Bangladesh witnessed 2,442 communal violence incidents in 330 days: Minority body
"Most of these violent incidents happened between August 4 and August 20 last year," the
Bangladesh Hindu Buddhist Christian Unity Council
said in a statement released at a press conference at the National Press Club here.
The minority communities faced 2,442 incidents of communal violence over a span of 330 days from August 4, 2024, it said.
The nature of violence ranged from murders and sexual assaults, including gang rapes, to attacks on places of worship, seizing homes and businesses, arrests on charges of alleged defamation of religion, and forced removals of minorities from organisations, the statement said.
Victims included men, women, and adolescents belonging to minority groups.
Live Events
The perpetrators have largely evaded justice, with the interim government "refusing to acknowledge" the incidents and "dismissing them as politically motivated," the statement said.
A senior Council leader, Narmal Rosario, said the ongoing reform initiatives by the interim government have repeatedly excluded minority communities, "which is the most frustrating factor for us".
"We want to walk together with all," he emphasised.
Another leader, Nimchandra Bhoumik, said, "The division (within the society) was not a pleasant matter for anyone."
"The government, in fact, ignores the incidents of repression of minorities. We demand proper justice," acting general secretary of the council, Manindra Kumar Nath, said.
As per the 2022 census, Hindus are the largest minority community in Bangladesh at 7.95% of the total population, followed by Buddhists (0.61%), Christians (0.30%), and others (0.12%).
Economic Times WhatsApp channel
)
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hindustan Times
33 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Court junks plea seeking FIR against Delhi exhibitor over MF Husain artworks
No communal unrest or public incitement was caused by the display of two artworks by MF Husain at an exhibition last year at DAG, formerly known as the Delhi Art Gallery, a Delhi court said on Tuesday while refusing to direct a police probe against the exhibitors. MF Husain (HT Archive) Additional sessions judge Saurabh Partap Laler of Patiala House Courts issued the order in response to a revision petition by an advocate. The advocate had challenged a magistrate's order from December last year, which had refused to register an FIR against DAG's director and owners. The advocate claimed DAG displayed allegedly obscene paintings by Husain that offended Hindu religious sentiments. The detailed order was released on Thursday. Observing that the matter lacked grave allegations, the court said, 'The allegations, while sensitive, pertain to artworks in a private gallery, not public incitement or violence. No communal unrest is reported, and the seized evidence suffices for adjudication.' The court noted that the petitioner faces no prejudice asshe can lead evidence in the complaint case, already ongoing before a magistrate at Patiala House Courts. Leading evidence refers to the complainant presenting evidence before the court through witness testimony and affidavits to support its argument. The petitioner, advocate Amita Sachdeva, filed a complaint in December last year, after attending the exhibition titled 'Husain: The Timeless Modernist' at DAG. She alleged that two of the paintings — one depicting Ganesha with a naked female figure on his lap, and another showing Hanuman holding a naked female figure — outraged the religious sentiments of Hindus. Following the complaint, the Delhi Police, acting on the court's directions,seized the paintings on January 22and stored them in the evidence room. Sachdeva also sought the preservation of CCTV footage from the exhibition held on December 4, 6 and 10, alleging that DAG tampered with evidence by removing the paintings shortly after she raised objections. DAG, meanwhile, denied any wrongdoing, emphasising its commitment to artistic freedom. It said that the paintings were acquired through legitimate channels and cleared customs upon entry to India. In January, judicial magistrate Sahil Monga ruled that the complainant, who claimed that the artworks offended her religious sensibilities, must substantiate her allegations rather than initiate a criminal investigation. The magistrate went on to order the case to proceed as a complaint case, entailing examination of the complainant as well as proposed accused, and the scrutiny of evidence before the court rules. Sachdeva, through advocate Makrand Adkar, contended the order, arguing that the offences necessitate a police investigation, including forensic investigation of the seized evidence, verification of the paintings' authenticity and an inquiry into potential financial fraud or tampering, which the complainant cannot undertake by herself. DAG was represented by senior advocate Madhav Khurana and advocates Shivam Batra and Rony O John. The court said, 'The primary grounds for challenge — that police investigation is essential — does not withstand scrutiny. The discretion under Section 175(3) BNSS (powers of a magistrate to order investigation) must be exercised judiciously, with application of mind, and not mechanically.' Noting that Sachdeva already has access to all the key evidence, including photographs, CCTV footage and the seized paintings themselves through which she can summon witnesses to show deliberate malice and outrage to religious feelings, the court said, 'The ATR (action-taken report) by the police confirms that the exhibition was acknowledged, but no malicious intent was discerned in the preliminary inquiry.' The judge dismissed the allegations of fraud or tampering, saying that they are unsubstantiated and appear speculative. The court said that in case police assistance is required, the magistrate who is presiding over the complaint case, holds the power to order a limited police inquiry to ascertain the truth, during the course of the matter. 'The impugned order (by the magistrate) reflects a reasoned application of mind, aligning with statutory provisions and judicial precedents. No police investigation is required at this stage, as evidence is accessible,' the order said. MF Husain remains a polarising figure in Indian art. His works have sparked numerous controversies, particularly for their depiction of Hindu deities in unconventional forms. Husain, who was conferred with the Padma Shri, Padma Bhushan and Padma Vibhushan, died in London in 2011. Regarding the seizure of the paintings, a senior police officer in Delhi said, 'We have not received any written or formal communication from the court yet. We will do as they they say. As of now, nothing is being returned.'
Time of India
2 hours ago
- Time of India
Delhi Court Upholds Dismissal of Plea Seeking FIR over MF Husain Paintings Exhibition
New Delhi: A Delhi court upheld the dismissal of a plea seeking the registration of an FIR for the exhibition of two works depicting Hindu deities by the late painter MF Husain at DAG (formerly Delhi Art Gallery) alleged to be offensive. The court observed that it did not find any "illegality" in an earlier court's order. The court of additional sessions judge Saurabh Partap Singh Laler upheld an order passed by a judicial magistrate first class earlier this year, noting that it reflected a reasoned application of mind, aligning with statutory provisions and judicial precedents. "No police investigation is required at this stage, as evidence is accessible and Section 225 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita provides an adequate mechanism for any future inquiry. The criminal revision petition is dismissed. The proceedings before the learned JMFC shall continue as per law," the additional sessions judge said. The complaint against the exhibition was lodged by lawyer Amita Sachdeva. The additional sessions judge noted that the allegations about the paintings being hurtful to Hindus, while sensitive, pertained to artworks in a private gallery, not public incitement or violence. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like American Investor Warren Buffett Recommends: 5 Books For Turning Your Life Around Blinkist: Warren Buffett's Reading List Undo It stated, "No communal unrest is reported, and the seized evidence suffices for adjudication. The petitioner faces no prejudice, as she can lead evidence in the complaint case. " You Can Also Check: Delhi AQI | Weather in Delhi | Bank Holidays in Delhi | Public Holidays in Delhi | Gold Rates Today in Delhi | Silver Rates Today in Delhi On Jan 22, the JMFC's court dismissed Sachdeva's application filed under Section 175 (3) of BNSS, seeking directions to the station house officer of the police station concerned to register an FIR against the top officials of DAG. Judicial magistrate first class Sahil Monga, in his order dated Jan 22, noted that CCTV footage of DAG, network video recorder and the paintings in question had already been seized. He said that no further investigation and collection of evidence were required at this stage of the case because all the evidence was in the possession of the complainant as well as on record. The court, however, allowed Sachdeva to present the evidence directly to the magistrate. It will examine whether there is sufficient ground to proceed with the matter. In her complaint, Sachdeva alleged that two paintings of the late painter on display at DAG "depicted Hindu gods and goddesses in an obscene manner". Her complaint also sought the preservation of CCTV footage from Dec 4, 6, and 10, 2024 — the dates when the exhibition took place. On Jan 20, the court ordered the seizure of the two paintings by the celebrated painter following Sachdeva's complaint. Stay updated with the latest local news from your city on Times of India (TOI). Check upcoming bank holidays , public holidays , and current gold rates and silver prices in your area.
The Hindu
4 hours ago
- The Hindu
Samajwadi Party didn't stand with Hindus in communal riots: Yogi Adityanath
Attacking Samajwadi Party's PDA pitch yet again, Uttar Pradesh Chief Minister Yogi Adityanath on Thursday accused the party of not standing with the Hindus during the communal riots. Addressing a public meeting in Aligarh to observe the fourth death anniversary of former U.P. Chief Minister Kalyan Singh, Mr. Adityanath alleged, 'Those who want to break the unity of society by talking of PDA didn't speak for Hindu victims during the communal riots of Aligarh, Bareilly, Meerut, and Muzaffarnagar.' Mr. Adityanath specified that the Hindu victims of communal violence included Dalits, backward classes, businessmen, and Hindus belonging to the general category. 'Only the BJP stood for them for we believe in development and security for all but appeasement of none,' he claimed. PDA is a Hindi umbrella acronym for backward castes, Dalits, minorities, tribals, and women, and which paid electoral dividends to the SP in the Lok Sabha polls. Expanding PDA as 'Parivar Development Authority' to accuse the SP of working for the interest of the Mulayam Singh Yadav family, Mr. Adityanath said in the last eight years of the BJP rule, when the State had become riot- and mafia-free, those who want 'sabka saath for parivaar ka vikaas' once again wish to divide society. Observed as Hindu Gaurav Diwas, the place and timing of the remark assume significance because Babuji, as Singh was fondly called, was not only a Hindutva icon of the BJP but was also the foremost face of the party who resigned from the CM's post in December 1992 after he violated the affidavit given to the Supreme Court where he promised to the Babri mosque would be protected. However, in 2024, the party suffered a setback when Rajveer Singh, his son, lost the family's traditional Etah seat in the Lok Sabha polls, where votes of Lodhs and Mauryas play a decisive role. Sounding in a firefighting mode, Deputy Chief Minister Keshav Prasad Maurya made a strident pitch for Bharat Ratna for Babuji and said Aligarh would soon be renamed Harigarh. Presenting the resignation of Singh before being sacked in 1992 as an act of sacrifice, Mr. Adityanath said, 'By taking the responsibility of the demolition of the disputed structure, he brought the symbol of slavery to ruin and paved the way for the construction of Ram Temple.' Taking on the INDIA alliance, the Chief Minister further alleged that on the one hand, the SP talks of PDA, while on the other, when the infiltrators from Bangladesh and Pakistan, and Rohingya are being removed from voter lists to secure the interests of the deprived and the backwards, the party, along with Congress, is putting a spanner in the efforts of the Election Commission and the judiciary. Earlier, Education Minister Dharmendra Pradhan also cited Singh's 'sacrifice' and Uma Bharti's resignation as Madhya Pradesh's CM in 2003 (after warrants were issued against her in the Hubli riots case of 1994) to defend the contentious Bill on the removal of the Prime Minister and Chief Ministers arrested on serious charges for 30 days. 'While Babuji and sister Uma Bharti resigned because of their nationalist beliefs, [AAP national convener] Arvind Kejriwal didn't demit office despite criminal charges.' He said Congress leader Rahul Gandhi described the Bill as 'black' because he had aligned with criminals in U.P. and Bihar. Ms Bharti, who also hails from the Lodh community and describes herself as Singh's sister, made a surprise entry at the event. After praising Mr. Adityanath for effectively taking forward the crime control policies started by Singh, she struck a note that indicated her interest in returning to mainstream politics. 'Those hailing from the clan of Babuji should take a pledge to claim their rights like a lion and not wait for the leftovers like jackals. I will be alive as long as you need me, the nation needs me,' she said. Currently, Singh's grandson serves as a Minister of State in the U.P. government, and his acolyte, B.L. Verma, is a Minister of State at the Centre.
