Eagles owner Jeffrey Lurie reportedly likened tush push opposition to 'wet dream,' drawing ire of NFL's Troy Vincent
The survival of the tush push arrived as a surprise.
And it didn't come without some last-minute and reportedly lurid wrangling from Philadelphia Eagles owner Jeffrey Lurie at Wednesday's NFL owners meetings in Minneapolis.
Advertisement
Per multiple reports, Lurie held court during a lengthy speech ahead of a vote of owners on a proposal to ban the play that helped propel the Eagles to a Super Bowl victory in February. The pre-vote meeting also featured a plea from Jason Kelce, who was for years the centerpiece of the tush push as Philadelphia's All-Pro center.
According to ESPN and The Athletic, Lurie spent roughly an hour arguing to fellow owners that the tush push should survive. Per both reports, Lurie took a, ahem, candid approach to making his case.
Lurie told his fellow owners that other teams' efforts to ban the play that they otherwise overwhelmingly can't stop was "like a wet dream for a teenage boy."
That's one way to put it. And one way to explain why "tempers flared" during the meeting, per ESPN's account. According to ESPN, Lurie's "wet dream" analogy drew the ire of NFL executive vice president of football operations Troy Vincent, who reportedly chastised Lurie for making the comment in front of women in the room.
Advertisement
It's worth noting that Vincent was a proponent of the tush-push ban. And Lurie reportedly criticized him and commissioner Roger Goodell for their support of the ban during the meeting.
Philadelphia Eagles owner Jeffrey Lurie has a lot to smile about lately. ()
(Kara Durrette via Getty Images)
In his plea, Lurie reportedly shot down arguments that the tush push presents an increased risk of player safety. In fact, he called it "the safest play in the history of the game."
While that might be an overstatement, there's no established data to demonstrate that the tush push directly leads to an increased risk of injury — even if the Green Bay Packers made player safety the centerpiece of their proposal to ban it.
Advertisement
The length of Lurie's plea grew weary for a least one fellow owner. Per ESPN, San Francisco 49ers owner Jed York asked Lurie "how much more s***" he needed to say as the speech crossed the one-hour mark. But ultimately, Lurie's speech may have proved worthwhile. Nine other teams joined the Eagles in voting to keep the tush push legal, enough to thwart the proposed ban.
Wednesday was expected to be the death knell for the short-yardage play that frequently results in a first-down or touchdown sneak for Eagles quarterback Jalen Hurts. But the vote to ban it fell two votes short of the 3/4 majority needed to bring its end.
Twenty-two out of 32 NFL teams voted in favor of banning the play, where 24 votes were needed to change the rulebook. And a team that in part just rode the tush push to a Super Bowl championship will push on in the new NFL season. It's taking a victory lap in the meantime.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Times
17 minutes ago
- New York Times
Can Scottie Scheffler still win the U.S. Open? He thinks so
Follow The Athletic's live coverage of the 2025 U.S. Open. OAKMONT, Pa. — Scottie Scheffler finished his second round at the U.S. Open on Friday at 4-over-par, eight shots back of the leader at that moment. He's not convinced he's out of it. 'There was some times today where you feel like you could give up, just based on how difficult the golf course is, how my swing was feeling,' Scheffler said. '… Going out early tomorrow, maybe get some easier conditions than the guys late in the afternoon. At the U.S. Open I don't think you're ever out of the tournament. Put together two decent days, I may be in 25th or 30th place or something like that after today, and like I said, by no means is that out of the tournament.' Advertisement While this is a larger deficit than he faced last month, Scheffler no doubt remembers that he was three shots back after 36 holes at the PGA Championship and ended the third round up by three. With no signs of Oakmont easing up and rain in the forecast for Saturday, the No. 1 player in the world is ready to try to force his way up the leaderboard. He shot a 1-over 71 on Friday, a bogey on his final hole — the par-4 9th — pushing him over par on the day. Scheffler admitted to issues off the tee that made the round a struggle, but his performance on No. 9 was an example of choosing patience. Scheffler's ball found the rough off the right side of the fairway, and he thought the lie was enough that he had 7-wood out of the bag. But Scheffler and caddie Ted Scott reconsidered, factoring in the bunker that guards the front of the green, and he instead hit a wedge back into the fairway. 'Being 3-over-par for the tournament and the lead is a few under par, that could be an area where you may try to force something. But I think forcing it around this place is probably not a good recipe to play too much good golf for me,' Scheffler said. 'You've got to be hitting fairways, you've got to be hitting greens, and hopefully I'll be able to do that on the weekend.' Scheffler's day began with a warning, a birdie on No. 10 that signaled to whoever was already on the course that he was coming. But then reality set in — the back nine played more than 2 1/2 shots harder than the front nine in the morning wave, and Scheffler had two bogeys and six pars before making the turn. A bogey-birdie-bogey run from holes Nos. 1-3 put Scheffler at 5-over-par and suddenly in danger of watching the cut line all afternoon. That will not be necessary — Oakmont is only getting harder by the hour, and birdies on Nos. 4 and 7 gave Scheffler the cushion he sought. Advertisement A year after Scheffler made the cut at Pinehurst but was never a factor, it's fair for the tens of thousands of golf fans here to wonder if history will repeat itself this weekend. The oddsmakers still like him — BetMGM has him at the third-best odds, +1000, behind only Sam Burns and Viktor Hovland. Burns is 3-under-par and Hovland is 1-under.
USA Today
18 minutes ago
- USA Today
49ers defensive coordinator shares admiration for his quarterback
49ers defensive coordinator shares admiration for his quarterback Through the first three years of his NFL career, San Francisco 49ers quarterback Brock Purdy has been really solid, leading the team to a 23-13 record in his 36 starts and completing 67.5% of his passes for 9,518 yards, 64 touchdowns and 27 interceptions. Considering San Francisco took Purdy with the final pick in the 2022 NFL draft out of Iowa State, what he's accomplished to this point has been remarkable. That's why the 49ers decided to address the situation early and give their quarterback a massive five-year, $265 million extension earlier this offseason. While Purdy is now set for life financially, this new contract has brought out even more doubters than the Cyclone product has dealt with during his time in the league. However, Purdy does have plenty of supporters, including defensive coordinator Robert Saleh, who is returning to San Francisco's sidelines after serving as the head coach of the New York Jets from 2021-24. "I think highly of him. I really do. He is really good," Saleh told reporters earlier this week. "You get jaded sometimes, I think, when you're looking at certain players for a certain amount of time. As a new face coming in and seeing Brock, [he's] pretty damn good. I can see where you get so used to seeing it, it becomes the standard, and you're always trying to elevate it, but not every head coach or not every organization is able to look at their quarterback and compare them to Brock. Brock is a damn good quarterback. I try not to poorly on other quarterbacks around the league, but he's one of the better ones." In three seasons, Purdy has led the 49ers to the postseason twice, which is two more times than any quarterback has done for the Jets since 2010. Bringing a team to multiple NFC championship games and a Super Bowl while still on your rookie deal is an impressive feat, even if Purdy has had talented players around him. It has to be great for 25-year-old to hear this praise from a coach who's been outside the building and has watched him from afar and will now get a chance to test him in practice. More 49ers: Aging 49ers star says he's not thinking about retirement yet
Forbes
18 minutes ago
- Forbes
The Tax Benefit Of Winning The U.S. Open At Oakmont Country Club
Last year's U.S. Open Champion, Bryson Dechambeau, had many reasons to smile. In addition to lifting the trophy, he also took home $4.3 million. The U.S. Open continues to represent one of golf's biggest prizes. While any golfer would give whatever it takes to take home this year's trophy (first place prize again expected to be $4.3 million), there is an extra layer of incentive this year that makes it even more beneficial relative to future years: taxes. Like Dechambeau's win last year in North Carolina, this year's winner can also expect to face relatively low state income taxes levied on their prize in comparison to upcoming years. In this article, I discuss the tax implications of winning at Oakmont and why it differs so much for the next three U.S. Open golf tournaments. Like other professions, when athletes earn money, they are subject to income taxes under Section 61 of the Internal Revenue Code. At the federal level, this rate maxes out at 37% for income over $626,350 ($751,600), meaning that most major professional athletes pay 37 cents for every incremental dollar earned. This tax applies to the athlete's money from contracts, endorsements, and winnings, among other sources. Furthermore, by being in the top tax bracket, the athlete's long-term investments will be subject to a higher (albeit preferential) tax rate of 20%. However, an extra layer of taxation that is less considered by many is state income taxes. Often referred to as the jock tax, athletes must pay state and local income taxes in the jurisdictions where they earn the money. According to Kiplinger, the jock tax has had made news in the past, starting with Michael Jordan being subject to it during the 1991 NBA Finals, subsequently leading to Illinois issuing tax bills to the L.A. Lakers players for the games they played in Chicago. The article also estimates that high-earning basketball players like Nikola Jokic and Steph Curry pay over a million per year for the jock tax due to taxable income earned in other states. Importantly, the jock tax primarily relates to income earned while physically in that jurisdiction, meaning that athletes' endorsement income is not subject to other state and local income taxes. This notion leads many professional athletes to live in states that do not levy an income tax. Professional golfers have also taken notice. GolfDigest reports an unusually high concentration of PGA golfers who reside in Florida, Texas, and Nevada to take advantage of the no-state income tax. This means that if the golfer wins a tournament in another state, they will need to pay that state's income tax on those winnings, but the golfer would not be subject to any additional layers of taxation since their home state does not require the golfer to pay income taxes. Oakmont Country Club is nestled in the suburbs of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. As discussed by Forbes, it is widely considered to be among golf's greatest challenges, and it has hosted the U.S. Open a record 10 times. It is also scheduled to host the U.S. Open again in 2033 and 2042. While the USGA almost certainly selected Oakmont to host this year's U.S. Open based on it being the golf standard for championship golf, Oakmont also has a significant financial advantage for golfers relative to the upcoming sites. Pennsylvania boasts one of the lowest state income tax rates levied on income in the entire country, with a 2025 rate of 3.07%. This means that absent any other deductions, the winner of the $4.3 million prize will only pay approximately $132,010 in state income taxes on the winnings. In contrast, the three upcoming U.S. Open sites are Shinnecock Hills Golf Club (New York), Pebble Beach Golf Links (California), and Winged Foot Golf Club (New York). New York's top state income tax rate is 10.9%, whereas California's is 13.3%. This means that the $4.3 million champions prize winner will pay $468,700 (New York) and $571,900 (California) in the upcoming years. As reported by each state also has different withholding tax rules that the golfer needs to adhere to, and this rate can differ by state and by country. Importantly, when considering the total prize pool of $21.5 million, the collective group of golfers will pay millions more in taxes when the tournament is played in New York and California, relative to recent U.S. Open tournaments in Pennsylvania and North Carolina. The tax liability would be even less if the U.S. Open would be held at a golf course in a no-state income tax rate state like Florida, Texas, Nevada, Tennessee, or Washington, begging the question of whether the USGA and PGA should attempt to locate more of the significant golf tournaments in those states to better the golfers' wallets. Despite these challenges, it is important to point out that winning the U.S. Open has countless benefits associated with it and is clearly worth the additional tax headache, regardless of where the tournament takes place that year. Also, H&R Block highlights the numerous tax deductions that are afforded to professional golfers to help lower those tax burdens. Professional golfers should become well versed in the taxes they might owe as well as the ways they can minimize those tax liabilities.
