MP HC quashes plea seeking guidelines to prevent allegedly misleading news reports about Muslims
The Madhya Pradesh High Court has dismissed a petition seeking prohibitory action against news reports that allegedly spread false and misleading information about Muslims and Islam, Live Law reported on Thursday.
The writ petition asked the court to order criminal action against the editors of two Hindi newspapers. The petition claimed that the newspapers used terms such as 'love jihad' to hurt the religious sentiments of Muslims and spread communal hatred, the legal news outlet reported.
The petition also requested the court to issue guidelines to curb misleading and false information being circulated in print and electronic media against Muslims and Islam.
'Love jihad' is a Hindutva conspiracy theory that accuses Muslim men of being part of an organised plot to trick unsuspecting Hindu women into romantic relationships to ultimately convert them to Islam.
The Union home ministry has told Parliament that Indian law has no provision defining such a term.
The bench of Justice Vishal Mishra noted that demands in the petition were for issues that should have been filed as a public interest litigation, not as a mandamus plea. Since it was filed improperly, the petition was dismissed.
Mandamus is a court order issued by a higher court, commanding a lower court or a public official to perform a duty they are legally required to do.
During the hearing, the state government's counsel objected to the petitioner's demands, arguing he had no legal standing to ask for such broad reliefs.
In response, the petitioner said that, as a member of the Muslim community, he was affected by the allegedly offensive reporting. He added that he had filed a complaint with the police but claimed no action was taken.
The court observed that if police had not responded, the petitioner could pursue other legal options, including filing a complaint with higher authorities or approaching a magistrate under the provisions of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
News18
40 minutes ago
- News18
Uddhav And Raj Thackeray Join Hands For Marathi Pride: Joint Rally Over Language Issue On July 6
The plan initially involved Raj Thackeray leading a rally on July 6 and Uddhav Thackeray organising a separate march on July 7. But after talks, a single joint rally will be held. In a surprising political turn, Maharashtra's fiery Thackeray brothers — Raj Thackeray and Uddhav Thackeray — are set to share a platform after years of sharp differences. The two leaders will lead a joint protest rally on July 6 to oppose what they call the forced imposition of Hindi in the state's schools and to demand stronger safeguards for the Marathi language. This rare show of unity was confirmed when Sanjay Raut, senior leader from the Uddhav Thackeray camp, took to social media to make a pointed announcement — first in Marathi, then in English. In his post, Raut tagged Union Home Minister Amit Shah and Maharashtra Chief Minister Devendra Fadnavis, signaling that the message was meant for Delhi as much as for Mumbai. Declaring that Maharashtra would witness a united fight against Hindi dominance, he underlined that the Thackeray name itself is a brand synonymous with Marathi pride. The developments gained further weight as leaders from Raj Thackeray's Maharashtra Navnirman Sena (MNS) spoke publicly about the need for every Marathi-speaking citizen to stand together. According to MNS leaders, the time has come to resist any attempt to sideline Marathi in schools through policies that allegedly push Hindi more aggressively than ever before. What makes this moment remarkable is that it brings together two cousins who have often been on opposing sides of Maharashtra's fractious political landscape. The plan initially involved Raj Thackeray leading a rally on July 6 and Uddhav Thackeray organising a separate march on July 7. But following backchannel discussions, a single massive rally will now be held on July 6 to demonstrate a united front. Meanwhile, the ruling MVA has dismissed these moves as theatrics timed with the upcoming elections. Senior BJP leaders have claimed there is no official compulsion to enforce Hindi in state-run schools and that the opposition is misleading Marathi-speaking voters for political mileage. They insist that the current government remains fully committed to protecting the primacy of Marathi in Maharashtra's cultural and educational fabric. Critics from the ruling side have also attacked Uddhav Thackeray, questioning why his concern for Marathi was missing when he was Chief Minister. They accused him of using the language issue to recover lost ground ahead of polls and claim that this sudden embrace of Raj Thackeray is a last-ditch effort to stay politically relevant. Despite the political crossfire, the prospect of the Thackeray brothers sharing a stage has ignited speculation in Maharashtra's political circles. Their supporters believe that when it comes to defending Marathi identity, old rivalries can be set aside. For many citizens, this rally could be more than just a protest — it may mark the beginning of a new, if uneasy, understanding between two influential factions that once defined Mumbai's streets and Maharashtra's regional politics. Whether this new alignment lasts beyond the July 6 rally remains to be seen, but for now, the Thackeray brothers' reunion has certainly captured the state's attention — and Delhi's too. First Published: June 27, 2025, 12:04 IST
The Print
41 minutes ago
- The Print
Any right-thinking citizen will endorse call to review ‘socialist', ‘secular' in Preamble: Minister
The RSS on Thursday called for reviewing the words 'socialist' and 'secular' in the preamble of the Constitution, saying they were included during the Emergency and were never part of the Constitution drafted by B R Ambedkar. Addressing an event organised at New Delhi on 50 years of the Emergency, RSS general secretary Dattatreya Hosabale said, 'The preamble of the Constitution Baba Saheb Ambedkar made never had these words. During the Emergency, when fundamental rights were suspended, Parliament did not work, the judiciary became lame, then these words were added.' Talking to reporters, Singh said, 'I think any right-thinking citizen will endorse it because everybody knows that it was not part of the original Constitution written by Dr Ambedkar and the team.' Singh was replying to a question on whether the BJP endorses the removal of the words 'secular' and 'socialist' from the Preamble of the Indian Constitution. Jammu, Jun 27 (PTI) In an indirect support to the RSS' call to review the words 'socialist' and 'secular' in the Preamble of the Constitution, Union minister Jitendra Singh on Friday said any right-thinking citizen will endorse it because everybody knows that these words were not part of the original Constitution written by Dr Bhim Rao Ambedkar. 'It is not a question of the BJP versus the non-BJP. It is a question of preserving democratic and constitutional values,' Singh said, adding that those who are raising the Constitution book are the biggest violators of it. Replying to another question on whether the BJP is going to bring a bill in Parliament regarding this, he said, 'I did not say that. I am not accredited to say that.' He further said just yesterday, Dattatreya ji raised a demand for the removal of these words. 'These were not part of Dr Ambedkar's original Constitution. These words are not the legacy of Dr Ambedkar. 'Ambedkar gave us the best Constitution in the world. If these terms were not his idea, then whose ideology was it that inserted them?' Taking a dig at the Congress, he said the term of the Lok Sabha and state assemblies was extended under these clauses from five to six years during the Emergency. 'This provision was misused in Jammu and Kashmir as well. Sheikh Abdullah extended the term of the Jammu and Kashmir Assembly to six years. 'When Morarji Desai became prime minister after three years, he reversed this provision at the national level. However, using Article 370, this change was never implemented in Jammu and Kashmir,' he said. The Union minister further said while all other assemblies in the country reverted to a five-year term, the J-K Assembly continued with a six-year term until August 5, 2019, when abrogation took place. 'The Jammu and Kashmir government not only misused the Emergency provisions, they misused them twice by invoking Article 370,' he said. Hosabale said discussions were held on this issue later, but no effort was made to remove them from the Preamble. So whether they should remain in the Preamble should be considered, he added. The suggestion from the RSS' second senior-most functionary to consider removing the two terms came as he hit out at the Congress for its Emergency-era excesses and demanded an apology from the party. Lambasting the Congress for showcasing itself as the champion of Independence, he said, 'I can say this with full confidence that no matter how many times the Congress beats the drum about the Constitution or how loudly it calls itself the party of freedom fighters, the truth is that the Congress never demanded independence. I am saying this with all the confidence at my command.' He further said until 1930, there was no document or record in which the Congress had demanded that India be given independence or had raised the slogan of complete independence. 'Even post-1930, the Congress was only demanding home state, home rule or dominion status. When Bhagat Singh was demanding complete independence, the Congress was still only talking about home rule. It was only in 1931, at the Lahore session of the Congress, after the hanging of Bhagat Singh, that the first resolution was passed demanding complete independence,' he said. It was also done in the wake of high emotions running among youth after the hanging of Bhagat Singh, he said. Singh said the resolution included the demand for independence, which means Congress only truly demanded freedom 17 years before it was achieved. 'So, if we go by that, Congress fought for India's independence only for 17 years,' he said. Lashing out at the Congress for the imposition of the Emergency, he said Indira Gandhi, in the darkness of night, woke up then president Fakhruddin Ali Ahmed from sleep to impose the Emergency. 'A specific 38th constitutional provision was used at that time so that no one could approach the court.' He said subsequently, a series of amendments were passed, among which the most notorious were the 42nd and 43rd Amendments. 'It was under these amendments that the words 'secular' and 'socialist' were inserted into the Constitution,' he said, adding that just on Thursday, Hosabale raised a demand for the removal of these words. PTI AB KSS KSS This report is auto-generated from PTI news service. ThePrint holds no responsibility for its content.
The Print
41 minutes ago
- The Print
CPI(M) denounces RSS' call to review terms ‘socialist', ‘secular' in Preamble
Hosabale, while addressing an event on the Emergency, said on Thursday that 'the preamble of the Constitution Baba Saheb Ambedkar made never had these words.' 'During the Emergency, when fundamental rights were suspended, Parliament did not work, and judiciary became lame, then these words were added.' The RSS leader said discussions were held on this issue later but no effort was made to remove them from the Preamble. 'So whether they should remain in the Preamble should be considered,' he had added. The left party alleged the RSS' proposal exposes its 'long-standing objective of subverting the Constitution and its intent to transform India into a Hindu Rashtra'. New Delhi, Jun 27 (PTI) The Communist Party of India (Marxist) on Friday denounced RSS general secretary Dattatreya Hosabale's call to review the words 'socialist' and 'secular' in the Constitution's Preamble, saying these ideas reflect the core values for which freedom fighters sacrificed their lives. Hitting out at the RSS, the CPI(M) Politburo said the inclusion of the words 'socialism' and 'secularism' in the Preamble was not an arbitrary addition. These words reflect the core values for which freedom fighters sacrificed their lives, it said. 'The Communist Party of India (Marxist) strongly denounces the proposal made by the RSS General Secretary to remove the words 'socialist' and 'secular' from the Preamble of the Indian Constitution. 'This proposal exposes the RSS's long-standing objective of subverting the Constitution and its intent to transform India into a Hindu Rashtra in pursuit of its Hindutva project,' the Left party said. It underlined that the Indian Constitution embodies the aspirations of countless freedom fighters from various streams. 'The inclusion of 'socialism' and 'secularism' in the Preamble is not an arbitrary addition; it reflects the core values for which freedom fighters like Shaheed-e-Azam Bhagat Singh and his comrades stood and sacrificed their lives,' the party said. The CPI(M) said the ideals of the freedom fighters are embedded in every provision of the Constitution, and the insertion of these words merely affirms that legacy. 'It is the height of hypocrisy for the RSS, which played no role in the freedom movement, to now advocate for the removal of these foundational principles. It cannot tolerate the values cherished by our martyrs betrays its reactionary, anti-people, and divisive ideology,' the politburo said. 'The CPI(M) firmly opposes any attempt to alter the core values enshrined in our Constitution. We appeal to the people to remain vigilant and resolutely resist all such efforts by the RSS and its protégé BJP.' The suggestion from the RSS's second senior-most functionary to consider removing the two works from the Preamble came as he hit out at the Congress for the Emergency era 'excesses' and demanded an apology from the party. PTI AO NSD NSD This report is auto-generated from PTI news service. ThePrint holds no responsibility for its content.
