The Internet Is Probably Telling You That Filing A Specific Privacy Complaint Can Wipe Out Your Student Loans. Here's What You Need To Know
If you have federal student loans and aren't a fan of President — oops, I mean "First Buddy" — Elon Musk and the DOGE bros potentially accessing your personal data, chances are you're seeing a lot of posts like this on social media:
All over the internet, and especially on TikTok, people are advising student loan borrowers to file FERPA complaints to get their debts cleared. But since TikTok trends and accurate legal and financial advice don't often go hand in hand, I had to learn more about what's really going on here.
In a nutshell, the argument goes that Elon Musk and DOGE accessed student loan borrower information without our consent, so people claim that we have the right under FERPA to file a complaint and get our loans wiped away.
Separately, the University of California Students Association filed a federal suit to block DOGE from accessing student financial aid data, citing the Privacy Act of 1974. A judge has paused DOGE's access to this data, but the hold is set to end on Monday.
Democratic senators have also begun to take some action around this. Last week, 16 senators headed up by Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer started a probe into DOGE's access to student loan data.
So, does this viral student loan discharge theory hold water? Thankfully, there is someone on TikTok who has the expertise to clear things up. Jay Fleischman (@moneywiselawyer), a lawyer with 25 years of experience in consumer law, is going viral for sharing why he thinks these FERPA complaints won't have the desired effect. In a video that's been viewed over 2 million times as of this writing, he starts by explaining what FERPA even is.
"FERPA is short for the Federal Education Rights and Privacy Act, which prevents your student information from being disclosed to third parties," Fleischman says. However, he goes on to explain that "There is no private right of action, no right for an individual to sue for violations of FERPA. The US Supreme Court actually decided the case in 2002 in a case called Gonzaga v. Doe. In that case, the US Supreme Court ruled that individuals do not have the right to sue for a violation of FERPA."
You can read the Department of Education's page on FERPA here.
He concludes the video by saying, "So if you're going to file a lawsuit for violations of FERPA, you're not going anywhere. You're going to waste your time, you're going to waste your money, you're going to get thrown out of court because there's no private right of action, no right for an individual to sue for a violation of FERPA."
A lot of commenters were (understandably) like, well, then, what the heck is FERPA even good for?!? So Fleischman made a follow-up video explaining exactly that. "In the case of FERPA, the right to sue for violations and the right to take enforcement actions for violations of FERPA falls to the federal government. So it would be the US Department of Education that would seek to enforce FERPA against an individual or party that violates it, or it would be the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau that would seek to enforce FERPA against people who violate it."
If you've been paying attention to the news in the last few weeks, you unfortunately know where this is going. He concludes by saying, "Well, with the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau basically shuttered, and with the Department of Education being rapidly downsized on the way to the administration trying to shutter it, there's not going to be anybody to enforce your rights. Your consumer protection rights under FERPA do not exist in the absence of a government that is ready, willing, and able to enforce those rights on your behalf."
Next, to learn more about what borrowers should actually do right now, I spoke with Natalia Abrams, President and Founder, and Sabrina Calazans, Executive Director, at the Student Debt Crisis Center.
The Student Debt Crisis Center is a nonprofit that highlights borrowers' stories and educates borrowers about their options and rights while advocating for the ultimate goal of canceling student debt and ending the student debt crisis.
First of all, they agreed that a FERPA complaint is not likely to get rid of your student loans. Abrams said, "We've never seen a claim where there has been debt relief or individualized relief from a FERPA claim." She also pointed me to a recent tweet from the Office of Federal Student Aid assuring borrowers that their data has not been accessed unlawfully.
You can read the Student Aid privacy policy, which, as of this writing, was last updated on February 12, 2025, here.
Calazans chimed in, saying, "There's a lot of misinformation spreading right now about everything related to the Department of Education. What happens if the Department of Education is dismantled or abolished? What happens to my debt? It does not go away, to our understanding. It just will pass on to either the Department of Treasury or maybe private lenders."
So, what should borrowers do right now? Abrams says that the main thing is to keep on top of payments. "We don't want people to miss a lot of payments, thinking that [their debt] is gone and then end up in a worse situation. As much as we want to find that holy grail that cancels all of the debt — we've long fought for that, and we got very close under the last administration — smarter folks than us in terms of attorney groups are looking into every angle they can to pull those levers."
Abrams went on to say, "If you're struggling to make your payment, there are what's called income-driven repayment programs that base your payment on your income versus the overall loan amount that can help people that are struggling to make their payment right now."
In 2023, the Biden administration introduced a new income-driven plan called the SAVE plan that set certain lower-income borrowers up for $0 monthly payments with no interest accruing. However, that plan has since been tied up in the courts with millions of borrowers still waiting to find out what will happen.
Abrams explained, "You can still technically enroll in the SAVE program and then be included in that forbearance. I'd caution a bit, because that could take up to two months, and we don't know where the status will be of the lawsuits in two months." Calazans added that, as of now, enrolling in the SAVE program also halts progress in plans like public service student loan forgiveness, so for that reason, they recommend sticking to other income-driven plans.
Calazans added another crucial step for borrowers to take right now. "We've also been encouraging folks to document any information that they have regarding their accounts. So they should log into studentaid.gov, and they should document what repayment plan they're in, their servicer, and their balance. All of that information is really critical so that you know where things stand. We don't know if the website's going to be pulled down. We don't know what they're going to take off of the website. So, it is important for folks to have that information."
Finally, Abrams said, "More chaos is not the answer for student loan borrowers that have been in chaotic times for years now ever since people thought their debt was going to be canceled, and then that was held up in the courts — and then this new SAVE plan and that was held up in the court. Borrowers need clarity and to be able to see the light at the end of the tunnel. And that's really hard when there's so many unknowns."
The Student Debt Crisis Center has authored a letter on Action Network that you can use to urge your representatives in Congress to stand with student loan borrowers and defend the Department of Education.
Do you have federal student loans, and what do you think about this whole situation? Tell us your thoughts in the comments.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


CNBC
28 minutes ago
- CNBC
Why Elon Musk turned against Trump's $5 trillion mega tax and spending bill
President Donald Trump is pushing to pass a sweeping tax and spending bill by July 4, but the proposal is already sparking fierce internal GOP debate. The bill combines 2017 tax cut extensions with new Trump-era proposals, including deductions on American-made auto loans and changes to child tax credits. But not everyone is on board. Elon Musk has launched a high-profile feud with Trump over the bill, and key Republican senators are warning that the bill could add trillions to the national debt.


New York Post
28 minutes ago
- New York Post
ChatGPT user creeped out after AI shares others' info — in yet another eerie episode: ‘Very scary'
AI, yi, yi. With artificial intelligence becoming omnipresent in every sector of life, privacy has become a growing concern among users, wondering where the details they share with the machines are winding up. One woman, who recently used ChatGPT to make a grocery list, was shocked to see the bot get its wires crossed — delivering a message she thinks she wasn't meant to see. 3 'It seems like I mistakenly mixed up the context from a different conversation or account,' said the chatbot when confronted over the alleged leak. AlexPhotoStock – 'I'm having a really very scary and concerning moment with ChatGPT right now,' the TikTok user Liz — who goes by @wishmeluckliz ‚ confessed in a viral video detailing the eerie-sounding episode. Liz claimed that 'somebody else's conversation' infiltrated her thread — and that even the trendy tool told her that this is what had transpired, even though skeptics believe it could be a creepy coincidence. The Post has reached out to ChatGPT's parent company OpenAI for comment. According to the clip, the cybernetic eavesdropping occurred while the content creator was using the AI's voice mode — wherein users can converse with the service — to help facilitate food shopping. However, after rattling off her list of needs, Liz forgot to turn the recorder off and left it running even though she remained silent for a 'long time' afterward, per the clip. 3 Liz called the apparent slip-up 'very scary.' TikTok/@wishmeluckliz Despite the lack of input, the Chat service replied with a seemingly unrelated message that was so jarring that Liz had to double-check via the transcription to make sure she wasn't imagining it. The message read, per a screenshot: 'Hello, Lindsey and Robert, it seems like you're introducing a presentation or a symposium. Is there something specific you'd like assistance with regarding the content or perhaps help with structuring your talk or slides? Let me know how I can assist.'' Liz found the reply bizarre given that she 'never said anything leading up to this.' After retracing the transcript, she realized that the bot had somehow recorded her saying that she was a woman named Lindsey May, who claimed to be the Vice President of Google, and was giving a symposium with another man named Robert. Confused, she broached the issue to GPT in voice mode, saying, 'I was just randomly sitting here planning groceries, and you asked if Lindsey and Robert needed help with their symposium. I'm not Lindsey and Robert. Am I getting my wires crossed with another account right now?' The bot replied, 'It seems like I mistakenly mixed up the context from a different conversation or account. You're not Lindsey and Robert and that message was meant for someone else.' 3 A screenshot of the unrelated message generated by the chatbot. TikTok/@wishmeluckliz 'Thanks for pointing that out and I apologize for the confusion,' it added, seemingly confessing to leaking someone else's private information. Shaken by the apparent admission, Liz said that she hoped she was 'overreacting and that there's a simple explanation for this.' While some TikTok viewers shared her concern of a potential privacy breach, techsperts believe that the bot could've been hallucinating based on patterns in its training data, which is based in part in user input. 'This is spooky — but not unheard of,' assured one AI expert and programmer. 'When you leave voice mode on but don't speak, the model will attempt to extract language from the audio — in the absence of spoken word it will hallucinate.' They added, 'It also isn't crossing wires, but is oriented towards hallucinating in agreement, so you suggested that wires got crossed and it agreed with you in an attempt to successfully 'answer your query.'' On Reddit, AI aficionados cited multiple instances where the bot would reply unprompted. 'Why does it keep transcribing 'Thank you for watching!' when I use voice recorder but am not saying anything?' said one. While seemingly harmless in these cases, hallucinating AI Chatbots can offer dangerous disinformation to humans. Google's AI Overviews, designed to give quick answers to search queries, has been guilty of multiple slips of the technological tongue, including one instance where it advised adding glue to pizza sauce to help cheese stick better. During another case, the AI bot billed a fake phrase — 'You can't lick a badger twice' — as a legitimate idiom.


Fox News
33 minutes ago
- Fox News
State Department reveals plan to deliver 'life-saving' meals to 1.4M starving children
FIRST ON FOX: The U.S. State Department and Secretary Marco Rubio punched back at claims that contracts providing Ready-to-Use Therapeutic Foods (RUTFs) have been halted and affirmed the agency will continue its commitment to "delivering critical humanitarian aid." "As USAID transitions under the State Department, our commitment to delivering critical humanitarian aid remains steadfast and aligned with America's foreign policy priorities," a senior State Department official told Fox News Digital in an exclusive statement. "We are proud to continue working with our local partners to deliver life-saving ready-to-use therapeutic food. Most recently, an additional $50 million in RUTFs was approved. This is enough to nourish over one million of the world's most vulnerable children." RUFTs' contracts and operations were previously overseen by the United States Agency for International Development (USAID). However, oversight now lies with the State Department after USAID merged into the agency in February, largely influenced by then-Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) head Elon Musk. RUTFs are pre-packaged, nutrient-rich, ready-to-eat meals that help prevent malnutrition, mainly in children. Some countries even refer to RUTFs as a form of medicine. The State Department's comments come after Secretary Rubio faced questions from lawmakers on Capitol Hill in a May hearing, when Democratic Rep. Gabe Amo of Rhode Island confronted Rubio in a heated exchange, saying the agency was intentionally "freezing" RUTF aid to countries in need. "You need to figure out why they're not moving, because it isn't an impediment for us," Rubio fired back. Amo responded, "No, you need to figure [that] out, sir," and said that the secretary "refused to make" a commitment to ensuring effective RUTF distribution. "We're going to continue to do food aid," Rubio answered. "We're going to do more food aid than any other country on the planet, times 10." A source at the State Department revealed to Fox News Digital that key partnerships with non-profit RUTF producers, MANA and Edesia, have been active since March 2. Additionally, 1.4 million boxes of RUTFs were approved on May 26. Fox also obtained an internal document and action memorandum for Jeremy Lewin, a former DOGE employee now overseeing the transition of merging USAID with the State Department, from USAID's Dianna Darney de Salcedo. The document called for urgent approval to move food commodities and RUFTs that were stored in warehouses to be shipped for use. The sensitive but unclassified document also revealed a request to approve a new Title II award, valued at $35 million, which sources say was several times less than initially estimated, to cover the costs of warehouses, shipping overseas, transporting inland, programming and distribution. Fox News Digital spoke to MANA CEO Mark Moore, who outlined a detailed timeline of RUTF federal contract negotiations and the challenges the non-profit faced as USAID merged into the State Department at the beginning of 2025. At one point, before the State Department and the Trump administration proposed contracts in May, Moore told Fox News, "We're all looking at June and July running out of these old contracts and saying we're just going to have to close the doors." He noted that "if this new order didn't come out, we'd really be screwed going into the summer." "It is trending the right way, and we're thrilled," Moore added. Fox News Digital reached out to Rep. Gabe Amo and Edesia but did not receive a response. Preston Mizell is a writer with Fox News Digital covering breaking news. Story tips can be sent to and on X @MizellPreston