Expert details Air India plane's 'problem' she believes led to horror crash
A computer glitch caused the doomed Air India flight AI171 to crash earlier this month, an aviation expert claimed today.
The snag would have sent wrong information to the engine, potentially leading it to believe the Boeing was on the ground when in fact it was airborne on Thursday June 12 in Ahmedabad, western India. The plane careered into a medical college, killing all but one of those onboard and several more people in the building and on the ground.
Mary Schiavo, an experienced professional who has worked on aviation disasters across each continent, said she believes a computer error is the most likely cause following a lack of concrete information shared by investigators so far. The former US Department of Transportation inspector general said: "I believe this crash was a computer problem. There are several 787 components that rely on computer code to tell the plane whether it is in the air or on the ground. If the computer or code malfunctions, the engines spool back and the thrust is reduced, even if in flight.
"This happened on an ANA 787 flight in 2019, which suffered a dual engine failure as landing, and I'm afraid it could have occurred on the fatal Air India Flight 171."
Ms Schiavo is now an aviation analyst and attorney, working for Motley Rice, a law firm investigating the possibilities of what might have occurred during the 787 Dreamliner disaster. As an attorney, she represented more than 50 of the family members of the passengers and crew of all the planes hijacked on September 11, 2001.
But the expert says the Air India Flight 171 disaster shares parallels with the ANA 787 flight tragedy in July 2019, which saw another Boeing 787-8 Dreamliner - operated by All Nippon Airways - suffer an engine oil problem on approach to Haneda, also known as Tokyo International Airport, in Japan. It experienced a dual engine failure, something Ms Schiavo believes could have happened to the Air India jet.
However, the airline's chairman, Natarajan Chandrasekaran, last week defended the plane's engines, describing them as "clean". The 62-year-old businessman told Times Now: "The right engine was a new engine put in March 2025.
"The left engine was last serviced in 2023 and due for its next maintenance check in December 2025. There are a lot of speculations and a lot of theories.
"But the fact that I know so far is this particular aircraft, this specific tail, AI171, has a clean history. I am told by all the experts that the black box and recorders will definitely tell the story. So, we just have to wait for that." The investigation into the crash continues.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Reuters
4 days ago
- Reuters
Baby sleep sack maker sues US for $90 million over safety remarks
Aug 15 (Reuters) - The manufacturer of a weighted sleep sack designed to aid infant slumber has sued the United States for $90 million in damages over what it called false claims about the safety of its swaddles and other products. California-based Dreamland Baby said in its lawsuit, opens new tab in the federal court in Santa Ana that its business suffered dramatically after a former member of the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission last year made misleading claims that the agency found weighted sleep products to pose dangers to infants. Dreamland said the agency voted against regulating weighted sleep sacks or issuing safety standards for them in 2023. But it said then-commissioner Richard Trumka Jr still 'elected to take matters into his own hands' in a rogue public campaign against Dreamland. 'While Dreamland may never fully recover from what has occurred, this action seeks to repair some of these wrongs,' Dreamland's attorneys at law firm Boies Schiller Flexner said in the lawsuit. The company said it was in 'financial and reputational peril.' Trumka, who is not a defendant, could not be immediately reached for comment. The product safety commission referred a request for comment to the U.S. Justice Department, which declined to comment. Dreamland had no immediate comment. The lawsuit marks an escalation of a court battle between Dreamland and the federal government that began last year. Dreamland in November sued, opens new tab Trumka, the product safety commission and other defendants in federal court in Washington, seeking a court order to stop what it called "baseless and unlawful attacks on weighted infant sleep products." Dreamland's sleep sacks, developed in 2019, are sown with polypropylene beads that add weight and, according to the company, place gentle pressure on infants that helps soothe them for better sleep. Dreamland said it was driving millions of dollars in sales annually until last year. Trumka in a statement, opens new tab on the product safety agency's website last year urged retailers to stop sales of weighted blankets and swaddles for babies. He cited what he said were warnings from the National Institutes of Health and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. The new lawsuit said that no formal product safety determination has been made regarding Dreamland's products. The case is Dreamland Baby Co v. United States, U.S. District Court for the Central District of California, No. 8:25-cv-01798. For Dreamland: Matthew Schwartz and Dan Boyle of Boies Schiller Flexner For United States: No appearance yet
Reuters
4 days ago
- Reuters
US court reinstates $81 million award against Boeing in trade secrets case
Aug 14 (Reuters) - A U.S. appeals court on Thursday reinstated an $81 million award against Boeing (BA.N), opens new tab in a lawsuit accusing it of stealing trade secrets from electric-aircraft startup Zunum Aero. The 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals overturned, opens new tab a California judge's decision to throw out a jury verdict for Zunum, rejecting his finding that the information Boeing allegedly stole was not entitled to trade-secret protection. A spokesperson for Boeing declined to comment on the appeals court's decision. Zunum attorney Vincent Levy of Holwell Shuster & Goldberg said that the decision "affirms what we have said from the start — that Zunum had an enormous opportunity to remake air travel, but Boeing took that opportunity away." Washington State-based Zunum was founded in 2013 to develop small electric commuter aircraft that can travel up to 1,500 miles. Boeing's venture capital arm invested $5 million in the startup in 2017. Zunum said in a 2020 lawsuit that it planned to begin selling its planes in 2022 but halted development after Boeing allegedly blocked its access to capital. The complaint said that Boeing developed its hybrid commuter aircraft using Zunum's trade secrets. A federal jury last May awarded Zunum nearly $81.2 million from Boeing for trade secret theft and $11.6 million for tortious interference, but reduced the total award to $72 million based on damages that it said Zunum could have mitigated. U.S. District Judge James Robart later set the final award at $81 million, but overturned the verdict last August after determining that Zunum did not adequately identify its secrets or show that they derived their value from being kept secret. The 9th Circuit said on Thursday, however, that Zunum had provided "sufficient specificity" for the jury to find that its secrets were legally protectable as well as "not generally known, not readily ascertainable, and valuable." The appeals court also ordered the case to be assigned to a new judge after Robart revealed that his wife had acquired Boeing stock through a retirement savings account during the litigation. The case is Zunum Aero Inc v. Boeing Co, 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, No. 24-5212. For Zunum: Vincent Levy of Holwell Shuster & Goldberg For Boeing: Moez Kaba of Hueston Hennigan Read more: Boeing hit with $72 mln verdict in EV aircraft trade secrets case Boeing should pay more than $300 mln after US verdict, EV aircraft maker says Boeing convinces US judge to overturn $72 mln trade-secrets verdict
BreakingNews.ie
5 days ago
- BreakingNews.ie
Michael O'Leary says Ryanair summer bookings remain strong
Ryanair is seeing strong demand across Europe with bookings ahead of last year, and is "reasonably optimistic" about hitting its summer targets, chief executive Michael O'Leary said in an interview on Thursday. He also praised Boeing for agreeing to deliver some jets earlier than scheduled, ending a run of delays that have curbed Ryanair's growth rate. Advertisement "We're seeing strong bookings through the peak summer months ... The fares are holding up," O'Leary said, adding that bookings were about 1 per cent ahead of the same point last year. He repeated a forecast from July that average fares were likely to recover almost all of a 7 per cent decline seen in the July-September quarter last year, when Ryanair was hit by consumer caution and a dispute with some online travel agents. Hitting the summer target will depend on close-in bookings for the remainder of the airline's key second quarter, which ends on September 30th, he said. There has been no sign of consumers changing their plans due to heatwaves this summer, O'Leary added. But he warned that US tariffs would ultimately act as a drag on global growth. Advertisement "I think everybody is cautious at the moment, and we're right to be cautious," he said. Boeing, which is due to deliver the final 29 aircraft of Ryanair's current order of 737 Max jets this winter, has agreed to deliver seven jets in August and seven in September, ahead of an earlier-agreed schedule. "Boeing are doing a terrific job," O'Leary said. He was speaking in Tirana, where he announced a doubling of capacity to four million passengers per year with the basing of three aircraft at the airport from next April. He described Albania as a hidden jewel of the Adriatic. Advertisement Ryanair, Europe's largest airline by passengers, also announced plans to increase capacity serving Sweden by 25 per cent for this winter, adding eight new routes, after the country scrapped its aviation tax at the beginning of last month. That will add to pressure on local rivals such as SAS and Norwegian Air. Ryanair chief marketing officer Dara Brady called on Sweden also to freeze airport charges and potentially offer additional incentives for growth, saying this could allow Ryanair to double its Swedish traffic by 2030. "The market is well capable of growing significantly here over the next number of years," Brady told a news conference.
