
Safety measures to protect children from 'toxic algorithms'
The Independent
A generation of children will no longer be "at the mercy of toxic algorithms", the Technology Secretary has declared, as new online safety protections officially came into force. Peter Kyle stated that the government was laying the foundations for a "safer, healthier, more humane online world", issuing a stern warning to tech firms that they "will be held to account" if they fail to adhere to the new measures. The changes, enacted as part of the Online Safety Act and set to be enforced by regulator Ofcom, mandate that online platforms hosting pornography or other harmful content — such as material related to self-harm, suicide, or eating disorders — must implement robust age checks.
These can include facial age estimation or credit card verification. Furthermore, platforms are now required to ensure their algorithms do not actively harm children by, for example, pushing such content towards them. Companies found to be non-compliant face severe penalties, including fines of up to £18 million or 10 per cent of their qualifying worldwide revenue, whichever sum is greater. Court orders that could block access to these platforms in the UK are also a potential consequence.
Campaigners have underscored the critical need for strict enforcement, with the NSPCC urging Ofcom to "show its teeth" if companies fail to make the necessary changes in line with the regulator's child protection codes. But the Molly Rose Foundation — set up by bereaved father Ian Russell after his 14-year-old daughter Molly took her own life having viewed harmful content on social media — said there is a "lack of ambition and accountability" in the measures, and accused the regulator of choosing to "prioritise the business needs of big tech over children's safety". Mr Kyle insisted the Government has "drawn a line in the sand" and that the codes will bring real change.
He said: "This Government has taken one of the boldest steps anywhere in the world to reclaim the digital space for young people — to lay the foundations for a safer, healthier, more humane place online. "We cannot — and will not — allow a generation of children to grow up at the mercy of toxic algorithms, pushed to see harmful content they would never be exposed to offline. This is not the internet we want for our children, nor the future we are willing to accept." He said the time for tech platforms "to look the other way is over", calling on them to "act now to protect our children, follow the law, and play their part in creating a better digital world". He warned: "And let me be clear: if they fail to do so, they will be held to account. I will not hesitate to go further and legislate to ensure that no child is left unprotected."
Ofcom chief executive Dame Melanie Dawes has previously defended criticism of the reforms, insisting that tech firms are not being given much power over the new measures, which will apply across the UK. Dame Melanie said: "Prioritising clicks and engagement over children's online safety will no longer be tolerated in the UK. "Our message to tech firms is clear — comply with age checks and other protection measures set out in our codes, or face the consequences of enforcement action from Ofcom." The regulator said X, formerly Twitter, and others including Bluesky, Reddit and dating app Grindr are among those to have committed to age assurances, and described its safety codes as demanding that algorithms "must be tamed and configured for children so that the most harmful material is blocked".
It said it has launched a monitoring and impact programme focused on some of the platforms where children spend most time including social media sites Facebook, Instagram and TikTok, gaming site Roblox and video clip website YouTube. The sites are among those which have been asked to submit, by August 7, a review of their efforts to assess risks to children and, by September 30, scrutiny of the practical actions they are taking to keep children safe. Chris Sherwood, chief executive at the NSPCC, said: "Children, and their parents, must not solely bear the responsibility of keeping themselves safe online. It's high time for tech companies to step up." He said if enforcement is "strong", the codes should offer a "vital layer of protection" for children and young people when they go online, adding: "If tech companies fail to comply, Ofcom must show its teeth and fully enforce the new codes".
Echoing this, Barnardo's children's charity said the changes are "an important stepping stone" but "must be robustly enforced". England's Children's Commissioner, Dame Rachel de Souza, said Friday "marks a new era of change in how children can be protected online, with tech companies now needing to identify and tackle the risks to children on their platforms or face consequences", and said the measures must keep pace with emerging technology to make them effective in the future. But Andy Burrows, chief executive of the Molly Rose Foundation, said: "This should be a watershed moment for young people but instead we've been let down by a regulator that has chosen to prioritise the business needs of big tech over children's safety."

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Gulf Today
2 days ago
- Gulf Today
Safety measures to protect children from 'toxic algorithms'
Aine Fox, The Independent A generation of children will no longer be "at the mercy of toxic algorithms", the Technology Secretary has declared, as new online safety protections officially came into force. Peter Kyle stated that the government was laying the foundations for a "safer, healthier, more humane online world", issuing a stern warning to tech firms that they "will be held to account" if they fail to adhere to the new measures. The changes, enacted as part of the Online Safety Act and set to be enforced by regulator Ofcom, mandate that online platforms hosting pornography or other harmful content — such as material related to self-harm, suicide, or eating disorders — must implement robust age checks. These can include facial age estimation or credit card verification. Furthermore, platforms are now required to ensure their algorithms do not actively harm children by, for example, pushing such content towards them. Companies found to be non-compliant face severe penalties, including fines of up to £18 million or 10 per cent of their qualifying worldwide revenue, whichever sum is greater. Court orders that could block access to these platforms in the UK are also a potential consequence. Campaigners have underscored the critical need for strict enforcement, with the NSPCC urging Ofcom to "show its teeth" if companies fail to make the necessary changes in line with the regulator's child protection codes. But the Molly Rose Foundation — set up by bereaved father Ian Russell after his 14-year-old daughter Molly took her own life having viewed harmful content on social media — said there is a "lack of ambition and accountability" in the measures, and accused the regulator of choosing to "prioritise the business needs of big tech over children's safety". Mr Kyle insisted the Government has "drawn a line in the sand" and that the codes will bring real change. He said: "This Government has taken one of the boldest steps anywhere in the world to reclaim the digital space for young people — to lay the foundations for a safer, healthier, more humane place online. "We cannot — and will not — allow a generation of children to grow up at the mercy of toxic algorithms, pushed to see harmful content they would never be exposed to offline. This is not the internet we want for our children, nor the future we are willing to accept." He said the time for tech platforms "to look the other way is over", calling on them to "act now to protect our children, follow the law, and play their part in creating a better digital world". He warned: "And let me be clear: if they fail to do so, they will be held to account. I will not hesitate to go further and legislate to ensure that no child is left unprotected." Ofcom chief executive Dame Melanie Dawes has previously defended criticism of the reforms, insisting that tech firms are not being given much power over the new measures, which will apply across the UK. Dame Melanie said: "Prioritising clicks and engagement over children's online safety will no longer be tolerated in the UK. "Our message to tech firms is clear — comply with age checks and other protection measures set out in our codes, or face the consequences of enforcement action from Ofcom." The regulator said X, formerly Twitter, and others including Bluesky, Reddit and dating app Grindr are among those to have committed to age assurances, and described its safety codes as demanding that algorithms "must be tamed and configured for children so that the most harmful material is blocked". It said it has launched a monitoring and impact programme focused on some of the platforms where children spend most time including social media sites Facebook, Instagram and TikTok, gaming site Roblox and video clip website YouTube. The sites are among those which have been asked to submit, by August 7, a review of their efforts to assess risks to children and, by September 30, scrutiny of the practical actions they are taking to keep children safe. Chris Sherwood, chief executive at the NSPCC, said: "Children, and their parents, must not solely bear the responsibility of keeping themselves safe online. It's high time for tech companies to step up." He said if enforcement is "strong", the codes should offer a "vital layer of protection" for children and young people when they go online, adding: "If tech companies fail to comply, Ofcom must show its teeth and fully enforce the new codes". Echoing this, Barnardo's children's charity said the changes are "an important stepping stone" but "must be robustly enforced". England's Children's Commissioner, Dame Rachel de Souza, said Friday "marks a new era of change in how children can be protected online, with tech companies now needing to identify and tackle the risks to children on their platforms or face consequences", and said the measures must keep pace with emerging technology to make them effective in the future. But Andy Burrows, chief executive of the Molly Rose Foundation, said: "This should be a watershed moment for young people but instead we've been let down by a regulator that has chosen to prioritise the business needs of big tech over children's safety."


Gulf Today
2 days ago
- Gulf Today
UK backs future Palestinian statehood but says ceasefire top priority
Britain supports eventual recognition of a Palestinian state, but the immediate priority should be alleviating the suffering in Gaza and securing a ceasefire between Israel and Hamas, a British cabinet minister said on Friday. Successive British governments have said they would formally recognise a Palestinian state at the right time, without ever setting a timetable or specifying the conditions for it to happen. "We want Palestinian statehood, we desire it, and we want to make sure the circumstances can exist where that kind of long-term political solution can have the space to evolve," British science and technology minister Peter Kyle told Sky News. "But right now, today, we've got to focus on what will ease the suffering, and it is extreme, unwarranted suffering in Gaza that has to be the priority for us today." His comments came after French President Emmanuel Macron said France intends to recognise a Palestinian state in September at the UN General Assembly, a plan that drew strong condemnation from Israel and the United States. In a statement on Thursday, British Prime Minister Keir Starmer said statehood was the "inalienable right of the Palestinian people", reiterating his call for a ceasefire as a necessary step towards achieving a two-state solution. Speaking during a visit to Australia, foreign minister David Lammy echoed Starmer's ceasefire call and described the situation in Gaza as "indefensible". Gaza health authorities say more than 100 people have died from starvation, most of them in recent weeks. Human rights groups have said mass starvation is spreading even as tonnes of food and other supplies sit untouched just outside the enclave. Reuters


Gulf Today
5 days ago
- Gulf Today
Hunter curses out Clooney for pushing dad out of race
John Bowden, The Independent Scandal-plagued former first son Hunter Biden ripped into actor George Clooney in a foul-mouthed tirade aired Monday. The 55-year-old son of former President Joe Biden went on an expletive-filled rant against the Hollywood megastar in an interview with Andrew Callaghan, an independent journalist and former host of the podcast, All Gas No Brakes. He railed against the Goodnight, and Good Luck auteur's demand that Joe Biden drop out of the 2024 presidential race, which the younger Biden and others in the family's inner circle have made clear they believe is to blame for the Democratic Party's loss to Donald Trump. But he also took aim at Clooney's acting chops, suggesting hurt feelings were at play. "What do you have to do with anything? Hunter Biden seethed about the ER star. "Why do I have to listen to you? What right do you have to step on a man who's given 52 years of his life to the service of this country and decide that you, George Clooney, are going to take out basically a full page ad in the New York Times to undermine the president at a time in which, by the way, what do people care about the most?" Biden claimed that the division within the Democratic Party led to Republicans having an insurmountable advantage ahead of November. He also claimed that the disastrous performance of his father at his one and only debate with Trump was due to his father taking Ambien in order to sleep on foreign trips. "I know exactly what happened in that debate. He flew around the world, basically mileage that he could have flown around the world three times, he's 81 years old, he's tired as s---, they give him Ambien to be able to sleep, he's gets up on the stage and he looks like he's a deer in the headlights," Hunter told Callaghan, adding: "(I)t feeds into every story that anybody wants to tell." Of Clooney's acting, he said of the From Dusk Till Dawn star: "I agree with Quentin Tarantino. George Clooney is not a actor. He is like... I don't know what he is. He's a brand." Biden's rant was nearly duplicated in a second podcast appearance — this time, a conversation with Jaime Harrison, former chair of the Democratic Party. Even here, Biden told the At Our Table host he didn't give a "s***" about Clooney's political opinions. "We lost the last election because we did not remain loyal to the leader of the party," he said during that appearance. "That's my position. We had the advantage of incumbency, we had the advantage of an incredibly successful administration, and the Democratic Party literally melted down." His father's performance at a June presidential debate with Donald Trump alarmed voters on all sides of the political spectrum and drew immediate fears from Democrats that the party was preparing to hand the election over to Republicans. Clooney was a prominent part of that avalanche, penning an op-ed for the New York Times titled, "I Love Joe Biden, But We Need a New Nominee". Pod Save America co-host Jon Favreau, a former speechwriter for Barack Obama, said that internal polling conducted by the Biden campaign showed the former president losing by a landslide were he to remain in the race. The elder Biden dropped out of the race a month later, after an agonizing few weeks of calls for him to step down by backbencher Democrats and the less-than-delicate hinting from the likes of former Speaker Nancy Pelosi and others seemingly urging the same. Kamala Harris, his vice president and running mate, ascended to the top of the ticked after party officials shot down the idea of a last-minute primary election playing out at the Democratic National Convention. Democrats had already blown their own chance to hold a real primary earlier in the year. Tim Walz, the governor of Minnesota, was drafted as her running mate after a short candidate search.