been so concerned, for purpose of inquiry: Provided that the detention of such person, including detention for a further period after three months, shall be subject to the provision of Article l0 of the Constitution.' The Section 3(b) of the bill says, 'Provided that where the detention order has been issued by the armed forces or civil armed forces under Sub-section (1), the inquiry shall be conducted by a joint investigation team (JIT) comprising of a police officer not below the rank of superintendent of police, intelligence agencies, civil armed forces, armed forces, and other law enforcing agencies.' The Section 3(c) of this bill says that Anti-Terrorism (Amendment) Bill, 2025 shall remain in force for a period of three years from its commencement. Apart from Anti-Terrorism (Amendment) Act, 2025, the other two bills passed by the House were Petroleum (Amendment) Bill, 2025 and Pakistan Land Port Authority Bill, 2025. The Petroleum (Amendment) Bill, 2025 aims at introducing 'IT-based tracking of petroleum products, to curb the smuggling of petroleum products.' The Pakistan Land Port Authority Bill, 2025 aims to 'establish a land port authority to provide and administer an integrated system of facilities for cross-border movement of goods and passengers at land ports in Pakistan and to make provision for its operation, management, development of land port and matters connected therewith and ancillary matter.' Through resolutions, the Senate extended the Capital Development Authority Amendment Ordinance 2025 and the National Agri-Trade and Food Safety Authority Ordinance, 2025 for 120 days. Meanwhile, the Interior Ministry, in a written reply shared in the Senate Question House, said that the Federal Investigation Agency (FIA) dismissed its 51 employees in the last three years for 'suspected collusion with human smugglers.' The Senate is prorogued. Copyright Business Recorder, 2025

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store