
Air India plane crash: Aviation minister defends AAIB amid Western media criticism – ‘No point in jumping to…'
'AAIB has made an appeal to all, especially Western media houses, which may have a vested interest in the kind of articles they are trying to publish,' Naidu said.
'I believe in AAIB. They have done a wonderful job in decoding the black box in India itself. Making any comments until the final report comes out is not a good exercise. There is no point in jumping to conclusions at this point,' he added.
The civil aviation minister was referring to the Aircraft Accident Investigation Bureau (AAIB) preliminary report, released on July 12, on the crash of Air India's Boeing 787-8 plane that killed 260 people, including 241 people onboard. The aircraft, which was operating the flight AI171 from Ahmedabad to London Gatwick, crashed into a building soon after takeoff.
Seconds before Air India flight 171 crashed while ascending from Ahmedabad, the fuel control switches of both its engines were cut off, according to the preliminary investigation report, suggesting a catastrophic pilot error in the cockpit of the Boeing 787 Dreamliner.
A 15-page preliminary investigation report into the disaster revealed that fuel-control switches of the two engines moved from the "run" to the "cutoff" position, within the space of one second, leading to immediate loss of altitude.
In the cockpit voice recording, one pilot is heard asking the other why he cut off the fuel. The other denied having done so.
The report by the AIIB neither concluded any reason for the switches moving nor apportioned explicit blame for the crash. It also did not identify the pilots in the voice recording. But it also said no fault was found in the aircraft.
The Federation of Indian Pilots (FIP) President Captain CS Randhawa on Saturday called out The Wall Street Journal and Reuters, accusing them of not basing their reports on factual content while highlights the AIIB's preliminary report on the AI-171 plane crash.
Captain CS Randhawa's strong remark followed the FIP's initiation of legal action through a formal notice to The Wall Street Journal and Reuters. They have also sought an official apology.
Strongly criticising the WSJ and Reuters, Randhawa blamed them for "misleading" the public, alleging that their reports are "not based on factual content."
"I would totally blame the Wall Street Journal for misleading the public, they come out with their own conclusions. Are they the investigative body? They're talking all this crap around the world. They are not the investigative body, and the reports are not based on any factual content, which is mentioned in the preliminary report. So, how can they jump to conclusions and give press statements around the world?" he told ANI.
Captain Randhawa said that FIP has issued a legal notice asking them to issue a statement in the press, giving an explanation of their reportage of the AAIB preliminary reports.
"We strongly condemn it, and we've also issued legal notices to the Wall Street Journal and Reuters. We have clearly said that how can you jump to these conclusions which are not part of the preliminary report of the AAIB? How can you blame the pilots? So we have asked for an explanation and have asked that you give a statement to the press." he said.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Economic Times
14 minutes ago
- Economic Times
IndusInd Bank shares in focus after board approves Rs 30,000-crore fundraising plan
IndusInd Bank shares will be in focus on Thursday after the bank's board of directors approved a fundraising plan of up to Rs 30,000 crore on Wednesday. ADVERTISEMENT According to an exchange filing, the bank will raise Rs 20,000 crore via debt securities, either in Indian currency or in permitted foreign currencies through private placement. Additionally, it will raise Rs 10,000 crore through equity instruments such as Qualified Institutional Placement (QIP), American Depository Receipts (ADR), or Global Depository Receipts (GDR). The fundraising comes in the backdrop of a $230 million hit to the bank's net worth in the fiscal year ended March 31, due to misaccounting of internal derivative trades over several years. This issue led to the resignations of CEO Sumant Kathpalia and Deputy CEO Arun Khurana in April. The UK-based Hinduja family, which holds a 15.82% stake in the bank and is classified as a promoter group, has now been allowed to nominate up to two directors on the board, following approval from the Reserve Bank of India. Promoters previously had no board representation. IndusInd Bank is currently being run by an executive committee. As per a Reuters report, the bank has shortlisted Rajiv Anand, Rahul Shukla, and Anup Saha as potential candidates for the CEO position. Notably, Saha resigned as Managing Director of Bajaj Finance earlier this week. IndusInd Bank is scheduled to announce its Q1 results on July 28. (Disclaimer: Recommendations, suggestions, views and opinions given by the experts are their own. These do not represent the views of the Economic Times) (You can now subscribe to our ETMarkets WhatsApp channel)


Time of India
16 minutes ago
- Time of India
Govt greenlights 10 new reactors; 13.7 GW nuclear boost by 2032 in the works
New Delhi: India's nuclear power capacity is projected to increase from 8,780 MW to 22,480 MW by 2031-32, driven by the commissioning of eight reactors under construction and 10 more sanctioned projects, Union Minister Jitendra Singh informed the Lok Sabha. At present, India operates 24 nuclear reactors with an installed capacity of 8,780 MW. Additionally, eight reactors with a total capacity of 6,600 MW are under construction. These include 700 MW Pressurised Heavy Water Reactors (PHWRs) such as RAPP-8 and GHAVP-1&2, the 500 MW Prototype Fast Breeder Reactor (PFBR) implemented by BHAVINI, and Light Water Reactors (LWRs) built under foreign cooperation including KKNPP-3&4 and KKNPP-5&6. Ten reactors with a projected capacity of 7,000 MW are at the pre-project activities stage. These include Kaiga 5&6, GHAVP 3&4, Chutka 1&2, and Mahi Banswara 1 to 4—all PHWRs. Upon the progressive completion of these ongoing and sanctioned reactors, the total installed capacity is expected to reach 22,480 MW by 2031-32. "The specific measures outlined to reach this goal involve a multi-faceted approach, leveraging both indigenous development and international collaboration," Singh stated in a written reply. Future expansion includes development of Indigenous Fast Breeder Reactors (FBRs), aligned with India's three-stage nuclear programme designed for efficient utilisation of limited uranium and abundant thorium resources. These efforts will be supported by a closed fuel cycle approach. Deployment of Bharat Small Reactors (BSRs) is also being pursued to decarbonise hard-to-abate industrial sectors. Additionally, plans are in place for the development of Small Modular Reactors (SMRs), including Indian SMRs of different capacities and Indian-designed LWRs. The government has launched a Nuclear Energy Mission with an outlay of ₹20,000 crore to support research and development of SMRs. The plan also includes increasing international cooperation on SMRs and nuclear fuel, along with potential exports of reactors, services, and supplies.


Mint
16 minutes ago
- Mint
Creators find a new calling: corporate AI trainers
Ansh Mehra, 27, is on the verge of reaching 1 million followers across Instagram and YouTube. But unlike other influencers, the computer science engineering graduate, who once worked at Swiggy, isn't worried about follower count. Instead, he has found a booming niche: artificial intelligence training for top corporations. India's largest private financial services group HDFC, Reliance Industries Ltd and British energy conglomerate Shell are among the world's top 75 firms by market value that are increasingly enlisting experts with deep AI knowledge to train their employees. Surging demand for their skills allows creators and consultants like Mehra to secure up to ₹25 lakh in a few weeks. Mehra has been running his AI training venture, The Cutting Edge School, for the past three years. He is currently conducting a workshop for over 1,000 employees for a top retail firm–he refused to identify the client, citing a non-disclosure agreement. 'Most companies that come to us have three key problems that they want solved: one, their employees are still using outdated tools for functions such as marketing, content creation and outreach; two, most of them are not using AI the way it should be; and three, giving the right prompts to ensure that privacy and security of individuals is maintained," Mehra said. Demand for AI upskilling has exploded globally as the technology becomes part of corporate workflow across sectors. India, too, will need more than 1 million skilled AI workers within the next 12 months to keep up with the pace of AI adoption by companies and for the country to achieve its target of generating $35 billion of domestic product by 2047, a report by the ministry of electronics and information technology (Meity) said earlier this month. AI tools to strategy In most cases, trainers are identified because of their social media content or CXO references based on years of experience in AI. Courses offered cost ₹6-25 lakh for courses running for four to six weeks, and the number of participating employees can go as high as 1,000. These courses mostly cover primers on the fundamentals of AI, and hands-on guides on how to make the most of popular tools such as OpenAI's ChatGPT, Google's Gemini, Microsoft's Copilot, Adobe's Firefly, and more. Companies are separately upskilling individual leaders to gain a deeper understanding of AI policy, lessons from lawsuits around the world, and strategies for how the technology can either add value or reduce costs. These courses typically cost ₹5,000-25,000 per person per week. Mehra's courses typically run for four weeks, and his 25-member team conducts 12 of them in a year—but aims to do more as demand ramps up. 'There is deep demand from companies for AI upskilling, and this demand is unlikely to die down," said Kashyap Kompella, a veteran AI consultant. 'The courses range from offering an introduction into the variety of AI tools available for various tasks, understanding their limitations and scope, the ethics and legality of it, and their applicability across the board—be it data analytics or for content generation." Kompella is conducting a six-week immersive AI training programme for more than 5,000 employees of a top Indian financial services firm. 'When used by capable individuals, AI can significantly enhance both personal and team productivity," he said. 'However, its impact depends heavily on how well users can collaborate with the technology. Companies are waking up to this today, and that is leading to heavy demand from conglomerates." Shell cited its silent period in response to Mint's query, but acknowledged that the company is working with external consultants for AI upskilling across functions. HDFC Mutual Fund, Reliance Retail and Nestle did not respond to emailed queries. Mid-career demand Sridev Ramesh, 29, who cofounded AI developer and engineering content platform 100xEngineers, offers courses to mid-career corporate professionals keen to learn how best to use popular AI tools to augment existing work in professions such as digital marketing, content generation and more. 'The biggest takers for our AI upskilling courses are aged 30-35, and are mid-career corporate professionals from across domains who are either trying to catch up on AI skills, or gain a deeper understanding of how it can affect their work," he said. 'We just began our fifth cohort—which has about 200 takers. While students pay about ₹1.1 lakh for this six-month online-only course, working professionals are charged up to ₹1.4 lakh for it." While Ramesh, who holds a distance learning degree in astrophysics engineering from The Open University, UK, has offered custom AI upskilling programmes to companies, he prefers the open registration route where his courses are not tied to any particular firm. 'We offered an internal upskilling course for using AI for digital marketing use cases at Netflix. But, most companies need a customized programme for a set number of employees—we prefer to offer our own course, and there is a huge demand for them at our end," said Ramesh. 'We currently limit registrations at up to 200 candidates per cohort because that is our bandwidth—all the training is provided by my cofounder and I." Queries emailed by Mint to Netflix remained unanswered till press time. Varun Mayya, 32, provides content and marketing courses through his agency Aeos Media. In the past year, the firm has offered AI video creation training and consultancy services to Godrej Properties, Amazon Prime Video and two major media conglomerates, among others, he said. Godrej Properties and Amazon have yet to respond to Mint's emailed queries. 'Our multi-week AI training programmes can extend up to ₹15 lakh for an internal corporate session, depending on the number of attendees and what is expected from us," Mayya said. 'We only stick to our area of expertise in AI training—AI content generation and marketing." Creators and consultants say the demand for AI upskilling is here to stay. 'We're only just discovering AI, and the field itself is actively evolving. Going forward, demand for education is certain to sustain for long—and those making the early moves can either delve deeper to offer greater expertise and certification in the long run," said 100xEngineers' Ramesh. According to Kompella, CXOs 'are only beginning to realize that understanding AI is imperative, and it is better done sooner than later". Surface-level training There is, however, some scepticism. Jibu Elias, India head for responsible computing at Mozilla, said the generative AI hype is driving corporate leaders to AI training and many courses largely skim the 'surface level usage of commercial tools". 'Tech companies also have vested interests in getting future users familiarised with their ecosystems early on—we've seen this playbook before," said Elias. 'But, what we're likely to see going forward is a shift from basic tool-training toward deeper education in context-specific AI reasoning, ethical judgment, and system integration. The role of the AI trainer isn't disappearing, but it will need to evolve just as fast as the tools themselves." Mehra of The Cutting Edge School, however, does not expect demand for corporate AI trainers to cool anytime soon. 'In most of our training courses, we see that established corporate employees are still sketchy on the best ways to use AI," he said. 'As long as the field of AI keeps evolving, those on the cutting-edge of the technology will always find demand from larger corporations, seeking help with upskilling their workforce."