logo
AHDB: UK-US trade deal could be good news for British beef sector

AHDB: UK-US trade deal could be good news for British beef sector

Agriland19-05-2025

New trade agreements agreed between the UK and the US could see increased quantities of British beef heading across the Atlantic.
Agricultural and Horticultural Development Board (AHDB) analysts have identified the key opportunities and threats associated with the new UK-US Comprehensive Prosperity Deal.
According to the AHDB, on the upside, the UK will be able to export up to 13,000t of beef to the US, tariff-free, following changes to an existing tariff rate quota (TRQ).
The US has a TRQ for beef imports, within which there are country-specific quotas for Australia, New Zealand, Argentina, and Uruguay.
British beef
The UK, along with Brazil, has access to the US TRQ under the 'Other Countries' allocation, which is 65,005t.
In practical terms, however, it has been challenging for the UK to make use of this TRQ for British beef for as Brazil often uses the entire allocation.
In 2024, Brazil had made use of the 'Other Countries' allocation by March 28 (it opened on January 1, 2024). This year, the 'Other Countries' allocation was spent in just 17 days after opening at the start of the calendar year, the AHDB said.
The proximity of Brazil to the US has also put the UK at a disadvantage in this respect, according to the board.
UK beef exporters would be wary of risking sending shipments of beef across the Atlantic only to find upon arrival that the quota allocation has been used up and they would face full tariff rates for British beef to cross the US border.
The new UK-US trade deal removes this risk, as the UK would have its own TRQ allocation.
But this will not all be one-way traffic.
Currently, the US has a 1,000t quota for exporting beef to the UK, which is subject to a 20% tariff.
Under the prosperity deal, the 20% tariff will be removed and the US will have a preferential beef TRQ of 13,000t.
However, US beef imports will have to meet UK food standards, so the Westminster government's red line on this aspect remains intact.
While the quantity of beef imports from the US matches that of beef exports from the UK, there are concerns over the value of imported US beef.
Imports of high value, premium cuts – such as strip loins – could potentially have a considerable impact on the UK domestic market.
The British Meat Processors Association (BMPA) estimates that the UK produces around 3,900t of strip loins which is just under a third of the beef TRQ for the US.
Northern Ireland is the best-placed region in the UK to avail of new British beef export opportunities to the US.
This is due to Northern Ireland's focus on grass-based beef production systems, which differentiate from US systems.
Adding to this is the fact that the deal comes as cattle prices have already reached record highs.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Gerry Adams to donate €100k to Irish language and Palestinian charities
Gerry Adams to donate €100k to Irish language and Palestinian charities

Irish Daily Mirror

time13 minutes ago

  • Irish Daily Mirror

Gerry Adams to donate €100k to Irish language and Palestinian charities

Gerry Adams said he will donate the €100,000 (£84,000) he is to receive in damages from the BBC to charities that help children in Gaza, the homeless in Ireland and Irish language groups. Mr Adams took the BBC to court over a 2016 episode of its Spotlight programme, and an accompanying online story, which he said defamed him by alleging he sanctioned the killing of former Sinn Fein official Denis Donaldson, for which he denies any involvement. Last Friday a jury at the High Court in Dublin found in his favour and awarded him €100,000 (£84,000) after determining that was the meaning of words included in the programme and article. The BBC will also have to pay Mr Adams's legal costs. During an eight-minute video posted on the official Sinn Fein YouTube channel, Mr Adams accused the BBC of showing "arrogance" when it did not resolve the dispute after he issued legal letters nine years ago. In Putting Manners On The BBC – The Gerry Adams Blog, Mr Adams said that the BBC has been held accountable for the content it broadcasts. Mr Adams said: "As for the money that the jury awarded me in damages, I will donate this to good causes. "These will include the children of Gaza, groups in Ireland involved in helping the homeless, Cumann Carad, the Irish language sector and other projects like this in west Belfast." He added: "When the case began six weeks ago, the BBC's legal strategy was evident very quickly. Their narrative was that pursued by successive British and Irish governments for years. "They blamed everything during the conflict on Irish Republicans and by extension, during this trial, on me. "The BBC lawyers embarked on a Jesuitical presentation of the case that tried to convince the jurors that the words broadcast and published by the British Broadcasting Corporation, that I had sanctioned the murder of Denis Donaldson, did not, in fact, mean that I sanctioned the murder of Denis Donaldson. "They were, they said, that's the British Broadcasting Corporation, not defending the truth of the accusation. "Instead they were defending, they claimed, their journalism, which they said was fair and reasonable, in the public interest and made in good faith. "They concluded their case by trying to exert moral pressure on the jurors by claiming that a defeat for the British Broadcasting Corporation would be a blow to freedom of speech and a setback to victims. "In the end the jury didn't buy in to any of this. "On all the key issues the jurors unanimously accepted that the script used by the Spotlight programme did mean that I had sanctioned and approved the murder of Denis Donaldson." He said that after the BBC's decision to air the Spotlight programme, he decided to sue the broadcaster. Mr Adams said the BBC could have resolved the dispute there and then. "They chose not to. Why? That's a question to be asked. Why did they not resolve this issue when they could have? "Was it arrogance? Yes, that's part of it. But I also suspect political interference. "In January, the British Prime Minister Keir Starmer responded to a decision in the High Court in Belfast, which included that I and, by implication, up to 400 other former internees, were wrongfully detained and that we were entitled to compensation. "Mr Starmer told the British Parliament that he would look at every conceivable way to block compensation being paid." Mr Adams also urged the Minister for Justice Jim O'Callaghan to meet Denis Donaldson's family. He signed off by saying "slan agus tog go bog e", which means goodbye and take it easy. Earlier this week the BBC was granted time to consider appealing against the jury's decision. The broadcaster was granted a stay on paying the full costs and damages to allow it time to consider whether to lodge an appeal. The stay was subject to paying half the damages (€50,000 or £42,000) and €250,000 (£210,000) towards solicitors' fees.

JP Magnier handed €50k in brown' envelopes to estate agent in Tipperary land sale, High Court hears
JP Magnier handed €50k in brown' envelopes to estate agent in Tipperary land sale, High Court hears

Irish Independent

timean hour ago

  • Irish Independent

JP Magnier handed €50k in brown' envelopes to estate agent in Tipperary land sale, High Court hears

The High Court has heard that billionaire bloodstock magnate John Magnier's son, JP, handed over two "brown" envelopes containing a total of €50K in cash to an estate agent involved in a failed €15m property deal which were delivered to the beneficiaries of the estate as a show of "appreciation". The court also heard that a solicitor involved in the proposed conveyance of Barne Estate, Co Tipperary, the subject of a legal action by John Magnier - who alleges a €15m deal was reneged upon by the vendors - has told the High Court that an agreement was in place between the parties before an exclusivity document was signed. Joseph Fitzpatrick, of Smithwick Solicitors, was giving evidence in the hearing today and told counsel for the Barne Estate that he secured an exclusivity agreement signed by both sides to run from August 31 to September 22 after hands were allegedly shaken on the deal. Lawyers acting for Mr Magnier, founder of the world-famous Coolmore Stud, have claimed before the High Court that a US-based construction magnate, Maurice Regan, the preferred buyer, engaged in a "full-frontal assault" on Mr Magnier's claimed deal to buy the 751-acre tract. Mr Magnier's proceedings claim that Barne Estate reneged on the alleged deal, preferring to sell the land at the higher price of €22.25m to Mr Regan, the founder of the New York building firm JT Magen. Mr Magnier – along with his adult children - wants to enforce the alleged deal. The Magnier side says the deal was struck at an August 22, 2023, kitchen meeting at Mr Magnier's Coolmore home. They also claim an exclusivity agreement that was in effect from August 31 to September 30 stipulated that the estate would not permit its representatives to solicit or encourage any expression of interest, inquiry or offer on the property from anyone other than Mr Magnier. Barne Estate has been held for the benefit of Richard Thomson-Moore and others by a Jersey trust. The Magnier side has sued the Barne Estate, Mr Thomson-Moore and three companies of IQEQ (Jersey) Ltd group, seeking to enforce the purported deal, which they say had been "unequivocally" agreed. The Barne defendants say there was never any such agreement, as they needed the consent of the trustees to finalise any agreement and subsequently they preferred to sell the estate to Mr Regan. Mr Regan is not a party to the case. Mr Magnier's son, JP, told Paul Gallagher SC, for the Magnier side, that his father asked him to get €50k in cash on September 8, 2023, and to put it into two envelopes to be given to the Thomson-Moores. He said the money was an "appreciation" for letting the Magnier side onto the Barne land, for their loyalty in honouring the deal and because they were allegedly "cash strapped". JP Magnier said he put the money into two envelopes and gave it to the estate agent at Barne Estate for them to be passed on to the Thomson-Moores. On September 11, 2023, however, he said the estate agent met with JP Magnier and "pushed" the envelopes in his direction, saying that the Thomson-Moores were concerned that their farm manager may have seen the original transaction. Niall F Buckley SC, for the Barne side, asked what colour the envelopes were and was told by JP Magnier that they were brown. Mr Buckley put it to JP Magnier that the envelopes were to keep the Thomson-Moores "sweet", as John Magnier was concerned they were going to pull out of the deal. JP Magnier said his father never said that to him. "I take it you didn't ask for a receipt?" asked Mr Buckley. JP Magnier replied: "No." "Doesn't that say it all," remarked Mr Buckley. "Knowing what you did about my clients' family circumstances and the need for them to provide for their child and given the vast amount of land you have, did it ever occur to you to let this one go?" "It wouldn't be my call," said JP Magnier. Mr Fitzpatrick told Martin Hayden SC, for the Barne Estate, that the exclusivity agreement was not to further any negotiation but to keep the "status quo" of the alleged sale agreement in order to further the preparation and receipt of the contracts. "Exclusivity was not for negotiations going forward but to facilitate the contract," said Mr Fitzpatrick. Mr Fitzpatrick said Mr Magnier had deposited €15M in the Smithwicks' client account before any purported contract was signed in order to "show good faith". However, a week before the exclusivity agreement expired, the Thomson-Moores said they were taking tax advice, he said. "We invited them to a meeting and that was refused, then the extension of the exclusivity was refused. It was clear they had no intention of signing with us and were running down the clock," said Mr Fitzpatrick. The case continues in two weeks' time before Mr Justice Max Barrett.

Gerry Adams to donate €100,000 from BBC defamation trial to Irish language and Palestinian charities
Gerry Adams to donate €100,000 from BBC defamation trial to Irish language and Palestinian charities

Irish Independent

timean hour ago

  • Irish Independent

Gerry Adams to donate €100,000 from BBC defamation trial to Irish language and Palestinian charities

Mr Adams took the BBC to court over a 2016 episode of its Spotlight programme, and an accompanying online story, which he said defamed him by alleging he sanctioned the killing of former Sinn Féin official Denis Donaldson, for which he denies any involvement. Last Friday, a jury at the High Court in Dublin found in his favour and awarded him €100,000 after determining that was the meaning of words included in the programme and article. The BBC will also have to pay Mr Adams's legal costs. During an eight-minute video posted on the official Sinn Féin YouTube channel, Mr Adams accused the BBC of showing 'arrogance' when it did not resolve the dispute after he issued legal letters nine years ago. In Putting Manners On The BBC – The Gerry Adams Blog, Mr Adams said that the BBC has been held accountable for the content it broadcasts. Mr Adams said: 'As for the money that the jury awarded me in damages, I will donate this to good causes. 'These will include the children of Gaza, groups in Ireland involved in helping the homeless, Cumann Carad, the Irish language sector and other projects like this in west Belfast. 'When the case began six weeks ago, the BBC's legal strategy was evident very quickly. Their narrative was that pursued by successive British and Irish governments for years. 'They blamed everything during the conflict on Irish Republicans and by extension, during this trial, on me. 'The BBC lawyers embarked on a Jesuitical presentation of the case that tried to convince the jurors that the words broadcast and published by the British Broadcasting Corporation, that I had sanctioned the murder of Denis Donaldson, did not, in fact, mean that I sanctioned the murder of Denis Donaldson. ADVERTISEMENT 'They were, they said, that's the British Broadcasting Corporation, not defending the truth of the accusation. 'Instead they were defending, they claimed, their journalism, which they said was fair and reasonable, in the public interest and made in good faith. 'They concluded their case by trying to exert moral pressure on the jurors by claiming that a defeat for the British Broadcasting Corporation would be a blow to freedom of speech and a setback to victims. 'In the end the jury didn't buy in to any of this. 'On all the key issues the jurors unanimously accepted that the script used by the Spotlight programme did mean that I had sanctioned and approved the murder of Denis Donaldson.' He said that after the BBC's decision to air the Spotlight programme, he decided to sue the broadcaster. Mr Adams said the BBC could have resolved the dispute there and then. 'They chose not to. Why? That's a question to be asked. Why did they not resolve this issue when they could have? 'Was it arrogance? Yes, that's part of it. But I also suspect political interference. 'In January, the British Prime Minister Keir Starmer responded to a decision in the High Court in Belfast, which included that I and, by implication, up to 400 other former internees, were wrongfully detained and that we were entitled to compensation. 'Mr Starmer told the British Parliament that he would look at every conceivable way to block compensation being paid.' Mr Adams also urged the Minister for Justice Jim O'Callaghan to met Denis Donaldson's family. He signed off by saying 'slan agus tog go bog e', which means goodbye and take it easy. Earlier this week, the BBC was granted time to consider appealing against the jury's decision. The broadcaster was granted a stay on paying the full costs and damages to allow it time to consider whether to lodge an appeal. The stay was subject to paying half the damages €50,000 and €250,000 towards solicitors' fees.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store