logo
Fox Sports executive Charlie Dixon accused twice of sexual battery, fired by network

Fox Sports executive Charlie Dixon accused twice of sexual battery, fired by network

USA Today29-04-2025
Fox Sports executive Charlie Dixon accused twice of sexual battery, fired by network
Show Caption
Hide Caption
Workplace sexual harassment comes out of the shadows
Long before the #MeToo and #TimesUp movements shook Hollywood, everyday women faced sexual harassment in the workplace. Many still do.
USA TODAY
Charlie Dixon, a Fox Sports executive vice president who is being sued for sexual misconduct, was fired by the network.
However, Dixon's attorney say the network terminated him for hiring his wife as a freelancer and not because of the harassment cases.
Former network host Julie Stewart-Binks filed a lawsuit in January, alleging that Dixon sexually assaulted her by forcibly kissing her after pushing her against a wall in January 2016.
Dixon is also a co-defendant in a lawsuit filed in January by a former hairstylist, Noushin Faraji, who says that Dixon rubbed and groped her buttocks in January 2017. Former host Skip Bayless and current "Speak" host Joy Taylor are also named in the lawsuit, which includes claims of sexual battery, negligent supervision and wrongful termination.
Dixon's attorney, John Ly, said his client is saddened by Fox Sports' decision to terminate his employment, and has cooperated fully with the investigation and denies engaging in any inappropriate conduct.
'After nine years in positions of increasing responsibility at the network, Mr. Dixon was told that he was being let go for violating company policy,' Ly said in a statement. 'According to the network, Mr. Dixon did not disclose to human resources or the legal department that a third-party production company had hired his wife as a temporary freelancer. But the reality is that Mr. Dixon had asked his supervisor about the hire and was told that there were no objections. It is noteworthy that a Fox spokesperson made no reference to the company investigation of sexual harassment claims in announcing Mr. Dixon's departure.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Texas Democrats evacuate amid bomb threat at Illinois hotel
Texas Democrats evacuate amid bomb threat at Illinois hotel

USA Today

time22 minutes ago

  • USA Today

Texas Democrats evacuate amid bomb threat at Illinois hotel

WASHINGTON — Some of the Texas Democrats who fled their state to try to block Republicans' redistricting efforts were evacuated from an Illinois hotel where they were staying over a bomb threat. Police said they responded to a 'report of a potential bomb threat at the Q-Center hotel and convention complex' at 7:15 a.m. central time in St. Charles, a suburb west of Chicago. They said they conducted a 'thorough search' along with the Kane County Sheriff's Office bomb squad and found 'no device.' 'In response to the threat, 400 people were immediately evacuated and the area was secured as bomb squad units conducted their investigation,' the St. Charles Police Department wrote. 'Following clearance from authorities, all guests and staff have safely returned to the premises.' Illinois Democratic Gov. JB Pritzker wrote on X that, 'Threats of violence will be investigated and those responsible will be held accountable.' Texas House Rep. John Bucy III, one of the Democrats at the hotel, told USA TODAY in an Aug. 6 interview that many legislators were still asleep when the alarm went off in the morning and that the group gathered outside. He said it took about two hours before everything was cleared up and they were allowed to safely reenter. "I want to say thank you to Gov. Pritzker. I want to say thank you to law enforcement and to the hotel staff," Bucy said. "They worked diligently to make sure that the place was safe... They are showing what real leadership looks like. It's sad to me that (Texas Gov.) Greg Abbott doesn't have the same qualities in him as a leader." More than 50 Texas Democrats left their state on Aug. 3 to deny Republicans the quorum they need to move ahead with their redistricting efforts. The effort could give Republicans in the U.S. House of Representatives up to five more seats in the 2026 midterms. The Democratic state lawmakers dispersed to blue states, including Illinois, Massachusetts and New York. Abbott, a Republican, filed an emergency petition Aug. 5 seeking to remove the Texas state Democratic House leader from office. Contributing: Phillip Bailey, Savannah Kuchar, and Thao Nguyen, USA TODAY

Will Trump's order encouraging removal of homeless from city streets 'restore public order' — or eat up public money?
Will Trump's order encouraging removal of homeless from city streets 'restore public order' — or eat up public money?

Yahoo

time2 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Will Trump's order encouraging removal of homeless from city streets 'restore public order' — or eat up public money?

Homelessness has long been a significant issue in the U.S. — and things only seem to be getting worse. Don't miss Thanks to Jeff Bezos, you can now become a landlord for as little as $100 — and no, you don't have to deal with tenants or fix freezers. Here's how I'm 49 years old and have nothing saved for retirement — what should I do? Don't panic. Here are 5 of the easiest ways you can catch up (and fast) Want an extra $1,300,000 when you retire? Dave Ramsey says this 7-step plan 'works every single time' to kill debt, get rich in America — and that 'anyone' can do it The federal government said the number of people experiencing homelessness on a single night in 2024 was the highest on record at 771,480. This figure has been climbing every year since 2017, when it was at 550,996. In order to address the 'root cause' of homelessness and 'restore public order,' President Trump recently signed an executive order to make it easier for states to remove people from the streets and get them into long-term institutions for treatment of addictions and mental health conditions. This isn't the only major action against homelessness this summer. In late June, the Supreme Court ruled that homeless individuals can be arrested or fined for sleeping in public areas. In a statement to USA Today, White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt said that Trump is "delivering on his commitment to Make America Safe Again and end homelessness across America." However, the move is not necessarily being looked at as a positive one. What the new executive order on homelessness entails On July 24, President Trump signed an executive order titled "Ending Crime and Disorder on America's Streets." The order says that 'endemic vagrancy, disorderly behavior, sudden confrontations, and violent attacks' have made America's cities unsafe, and the 'overwhelming majority' of people experiencing homelessness are either addicted to drugs, have a mental condition, or both. It directs Attorney General Pam Bondi to reverse judicial precedents and end consent decrees that limit state and local governments' ability to commit individuals on the streets who are a risk to themselves or others. This aims to make forcibly moving people into institutions easier. Federal grants will be prioritized for states that enforce prohibitions on acts related to homelessness, like open illicit drug use, urban camping and loitering, and urban squatting. Funding will also be redirected away from 'housing first' programs and so-called 'harm reduction' or 'safe consumption' efforts. 'At a time when unaddressed housing costs are driving record numbers of people into homelessness, this order demonstrates a lack of focus and understanding on what our communities — both red and blue — need to address this crisis,' said Ann Oliva, CEO of the National Alliance to End Homelessness. 'Instead, it largely focuses on punishing people for being homeless and denying desperately needed funds to overwhelmed and under-resourced frontline workers.' The nonprofit criticized the attack on the 'housing first' approach, the push for forced institutionalization, and the violation of the right to privacy for the homeless. The National Homelessness Law Center said it "strongly condemns" Trump's order, saying it "deprives people of their basic rights and makes it harder to solve homelessness." The group also said that the order "does nothing to lower the cost of housing or help people make ends meet." If anything, it expects that more people will be driven into homelessness. 'As a licensed mental health professional, I know that forced treatment is unethical, ineffective, and illegal," Jesse Rabinowitz of the National Homelessness Law Center told USA Today. Alexandria, Va., Mayor Alyia Gaskins called Trump's executive order "cruel" in an NPR interview. "It requires states and cities like mine to demonstrate aggressive enforcement," she said. "It ends support for housing first policies. It encourages the expanded use of law enforcement all at a time when we know that the criminalization of homelessness doesn't work." The National Low Income Housing Coalition said that Trump's executive order will 'do nothing to address the underlying causes of America's housing crisis and instead make it harder for states and communities to address these challenges.' Read more: Nervous about the stock market in 2025? Find out how you can How homelessness policies impact taxpayers When cities experience high levels of homelessness, it can impact residents in many ways. It can cause them to feel unsafe in their own backyards and result in lower property values. So addressing the homelessness crisis could yield positive results for residents and property owners — provided it's done the right way. Critics of Trump's approach feel that the order does not address the root of the issue and instead focuses on mandating institutionalization and treating homelessness as a crime. It rejects the housing first approach to the problem, which involves quickly moving the homeless into affordable housing and then addressing their other needs. The National Low Income Housing Coalition says the country is short 7.1 million affordable rental homes. If the critics are right, we could see homeless numbers increase. Forcing the homeless into facilities could also burden a health care system that's already overwhelmed and seeing cuts in federal spending with the One Big Beautiful Bill Act. Experts say there aren't enough facilities to treat the homeless. "The order seeks to make it easier to commit people with mental illness who can't care for themselves, while also promising grants and other assistance to help ramp up commitments, and threatening to divert funding away from places that don't push people into treatment facilities 'to the maximum extent permitted by law,'" noted CalMatters. "But the order doesn't include funding for new mental health or addiction treatment beds. In a state already struggling with a lack of resources, some experts said Trump's order for more forced treatment feels hollow." 'There really is not a lot of bed space. And with budgets being strapped the way that they are these days, particularly with cuts coming from D.C., it's going to — states and communities are going to be hard-pressed to really build those facilities and be able to meet the needs of the people that are looking to be — that people want to put away,' said David Ovalle, national reporter focusing on opioids and addictions for The Washington Post, to PBS. If states decide to foot at least a portion of the bill for housing and treating the homeless long-term, it could divert critical health care resources away from other people in need. It could also force municipalities to increase taxes if they're not given enough federal funding to enforce treatment, burdening taxpayers even more. Addressing the nation's homelessness crisis is crucial. And if done correctly, everyone benefits. Unfortunately, it seems like the current approach may be one in which almost everybody loses out. This article provides information only and should not be construed as advice. It is provided without warranty of any kind.

Trump Brazenly Preyed On Me as Epstein Watched: Model
Trump Brazenly Preyed On Me as Epstein Watched: Model

Yahoo

time17 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Trump Brazenly Preyed On Me as Epstein Watched: Model

Stacey Williams, a former model who once dated Jeffrey Epstein, says Donald Trump groped her in his Trump Tower office in 1993—while casually chatting with Epstein just feet away. In a new episode of The Daily Beast Podcast, Williams says the incident unfolded after Epstein had suggested they stop by Trump Tower while taking a walk down Fifth Avenue. 'Donald came out of his office right outside of, in sort of the waiting area, and started groping me while the two of them continued having a casual conversation,' Williams tells host Joanna Coles on The Daily Beast Podcast. 'He's just moving his hands sort of up and down my body and like smiling at him and Jeffrey smiling back.' Williams was 25 at the time, while Trump was around 46. Williams first came forward with the allegations in October 2024 during a call organized by Survivors for Kamala, a group of survivors of sexual and gender-based violence supporting Kamala Harris in the 2024 election. At the time, the Trump campaign denied her account. 'These accusations, made by a former activist for Barack Obama and announced on a Harris campaign call two weeks before the election, are unequivocally false. It's obvious this fake story was contrived by the Harris campaign,' Karoline Leavitt said in a statement to The Guardian at the time. The White House did not immediately respond to a request for comment from the Daily Beast. Williams says she first met Trump—then still a real estate developer—during a taping of Saturday Night Live, where she says he immediately made her feel 'uncomfortable' by being 'extremely flirtatious,' even though his then-girlfriend and future wife, Marla Maples, was present. But she says Epstein, 'always talked about Donald,' and that Trump was 'ever-present in those conversations and in those months.' When Epstein proposed dropping by Trump's office, she didn't think twice about it. 'I knew at that point how close they were, what good friends they were,' Williams said. 'That wasn't the first time I'm hearing about the degree of their connection where it's normal or comfortable to just stop by his office in the middle of the day.' 'So I said, oh, all right. OK, let's stop by,' she recalls. Williams says that she froze as Trump began groping her, caught off guard by how brazenly he did it while carrying on his conversation with Epstein. 'I was just confused because they were continuing to talk, as if nothing's happening,' she says. 'Everything Donald does is hidden in its brazenness. You just do it right out there and everyone goes 'Well, that can't be happening because it's totally wrong and he's doing it right in front of everyone, so therefore it can't be happening.' I mean that's what went through my head at that point.' Noting that she had, by that point, garnered a reputation in the modeling industry for standing up for herself in the face of inappropriate photographers, Williams added: 'For me to freeze, you know how masterful he is, in a way, to pull that off.' Afterwards, in the elevator down, Williams says Epstein 'had a really enraged look on his face.' 'By the time we get out on the street—we got out on Fifth Avenue—he just turned and started yelling at me and said, 'Why did you let him do that?'' she recalls. Williams, now 57, suspects that Epstein had expected her to fight back as she had told him she was used to pushing back against unwanted advances. She says she stopped seeing Epstein soon after. Later in 1993, she says Trump sent her a postcard with an aerial view of Mar-a-Lago, writing, 'Stacey—your home away from home. Love, Donald,' using a black Sharpie. Leavitt has previously argued that the handwriting on the postcard was not Trump's. Two friends confirmed to The Guardian, which first reported Williams's story, that she had told them years ago about the alleged incident. Williams' accusation of groping and unwanted sexual advances echoes a broader pattern: about two dozen women have accused the former president of sexual misconduct spanning several decades, according to The Guardian. In 2023, a jury found Trump liable for sexually abusing advice columnist E. Jean Carroll in a department store dressing room in 1996. Williams, a native of rural Pennsylvania, arrived in New York as an 18-year-old in 1986 after being signed by a modeling agency. She says she first met Epstein through her agent, but that they only exchanged numbers after meeting again at a Christmas party in the Plaza Hotel hosted by Trump in 1992, after which they dated casually for a period of a few months. She describes dating Epstein as 'not really dating' and 'very odd,' because 'he didn't like to go to restaurants. He said he didn't like humanity.' She says they spoke almost daily over the phone for around four to five months, and they 'didn't have a very sexual relationship.' Still, she saw flashes of a 'dark and twisted' side of Epstein, often through 'subtle' threats he would make. At one point, she says he told her he had filmed her nude in his bedroom. 'He liked to intimidate,' she says. Williams says the MeToo movement prompted her to revisit her experiences with Epstein and Trump and 'start connecting more dots.' Epstein and Trump were friends from the late 1980s through to 2004, when they had a falling out because Epstein 'stole' Trump's staff, the 79-year-old president recently revealed. Trump says he was never aware of Epstein's crimes. Epstein pleaded guilty to soliciting a minor for prostitution in 2008, but only served a controversial 13-month stint in county jail. In 2019, he was arrested on federal sex trafficking charges and died in jail while awaiting trial on charges that could have led to a life sentence. His death was ruled a suicide.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store