logo
EXCLUSIVE The inside story of why Taylor Swift spectacularly snubbed Kamala Harris on the campaign trail

EXCLUSIVE The inside story of why Taylor Swift spectacularly snubbed Kamala Harris on the campaign trail

Daily Mail​6 days ago
Despite whispers and building anticipation that she could join Beyonce or Lady Gaga for the biggest political and pop culture spectacle in history, she never showed up on the campaign trail in support of Kamala Harris.
Despite a debate night endorsement of Harris in September that sent Donald Trump spiraling, Taylor Swift decided to sit out the remainder of the 2024 cycle.
The forthcoming book, 2024: How Trump Retook the White House and the Democrats Lost America, reveals new details about who's at fault for there never being a Harris-Swift moment on the campaign trail that could've captivated and motivated the pop star's legion of fans.
'Swift proved to be a special challenge. Staffers who worked on celebrity appearances were instructed not to make any outreach to her universe; Doug Emhoff was handling it,' wrote journalists Josh Dawsey, Tyler Pager and Isaac Arnsdorf.
Emhoff, the authors explained, had an in with Swift's team.
'Before Harris became vice president, Emhoff had had a lucrative career as an entertainment lawyer in Los Angeles,' they wrote. 'He and Swift's lawyer, Doug Baldridge, were both partners at the firm Venable.'
Emhoff, the authors wrote, had reached out to Baldridge to 'convey that the campaign would appreciate any efforts the pop star could make to help Harris.'
'Baldridge said Swift would do what Swift thought was best,' they said.
Taylor Swift surprised the Harris campaign by endorsing the Democratic nominee directly following her September 10 debate against President Donald Trump. Second gentleman Doug Emhoff was the only person allowed to do outreach to Swift's team
On September 10, Harris stepped onstage in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania for a first and only debate against the GOP nominee, former President Donald Trump.
'Minutes after the debate ended, Taylor Swift surprised the campaign with a full- throated endorsement posted on her Instagram,' the authors noted. 'She shared a photo of her with her cat, Benjamin Button, and signed it "Childless Cat Lady," a dig at J.D. Vance.'
With no audience in the actual debate hall, the Harris campaign had set up shop at the Cherry Street Pier, an old warehouse on the Delaware River converted into art galleries and a performance space.
'Harris asked if she should mention the endorsement when she spoke to supporters at a watch party,' the authors said. 'They said that would sound too thirsty, but agreed to change her walk-off song to Swift's "The Man."'
The mood in the room was electric - and it only seemed a matter of time before Swift, herself, would make some sort of appearance along Harris' side.
Swift famously didn't step into politics until the 2018 campaign cycle - endorsing Tennessee Senate candidate Phil Bredesen and Democratic Rep. Jim Cooper - and expressing remorse in the documentary Taylor Swift: Miss Americana for not doing more to help Democrat Hillary Clinton beat Trump in 2016.
She endorsed Joe Biden via social media in 2020 - though the COVID-19 pandemic and Biden's COVID-conscious campaign strategy meant that celebrity engagement was limited.
But the Harris campaign 'dedicated huge resources in the final month to massive rallies with celebrity guests,' the authors noted. 'Harris and Walz said they were bringing joy back to politics, and massive celebrity-filled rallies - Meghan Thee Stallion performed in Atlanta, Maggie Rogers in Ann Arbor, Gracie Abrams and Mumford & Sons in Madison, Wisconsin - were key to that strategy.'
Beyonce - who had been rumored to appear alongside Harris at the Democratic National Convention in Chicago in August - finally hit the campaign trail at a special abortion rights rally in the songstress' hometown of Houston, Texas in late October.
'But privately, some campaign staff raised concerns that the major rallies may not be worth the millions of dollars they cost to stage or the staff investment,' the authors said. 'There was scant evidence that the rallies were persuading voters or necessarily boosting turnout.'
Federal Election Commission filings later showed the Harris paid Beyonce's production company, Parkwood Production Media LLC, $165,000 for that event.
There were also concerns about some of the celebrity assignments - such as sending Bruce Springsteen, whose fans are predominantly white, to Clarkston, Georgia, where the city's population is 70 percent black and 50 percent foreign-born.
'The predominantly white press corps seemed more interested in Springsteen's performance than the 23,000 mostly black attendees,' the authors wrote.
Still, the celeb-filled Harris-Walz campaign carried on.
And still no Taylor.
In the final hours before Election Day, there was some evidence that a Swift appearance may finally be happening.
On Monday, November 4, Harris was heading to Pennsylvania and would door-knock with volunteers in Reading, the closest city to Swift's birthplace.
'Rumors flew that the town's most famous daughter, Taylor Swift, would join Harris there or perform at a last rally in Philadelphia,' the authors said. 'Low-level Harris aides did nothing to tamp down the speculation.'
Instead the final night featured performances by 2 Chainz in Raleigh, Christina Aguilera in Las Vegas and Jon Bon Jovi in Detroit, which the authors called 'another head-scratcher for many black voters.'
Reprising the role she played in 2016 and 2020, Lady Gaga was the main act for the final event, performing songs in front of the Rocky steps at the Philadelphia Museum of Art.
Emhoff had been told that Swift would do what Swift thought best.
'Nothing more than the endorsement ever materialized,' the authors said.
A spokesperson for Swift did not respond to the Daily Mail's request for comment.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

‘Is Peter Gabriel in my vocal range? I don't care. I'm singing it at karaoke': Xzibit's honest playlist
‘Is Peter Gabriel in my vocal range? I don't care. I'm singing it at karaoke': Xzibit's honest playlist

The Guardian

time18 minutes ago

  • The Guardian

‘Is Peter Gabriel in my vocal range? I don't care. I'm singing it at karaoke': Xzibit's honest playlist

The first song I fell in love withFight the Power by Public Enemy from their Fear of a Black Planet album touched my soul. Hearing the vibrant production on that record is what really inspired me as a child to become a musician. I listened to it so much, I nearly wore it out. It was first single I boughtRuff Rhyme (Back Again) by my friend King T on cassette tape from Tower Records in Albuquerque, New Mexico. It has the Ruff Mix remix on the B-side, and to this day he and I fight about which is best. The song I do at karaokeIn Your Eyes by Peter Gabriel. Is it in my vocal range? I don't give care if I'm singing it right. I'll do my best. The best song to play at a party It depends on what they're serving. If it's a wild party and there's a whole bunch of drugs involved, it's gotta be uptempo. If it's kick back with some weed, then some 90s or 00s gangsta rap like Nuthin' But a 'G' Thang by Dr Dre featuring Snoop Dogg. The song I secretly likeI love Everything by Mary J Blige from her Share My World album, which samples You Are Everything by the Stylistics and The Payback by James Brown. I've been a fan of hers ever since she came out. She's one of my favourite artists who integrates hip-hop and R&B. The best song to have sex toIt's not about the music. Sometimes it's just about being into your partner: that's the music right there. Would I have sex to my own records? Hell no. Have you heard my shit, like Choke Me, Spank Me (Pull My Hair)? You can't have sex to those records. The song that changed my lifeBitch Please by Snoop Dogg featuring Nate Dogg and Xzibit was the beginning of an era. It launched us into the stratosphere, turned the page, and kicked everything up in my career. The song that makes me cryYou just reminded me I haven't cried in a minute. I gotta go look for that. Sign up to Inside Saturday The only way to get a look behind the scenes of the Saturday magazine. Sign up to get the inside story from our top writers as well as all the must-read articles and columns, delivered to your inbox every weekend. after newsletter promotion The song that gets me up in the morningYankee and the Brave by Run the Jewels because it's adrenaline and goes good with coffee. The song I'd like played at my funeralPlay This at My Funeral, the first song on my new album. Xzibit's new album Kingmaker is out now.

Iran says it would resume nuclear talks if US guaranteed no further attacks – Middle East crisis live
Iran says it would resume nuclear talks if US guaranteed no further attacks – Middle East crisis live

The Guardian

time33 minutes ago

  • The Guardian

Iran says it would resume nuclear talks if US guaranteed no further attacks – Middle East crisis live

Update: Date: 2025-07-13T09:25:45.000Z Title: Abbas Araghchi Content: June attacks by the US and Israel on Iran struck but did not fully destroy nuclear facilities Yohannes Lowe Sun 13 Jul 2025 11.25 CEST First published on Sun 13 Jul 2025 10.03 CEST From 10.03am CEST 10:03 Welcome to our live coverage of the Middle East, with a focus on the prospect of US-Iran nuclear talks restarting. According to state media, Iran's foreign minister, , said on Saturday that his country would be willing to re-engage in nuclear talks with Washington if there were assurances of no more attacks against it. Araghchi served as lead negotiator in the strained nuclear talks with the US over the summer, which collapsed after Israel launched a surprise attack on Iran's nuclear sites on 13 June, including at the key Natanz nuclear site as well as at ballistic missile sites. Referring to the subsequent 12-day Israeli bombardment of Iran's nuclear and military sites, and the US airstrike on 22 June, Araghchi said that if the US and others wish to resume talks with Iran, then: First of all, there should be a firm guarantee that such actions will not be repeated. The attack on Iran's nuclear facilities has made it more difficult and complicated to achieve a solution based on negotiations. Both Iran and the US struck Iranian nuclear facilities in June but did not destroy the Iranian nuclear programme, likely setting it back by a couple of months, according to an early Pentagon intelligence assessment of the attack. The Trump administration, which claims that Iranian nuclear facilities were completely destroyed in the attacks, insists that Iran cannot be allowed to have a nuclear weapon. Following the airstrikes, Iran suspended cooperation with the UN nuclear watchdog, the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), which led to the departure of inspectors. Iran says it is not developing nuclear weapons and that its enrichment of uranium is for peaceful purposes. Iran is maintaining a fragile ceasefire with the US and Israel but the risk exists of the crisis flaring up into further warfare unless a diplomatic agreement is found soon. We'll continue to bring you the latest developments and analysis throughout the day, stay with us. 11.25am CEST 11:25 Patrick Wintour The Guardian's diplomatic editor, Patrick Wintour, filed this report last week: European nations will act to impose 'dramatic sanctions' on Iran in the coming weeks if it does not end the uncertainty about its nuclear programme, including by allowing the return of UN inspectors, the UK foreign secretary, David Lammy, has warned. He also told the Commons that Iran could not assume Israel would not strike its nuclear sites again. His tough warning was echoed by the French foreign ministry, which is working closely with the UK in an attempt to persuade Iran to end its new ambiguity about its nuclear intentions and re-engage in talks with the US. The UK, France and Germany – the E3 – signed the original nuclear deal with Iran in 2015 and according to its terms can impose 'snapback' UN sanctions without the risk of a security council veto, so long as they act by its expiry in October. Alternatively, they could table a UN resolution to delay the snapback by some months if Iran shows a willingness to negotiate. The three countries are also using their power to reimpose UN sanctions as a lever to persuade the US to join the talks with the Iranians, but have so far had no success. You can read the full story here: 10.47am CEST 10:47 Israel claims it acted because Tehran was within reach of a nuclear weapon. US intelligence agencies and the International Atomic Energy Agency had assessed Iran last had an organised nuclear weapons program in 2003, though Tehran had been enriching uranium up to 60% — a short, technical step away from weapons-grade levels of 90%. 10.38am CEST 10:38 During the 12-day war, Israeli airstrikes killed hundreds of people, including civilians, and injured thousands of others in Iran, according to official figures. As we have already mentioned, the war on Iran – cast as a preemptive attack for self-defence – was launched by Israel and later joined in by the US. Israel claimed the attacks were necessary before its adversary got any closer to building an atomic weapon, although experts and the US government had assessed that Iran was not actively working on such a weapon before the strikes. Israel has acknowledged being hit by more than 50 missiles during its war with Iran, resulting in at least 28 deaths, but the true extent of the damage may never be known due to stringent media restrictions. 10.20am CEST 10:20 The Iranian foreign minister's comments about the possibility of restarting nuclear talks follow Donald Trump's Monday meeting with his Israeli counterpart, Benjamin Netanyahu, where he reportedly said he was open to lifting sanctions on Iran. Earlier this month, the US issued a new wave of sanctions against Iranian oil exports. 'I would love to be able to, at the right time, take those sanctions off,' Trump told a journalist at the White House on Monday night. During the meeting with Netanyahu, Trump also said he 'hoped' that the US would not strike Iran again. 'They want to work something out,' he said. 'They're very different now than they were two weeks ago.' Updated at 10.24am CEST 10.03am CEST 10:03 Welcome to our live coverage of the Middle East, with a focus on the prospect of US-Iran nuclear talks restarting. According to state media, Iran's foreign minister, , said on Saturday that his country would be willing to re-engage in nuclear talks with Washington if there were assurances of no more attacks against it. Araghchi served as lead negotiator in the strained nuclear talks with the US over the summer, which collapsed after Israel launched a surprise attack on Iran's nuclear sites on 13 June, including at the key Natanz nuclear site as well as at ballistic missile sites. Referring to the subsequent 12-day Israeli bombardment of Iran's nuclear and military sites, and the US airstrike on 22 June, Araghchi said that if the US and others wish to resume talks with Iran, then: First of all, there should be a firm guarantee that such actions will not be repeated. The attack on Iran's nuclear facilities has made it more difficult and complicated to achieve a solution based on negotiations. Both Iran and the US struck Iranian nuclear facilities in June but did not destroy the Iranian nuclear programme, likely setting it back by a couple of months, according to an early Pentagon intelligence assessment of the attack. The Trump administration, which claims that Iranian nuclear facilities were completely destroyed in the attacks, insists that Iran cannot be allowed to have a nuclear weapon. Following the airstrikes, Iran suspended cooperation with the UN nuclear watchdog, the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), which led to the departure of inspectors. Iran says it is not developing nuclear weapons and that its enrichment of uranium is for peaceful purposes. Iran is maintaining a fragile ceasefire with the US and Israel but the risk exists of the crisis flaring up into further warfare unless a diplomatic agreement is found soon. We'll continue to bring you the latest developments and analysis throughout the day, stay with us.

Maga on the brink: The rows that nearly shattered Trump's core base
Maga on the brink: The rows that nearly shattered Trump's core base

Telegraph

time36 minutes ago

  • Telegraph

Maga on the brink: The rows that nearly shattered Trump's core base

When it matters, only Donald Trump can pull the Maga movement back from the brink. Since Mr Trump returned to the White House in January, his support base has been engulfed by rows on everything from Jeffrey Epstein to launching airstrikes on Iran. But each time the US president has been there to paper over the cracks appearing in his coalition. Last month, Nato chief Mark Rutte described Mr Trump as a 'daddy' who 'has to sometimes use strong language' to keep his team in check. Mr Rutte was talking about the Middle East, but it could easily describe the Republican's role as the patriarch of the Maga movement. And while that family might squabble like any other, it's rare for any of them to become permanently estranged. Or maybe Mr Trump's instincts stem from his time as a real estate developer in New York City. 'Know your market' is one of the key lessons from his 1987 memoir, The Art of the Deal. Either way, Maga is woven together by a strange mix of personality and ideology, and many GOP strategists doubt it can survive when Mr Trump finally exits the political stage. Asked what held the movement together, Dave Carney, a veteran Republican operative who worked on George H W Bush and Bob Dole's presidential campaigns, said simply: 'president Trump.' Qatari jet gift There were early signs of trouble when Mr Trump decided to accept a $400 million luxury jet gifted from Qatar to serve as Air Force One, something which united moderates and the Maga faithful in condemnation. Taking a plane from a country accused of sponsoring extremist groups that include Hamas and Hezbollah, and which Mr Trump had labelled 'funders of terrorism' a few years ago, proved too much for some to swallow. Laura Loomer, the Right-wing activist at the centre of many of the Maga rows, was bitterly disappointed in the decision. Once she declared she would take a bullet for the president. But in May she called the jet a 'stain' on the Trump administration, declaring: 'We cannot accept a $400 million 'gift' from jihadists in suits.' Conservative radio host Mark Levin agreed, while Ben Shapiro, the co-founder of the Daily Wire and a prominent Maga voice, accused Mr Trump of abandoning his 'America First' movement. But the president rode out the turbulence and still got his plane. He held off on direct criticisms of allies and even seems to have launched a charm offensive, calling Ms Loomer shortly afterwards, who apologised for 'jumping to conclusions'. Mr Trump knows how to pick his battles, and unite his restless base against a common enemy rather than letting them turn against themselves. Iran strikes Many prominent Maga voices, scarred by military quagmires in Iraq and Afghanistan, were sceptical when he launched air strikes on Iran's nuclear sites last month using 'bunker-busting bombs'. Marjorie Taylor Greene, the firebrand Republican congresswoman, declared she was 'sick' of foreign wars and urged Mr Trump to focus on domestic issues like the 'invasion' of the US's borders by illegal immigrants. And Steve Bannon, Mr Trump's former White House chief strategist, warned the strikes would not have been what 'a lot of Maga wanted to hear'. 'If they hit back at American troops, do we go back in and hit again? Next thing you know, brother, you're in a forever war,' he said on his 'War Room' podcast. Mr Trump held off and instead picked a fight with someone outside Maga – Thomas Massie, a Republican congressman who hails more from the party's libertarian tradition. In a 300-word diatribe on his Truth Social account, the president labelled the Kentucky congressman 'not Maga' and a 'simple-minded grandstander', declaring he planned to campaign against him in next year's primaries. 'Maga doesn't want him, doesn't know him, and doesn't respect him,' he said. Brian Darling, a Republican strategist who is a 'big fan' of Mr Massie and worked for fellow Kentuckian Rand Paul, believes focusing Maga supporters against a common enemy proved an effective strategy. 'Donald Trump picks fights with members of his own party and he intimidates them,' he added. 'Many times he will threaten primaries and he'll just browbeat Republican members of Congress to get in line.' Mr Trump was also helped by effective surrogates who could sell the Iran strikes, like the vice-president, JD Vance, who insisted the president had been 'consistent' on Iran his whole career. And the Right-wing activist Charlie Kirk, when Mr Trump suggested Iran should undergo regime change, insisted he was talking about a 'bottom-up revolution' rather than decapitating its leadership. Epstein files Surrogates can also be important human shields, as the president's top law enforcement lieutenants have found out to their cost over the botched handling of the Epstein files. Kash Patel and Dan Bongino, the director and deputy director of the FBI, had spent years playing into conspiracies about a 'black book' owned by Jeffrey Epstein, the paedophile and disgraced financier. Attorney general Pam Bondi, meanwhile, claimed in February that his 'client list' was on her desk, 'ready to review'. But this month the FBI and justice department concluded, in a memo seen by Axios, there was no client list and Epstein – rather than being silenced by the 'deep state' of shadowy figures controlling the government – killed himself in a Manhattan jail cell. 'Pam Bondi fed a monster,' said Matthew Bartlett, a Republican operative who worked for the first Trump administration in the State Department. 'And now there's a chance that the monster eats her.' He still believes the issue is damaging for Mr Trump because it goes beyond a policy debate to the 'much more compelling' issue of: 'I don't believe my government is telling me the truth.' But for now most of the heat seems to be taken by Ms Bondi and the FBI duo, who don't have the same Teflon quality as the president or the same regard of the Maga base. Dan Bongino, the FBI deputy director, has been so affected by the fallout, he is considering resigning. Immigration On immigration, the administration has been dragged in opposite directions by the demands of hawkish Maga voices while Big Tech and farmers worry about their workforce. It burst to the fore in December in a row between Mr Bannon and Elon Musk, then a chief ally of Mr Trump's, over H1-B visas for highly-skilled immigrants. There was so much bad blood between the two men that Mr Bannon threatened to 'rip his f—ing face off'. Mr Trump sided with Mr Musk at the time but has also embarked on a mass deportation drive while aggressively stamping out illegal immigration. And on the issue of migrant workers on farms, the administration is creating a temporary visa programme to fill jobs. Both the president and the White House has aggressively pushed back on suggestions the move is 'amnesty' or 'amnesty lite'. Another factor in Mr Trump's favour is that the Democrats, having lost the White House, Senate, and House of Representatives in November, are in such disarray they aren't threatening to erode his base of support. The president 'is one lucky motherf----r', said Mr Carney. 'His opponents are so bad, it makes his successes look even better.' Mr Bannon claims there are three pillars of Maga: restricting free trade, limiting immigration and ending the 'forever wars'. But there is something that underpins all of that: Mr Trump. Danielle Vinson, a professor of politics at Furman University in South Carolina, said the movement was not 'ideologically consistent' or 'monolithic' on issues. 'Maga is largely a cult of personality, so as long as Trump is president, he will have their support,' she said. 'Not everyone in Maga cares about all these issues equally. Maga is more about style than substance, and Maga is really primarily about Trump.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store