Dean Cain says men shouldn't compete in women's sports; releases heartwarming film on girls' soccer team
Friday marks the nationwide release of family-friendly sports film "Little Angels", a triumphant story of a team of athletes and an unyielding coach, written, directed and produced by actor Dean Cain.
"Little Angels" unfolds the story of Jake Rogers, a Division I college football coach, played by Cain, with $5 million and a take-it-or-leave-it chance for redemption on the line. A male-centric statement hurdles the lead into a reflective arc and, when writing the script, the red-card comment "soccer is for girls," was definitive, according to Cain.
"It's always a joke I make," Cain told Fox News Digital.
Dean Cain Says He Turned Down Being One Of The Highest-paid Actors On Tv To Raise His Son Alone
"Soccer is the world's game and I make fun of soccer because I played as an American football player and that's just what we do. We make fun of soccer. We make fun of rugby."
In 1988, after his collegiate football career at Princeton, Cain was signed to the Buffalo Bills as a rookie. His professional NFL career came to a halt when he injured his knee.
Read On The Fox News App
While the on-air declaration that soccer is for girls kicks off Rogers' journey to softening in "Little Angels", the topic of men in women's sports is not a cornerstone of the film. However, Cain is firm in his position that, after a certain age, boys and girls should not compete together.
"I'm a huge, huge supporter of women's athletics," Cain told Fox News Digital. "I don't think men or boys have any business once they're past the age of 7 or 10 competing together."
"When you get to those higher levels, I don't think that men should be competing with women, period, end of story," Cain said. "Many of my ex-girlfriends have been professional athletes, and I really have tremendous respect for women's sports. I think it's hugely important to have women be able to compete against women and do that."
Dean Cain's New Christmas Movie Celebrates Faith: A 'Trip Back In Time To Bethlehem'
The benchmark theme of "Little Angels" is purpose and perspective and reserves the plot for a heartwarming tale of teamwork and family.
"There's a lot of me in that character," Cain said of Rogers.
Despite public perception, Rogers cannot be defended from his offside remark about female athletes.
"College football coaches get looked at sometimes like they're a deity of something, like they're a God of some kind," Cain said.
Rogers is met with an ultimatum: coach a team of 12-year-old girls or lose $5 million.
Films like "A League of Their Own," "The Mighty Ducks" and even the true underdog story of "Dodgeball" echo a similar sentiment and evoke childhood memories across generations.
Dean Cain Says He 'Had To Get Out Of California': 'Land Of Ridiculousness'
The timeless tale in each of these movies follows a team of misfits bonded together by both their love of the game and a defeated coach who finds inspiration through group aspirations. This narrative conjures wistful affection in a way that other genres outside sports dramas cannot.
"Take a guy who is flawed in a situation where he doesn't want to be," Cain said. "Through human experience and being with these young ladies and other people, he teaches them teamwork and the value of team and family."
The movie, starring Lou Ferrigno, Bryan Callen and Swedish actress Helena Mattson, began casting during the COVID-19 pandemic.
"You hope that you get them together and they have chemistry," he said of the athletes. "They are the heart of the story."
"The young actresses were phenomenal," Cain said of a cast including Alex Jayne Go and "Role Models" actress Alexandra Stamler. Cain's niece and goddaughter also star in the film as athletes.
"I've been called Superman forever and that's great. I love it," Cain said. "If people call me Coach Jake after this, 'Hey Coach Jake,' that's a warm fuzzy for me. It's a big-time warm and fuzzy."
Cain is working on four films this year, including a golf-centered movie that he is co-directing with his son.
The world premiere of "Little Angels" was featured at the International Christian Film Festival (ICFF) in May. There, Cain was awarded with the ICFF Lifetime Achievement Award.
"I've been producing for a long time and directing," Cain said. "Man, I don't feel like I'm anywhere near getting a Lifetime Achievement Award, so, I think they were just being nice to me."
"Little Angels" hits theaters nationwide on Friday, June 6, 2025.Original article source: Dean Cain says men shouldn't compete in women's sports; releases heartwarming film on girls' soccer team
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Boston Globe
27 minutes ago
- Boston Globe
A $2.8 billion settlement will change college sports forever. Here's how.
A: Grant House is a former Arizona State swimmer who sued the defendants (the NCAA and the five biggest athletic conferences in the nation). His lawsuit and two others were combined and over several years the dispute wound up with the settlement that ends a decades-old prohibition on schools cutting checks directly to athletes. Now, each school will be able to make payments to athletes for use of their name, image and likeness (NIL). For reference, there are nearly 200,000 athletes and 350 schools in Division I alone and 500,000 and 1,100 schools across the entire NCAA. Get Starting Point A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday. Enter Email Sign Up Q: How much will the schools pay the athletes and where will the money come from? Advertisement A: In Year 1, each school can share up to about $20.5 million with their athletes, a number that represents 22% of their revenue from things like media rights, ticket sales and sponsorships. Alabama athletic director Greg Byrne famously told Congress 'those are resources and revenues that don't exist.' Some of the money will come via ever-growing TV rights packages, especially for the College Football Playoff. But some schools are increasing costs to fans through 'talent fees,' concession price hikes and 'athletic fees' added to tuition costs. Q: What about scholarships? Wasn't that like paying the athletes? A: Scholarships and 'cost of attendance' have always been part of the deal for many Division I athletes and there is certainly value to that, especially if athletes get their degree. The NCAA says its member schools hand out nearly $4 billion in athletic scholarships every year. But athletes have long argued that it was hardly enough to compensate them for the millions in revenue they helped produce for the schools, which went to a lot of places, including multimillion-dollar coaches' salaries. They took those arguments to court and won. Advertisement Q: Haven't players been getting paid for a while now? A: Yes, since 2021. Facing losses in court and a growing number of state laws targeting its amateurism policies, the NCAA cleared the way for athletes to receive NIL money from third parties, including so-called donor-backed collectives that support various schools. Under House, the school can pay that money directly to athletes and the collectives are still in the game. Q: But will $20.5 million cover all the costs for the athletes? A: Probably not. But under terms of the settlement, third parties are still allowed to cut deals with the players. Some call it a workaround, but most simply view this as the new reality in college sports as schools battle to land top talent and then keep them on campus. Top quarterbacks are reportedly getting paid around $2 million a year, which would eat up about 10% of a typical school's NIL budget for all its athletes. Q: Are there any rules or is it a free-for-all? A: The defendant conferences (ACC, Big Ten, Big 12, SEC and Pac-12) are creating an enforcement arm that is essentially taking over for the NCAA, which used to police recruiting violations and the like. Among this new entity's biggest functions is to analyze third-party deals worth $600 or more to make sure they are paying players an appropriate 'market value' for the services being provided. The so-called College Sports Commission promises to be quicker and more efficient than the NCAA. Schools are being asked to sign a contract saying they will abide by the rules of this new structure, even if it means going against laws passed in their individual states. Advertisement Q: What about players who played before NIL was allowed? A: A key component of the settlement is the $2.7 billion in back pay going to athletes who competed between 2016-24 and were either fully or partially shut out from those payments under previous NCAA rules. That money will come from the NCAA and its conferences (but really from the schools, who will receive lower-than-normal payouts from things like March Madness). Q: Who will get most of the money? A: Since football and men's basketball are the primary revenue drivers at most schools, and that money helps fund all the other sports, it stands to reason that the football and basketball players will get most of the money. But that is one of the most difficult calculations for the schools to make. There could be Title IX equity concerns as well. Q: What about all the swimmers, gymnasts and other Olympic sports athletes? A: The settlement calls for roster limits that will reduce the number of players on all teams while making all of those players – not just a portion – eligible for full scholarships. This figures to have an outsize impact on Olympic-sport athletes, whose scholarships cost as much as that of a football player but whose sports don't produce revenue. There are concerns that the pipeline of college talent for Team USA will take a hit. Q: So, once this is finished, all of college sports' problems are solved, right? A: The new enforcement arm seems ripe for litigation. There are also the issues of collective bargaining and whether athletes should flat-out be considered employees, a notion the NCAA and schools are generally not interested in, despite Tennessee athletic director Danny White's suggestion that collective bargaining is a potential solution to a lot of headaches. NCAA President Charlie Baker has been pushing Congress for a limited antitrust exemption that would protect college sports from another series of lawsuits but so far nothing has emerged from Capitol Hill. Advertisement
Forbes
an hour ago
- Forbes
Metallica's Smash Brings The Band To A Milestone For The First Time
Metallica's catalog is filled with the kind of rock smashes any band would be lucky to claim. The Grammy-winning group has produced more hits than most acts could ever dream of – especially in the hard rock space – but when it comes to pure purchases by American listeners, one title stands out above the rest. 'Enter Sandman' is a bestseller yet again in the United States. The track currently appears on a trio of Billboard rankings dedicated purely to sales, and this frame is especially notable for the tune. Metallica's timeless cut lifts one spot on the Rock Digital Song Sales chart, earning its one-hundredth stay on the list of the bestselling rock-only tracks in the country. The track is so massively popular that it has spent more time on the tally than Metallica's other 13 charting successes combined. The group's second-longest running entry is 'Master of Puppets,' which so far has managed just seven appearances on the list. While 'Enter Sandman' is easily Metallica's longest-charting release on the Rock Digital Song Sales roster, it doesn't stand as the band's highest-peaking. Both 'Master of Puppets' and 'Lux Æterna' peaked at No. 2 in 2022. 'Enter Sandman,' meanwhile, stalled at No. 3 in 2021 and has yet to surge any higher. Metallica is one of just three acts on the 15-spot Rock Digital Song Sales chart at the moment that claims a more-than-100-week winner. 'Enter Sandman' joins 'The Sound of Silence' by Disturbed (329 weeks) and 'Thunderstruck' by AC/DC, which this frame reaches 520 turns — exactly a decade — on the list. 'Enter Sandman' may be rising slightly on the Rock Digital Song Sales chart, but that's actually the American tally where it performs the worst. It appears at No. 3 on the Hard Rock Streaming Songs roster, and the tune also dips slightly to No. 5 on the Hard Rock Digital Song Sales list.
New York Post
2 hours ago
- New York Post
UFC 316 predictions, odds: Full picks for prelims and main card in Newark
Gambling content 21+. The New York Post may receive an affiliate commission if you sign up through our links. Read our editorial standards for more information. Live from Newark, N.J., UFC 316 is jam-packed with massive fights, champions, contenders and grizzled vets. Loads of household names like Kevin Holland, Vicente Luque, Kelvin Gastelum, along with newcomer Patchy Mix, are just a few stars to watch this weekend. We'll have wall-to-wall coverage of UFC 316 throughout, including live updates, as The Post's Scott Fontana and I will be in attendance. Below, I break down my best bets for this 13-fight card where just five fights are expected to go the distance. Expect violence in front of a high-octane crowd at the Prudential Center. UFC 316 predictions Merab Dvalishvili vs. Sean O'Malley Merab Dvalishvili looked like a -1000 favorite in their first meeting last September when he wrestled O'Malley's title away from him en route to a unanimous decision win. Dvalishvili was a +105 underdog in that fight, which looks like a gift in hindsight. For the amount that Dvalishvili grappled in that fight, he didn't win the decision clearly, according to the judges. Two had Dvalishvili up, 48-47, and winning three of the first four rounds. It is possible that Dvalishvili threw away the fifth and final round after having coasted through the first two, but O'Malley did land some hard shots. Dvalishvili does have a clear path to victory via takedowns, as he went 6-for-15 on attempts in the first fight, although he was just 3-for-11 in the fight's final three rounds. The odds had been a bit wide here, with O'Malley reaching +300 status at one point, but his price has cratered down to a much more palatable +210 underdog at the time of writing. Dvalishvili by decision is -150 odds, and we know this is the most likely scenario in terms of win equity, where the Georgian grappler could just continue to land takedowns against the cage. 3 Sean O'Malley faces Merab Dvalishvili ahead of UFC 316 in Newark. Noah K. Murray-NY Post Although, this is not your 2021 MMA where grapplers had been allowed to lie on their opponents en route to a 50-45 decision. Dvalishvili doesn't tire, that much we know. But O'Malley did not land that much damage and still took two rounds. I still think the value is on O'Malley, who should have learned a ton from their first matchup. Let's back the Sugar Show to reclaim his gold in a wild scene in Newark. PICK: Sean O'Malley ML +215 or better (+230, DraftKings) 3 Kayla Harrison faces Julianna Pena this weekend. Zuffa LLC Julianna Pena vs. Kayla Harrison Long expected to be the best fighter in the women's bantamweight division, Kayla Harrison faces champion Julianna Pena in one of the most highly anticipated bouts in women's title history. Harrison is an athletic marvel, as she is the only American to win Olympic gold in Judo. With a sterling 18-1 record, Harrison is a -750 favorite and rightfully so. She has been dominant at every step of her mixed martial arts career. Pena has solid submissions and we know Harrison has a strong offensive grappling background, so I'd presume the champion feels comfortable fighting off her back. Get the lowdown on the Best USA Sports Betting Sites and Apps That's a bad recipe as far as betting is concerned, as anyone who is in grappling situations on their back is losing unless they get a submission win. Harrison has never been submitted in her career and Pena is +1200 to do so. That's the only way I see Harrison losing and even oddsmakers don't see that happening. Harrison dominates Saturday night… AND NEW. PICK: Harrison wins in Over 1.5 rounds (-175, DraftKings) 3 Joe Pyfer looks huge ahead of fight with Kelvin Gastelum at UFC 316. Zuffa LLC UFC 316 full fight card predictions Merab Dvalishvili vs. Sean O'Malley: Sean O'Malley ML +215 or better (+230, DraftKings) Julianna Pena vs. Kayla Harrison: Harrison wins in Over 1.5 rounds (-175, DraftKings) Kelvin Gastelum vs. Joe Pyfer: Pyfer by submission (+440, BetRivers) Mario Bautista vs. Patchy Mix: Mix by KO/TKO (+900, BetMGM) Vicente Luque vs. Kevin Holland: Fight goes to decision (+165, Fanatics Sportsbook) Bruno Silva vs. Joshua Van: Bruno Silva by decision (14/1, BetRivers) Azamat Murzakanov vs. Brendson Ribeiro: Murzakanov by KO/TKO in Round 2 (+300) or 3 (+750, FanDuel) Serghei Spivac vs. Waldo Cortes-Acosta: Fight goes to decision (+165, BetRivers) Khaos Williams vs. Andreas Gustafsson: Williams wins by KO/TKO in round 1 (+390, FanDuel) Ariane da Silva vs. Wang Cong: Fight goes to decision (-115, DraftKings) Jeka Saragih vs. JooSang Yoo: Fight goes to decision (+160, BetMGM) Quillan Salkilld vs. Yanal Ashmouz: Ashmouz ML (+425, DraftKings) MarQuel Mederos vs. Mark Choinski: Mederos ML for parlays (-205, Caesars) Why Trust New York Post Betting Erich Richter is a brazilian jiu-jitsu blue belt but he has a black belt in MMA betting. During the football season he's showcased massive profits at The Post in the player prop market the last two seasons. While constantly betting long shots, his return on investment is 30.15 percent since 2022.
