
Editorial: State control of Chicago Public Schools grows likelier as budget crisis intensifies
It was just before Christmas in 1979 when CPS, frozen out of debt markets and with state government unwilling to bail the district out after several such rescues in the 1970s, couldn't pay its workers. Vendors wouldn't provide services for fear of going unpaid.
In January 1980, Gov. Jim Thompson hammered out a deal with the city, the Chicago Teachers Union and CPS to have the state essentially take over financial decision-making for Chicago's public schools. The state was able to borrow on the schools' behalf and collected new property taxes to finance the debt. The School Finance Authority, created to oversee CPS' finances, assumed control of CPS budgets and contracting.
It was a monumental decision. The authority, established by the emergency legislation passed that January, didn't dissolve until 2010 — a full three decades later.
Mayor Richard M. Daley convinced Springfield to hand him authority over the schools in 1995, but the bonds financing CPS through the difficult years of the 1980s didn't expire until 2010.
We recount this history because once again there now is open discussion of some sort of Springfield takeover of CPS.
State Rep. Curtis Tarver, who represents a South Side district, has proposed legislation to put CPS under the supervision of the existing Illinois Finance Authority. That measure was the focus of a legislative hearing Thursday in Chicago before the Illinois House Executive Committee on CPS' fraught financial condition.
With former Chicago Teachers Union organizer Brandon Johnson now serving as Chicago mayor, the costs of an already unaffordable school system have only grown, as City Hall has abdicated its duty to represent taxpayers, at least when it comes to Chicago's massive school system.
At the hearing, CPS representatives, led by interim Superintendent Maquline King, laid out the $734 million budget hole facing her and the Chicago Board of Education. The board must approve a budget for the upcoming school year no later than Aug. 28.
After recently calling for a special session in Springfield to bail out CPS, King recognized that's not possible before she and the board have to make budget decisions. So it sounds like they're considering punting.
'Because there is a misalignment between the state, city and district's fiscal calendars, we can pass an FY 2026 budget with a reasonable assumption of future revenue, with the realization that we will need to make drastic midyear cuts if the revenue does not materialize,' she told lawmakers.
The plan then, such as it is, is to continue to put the onus on the state to bail out a school system where a third of the schools are operating at less than 50% student capacity and where some of the highest-paid public school teachers in the land — taking advantage of a hopelessly compromised mayor — just a few months ago won 4% yearly pay raises over four years as a baseline. For many teachers, the raises will be far higher, with so-called step increases substantially inflating the sum to be charged to taxpayers.
This is also the system that, as Civic Federation President Joe Ferguson noted in his testimony at the hearing, boosted the CPS employee head count by 7,000, or 20%, since 2020, using one-time federal pandemic cash to pay for the hiring binge. Over that same period of time, the CPS student population dropped by 8%, to 325,000 from 355,000.
Name any other enterprise that boosts its staff by 20% while its customer count falls by nearly 10%.
We spoke with Donald Haider, professor emeritus at Northwestern University's Kellogg School of Management who served as vice chairman of the Chicago School Finance Authority in the 1980s.
'Back in 1980, Mayor (Jane) Byrne had absolutely no choice because all of a sudden CPS was thrown out of capital markets,' he recalled. Now? It would be a stark admission of failure for a former CTU organizer to be the mayor to cede control of CPS to the state, he said.
What seems clearer every day, as CPS careens toward its inevitable day of reckoning, is that the state ultimately will need to be involved in putting the system back on a stable course. That day will only arrive, though, when Johnson and his school board allies, as well as CTU, stop demanding cash from the state with no strings attached and become willing to enter real negotiations about what CPS reform entails.
And, yes, there will need to be reform. A school board and a mayor that jack up teacher salaries and openly talk of taking on more junk-rated debt during a period of deficits well into the hundreds of millions have relinquished their right to determine CPS' future. There assuredly will be painful conditions attached to whatever assistance the state provides — if indeed a cash-strapped Springfield even summons the will and the means to help. A meaningful, enforceable school consolidation plan, perhaps? Limits on contracting authority maybe, including future negotiations with CTU?
The bottom line: If you can't manage your own business, you're in no position to complain when others force concessions from you in return for fixing what you've broken.
When the time comes for true hardheaded negotiations — and we believe that time is coming soon — a new or existing state oversight mechanism may well once again hold the purse strings for the nation's fourth-largest public school system. The reality of limited dollars is something every household or business must face. CTU and Mayor Johnson aren't any different.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
5 hours ago
- Yahoo
Editorial: State control of Chicago Public Schools grows likelier as budget crisis intensifies
Chicagoans with long memories can hear echoes of the past in the growing crisis around finances at Chicago Public Schools. It was just before Christmas in 1979 when CPS, frozen out of debt markets and with state government unwilling to bail the district out after several such rescues in the 1970s, couldn't pay its workers. Vendors wouldn't provide services for fear of going unpaid. In January 1980, Gov. Jim Thompson hammered out a deal with the city, the Chicago Teachers Union and CPS to have the state essentially take over financial decision-making for Chicago's public schools. The state was able to borrow on the schools' behalf and collected new property taxes to finance the debt. The School Finance Authority, created to oversee CPS' finances, assumed control of CPS budgets and contracting. It was a monumental decision. The authority, established by the emergency legislation passed that January, didn't dissolve until 2010 — a full three decades later. Mayor Richard M. Daley convinced Springfield to hand him authority over the schools in 1995, but the bonds financing CPS through the difficult years of the 1980s didn't expire until 2010. We recount this history because once again there now is open discussion of some sort of Springfield takeover of CPS. State Rep. Curtis Tarver, who represents a South Side district, has proposed legislation to put CPS under the supervision of the existing Illinois Finance Authority. That measure was the focus of a legislative hearing Thursday in Chicago before the Illinois House Executive Committee on CPS' fraught financial condition. With former Chicago Teachers Union organizer Brandon Johnson now serving as Chicago mayor, the costs of an already unaffordable school system have only grown, as City Hall has abdicated its duty to represent taxpayers, at least when it comes to Chicago's massive school system. At the hearing, CPS representatives, led by interim Superintendent Maquline King, laid out the $734 million budget hole facing her and the Chicago Board of Education. The board must approve a budget for the upcoming school year no later than Aug. 28. After recently calling for a special session in Springfield to bail out CPS, King recognized that's not possible before she and the board have to make budget decisions. So it sounds like they're considering punting. 'Because there is a misalignment between the state, city and district's fiscal calendars, we can pass an FY 2026 budget with a reasonable assumption of future revenue, with the realization that we will need to make drastic midyear cuts if the revenue does not materialize,' she told lawmakers. The plan then, such as it is, is to continue to put the onus on the state to bail out a school system where a third of the schools are operating at less than 50% student capacity and where some of the highest-paid public school teachers in the land — taking advantage of a hopelessly compromised mayor — just a few months ago won 4% yearly pay raises over four years as a baseline. For many teachers, the raises will be far higher, with so-called step increases substantially inflating the sum to be charged to taxpayers. This is also the system that, as Civic Federation President Joe Ferguson noted in his testimony at the hearing, boosted the CPS employee head count by 7,000, or 20%, since 2020, using one-time federal pandemic cash to pay for the hiring binge. Over that same period of time, the CPS student population dropped by 8%, to 325,000 from 355,000. Name any other enterprise that boosts its staff by 20% while its customer count falls by nearly 10%. We spoke with Donald Haider, professor emeritus at Northwestern University's Kellogg School of Management who served as vice chairman of the Chicago School Finance Authority in the 1980s. 'Back in 1980, Mayor (Jane) Byrne had absolutely no choice because all of a sudden CPS was thrown out of capital markets,' he recalled. Now? It would be a stark admission of failure for a former CTU organizer to be the mayor to cede control of CPS to the state, he said. What seems clearer every day, as CPS careens toward its inevitable day of reckoning, is that the state ultimately will need to be involved in putting the system back on a stable course. That day will only arrive, though, when Johnson and his school board allies, as well as CTU, stop demanding cash from the state with no strings attached and become willing to enter real negotiations about what CPS reform entails. And, yes, there will need to be reform. A school board and a mayor that jack up teacher salaries and openly talk of taking on more junk-rated debt during a period of deficits well into the hundreds of millions have relinquished their right to determine CPS' future. There assuredly will be painful conditions attached to whatever assistance the state provides — if indeed a cash-strapped Springfield even summons the will and the means to help. A meaningful, enforceable school consolidation plan, perhaps? Limits on contracting authority maybe, including future negotiations with CTU? The bottom line: If you can't manage your own business, you're in no position to complain when others force concessions from you in return for fixing what you've broken. When the time comes for true hardheaded negotiations — and we believe that time is coming soon — a new or existing state oversight mechanism may well once again hold the purse strings for the nation's fourth-largest public school system. The reality of limited dollars is something every household or business must face. CTU and Mayor Johnson aren't any different. Submit a letter, of no more than 400 words, to the editor here or email letters@ Solve the daily Crossword


Chicago Tribune
9 hours ago
- Chicago Tribune
Editorial: Smoky air should not become a permanent hallmark of Chicago summers
We're more than two-thirds of the way through Chicago's meteorological summer, and so far when the weather hasn't been suffocatingly hot and humid, it's featured air that's dangerous for too many of us to breathe. Sweltering conditions are a normal part of summer in Chicago — some years more so than others, of course — but when the winds blow from the north, Chicagoans are supposed to be able to breathe a sigh of relief and head for the tennis courts or the baseball/softball diamonds or the bike trails. Or, at the very least, their patios and porches. For the past three years, that temperature relief has been accompanied by plumes of smoke from wildfires raging all the summer long in Canada. The end of last week's heat wave brought daily warnings of poor air quality, with Chicago tabbed Thursday as having the worst air quality in the entire world. The warnings continued through most of the weekend. For many, the conditions made our eyes itchy and were just sort of bothersome. But for those who suffer from asthma and other pulmonary ailments, the air was downright hazardous. If this situation were a one-off — just a uniquely awful set of circumstances north of the border — we'd be inclined to give Canada a pass. But this is becoming a regular ordeal, and it's time people who can do something about it acknowledge the issue — and act. That means Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney, who took office earlier this year and will have no such excuses next summer. That also means President Donald Trump. We mention our president because he has spent much of his first six months in office bullying and trolling Canada over trade, national defense and whether that sovereign nation ought to become just another U.S. state. We've criticized Trump for treating one of this country's most stalwart friends on the world stage as an adversary. Among other things, the natural offense Canadians have taken to Trump's provocations and threats has led many to boycott travel to the U.S. One look at Las Vegas' underwhelming summer traffic suggests this needless antagonism with Canada is costing the U.S. directly. We'd love to see Trump abandon his self-defeating economic battle with Canada over products such as lumber and focus instead on a Canadian export that truly is damaging America — wildfire smoke. A large swath of the U.S. — essentially the entire Upper Midwest, including states such as Wisconsin and Michigan that were key to Trump's 2024 victory — is enduring unacceptable health and other risks because of these blazes. While wildfires are common in Canada given that vast geographic territory's abundance of unsettled areas, it's only been in recent years that the conflagrations have grown so large. Unlike the U.S., which long has supported a substantial force to fight wildfires, primarily in the West, Canada's firefighters are mainly focused on blazes in municipalities. Essentially, Canada has said it doesn't have the capacity to battle these wildfires before they get so out of control that they must burn themselves out or rage on for months until the seasons change. The U.S. has sent hundreds of firefighters to help in recent years, but the efforts haven't been sufficient. This is not a new summertime status quo to which Chicagoans and other Upper Midwesterners simply should be told to get accustomed. It's unacceptable and should be treated as such. We're not saying that solving a problem driven by large-scale climatic changes is simple — or cheap. There's a reason Canada isn't equipped like the U.S. to battle fires sparked in wilderness areas. Our neighbor to the north hasn't needed the capability in the past. It does now. To be fair, the United States has faced its own reckoning with increasingly destructive wildfires, especially in the West. But we've built up a robust federal firefighting infrastructure over decades in response — something Canada is only now beginning to consider on a national scale. What's needed is for leaders to make this scourge a priority. Where there's a will there's a way, especially given the wealth held in North America. Surely, in coming summers, the U.S. could contribute expertise and even personnel while Canada invests in early detection and extinguishment of these fires. In return, Trump could drop his trade-related threats and demands and focus on a U.S.-Canadian problem that directly affects millions of American lives. How about if both countries committed to action that truly would be beneficial on both sides of the border? A win-win. What a novel concept.
Yahoo
a day ago
- Yahoo
Cooper-Standard Holdings Inc (CPS) Q2 2025 Earnings Call Highlights: Record Green Scores and ...
Release Date: August 01, 2025 For the complete transcript of the earnings call, please refer to the full earnings call transcript. Positive Points Cooper-Standard Holdings Inc (NYSE:CPS) achieved a record 100% green score on 317 customer scorecards for quality and service in Q2 2025. The company reported a significant improvement in safety performance, with a total incident rate of 0.26, well below the world-class benchmark of 0.47. CPS achieved $25 million in savings through lean initiatives and cost-saving programs, alongside $4 million in savings from restructuring and headcount optimization. The company was awarded $77 million in net new business during Q2 2025, reflecting strong customer relationships and technical capabilities. CPS reported a 23% increase in adjusted EBITDA to $62.8 million, with a 170 basis point margin expansion despite lower sales volumes. Negative Points Sales for Q2 2025 decreased by 0.3% compared to the same period in 2024, primarily due to unfavorable volume and mix. The company reported a net loss of $1.4 million in Q2 2025, although this was an improvement from a $76.2 million loss in Q2 2024. Net cash used in operating activities was approximately $16 million in Q2 2025, compared to $12 million in the same quarter of 2024. Higher wages and general inflation increased costs by $6 million in Q2 2025. There remains uncertainty around US trade policy and tariffs, which could impact the auto industry and CPS's operations. Q & A Highlights Warning! GuruFocus has detected 5 Warning Sign with CPS. Q: On the ceiling side, it looks like there's $400 million of incremental revenue, of which $300 million is net new business. Is that correct? A: Yes, your math is right. The rest, about $100 million, is from modest increases in production, pricing, or mix adjustments. - Jeff Edwards, Chairman and CEO Q: Regarding the fluid side, there's $600 million of incremental revenue. How much of that is net new business? A: We've broken out net new business for both product groups. Each quarter, we provide data on what we've been booking, including content per vehicle. The $600 million includes known content but doesn't account for potential vertical integration or consolidation opportunities. - Jeff Edwards, Chairman and CEO Q: Can you elaborate on margin expansion and how you decide what's optimal in a tariff environment? A: We have a detailed quote process for new business with hurdle rates and margin expectations. Pricing is managed closely, and improvements from cost optimization enhance margins. Our forecasting has improved, providing accuracy even in long-term projections. - Jeff Edwards, Chairman and CEO Q: Are there any current lines in fluid or ceiling that meet the margin targets for 2030? A: Yes, the programs we're booking now, which launch in three years, already achieve the hurdle rates in our plan. The vertical integration for fluid, which will drive significant content per vehicle, is not yet reflected in these numbers, offering potential upside. - Jeff Edwards, Chairman and CEO Q: How do you see the working capital use unwinding in the second half? A: The main outflow was the build-up of accounts receivable, which is expected to normalize. We anticipate positive free cash flow for the year, with working capital improvements acting as a tailwind in the second half. - John Banis, Executive Vice President and CFO For the complete transcript of the earnings call, please refer to the full earnings call transcript. This article first appeared on GuruFocus. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data