logo
The Internet Is Probably Telling You That Filing A Specific Privacy Complaint Can Wipe Out Your Student Loans. Here's What You Need To Know

The Internet Is Probably Telling You That Filing A Specific Privacy Complaint Can Wipe Out Your Student Loans. Here's What You Need To Know

Yahoo15-02-2025
If you have federal student loans and aren't a fan of President — oops, I mean "First Buddy" — Elon Musk and the DOGE bros potentially accessing your personal data, chances are you're seeing a lot of posts like this on social media:
All over the internet, and especially on TikTok, people are advising student loan borrowers to file FERPA complaints to get their debts cleared. But since TikTok trends and accurate legal and financial advice don't often go hand in hand, I had to learn more about what's really going on here.
In a nutshell, the argument goes that Elon Musk and DOGE accessed student loan borrower information without our consent, so people claim that we have the right under FERPA to file a complaint and get our loans wiped away.
Separately, the University of California Students Association filed a federal suit to block DOGE from accessing student financial aid data, citing the Privacy Act of 1974. A judge has paused DOGE's access to this data, but the hold is set to end on Monday.
Democratic senators have also begun to take some action around this. Last week, 16 senators headed up by Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer started a probe into DOGE's access to student loan data.
So, does this viral student loan discharge theory hold water? Thankfully, there is someone on TikTok who has the expertise to clear things up. Jay Fleischman (@moneywiselawyer), a lawyer with 25 years of experience in consumer law, is going viral for sharing why he thinks these FERPA complaints won't have the desired effect. In a video that's been viewed over 2 million times as of this writing, he starts by explaining what FERPA even is.
"FERPA is short for the Federal Education Rights and Privacy Act, which prevents your student information from being disclosed to third parties," Fleischman says. However, he goes on to explain that "There is no private right of action, no right for an individual to sue for violations of FERPA. The US Supreme Court actually decided the case in 2002 in a case called Gonzaga v. Doe. In that case, the US Supreme Court ruled that individuals do not have the right to sue for a violation of FERPA."
You can read the Department of Education's page on FERPA here.
He concludes the video by saying, "So if you're going to file a lawsuit for violations of FERPA, you're not going anywhere. You're going to waste your time, you're going to waste your money, you're going to get thrown out of court because there's no private right of action, no right for an individual to sue for a violation of FERPA."
A lot of commenters were (understandably) like, well, then, what the heck is FERPA even good for?!? So Fleischman made a follow-up video explaining exactly that. "In the case of FERPA, the right to sue for violations and the right to take enforcement actions for violations of FERPA falls to the federal government. So it would be the US Department of Education that would seek to enforce FERPA against an individual or party that violates it, or it would be the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau that would seek to enforce FERPA against people who violate it."
If you've been paying attention to the news in the last few weeks, you unfortunately know where this is going. He concludes by saying, "Well, with the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau basically shuttered, and with the Department of Education being rapidly downsized on the way to the administration trying to shutter it, there's not going to be anybody to enforce your rights. Your consumer protection rights under FERPA do not exist in the absence of a government that is ready, willing, and able to enforce those rights on your behalf."
Next, to learn more about what borrowers should actually do right now, I spoke with Natalia Abrams, President and Founder, and Sabrina Calazans, Executive Director, at the Student Debt Crisis Center.
The Student Debt Crisis Center is a nonprofit that highlights borrowers' stories and educates borrowers about their options and rights while advocating for the ultimate goal of canceling student debt and ending the student debt crisis.
First of all, they agreed that a FERPA complaint is not likely to get rid of your student loans. Abrams said, "We've never seen a claim where there has been debt relief or individualized relief from a FERPA claim." She also pointed me to a recent tweet from the Office of Federal Student Aid assuring borrowers that their data has not been accessed unlawfully.
You can read the Student Aid privacy policy, which, as of this writing, was last updated on February 12, 2025, here.
Calazans chimed in, saying, "There's a lot of misinformation spreading right now about everything related to the Department of Education. What happens if the Department of Education is dismantled or abolished? What happens to my debt? It does not go away, to our understanding. It just will pass on to either the Department of Treasury or maybe private lenders."
So, what should borrowers do right now? Abrams says that the main thing is to keep on top of payments. "We don't want people to miss a lot of payments, thinking that [their debt] is gone and then end up in a worse situation. As much as we want to find that holy grail that cancels all of the debt — we've long fought for that, and we got very close under the last administration — smarter folks than us in terms of attorney groups are looking into every angle they can to pull those levers."
Abrams went on to say, "If you're struggling to make your payment, there are what's called income-driven repayment programs that base your payment on your income versus the overall loan amount that can help people that are struggling to make their payment right now."
In 2023, the Biden administration introduced a new income-driven plan called the SAVE plan that set certain lower-income borrowers up for $0 monthly payments with no interest accruing. However, that plan has since been tied up in the courts with millions of borrowers still waiting to find out what will happen.
Abrams explained, "You can still technically enroll in the SAVE program and then be included in that forbearance. I'd caution a bit, because that could take up to two months, and we don't know where the status will be of the lawsuits in two months." Calazans added that, as of now, enrolling in the SAVE program also halts progress in plans like public service student loan forgiveness, so for that reason, they recommend sticking to other income-driven plans.
Calazans added another crucial step for borrowers to take right now. "We've also been encouraging folks to document any information that they have regarding their accounts. So they should log into studentaid.gov, and they should document what repayment plan they're in, their servicer, and their balance. All of that information is really critical so that you know where things stand. We don't know if the website's going to be pulled down. We don't know what they're going to take off of the website. So, it is important for folks to have that information."
Finally, Abrams said, "More chaos is not the answer for student loan borrowers that have been in chaotic times for years now ever since people thought their debt was going to be canceled, and then that was held up in the courts — and then this new SAVE plan and that was held up in the court. Borrowers need clarity and to be able to see the light at the end of the tunnel. And that's really hard when there's so many unknowns."
The Student Debt Crisis Center has authored a letter on Action Network that you can use to urge your representatives in Congress to stand with student loan borrowers and defend the Department of Education.
Do you have federal student loans, and what do you think about this whole situation? Tell us your thoughts in the comments.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Federal regulators probe Tesla over not properly reporting crashes involving Autopilot and Full Self-Driving
Federal regulators probe Tesla over not properly reporting crashes involving Autopilot and Full Self-Driving

Business Insider

time15 minutes ago

  • Business Insider

Federal regulators probe Tesla over not properly reporting crashes involving Autopilot and Full Self-Driving

Tesla is once again in the crosshairs of federal regulators. The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration announced Wednesday that it is investigating allegations that Tesla is not correctly reporting crashes involving its Autopilot and Full Self-Driving systems. In the probe notice, the NHTSA said that car companies are required to report crashes involving autonomous or advanced driver assistance systems within five days of being notified of them. The regulator alleged that Tesla submitted reports months after the incident, sometimes in batches or on a rolling basis. "Preliminary engagement between [Office of Defects Investigation] and Tesla on the issue indicates that the timing of the reports was due to an issue with Tesla's data collection, which, according to Tesla, has now been fixed," according to the NHTSA's notice. "NHTSA is opening this Audit Query, a standard process for reviewing compliance with legal requirements, to evaluate the cause of the potential delays in reporting, the scope of any such delays, and the mitigations that Tesla has developed to address them." The NHTSA did not immediately respond to a request for comment. Dan O'Dowd, founder of The Dawn Project, a tech safety advocacy group, pointed out to Business Insider that according to Tesla's crash-counting methodology listed on its website, the company only counts crashes involving airbag deployments and if Autopilot was engaged within five seconds before the crash. Tesla did not immediately respond to a request for comment. In 2022, the NHTSA said it was investigating Tesla's Model 3 and Model Y vehicles over an alleged phenomenon known as " phantom braking," which is when the vehicle suddenly slams on the brakes for no reason, often at high speeds. In 2020, Tesla CEO Elon Musk said on what was then Twitter that phantom braking would be fixed in a coming software update, but he has not commented further since then. On August 1, a Florida judge ordered Tesla to pay $242 million in damages after finding the EV partly to blame for a 2019 crash that killed a 22-year-old woman and seriously injured her boyfriend. The driver was using Autopilot and had briefly looked away when the crash took place. Musk said on X that the company would appeal the decision. Another lawsuit brought by California's Department of Motor Vehicles alleges that Tesla's use of language in advertising Autopilot and FSD has misled consumers into thinking the vehicles are more autonomous than they really are. The case could see Tesla's right to sell in California suspended for at least 30 days. Attorney Matthew Benedetto, a member of Tesla's legal team, denied the allegations and told an administrative judge last month that the company informed customers that they "cannot fully rely" on FSD or Autopilot.

TikTok employees raised concerns that app could be addictive, unsealed edited video shows
TikTok employees raised concerns that app could be addictive, unsealed edited video shows

CBS News

time15 minutes ago

  • CBS News

TikTok employees raised concerns that app could be addictive, unsealed edited video shows

Newly unsealed and edited video shows TikTok employees and consultants expressing concern that potentially addictive features of the app could harm users' mental health. The video compilation, which was shared with CBS News by the North Carolina Department of Justice, is part of the evidence in a 2024 lawsuit the state's former attorney general and other prosecutors filed against TikTok alleging the company misled the public about the safety of the social media platform. North Carolina Special Superior Court Judge Adam Conrad on Tuesday ordered that the video and complaint be unsealed. In a separate ruling, he also denied a motion by TikTok's parent company, China-based ByteDance, to dismiss the North Carolina lawsuit. "These clips clearly show that social media companies know they're designing their apps to hook our children even at the expense of their health," said North Carolina Attorney General Jeff Jackson in a statement to CBS News. "That's why the company fought so hard to keep the video out of the public eye." A TikTok spokesperson called the video a "shameful attempt to distort an open internal conversation about making the platform safer when TikTok was just beginning five years ago," in a statement to CBS MoneyWatch. "This manipulation relies on conversations taken out of context with the sole purpose of misleading the public and grandstanding," he added. The spokesperson also said that TikTok has over 70 features and settings designed to support the safety and well-being of teens and other app users. Those features include a 60-minute daily screen time limit and another that automatically triggers a guided meditation exercise after 10 p.m. for teen users scrolling on TikTok. In a complaint issued in October 2024, former North Carolina Attorney General Joshua Stein alleged TikTok's design fosters "excessive, compulsive and addictive use" and that the company knew about the harm it was causing. Stein also claimed that TikTok ignored the addictive nature of the app "because their business model and desire for advertising revenue require keeping consumers on the app as much as possible." The lawsuit is part of broader litigation against TikTok over allegations that it is harmful to children's mental health brought by 14 state attorney generals last year. Minnesota's attorney general joined the fight this week with a separate lawsuit. TikTok has denied the claims. "We strongly disagree with these claims, many of which we believe to be inaccurate and misleading," a TikTok spokesperson said in a statement to CBS MoneyWatch at the time. "We're proud of and remain deeply committed to the work we've done to protect teens and we will continue to update and improve our product." The 3 1/2-minute video released this week features a series of clips of internal company meetings, with speakers describing what they viewed as harmful features of the TikTok app, including some that promote "compulsive use." The meetings featured in the video took place a few years ago, according to a spokesperson for the North Carolina Department of Justice, who said they were unable to disclose the exact dates. "We obviously wanted people to spend as much time as possible on TikTok, which can be in contrast to what is best for your mental health," said Ally Mann, whose LinkedIn profile lists her as a creator marketing and events lead at TikTok. In a separate clip, Ashlen Sepulveda, who is labeled in the video as working on trust and safety at the company, explains potential pitfalls of the TikTok algorithm which she says selects content based on users' searches. "Let's say for eating disorders, for example," Sepulveda said in the video. "The more the user looks up things about fitness or diet, it turns into losing weight and then soon enough the entire 'for you' feed for this user is really soft disordered eating behavior that is being discussed by their peers with no opportunity to remove themselves from that bubble." In another clip, Brett Peters, who is global head of creator advocacy and reputation at TikTok, according to his LinkedIn profile, said TikTok's goal is to produce such a diversity of content that "you never want to leave" the app. Sixty-three percent of teens said they used TikTok in 2023, according to Pew Research Center poll. Meanwhile, TikTok continues to face an uncertain future as it stares down an approaching deadline, recently extended to Sept. 17 by President Trump, requiring the app to separate from its China-based parent company or be banned in the U.S.

OpenAI lawyers question Meta's role in Elon Musk's $97B takeover bid
OpenAI lawyers question Meta's role in Elon Musk's $97B takeover bid

Yahoo

time20 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

OpenAI lawyers question Meta's role in Elon Musk's $97B takeover bid

OpenAI is asking Meta to produce evidence related to any coordination with Elon Musk and xAI to acquire or invest in the ChatGPT-maker. The request was made public in a brief filed Thursday in Elon Musk's ongoing lawsuit against OpenAI. Lawyers representing OpenAI said they subpoenaed Meta in June for documents related to its potential involvement in Musk's unsolicited, $97 billion bid to takeover the startup in February. It's unclear from the filing whether such evidence exists. OpenAI's lawyers say they discovered that Musk communicated with Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg concerning xAI's bid to purchase the ChatGPT-maker, including 'about potential financing arrangements or investments.' Meta objected to OpenAI's initial subpoena in July; the ChatGPT-maker's lawyers are now seeking a court order to obtain such evidence. OpenAI is also asking the court for any of Meta's documents and communications related to 'any actual or potential restructuring or recapitalization of OpenAI' — the core issue in Musk's lawsuit against OpenAI. In the background of OpenAI's fight with Elon Musk, Meta has significantly invested in its own efforts to develop frontier AI models. That effort has included poaching several of OpenAI's leading AI researchers, including a co-creator of ChatGPT, Shengjia Zhao, who now leads research efforts at Meta Superintelligence Labs, the company's newest AI unit. Meta also invested $14 billion in Scale AI, and reportedly approached several other AI labs about acquisition deals. Lawyers representing Meta asked the court to reject OpenAI's request for evidence, arguing that Musk and xAI can provide any relevant information. Meta also argues that its internal discussions of OpenAI's restructuring and recapitalization are not relevant to the case. This is a developing story… Check back for updates.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store