Manipur crisis persists as BJP shows no political will, says Congress
Remove Ads
Tired of too many ads?
Remove Ads
Claiming that there is no political will to resolve the crisis in Manipur, the opposition Congress on Saturday said that despite the BJP-led alliance having 54 MLAs in the 60-member assembly, it cannot form a government in the state.Speaking to reporters on the sidelines of a programme to mark the anniversary of the Quit India Movement, state Congress president Keisham Meghachandra said that with the imposition of the President's Rule in the state, the gunfights may have stopped, but people can't move freely.Earlier this week, Parliament approved a statutory resolution to extend President's Rule in Manipur for another six months, beyond August 13."We have given suggestions and memorandums on the current law and order situation in the state to the BJP leadership many times. But our views are not taken seriously by the BJP-led government at the Centre. With the imposition of the President's Rule on February 13, the gunfights may have stopped, but people still can't move freely," he said."Social welfare schemes remain paralysed, and the finances of the state are in a huge crisis. We are not in favour of the extension of the President's Rule for another six months. There is no one to listen to the complaints and grievances of the people," he added.Meghachandra alleged that there is no political will to resolve the crisis."Despite the BJP and its allies having 54 MLAs in the 60-member House, no government could be formed," he said.The Congress leader claimed that development of the state has completely stopped, and the healthcare facilities being provided by the Centre are not reaching the people."Due to the failure of the administration, the hardships of the people have multiplied," he claimed.Meghachandra also criticised the BJP-led government at the Centre for the budget allocated to the state."The size of the budget recently passed in Parliament is small, and the amount allotted for relief camps is not sufficient. We are disappointed with the budget," he said.The Lok Sabha on Thursday passed the Manipur Appropriation Bill, 2025, authorising the state to spend Rs 30,969 crore for meeting expenditure requirements during the current financial year.In May 2023, ethnic clashes broke out in the state between the Meteis and Kukis, leaving over 260 people killed, 1,500 injured, and over 70,000 people displaced.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hindu
10 minutes ago
- The Hindu
LDF and UDF ratchet up their demand for Suresh Gopi to clarify voter list fraud accusations
As accusations of voter list fraud in the Thrissur Lok Sabha constituency in the 2024 general elections appeared to turn from a trickle into a torrent, the ruling front and the opposition in Kerala ratcheted up their demand for a public accounting from Union Minister of State for Tourism, Suresh Gopi, MP. Communist Party of India (Marxist) [CPI(M)] general secretary, M.A. Baby, dismissed the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) former State president K. Surendran's averment that Mr. Gopi owed no explanation and the ruling Left Democratic Front (LDF) and opposition United Democratic Front (UDF) were grousing belatedly about Election Commission of India (ECI) officials in Thrissur stacking the odds in favour of the Union Minister. Speaking to reporters in New Delhi, Mr. Baby said: 'Belated reporting of a theft did not absolve the perpetrator of the crime. The BJP's voter fraud in Thrissur is a microcosm of what the BJP-engineered in other States. The modus operandi, including identity theft, reflects a pattern. The Election Commission of India (ECI) should retrieve its lost credibility by conducting a thorough investigation', he said. Meanwhile, Mr. Gopi, who arrived after a long hiatus in Thrissur early Wednesday, appeared to maintain a sphinx-like silence. When mobbed by reporters, Mr. Gopi quipped: 'Thank you for the favours done'. Congress speak Leader of the Opposition V.D. Satheesan said Mr. Gopi's reticence was a deliberate attempt to cock a snook at the Thrissur electorate and civil society. 'Mr. Gopi has the right of reply, given the gravity of the accusations of voter fraud swirling around him and the BJP in Kerala. His speechlessness lends credibility to Congress's accusations of massive voter list fraud in Thrissur each passing hour,' Mr. Satheesan said. Senior Congress leader Ramesh Chennithala adduced evidence of what he claimed was massive voter list fraud by CPI(M) and BJP since 2021. He said the BJP appeared to have taken a page from the CPI(M) 's playbook on rigging elections. 'It included persons appearing in multiple voters' lists across districts and fictitious voters using phoney addresses and identity proof', he added.
Economic Times
10 minutes ago
- Economic Times
Forget Canada! D.C. mayor taunts Trump, says US capital should be America's 51st state instead
Washington D.C. Mayor Muriel Bowser criticized President Trump's decision to assume control of the city's police and deploy the National Guard, calling it political theater. Highlighting falling crime rates, used the occasion to push for D.C. statehood, arguing that only full autonomy can protect residents' rights. The federal oversight can last 30 days unless extended by Congress. Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Federal takeover amid declining crime rates Bowser calls it a Political Theater Partisan divide deepens Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Guard's limited role Statehood debate reignited What's next? FAQs: Washington, D.C., Mayor Muriel Bowser has fiercely delivered a sharp rebuke to President Trump's unprecedented decision to take control of the city's police department and deploy National Guard troops, calling it a direct threat to the city's democratic autonomy. Seizing the moment to amplify her long-standing campaign for the District to become the 51st state. Bowser mentioned that only full independence can protect the rights of more than 700,000 August 11, 2025, Trump invoked Section 740 of the Home Rule Act , giving him authority to assume command of the Metropolitan Police Department and authorize the deployment of 800 National Guard members under Title 32 status. At present, between 100 and 200 guardsmen remain active, managing support functions such as traffic management and crowd control. They have no arrest powers. As per the law, the federal control is restricted to 30 days unless Congress votes to extend justified the action by warning of the rise of violence in the city, but crime data presents a different angle. Washington, D.C., recorded a 35% drop in violent crime in 2024, and homicides have fallen by 26% in 2025. City officials credit targeted policing strategies and community programs for these declines, calling the president's move unnecessary and politically the takeover 'unsettling and unprecedented,' Bowser emphasized the intervention had little to do with public safety and more to do with political theater. She stressed that the city does not need federal oversight, but equal representation and control over its own governance. In a pointed jab, she quipped that the president 'doesn't have to look north to Canada for a fight — he's found one right here in the capital.'The move has deepened partisan rifts. Democrats say the federal intervention is proof of why D.C. should become the 51st state, noting residents pay federal taxes and serve in the military yet have no voting representation in Congress. Republicans, however, support Trump's decision, mentioning recent high-profile crimes and accusing local leaders of being soft on enforcement. Congress has scheduled hearings to examine the city's safety record and their visible presence of National Guard members across the city, their role is largely supportive. They are coordinating with logistics and crowd control but leaving law enforcement to the Metropolitan Police Department. Even during local coordination, the guardsmen have to finally answer the federal authority for the duration of the high-profile clash has reignited the debate for D.C. statehood . Past proposals, like the Washington, D.C. Admission Act has cleared the House but failed in the Senate. Advocates say statehood would end the capital's vulnerability to sudden federal control , while critics caution it could shift the political balance in Federal control will end in early September unless extended. Legal experts are already weighing whether Trump's actions could face constitutional challenges over executive authority in a jurisdiction that is not a state. Bowser says her administration will continue ensuring safety while protecting the city's autonomy. 'Our residents deserve the same rights as everyone else,' she stated, insisting that true security will come not from federal oversight, but in full statehood for the District of Columbia.Q1. Who is Muriel Bowser?A1. Muriel Bowser is the mayor of Washington, D.C.Q2. What is the Home Rule Act?A2. A law that grants D.C. a degree of self-governance but allows federal intervention in certain circumstances.
India.com
10 minutes ago
- India.com
Mountbatten, Midnight & Ramadan: The Story Behind India & Pakistans Independence Dates
As India gets ready to be 79 years young on its Independence Day on August 15, it is a question that often pops up: why does neighbouring Pakistan celebrate the country's independence a day before, on August 14? The disparate dates, driven by historical contexts and logistics of the 1947 Partition, are representative of distinct narratives for the countries' birth. The Original Plan And Mountbatten's Speed Early in 1947, Lord Louis Mountbatten was appointed as the final Viceroy of India and was entrusted with the job of transferring power from British to Indian hands. The target date for the transfer of power was fixed as not later than June 1948. But due to growing communal violence and worsening law and order situation, Mountbatten was forced to bring the date forward to August 1947, pushing for a faster withdrawal of the British. The Indian Independence Act was adopted by the British Parliament on July 4, 1947, and it established that the authority of the British would cease on August 15, 1947. That very same day was the formal establishment of two new nations, India and Pakistan. It is interesting to note that the actual boundaries between the nations were not disclosed until August 17, a step taken in order to avoid instant upheaval. Mountbatten subsequently revealed that his selection of August 15 was partly sentimental, the second anniversary of Japan's World War II surrender on August 15, 1945. It represented the end of imperial wars to him. Pakistan's Change To August 14 Even though the Indian Independence Act had designated August 15 for both countries, and Pakistan's founder, Muhammad Ali Jinnah, had initially made use of this date, Pakistan officially changed its Independence Day to August 14 by 1948. This was due to practical as well as symbolic reasons. Practical Transfer Of Power The main practical justification for the change was the timing of the formal transfer of power ceremonies. Lord Mountbatten conducted the ceremony in Karachi for Pakistan on 14 August 1947 during the daytime. This enabled him to subsequently go on to New Delhi to conduct the midnight ceremony marking India's independence as 15 August began. Religious Significance Another important reason for Pakistan's selection was that August 14, 1947, coincided with the 27th day of Ramadan in the Islamic calendar. This is a holy night, and thus great religious significance attaches to Pakistan's selection of its independence date. Pakistan has ever since celebrated August 14 as its Independence Day, whereas India still marks August 15 as its independence day from colonial rule.
