logo
Why disposable vapes will vanish from stores this week

Why disposable vapes will vanish from stores this week

By Nik Dirga of RNZ
Explainer - Disposable vape fans will see their habit go up in smoke from Tuesday, as tough new vape rules kick in.
Here's what you need to know about changes to vape sales and advertising. What's being banned?
The distribution, manufacture, sale and supply of disposable vapes is being banned from Tuesday.
"We are getting rid of vapes that are most popular among young people, and that can only be positive," Associate Health Minister Casey Costello said in announcing the changes last year.
The 2023/24 NZ Health Survey found 10.5 percent of people aged 15 to 17 vaped daily.
However, pod-style vaping devices will still be sold. They contain pre-filled pods which are swapped out to refill the vape.
Also as of Tuesday, vaping devices, products and packaging can no longer be displayed at general retailers. Specialist vape stores must not display products in any way that makes them visible from outside their place of business - that includes advertising, display in online stores and in vending machines.
There are also many new restrictions on advertising to promote or encourage the use of vaping products, including to existing customers. The new raft of advertising restrictions mean businesses could face a $2000 infringement fine.
For instance, the government says it would violate the new regulations if a shop is advertising or posting about vaping products on social media platforms such as Facebook, Instagram, Twitter or Google business listings.
"From the 17th June we will no longer be able to show images of the products," one online vape retailer says on its website.
There's quite a lot of detail in the new advertising rules and a full breakdown can be found on Health New Zealand's website.
Also as of Tuesday, vaping specialist retailers can no longer use various promotional techniques such as giving away free vaping products, discounts, offering rewards, cash rebates or gifts for the purchase of vaping products, or offer lotteries or games to people who buy vaping products. Haven't there already been some restrictions on vapes?
Yes, as part of the series of changes to the Smokefree Environments and Regulated Products Act 1990 last year. The new changes are the second line of alterations which began coming into effect in December.
As of December, fines for selling to minors and publishing prohibited advertisements were increased, and new vape speciality stores were forbidden from opening within 100 metres of early childhood education centres. There were already location restrictions saying speciality vape stores had to be at least 300 metres from schools or marae.
In introducing the amendments to smoking regulations last year, Associate Health Minister Casey Costello said, "New Zealand was too slow to effectively regulate vaping, and youth vaping rates are too high".
"We have collectively agreed that, we have recognised that, and we know that we can do better. We have to stop young people from taking it up as a habit."
The ban on disposable vapes was put off for six months to allow retailers to prepare for the changes.
Jonathan Devery, chair of the Vaping Industry Association of New Zealand, said the group does support the disposable vapes ban, with a few caveats.
He said while VIANZ "supports the intent behind the policy - to reduce youth access and address the environmental impact of single-use products - the association is urging caution about the potential unintended consequences".
University of Otago public health professor Janet Hoek, a leading researcher into vaping, said whether or not the ban will make a difference will depend on enforcement and product innovation by the industry. Will people just switch from disposable vapes to refillable pods?
"I would expect [the ban] to reduce youth vaping given young people are very price sensitive," Hoek said. "However, if the industry responds, as I think it is likely to do, by introducing cheaper pod vapes, the impact will be much less limited than we might hope."
"They're not a straightforward replacement," Devery said. "There's a real risk that removing the most convenient smoking cessation option could drive consumers back to cigarettes."
Hoek said many manufacturers may look for loopholes they can exploit with bans.
"Disposable vapes are typically inexpensive [i.e., may cost less than $10 a device], so the vaping industry may respond by introducing new lower priced reusable vapes," Hoek said, saying she had seen pod starter kits - without pods, which cost extra - being advertised for under $10.
"We saw this behaviour among tobacco companies as they tried to undermine the impact of increased tobacco excise taxes [they 'shifted' the tax to higher priced brands, away from lower priced brands and introduced entirely new brands to create a new 'super value' partition within the market]."
Devery of VIANZ said it's possible some vape sales may just go underground.
"There are also serious concerns about enforcement," he said. "Early warnings from the UK, where a disposable vape ban came into effect on 1 June, suggest black market sales are likely to increase."
Hoek said there is a lot of concern that manufacturers may find ways around disposable bans - she pointed to 'Big Puff' high-capacity throwaway vapes that have drawn concern in the UK with their own disposables ban. What does this mean for the vaping industry?
"We have consistently called for a full ban on disposable vapes, rather than incremental technical fixes, and we welcome the environmental benefits it will bring," Devery said. "But the transition must be managed carefully to avoid driving consumers back to smoking or into unregulated markets."
The industry group feels that some of the advertising restrictions may ultimately harm consumers and make it harder for retailers to interact with them.
"Many retailers, especially online, have relied on clear product information and guidance to help adults make informed choices," Devery said. "New restrictions will limit what can be communicated, making it harder for consumers to understand available options or find support to switch."
"Retailers are still recovering from last year's rushed regulations that left them with unsellable stock and high compliance costs - from updating websites to in-store signage," he said.
Many retailers have discounted their products heavily before the bans take effect. But should more be done to control vaping?
Hoek said she thought the new measures would help cut youth vaping, but more strategy was needed.
"There are many omissions from the measures (e.g., the high concentration of vape stores in lower income communities; the location of vape stores right next to schools). I would favour a more proactive strategy that reduced the appeal, availability, addictiveness and affordability of vaping products."
One of the key complaints about disposable vapes have been the waste they generate, Devery said.
"Removing disposables will help cut vape-related e-waste by over 80 percent according to our industry estimates, but more must be done," he said. "VIANZ recommends expanded take-back schemes like VapeCycle, producer-responsibility regulations, and better consumer education on safe disposal."
"I would favour a 'polluter pays' model, where vape companies are responsible for the costs their products create," Hoek said.
"Vape companies have been given clear rules to follow, and yet some are already looking for loopholes," Asthma and Respiratory Foundation chief executive Letitia Harding said in a statement. Will this help New Zealand meet its Smokefree 2025 goals?
Back in 2011, New Zealand's government set the goal of a Smokefree New Zealand by 2025. There have been concerns that goal is falling short, with particular worries about Māori and Pasifika smoking rates.
Costello has maintained the government's changes will continue work toward the target.
"We do not want our young people vaping," Costello said in Parliament. "We do not want them taking up this habit. We do not want them to be nicotine addicted. We also don't want anybody taking up tobacco and smoking."
The current smokefree goal aims to have less than 5 percent of the population smoking by December, but the latest data reveals there are still about 300,000 daily smokers - 6.9 percent of adults - across the country.
"VIANZ urges the government to closely monitor the ban's impact on smoking rates, particularly among priority groups, and ensure regulations don't inadvertently harm those most vulnerable," Deverey said.
"Vaping regulation must be viewed in the context of the devastating harm caused by smoking, which kills two out of every three users."
"Strong rules and environmental responsibility are essential, but the broader goal must remain to reduce smoking and improve public health outcomes."
Hoek said it's important vaping retailers were brought along on that goal.
"People who sell vaping products should be able to help people switch successfully from smoking to vaping," she said.
"We also need to let people know that, once they have switched completely to vaping and no longer think there's a risk they would return to smoking, they should stop vaping.
"That latter message isn't [for obvious reasons] communicated by vaping companies or retailers."
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Auckland Council hires private investigator to track homeowner, forced sale looms over $220k rates bill
Auckland Council hires private investigator to track homeowner, forced sale looms over $220k rates bill

NZ Herald

time3 hours ago

  • NZ Herald

Auckland Council hires private investigator to track homeowner, forced sale looms over $220k rates bill

The council would not disclose the current rating debt. Property records show the home, which is down a private driveway and part of a block of flats, was last sold in 1996 for $438,000. Its new council valuation is $1.025 million. 'For some years, we have been trying to contact the owner, and we are now entering the final opportunity before the property enters a rating sale process,' Tucker said. 'Despite extensive efforts to contact the owner over many years – including direct correspondence, public notification and professional services to find the owner – we haven't been able to make contact. 'We do not take a rating sale lightly, and it really is a last resort.' Tucker said all attempts to speak to the owner had been unsuccessful, apart from one instance. 'Despite a short period of email correspondence in 2023 and unverifiable claims from third parties purporting to act on the owner's behalf, no payment plan has been established, and no material payments have been received. 'The council is taking action now, as it needs to recover the unpaid rates, and there may be issues with unlawful access to the property and degradation of the site.' Due to the absence of verified contact, the property not being owner-occupied, and the failure of all previous engagement attempts, the statutory conditions for a forced rating sale had now been met under the Local Government (Ratings) Act, Tucker said. Private investigator hired to track Wu A timeline provided by the council shows the last full rates payment was made in 2005. The council was in contact with tenants and a property manager between 2006 and 2012, but neither had authority to address the rates arrears. In May 2014, the council hired a private investigator to track Wu before starting legal proceedings the following month, and registering a charging order against the property title in 2015. 'New information about the property's appropriate legal categorisation then emerged, which halted court proceedings while the council worked through associated legal details.' In 2021, the council applied to the District Court to sell the property as abandoned land. The property is down a private driveway and part of a block of flats. The owner last made a full rates payment in 2005. Photo / Google But, after posting a public notice in January 2023, the council received correspondence from a person purporting to be Choi Wu, which prevented the land from being treated as abandoned. The council is now calling for anyone who knows Wu or immediate family members to make contact 'to help resolve this matter and establish a solution'. If the sale went ahead, Tucker said the proceeds would be used to recover the full amount of outstanding rates, penalties and associated costs, including real estate agency and legal fees. The remainder of the proceeds would be released to the owner or held in trust until claimed. Tucker said anyone concerned about paying their rates was encouraged to get in touch to discuss assistance options. These included a government-funded rates rebate scheme, a rates postponement scheme for residential properties, and flexible payment options. Forced sale abandoned last year after discovery that owner had died Auckland Council was unable to contact the owners of this house in Guthrey Place, Ōtara, to arrange payment of outstanding rates and penalties totalling more than $300,000. Photo / Jason Oxenham In August last year, an imminent forced sale of a home in Ōtara was abandoned at the 11th hour after council officials learned the owner was dead. The Guthrey Pl house was set to be sold over an unpaid rates bill of $317,000. At the time, it was the city's longest outstanding rates bill. No payments had been made since March 2005. The council had tried for years to contact the owner and arrange repayment, without success. However, after coverage in the Herald, the court-ordered auction was abandoned when relatives of the property's owner, Joseph William Leef, contacted council officials to tell them Leef was dead. The only successful compulsory ratings sale in the supercity occurred in 2015. Charlotte Hareta Marsh lost her home of 20 years in a court-ordered sale after failing to pay rates for nine years. Charlotte Marsh at her former home in Manurewa before it was forcibly sold by Auckland Council. She had refused to pay rates arrears of more than $12,000. Photo / Dean Purcell Despite repeated warnings, she refused to recognise the authority of Auckland Council and claimed to have paid her rates instead to the 'rightful land owner', Arikinui o Tuhoe, a self-proclaimed sovereign authority. At the time of the sale, Marsh owed more than $12,000 in rates and penalties, and nearly $3000 in court costs. The late activist Penny Bright's 11-year refusal to pay rates nearly cost her her Kingsland home in the months before her death. Bright had disputed and refused to pay her rates, citing 'the lack of transparency in council spending on private-sector consultants and contractors'. The council went to court to have Bright's home forcibly sold to recoup tens of thousands of dollars in unpaid rates and penalties, and it was listed for sale in April 2017. But in May that year, a deal was struck after Bright applied for a rates postponement, which was accepted by the council. The forced sale proceedings were halted. Lane Nichols is Auckland desk editor for the New Zealand Herald, with more than 20 years' experience in the industry. Sign up to The Daily H, a free newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.

YouTube turns to AI to spot children posing as adults
YouTube turns to AI to spot children posing as adults

RNZ News

time20 hours ago

  • RNZ News

YouTube turns to AI to spot children posing as adults

Photo: AFP/ NurPhoto YouTube has started using artificial intelligence (AI) to figure out when users are children pretending to be adults on the popular video-sharing platform amid pressure to protect minors from sensitive content. The new safeguard is being rolled out in the United States as Google-owned YouTube and social media platforms such as Instagram and TikTok are under scrutiny to shield children from content geared for grown-ups. A version of AI referred to as machine learning will be used to estimate the age of users based on a variety of factors, including the kinds of videos watched and account longevity, according to YouTube Youth director of product management James Beser. "This technology will allow us to infer a user's age and then use that signal, regardless of the birthday in the account, to deliver our age-appropriate product experiences and protections," Beser said. "We've used this approach in other markets for some time, where it is working well." The age-estimation model enhances technology already in place to deduce user age, according to YouTube. Users will be notified if YouTube believes them to be minors, giving them the option to verify their age with a credit card, selfie, or government ID, according to the tech firm. Social media platforms are regularly accused of failing to protect the well-being of children. Australia will soon use its landmark social media laws to ban children under 16 from YouTube , a top minister said late last month, stressing a need to shield them from "predatory algorithms." Communications Minister Anika Wells said four in 10 Australian children had reported viewing harmful content on YouTube, one of the most visited websites in the world. Australia announced last year it was drafting laws that will ban children from social media sites such as Facebook, TikTok and Instagram until they turn 16. "Our position remains clear: YouTube is a video sharing platform with a library of free, high-quality content, increasingly viewed on TV screens," the company said in a statement at the time. "It's not social media." On paper, the ban is one of the strictest in the world. It is due to come into effect on 10 December. The legislation has been closely monitored by other countries, with many weighing whether to implement similar bans. - AFP

Oracle & Google Cloud boost AI with Gemini model access
Oracle & Google Cloud boost AI with Gemini model access

Techday NZ

timea day ago

  • Techday NZ

Oracle & Google Cloud boost AI with Gemini model access

Oracle and Google Cloud have expanded their partnership to provide Oracle customers with direct access to Google's Gemini AI models through the Oracle Cloud Infrastructure Generative AI service. The collaboration gives Oracle customers the ability to leverage Gemini 2.5 and its upcoming model family for enterprise-grade applications, including advanced coding, workflow automation, and domain-specific solutions such as MedLM for healthcare. Expanded AI offerings Through the integration, enterprises will have the opportunity to use Gemini's multimodal capabilities, enabling applications that can handle text, code, and industry-specific tasks. Oracle plans further integrations with Google Cloud's Vertex AI, which will make the entire Gemini model suite - including video, image, speech, and music generation - accessible within Oracle Fusion Cloud Applications across various departments such as finance, HR, supply chain, sales, service, and marketing. Oracle customers will also be able to deploy Gemini models using their existing Oracle Universal Credits, potentially simplifying adoption and controlling costs. Use cases and industry impact Gemini models are designed to provide accuracy and performance for enterprise use cases, partly due to their grounding in up-to-date Google Search data, large context windows, and data privacy features. The models can be used for knowledge retrieval, productivity tools, advanced software development, and sector-specific solutions. Specialised industry models like MedLM for healthcare are among the offerings expected for future integration. The presence of these models within existing Oracle platforms aims to streamline the adoption of AI across industries, supporting teams in tasks that range from automating business processes to building AI-powered agents. Customer access and integration With the expanded partnership, Oracle states customers will have more flexibility and choice over the models they use. As future integrations are developed, customers will be able to select from a range of Gemini models via Vertex AI, directly within Oracle's cloud applications ecosystem. "Today, leading enterprises are using Gemini to power AI agents across a range of use cases and industries," said Thomas Kurian, CEO, Google Cloud. "Now, Oracle customers can access our leading models from within their Oracle environments, making it even easier for them to begin deploying powerful AI agents that can support developers, streamline data integration tasks, and much more." Google's Gemini models have been cited for their enterprise suitability due to features such as encryption, privacy controls, and reasoning abilities. Clay Magouyrk, President, Oracle Cloud Infrastructure, stated, "Oracle has been intentional in offering model choice curated for the enterprise, spanning open and proprietary models. The availability of Gemini on OCI Generative AI service highlights our focus on delivering powerful, secure, and cost-effective AI solutions that help customers drive innovation and achieve their business goals." Performance and scalability Oracle continues to position its infrastructure as a foundation for running intensive AI workloads. According to the companies, Oracle Cloud Infrastructure offers specialised, cost-effective GPU instances suitable for applications in generative AI, natural language processing, computer vision, and recommender systems. The collaboration is described as a means for customers to apply generative and agentic AI to business needs, with a focus on meeting enterprise requirements for security, adaptability, and performance. Through this partnership, both companies aim to facilitate the deployment of multimodal and AI agent technologies in a broad range of enterprise scenarios.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store