Colorado teen, 15, shot and killed, two others injured in shooting near Aurora fire station; Suspect at large
The shooting was reported around 12:30 a.m. at Aurora Fire Rescue Station 2, located at 12600 E. Hoffman Boulevard. Aurora firefighters returning to the station came upon the teen and a 20-year-old woman who had been shot. The firefighters began rendering aid and took them to a nearby hospital, but the 15-year-old died of her injuries, according to the Aurora Police Department. The woman is expected to survive.
A third person, also a minor, was grazed by a bullet in the shooting, police say.
Aurora police investigators believe the shooting happened in the parking lot of the fire station, but don't believe there was any connection to the fire station or any firefighters and believe the shooting was an "isolated incident."
Police don't have any information on a suspect or suspects and are still investigating the shooting.
The girl who died will be identified by the Arapahoe County Coroner's Office.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Medscape
30 minutes ago
- Medscape
Psoriasiform Dermatitis Risk in Children on TNFi Reviewed
TOPLINE: Older age at TNF alpha inhibitors initiation, a diagnosis of juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA), and concomitant immunomodulator use were associated with delayed onset of paradoxical psoriasiform dermatitis (PD) in children treated with TNFi, in a retrospective chart review. METHODOLOGY: Researchers conducted a retrospective chart review of 3418 patients receiving TNFi therapy for various conditions (including Crohn's disease, JIA, and ulcerative colitis) at Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, from January 2018 to January 2023. Overall, 70 patients (2%) developed PD skin eruptions (52.9% women; 91.4% White; 5.7% Black; median age at TNFi initiation, 11.7 years; median age at PD onset, 13.6 years); 21.4% of patients were given concomitant immunomodulators; 94% of patients had PD at multiple sites. The median time from starting a TNFi to the onset of PD was 16.9 months. Treatments for PD included topical steroids (85.7%), systemic medications (15.4%), and nonsteroid topicals including tacrolimus, pimecrolimus, and calcipotriene (24.3%). PD outcomes and factors associated with its severity were evaluated. TAKEAWAY: PD rashes resolved in 32 patients (45.7%); the median time to resolution was 15.5 months. Most (71.4%) of those with PD had Crohn's disease, and infliximab (52.7%) and adalimumab (44.6%) were the most frequently used TNFi. The initial TNFi was discontinued in 40 patients (57.1%) because of PD in 23 (57.5) of those patients. Of these 40 patients, 12 (30%) switched to another TNFi with a 33% recurrence rate, while 25 (62.5%) switched to a different medication class with PD persisting in 36%. Girls were more likely to receive high-potency topical steroids, possibly indicating a difference in prescribing practices or worse disease. Onset of PD occurred later in patients with JIA (coefficient estimate [CE], 22.6 months; P = .02), those on concomitant immunomodulators (CE, 11.0; P = .04), or those who were older when the TNFi was started (CE, 2.4; P < .01). IN PRACTICE: 'Our study found that the diagnosis of JIA, older age at TNFi initiation, and concomitant immunomodulation are potential predictors of later PD onset,' the authors of the study concluded. 'Female sex may influence PD severity,' they added, 'but conflicting results and the retrospective design of this study call for additional research to better understand the factors contributing to PD severity in pediatrics.' SOURCE: This study was led by Muayad M. Shahin, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, and was published online on July 31, 2025, in Pediatric Dermatology. LIMITATIONS: The retrospective study design limited the availability of detailed morphologic descriptions. Additionally, multiple definitions of severe PD restricted analysis of risk factors across different outcome measures. DISCLOSURES: This research was funded by the National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases Core Center and the University of Cincinnati Office of Research medical student summer research award, funded by the Stella and Carey Wamsley Charitable Trust. One author disclosed serving as a consultant for LEO Pharma. The other authors reported having no conflicts of interest. This article was created using several editorial tools, including AI, as part of the process. Human editors reviewed this content before publication.
Medscape
30 minutes ago
- Medscape
Rural Parents See More Care Gaps and Delays After Pregnancy
TOPLINE: Parents in the year following birth residing in rural areas experienced more healthcare barriers, including reduced access to obstetric care and increased emergency department visits, than their urban counterparts. While infant care was similar between rural and urban areas, postpartum parents reported delays in medical care compared with their infants in both settings. METHODOLOGY: Researchers conducted a cross-sectional analysis using data from the National Health Interview Survey to examine rural-urban differences in healthcare access in postpartum parents and infants. They included nonpregnant women aged 18-49 years who had infants aged 1 year or younger. A total of 2019 postpartum parents (mean age, 27.1 years) and 2191 infants residing in rural areas, and 12,112 postpartum parents (mean age, 29.2 years) and 13,088 infants residing in urban areas were included in the study. Self-rated health was assessed on a five-point scale ranging from excellent to poor for both postpartum parents and infants. Healthcare utilization was evaluated based on the location where the care was received, the number of office or emergency department visits in the prior year, visits to specific clinicians, and the number of hospitalizations. Barriers to care were categorized into insurance coverage issues (such as gaps in coverage, losing coverage after pregnancy, or changes in care location) and reasons for delayed medical care. TAKEAWAY: Parents residing in rural areas were less likely to see an obstetrician-gynecologist (P = .002), visited the emergency department more frequently (P = .030), and had more hospitalizations (P = .041) than those residing in urban areas. Parents residing in rural areas experienced more disruptions in medical care, gaps in insurance coverage, and loss of Medicaid coverage after pregnancy than their urban counterparts. Delays in medical care were also more prevalent among parents residing in rural vs urban areas (20.3% vs 15.8%; P = .009); this pattern was not observed among infants. Among both rural and urban parent-infant dyads, adults were more likely to experience uninsurance and delayed medical care than their infants. Cost was a more common reason for delayed care among postpartum parents than among infants in the same household, regardless of where they lived. IN PRACTICE: 'Investments in rural health care infrastructure may support rural families,' the authors wrote. 'Integrating and incentivizing care for postpartum parents alongside their infants may address differential use and access to care in this critical period.' SOURCE: The study was led by Sara C. Handley, MD, MSCE, of the Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania in Philadelphia. It was published online on August 3, 2025, in The Journal of Rural Health. LIMITATIONS: The analysis did not include specific weighting to represent the US population of parent-infant dyads. The cross-sectional design did not specify the age of the infant, which could have affected the reported number of visits and limited comments on completeness of the care. DISCLOSURES: The study received support through grants from the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, the University of Minnesota Foundation Rural Health Research Center Fund, and the Federal Office of Rural Health Policy. The authors reported having no conflicts of interest. This article was created using several editorial tools, including AI, as part of the process. Human editors reviewed this content before publication.
Forbes
31 minutes ago
- Forbes
Trump Says Homeless Must Move From D.C. ‘Immediately'—FBI Agents Reportedly Deployed
The FBI is set to deploy its agents to conduct night patrols in the nation's capital, according to multiple reports, as President Donald Trump said that homeless people living in the nation's capital would 'have to move out, IMMEDIATELY,' ahead of a planned press conference where he will address his claims that violent crime is widespread in the nation's capital, despite federal data indicating crime rates have fallen to historic lows. The president claimed Washington, D.C., had become "one of the most dangerous cities anywhere in the world," despite federal data indicating crime fell to historic lows. Copyright 2025 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. According to the New York Times and the Washington Post, the administration will pull 120 FBI agents, primarily from the agency's Washington field office, from their regular duty and deploy them on night patrol duty with local law enforcement officers to tackle street crime. A White House press conference on Monday will 'essentially stop violent crime' in Washington, D.C., Trump wrote on Truth Social, claiming the city had become 'one of the most dangerous' in the world. Trump said the press conference would take place at 10 a.m. on Monday, and would focus on 'ending the Crime, Murder, and Death in our Nation's Capital.' 'The Homeless have to move out, IMMEDIATELY,' Trump wrote in a post on Truth Social accompanied by images of a few tents and refuse scattered on the side of the road and the steps of a building, adding 'we will give you places to stay, but FAR from the Capital.' Trump said his plans in D.C. include also 'beautification' efforts, and took the opportunity again to lambast the Federal Reserve for their yearslong headquarters renovation and ballooning budget of at least $2.5 billion on the project. Trump has claimed in recent months that violent crime was rampant in Washington, D.C., and has threatened to deploy the National Guard and have the city be taken over by the federal government, writing earlier this week that if 'D.C. doesn't get its act together, we will have no choice but to take Federal control of the city.' Violent crime rates in Washington, D.C., dropped 35% from 2023 to 2024, marking the lowest rates recorded in more than 30 years, according to the Justice Department. According to data released Aug. 8 by the Metropolitan Police Department, violent crime rates have continued to fall in 2025, with violent crime down 26% year-over-year. The MPD said homicide rates have dropped 12% on the year so far, sex abuse by 49%, assault with a dangerous weapon by 20% and robbery by 28%. Property crime rates have also fallen, including burglary (19%), theft from vehicles (4%) and other theft crimes (6%). However, Trump continued to insist Sunday that the crime numbers keep rising. 'The Mayor of D.C., Muriel Bowser, is a good person who has tried, but she has been given many chances, and the Crime Numbers get worse, and the City only gets dirtier and less attractive,' the president wrote on Truth Social. 'The American Public is not going to put up with it any longer.' Why Does Trump Want A Federal Takeover Of D.c.? Trump previously called for the federal government to take control of Washington, D.C., by falsely claiming violent crime rates were rising in the city. His latest calls follow an attack on a high-ranking member of the Department of Government Efficiency, as Trump wrote on Truth Social that crime in D.C. was 'out of control' and the federal government would 'put criminals on notice that they're not going to get away with it anymore.' MPD said two 15-year-old suspects were arrested and charged with unarmed carjacking, after Edward Coristine was assaulted in the early morning of Aug. 3. Bowser said that although the incident was unfortunate, crime in the city was already trending lower for the month. 'We had one of the lowest crime levels in shootings in a July in recent history,' the mayor said, later adding that carjackings fell 50% after spiking in 2023, and are still falling this year. It's not immediately clear whether Trump would bring in the National Guard, though the White House said in a statement that agents from some law enforcement agencies, including the FBI, the U.S. Marshals Service, the Drug Enforcement Administration, immigration police and a dozen other offices were deployed early Friday. It's not immediately clear where or how many agents were deployed, though the White House said deployment was focused on 'high traffic areas and other known hotspots.' Officials will be 'identified, in marked units, and highly visible.' Bowser said she was concerned that deploying the National Guard would not be the most 'efficient' use of their time, explaining Sunday 'they're not law enforcement officials. These are men and women who leave their families to serve our country, and that is just not their primary role—to enforce local laws.' Earlier this year, Trump deployed about 4,000 National Guardsmen to Los Angeles in response to protests against Immigration and Customs Enforcement raids. Could Trump Order A Federal Takeover Of D.c.? Trump could lobby support for federal control of Washington, D.C., though doing so would require approval from Congress, which would need to vote to repeal the 1973 Home Rule Act. The law established a legal framework for city residents to elect local officials, including a mayor and city council, to manage city business. A bill to repeal the Home Rule Act was introduced by Rep. Andrew Ogles, R-Tenn., in February, though the legislation has yet to move forward. Jeanine Pirro, the U.S. attorney for Washington, D.C., told Fox News she would 'totally' support Trump if he sought a federal takeover, adding, 'If that's what we need to do to get it done, that's what he should do.' Trump has said he would support a federal takeover of the MPD, falsely claiming the crime rate in the city was 'ridiculous,' though legal experts have said this would likely be challenged in court. On Sunday, Bowser said that the president could only take over the MPD if specific conditions were met. 'None of those conditions exist in our city right now. As I mentioned, we are not experiencing a spike in crime, in fact, we're watching our crime numbers go down.' Key Background Trump proposed the federal government's takeover of Washington, D.C., multiple times during his presidential campaign last year. He met with Mayor Muriel Bowser at his Mar-a-Lago property in December, during which Bowser said the pair discussed 'shared priorities.' Bowser has not directly addressed Trump's false claims of violent crime rates rising in the city, though she said in February that Washington, D.C. was a 'world-class city' and noted the city holds a AAA bond rating from Moody's and that violent crime was at a 30-year low. Bowser and Trump previously clashed in 2020, when Trump deployed the National Guard to the city as protests enveloped the city and others in the wake of George Floyd's murder. Are Federal Law Enforcement Agents Already Operating In D.c.? About 450 federal law enforcement agents were already deployed in D.C. and making arrests, FOX 5 DC reported. Law enforcement has not released official numbers for arrests. However, they reportedly include an individual detained for carrying a handgun without a license, a person driving on a suspended license and people riding dirt bikes in a park. Three guns were seized, including one that was stolen. 'We are not experiencing a crime spike. We do know that this task force has been focused on quality of life issues,' Bowser said Sunday. After reviewing the reported arrests, the mayor said 'that sounds like a typical MPD rundown of arrests that I review on a daily basis.' Forbes Trump Says Federal Government Should 'Take Over' And Run Washington, D.C. By Siladitya Ray
