
US labor market steady, jobless claims at three-month low
The lack of material labor market deterioration likely gives the Federal Reserve cover to keep interest unchanged next week amid signs that President Donald Trump's aggressive tariffs on imports were starting to lift inflation. That was underscored by a survey from S&P Global on Thursday showing businesses asked higher prices for goods and services in July.
Trump is pressuring the U.S. central bank to resume its interest rate cuts. Economists expect the Fed will keep its benchmark interest rate in the 4.25%-4.50% range after the end of a two-day policy meeting next Wednesday. The Fed cut rates three times in 2024, with the last move coming in December.
"Trump 2.0 economic policies have not brought the economy to its knees yet although whether this continues to be the case going forward remains an open question," said Christopher Rupkey, chief economist at FWDBONDS. "The weekly jobless claims give Fed officials no cover whatsoever if they are seriously thinking of cutting interest rates at next week's meeting."
Initial claims for state unemployment benefits dropped 4,000 to a seasonally adjusted 217,000 for the week ended July 19, the lowest level since April, the Labor Department said. Economists polled by Reuters had forecast 226,000 claims for the latest week. Claims have declined for six straight weeks and have pulled further away from an eight-month high touched in June.
Unadjusted claims decreased by 45,319 to 215,792 last week.
Though there have been some layoffs, employers have been mostly reluctant to fire workers, opting instead to scale back on hiring while awaiting more clarity on the Trump administration's protectionist trade policy.
Uncertainty over where tariff levels will eventually settle continued to weigh on business sentiment in July, the survey from S&P Global showed, even as activity picked up. The survey's measures of prices paid by businesses for inputs as well as what they charged for goods and services rose this month.
S&P Global said about 40% of service providers reporting higher selling prices explicitly mentioned tariffs, while just under half of their counterparts in manufacturing blamed the import duties. Employment levels at businesses remained steady, the survey also showed, aligning with the low jobless claims data.
Stocks on Wall Street were mixed. The dollar gained versus a basket of currencies. U.S. Treasury yields rose.
There is still a chance that claims could push higher. Claims have tended to increase in July, in part due to the temporary motor vehicle assembly plant shutdowns, whose varied timing can throw off the model the government uses to strip out seasonal fluctuations from the data.
Though job growth has slowed from last year, the labor market remains stable. Nonetheless, the hesitancy by businesses to boost hiring has left many of those who are out of work to experience long spells of unemployment. The number of people receiving benefits after an initial week of aid, a proxy for hiring, increased 4,000 to a seasonally adjusted 1.955 million during the week ending July 12, the claims report showed.
The so-called continuing claims covered the period during which the government surveyed households for July's unemployment rate. Continuing claims eased slightly between the June and July survey weeks.
While economists said the elevated continuing claims reading posed an upside risk to the unemployment rate, they mostly expected it to hold steady at 4.1% this month. A decline in labor supply amid reduced flows of immigrants means the economy now only needs to create roughly 100,000 or fewer jobs per month to keep up with growth in the working-age population.
The drop in the unemployment rate in June after holding at 4.2% for three straight months was mostly because people dropped out of the labor force.
"Labor supply is growing much more slowly in 2025 due to immigration policy changes, so the unemployment rate can likely hold steady even if payrolls increase much more slowly in the second half of 2025 than in 2023 or 2024," said Bill Adams, chief economist at Comerica Bank.
But high borrowing costs and economic uncertainty are hurting the housing market.
New home sales increased 0.6% to a seasonally adjusted annualized rate of 627,000 units in June, a third report from the Commerce Department's Census Bureau showed. That was below economists' expectations for a rise to a rate of 650,000 units.
Sales fell 6.6% on a year-over-year basis in June. The inventory of unsold homes on the market increased to 511,000 units, the highest level since October 2007, from 505,000 in May. That could make it difficult for builders to break more ground on new single-family housing projects.
Government data last week showed single-family homebuilding dropped to an 11-month low in June while permits for future construction declined to more than a two-year low. Economists expect that residential investment, which includes homebuilding and home sales through broker commissions, likely remained a drag on gross domestic product in the second quarter.
"We think renewed weakness in the housing sector this year, with residential investment likely to decline again in the second quarter, is the best evidence that rates are still at restrictive levels," said Veronica Clark, an economist at Citigroup.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Independent
7 minutes ago
- The Independent
Britain has no business laughing at Trump's EU trade deal
In a world where Donald Trump's tariffs and trade wars make everyone a loser, are there any winners from his latest deal, sealed by a handshake with the president of the European Commission, Ursula von der Leyen, in a ballroom at one of the president's Scottish golf courses, of all places? One very clear loser is von der Leyen herself. If body language is anything to go by, she looked like she'd been badly bullied by the Big Orange Man – and, truthfully, so she had. In her own clipped remarks, she admits that a reduction in tariffs to 15 per cent, while 'not to be underestimated', was 'the best we could get'. President Macron has declared the US-EU trade deal a 'dark day' for Europe – and you can understand why. A general tariff level of 15 per cent – better than the 20 per cent proposed by Trump on his infamous 'Liberation Day' in April, and even better than the 30 per cent he was threatening a couple of weeks ago – is still prohibitive. It is certainly way above the 2 to 3 per cent levels that most EU exporters used to face. A trade war has been avoided, but this looks like the kind of deal the Americans have forced on the likes of Vietnam or Indonesia. So it is something of a humiliation for the mighty European Union, a global trade superpower. The feeling in some parts of Europe must be that if von der Leyen had played hard ball like the Chinese, a more evenly balanced and more advantageous relationship could have been reached in the long run. We will never know the truth about that. For European pride and for many of its great industrial concerns, the deal is disappointing, and will be expensive – the Volkswagen group is just one to speak out. But for European consumers, it is surely good news. They will be able to enjoy cheaper imports from the United States; it is American customers who will have to pay more for their French wines and Italian sports cars. Could it be that the EU's trade deal – which Trump has, well, trumpeted as the 'biggest ever', and whose biggest 'win' is the removal of a threat to raise tariffs to 30 per cent later this week – is marginally worse than the one Starmer did with Trump in May? Britain's trade deal lowered tariffs of UK goods imported into the US to 10 per cent, and imposed a lesser, 25 per cent tariff on the UK steel industry, with room for further concessions, while the 50 per cent 'worldwide rate' will remain for the EU. For those now cheering this as a rare Brexit benefit, it is a hollow victory. For the concessions to Britain are so minor, they cannot hope to make up for the ground lost since Brexit – essentially, a GDP loss in excess of 5 per cent. And we're not out of the rough, by any stretch. As Keir Starmer meets the US president for further trade discussions at the Trump Turnberry golf course, he will be acutely conscious of his counterpart's unpredictability. Starmer has milked the modest concessions he managed to wangle, particularly on cars and food standards, but much remains vague and far from nailed-down. The greatest danger is the fuzzy UK commitment to improve the trading environment for the US pharma groups will eventually mean an enormous increase in the drugs bill for the National Health Service, which it can ill-afford. Trump also omitted virtually the whole of the service sector from his UK deal, where the British actually enjoy a surplus, which is great until he decides otherwise. There are no legally binding rules here. The world economy remains highly inter-dependent, and globalisation, while receding, cannot sensibly be ended, as even Elon Musk tries to argue. All barriers to trade harm the country that erects them both directly and, in their depressing effects on world growth, indirectly. Consumers are charged more, on a highly regressive basis, companies are forced to pay more for inputs, and be less cost-effective, and competition and dynamic structural change are deliberately impeded. Whatever the details of the individual deals counties are trying to strike with one another, tariffs make us all poorer in the long run.


Daily Mail
8 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Opinion: Bank fears Farage turmoil in No 10
As a public figure, the governor of the Bank of England Andrew Bailey receives most attention from consumers and businesses alike for his role in setting interest rates . Critical as that is to national wellbeing, it has long been my belief that Bailey is more comfortable with the Bank's other, less discussed role of maintaining financial stability. Bailey was first to the battlements in his early days in office in March 2020 as the pandemic shut down Britain and much of the world. Bond markets in New York were in panic, and the Bank, led first by Mark Carney and then Bailey, moved to calm events. A currency swap deal with the US was activated, interest rates were cut to the bone and more money printing, through quantitative easing, was authorised. Bailey passionately urged government to take steps to prevent scarring to the economy. He was also at the tiller in the autumn of 2022 when Liz Truss 's tax-cutting mini Budget sparked a run on the pound and a sudden retreat from British government bonds. The scale and suddenness of the move caused ructions for pension funds which had used derivative products to gamble on returns. The episode had threatened, without Bailey's intervention, to cause a cascade of financial collapses among banks who had provided credit for the trades. The Bank of England became a butt of criticism, not least on these pages. Its twice-yearly Financial Stability Report had in the past warned of the potential danger of liability driven-investment products (LDIs) but neither the Bank nor the Pensions Regulator addressed the matter. It is one thing for the Financial Stability Committee to identify and warn of dangers to the financial system, but quite another to tackle a weakness and close it down. Bailey was in the Bank's engine room in the Great Financial Crisis of 2008, so has vast experience of dealing with fractures in the financial system and knows how rapidly contagion takes place. All this experience tells him that Chancellor Rachel Reeves' efforts to encourage growth, by deregulating the City, could be a huge error. It is a reminder of the light touch regulation in the run-up to the collapse of Northern Rock in 2007 and the crisis which followed. Readers of this month's Financial Stability document would find few clues to what Bailey believes is the most acute concern at present. It is not Trump tariffs or the present Government's borrowing needs, as serious as they may be. The governor's biggest worry is political uncertainty. It may seem mad to think that this should be the case given Labour's vast Commons majority and four more years in office. The significant statistic is that Nigel Farage's Reform UK has led the other parties in 65 consecutive polls. And the present kerfuffles in Epping and the record small boat arrivals in a long hot summer make the potential for a Farage journey to Downing Street ever more credible. Bailey and the independent Bank never indulge in party politics. But for the governor, pound sterling, the bond markets and the whole stability of the financial system, the number one threat is a big-spending populist released into Downing Street. Reach for the safety straps.


Reuters
8 minutes ago
- Reuters
Argentina economic recovery to moderate in the run-up to October vote : Reuters poll
July 28 (Reuters) - Argentina's ongoing economic recovery will moderate to a normal pace in the run-up to October's mid-term legislative election, a Reuters poll showed. At the start of 2025, Latin America's No. 3 economy behind Brazil and Mexico picked up strongly following a two-year recession that capped more than a decade of poor performance. Consumption got a boost from a drastic fall in inflation thanks to President Javier Milei government's "chainsaw" drive that shored up fiscal results, while facing intense social criticism. But Argentines are cutting some spending and investment plans amid a slackening labor market, resurging currency worries and tighter credit conditions. Gross domestic product (GDP) is set to expand at a still-decent 3.4% rate in 2026 from an expected 5.0% this year, according to the median estimate of 28 analysts polled between July 21-25. Inflation is forecast to fall to 23% in 2026 from a projected 42% this year. In 2024, consumer prices shot up 237%, the worst since 1991 when Argentina was experiencing a similar economic shock. "Growth stagnated in recent months as a result of flattening real wages, increased uncertainty and the slowdown in credit from a restrictive monetary policy," said Federico Filippini, head of research at Adcap. "Next year's forecasts are heavily influenced by the upcoming election and the government's ability to advance its reform agenda." Economic activity missed analyst calls in May on yearly terms and virtually stalled against April's levels, the latest data from a leading indicator showed. Businesses are feeling the pinch of high interest rates from the adoption of a market-based money supply scheme in line with a $20 billion International Monetary Fund (IMF) program signed in April. The implementation of the new framework also impacted local assets shaken by foreign exchange tensions caused by a drying up of U.S. dollar inflows from agricultural exports. "Volatility will continue, but less than in recent weeks, with interest rates moving more freely and agricultural exports remaining low until year-end," said Fausto Spotorno, economist at Orlando Ferreres. An expected $2 billion IMF disbursement should contribute to calm market anxiety before October's vote by bolstering Argentina's depleted international reserves. Unable to tap global debt markets due to the country's steep risk premium, the government has received some additional relief through special bond sales as well as bank "repo" deals. However, surging imports from Milei's economic opening keep the central bank's balance sheet under pressure, despite an increase in energy and mining exports. To address the issue, many Peronists campaigning for the October election want to return to a policy mix of devaluation, protectionism and industrial promotion. Voters rejected this approach at the ballot box in 2023, when Milei's La Libertad Avanza party won a presidential election vowing to trim the size of the state. Now his LLA has an advantage in polls over the Peronists, whose internal rivalries flared up after their leader Cristina Fernandez de Kirchner was put under house arrest for corruption. Investors hope Milei will push the "libertarian" agenda aggressively if his party wins more seats in Congress, recreating Argentina's economic transformation of the 1990s. "We may see a re-discussion of reforms that were attempted during the current legislature but failed... for example, comprehensive labor and tax reforms, potentially also a pensions reform," Citi analysts wrote in a report. "The new Congress could also give impulse to privatizations of some state companies that may require only a simple majority – Banco Nacion, (water utility) AySA and Aerolineas Argentinas." (Other stories from the Reuters global economic poll)