The Internet Is Probably Telling You That Filing A Specific Privacy Complaint Can Wipe Out Your Student Loans. Here's What You Need To Know
If you have federal student loans and aren't a fan of President — oops, I mean "First Buddy" — Elon Musk and the DOGE bros potentially accessing your personal data, chances are you're seeing a lot of posts like this on social media:
All over the internet, and especially on TikTok, people are advising student loan borrowers to file FERPA complaints to get their debts cleared. But since TikTok trends and accurate legal and financial advice don't often go hand in hand, I had to learn more about what's really going on here.
In a nutshell, the argument goes that Elon Musk and DOGE accessed student loan borrower information without our consent, so people claim that we have the right under FERPA to file a complaint and get our loans wiped away.
Separately, the University of California Students Association filed a federal suit to block DOGE from accessing student financial aid data, citing the Privacy Act of 1974. A judge has paused DOGE's access to this data, but the hold is set to end on Monday.
Democratic senators have also begun to take some action around this. Last week, 16 senators headed up by Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer started a probe into DOGE's access to student loan data.
So, does this viral student loan discharge theory hold water? Thankfully, there is someone on TikTok who has the expertise to clear things up. Jay Fleischman (@moneywiselawyer), a lawyer with 25 years of experience in consumer law, is going viral for sharing why he thinks these FERPA complaints won't have the desired effect. In a video that's been viewed over 2 million times as of this writing, he starts by explaining what FERPA even is.
"FERPA is short for the Federal Education Rights and Privacy Act, which prevents your student information from being disclosed to third parties," Fleischman says. However, he goes on to explain that "There is no private right of action, no right for an individual to sue for violations of FERPA. The US Supreme Court actually decided the case in 2002 in a case called Gonzaga v. Doe. In that case, the US Supreme Court ruled that individuals do not have the right to sue for a violation of FERPA."
You can read the Department of Education's page on FERPA here.
He concludes the video by saying, "So if you're going to file a lawsuit for violations of FERPA, you're not going anywhere. You're going to waste your time, you're going to waste your money, you're going to get thrown out of court because there's no private right of action, no right for an individual to sue for a violation of FERPA."
A lot of commenters were (understandably) like, well, then, what the heck is FERPA even good for?!? So Fleischman made a follow-up video explaining exactly that. "In the case of FERPA, the right to sue for violations and the right to take enforcement actions for violations of FERPA falls to the federal government. So it would be the US Department of Education that would seek to enforce FERPA against an individual or party that violates it, or it would be the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau that would seek to enforce FERPA against people who violate it."
If you've been paying attention to the news in the last few weeks, you unfortunately know where this is going. He concludes by saying, "Well, with the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau basically shuttered, and with the Department of Education being rapidly downsized on the way to the administration trying to shutter it, there's not going to be anybody to enforce your rights. Your consumer protection rights under FERPA do not exist in the absence of a government that is ready, willing, and able to enforce those rights on your behalf."
Next, to learn more about what borrowers should actually do right now, I spoke with Natalia Abrams, President and Founder, and Sabrina Calazans, Executive Director, at the Student Debt Crisis Center.
The Student Debt Crisis Center is a nonprofit that highlights borrowers' stories and educates borrowers about their options and rights while advocating for the ultimate goal of canceling student debt and ending the student debt crisis.
First of all, they agreed that a FERPA complaint is not likely to get rid of your student loans. Abrams said, "We've never seen a claim where there has been debt relief or individualized relief from a FERPA claim." She also pointed me to a recent tweet from the Office of Federal Student Aid assuring borrowers that their data has not been accessed unlawfully.
You can read the Student Aid privacy policy, which, as of this writing, was last updated on February 12, 2025, here.
Calazans chimed in, saying, "There's a lot of misinformation spreading right now about everything related to the Department of Education. What happens if the Department of Education is dismantled or abolished? What happens to my debt? It does not go away, to our understanding. It just will pass on to either the Department of Treasury or maybe private lenders."
So, what should borrowers do right now? Abrams says that the main thing is to keep on top of payments. "We don't want people to miss a lot of payments, thinking that [their debt] is gone and then end up in a worse situation. As much as we want to find that holy grail that cancels all of the debt — we've long fought for that, and we got very close under the last administration — smarter folks than us in terms of attorney groups are looking into every angle they can to pull those levers."
Abrams went on to say, "If you're struggling to make your payment, there are what's called income-driven repayment programs that base your payment on your income versus the overall loan amount that can help people that are struggling to make their payment right now."
In 2023, the Biden administration introduced a new income-driven plan called the SAVE plan that set certain lower-income borrowers up for $0 monthly payments with no interest accruing. However, that plan has since been tied up in the courts with millions of borrowers still waiting to find out what will happen.
Abrams explained, "You can still technically enroll in the SAVE program and then be included in that forbearance. I'd caution a bit, because that could take up to two months, and we don't know where the status will be of the lawsuits in two months." Calazans added that, as of now, enrolling in the SAVE program also halts progress in plans like public service student loan forgiveness, so for that reason, they recommend sticking to other income-driven plans.
Calazans added another crucial step for borrowers to take right now. "We've also been encouraging folks to document any information that they have regarding their accounts. So they should log into studentaid.gov, and they should document what repayment plan they're in, their servicer, and their balance. All of that information is really critical so that you know where things stand. We don't know if the website's going to be pulled down. We don't know what they're going to take off of the website. So, it is important for folks to have that information."
Finally, Abrams said, "More chaos is not the answer for student loan borrowers that have been in chaotic times for years now ever since people thought their debt was going to be canceled, and then that was held up in the courts — and then this new SAVE plan and that was held up in the court. Borrowers need clarity and to be able to see the light at the end of the tunnel. And that's really hard when there's so many unknowns."
The Student Debt Crisis Center has authored a letter on Action Network that you can use to urge your representatives in Congress to stand with student loan borrowers and defend the Department of Education.
Do you have federal student loans, and what do you think about this whole situation? Tell us your thoughts in the comments.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Newsweek
23 minutes ago
- Newsweek
'Musk Must Fall': Nationwide Protest to Take Place on Elon Musk's Birthday
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Mass protests across the country are being scheduled for Tesla CEO Elon Musk's birthday on June 28, led by the Tesla Takedown movement. Despite no longer being part of the government, Musk's Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) policies and his continued impact as a private citizen are still being felt across the country, from mass governmental layoffs to his involvement in running companies with large government contracts. The "Musk Must Fall" protests are planned for cities across the country, including in "red" states of Texas, Missouri, Georgia, and Ohio, with the Tesla Takedown team saying: "And our birthday gift to the Broligarch in Chief? A global party with one powerful message: Musk Must Fall." Tesla has been contacted via email for comment. New Yorkers gathered outside the Tesla dealership in the Meat Packing district in Manhattan to protest against Elon Musk and his actions with DOGE, 3/29/25. New Yorkers gathered outside the Tesla dealership in the Meat Packing district in Manhattan to protest against Elon Musk and his actions with DOGE, 3/29/25. Andrea Renault/STAR MAX/IPx Why It Matters Musk retains a lot of power over global politics as he is capable of endless donations to political parties and aiding in message amplification as the owner of X (formerly Twitter). According to public polls, he was an unpopular member of the Trump administration and, since leaving, has been in a public feud with President Donald Trump. Despite some political commentators recommending that Democrats try to win Musk and his billions over to their side, these protests show that Musk is still a deeply unpopular figure in American politics. What To Know Tesla Takedown protest in New York, March 29, 2025. Tesla Takedown protest in New York, March 29, 2025. Andrea Renault/STAR MAX/IPx Protests are planned for June 28 in 15 states: Virginia, California, Washington, Florida, Colorado, New Mexico, Nevada, Georgia, Maryland, Minnesota, Oregon, Texas, Idaho, Ohio, Missouri, as well as the District of Columbia. There are also protests planned overseas in the UK. These protests come amid a social media spat between President Trump and Musk. Musk has accused Trump of not being able to win the election without him, and Trump has threatened to pull government money for Musk's companies, such as SpaceX and Starlink. The Tesla Takedown team disputes the idea that Musk is no longer part of the current administration, saying: "Elon is still deeply tied to the Trump regime, still fueling conspiracies and fascist rhetoric, and still using his immense wealth to warp government policy and buy elections around the globe." These protests have been occurring outside of Tesla showrooms since Trump was inaugurated on January 20. Tesla Takedown is a non-violent movement and is not related to incidents in the U.S. where some Tesla cars and dealerships have been vandalized. The Trump administration has said that Tesla vandalism is "domestic terrorism," and the FBI has launched a task force to target attacks on Teslas and their dealerships. What People Are Saying Tesla Takedown: "On June 28—Elon's birthday—let's celebrate everything we've achieved and recommit to the long fight still ahead." An FBI spokesperson told Newsweek for a previous article: "The FBI is committed to protecting the U.S. from many threats including terrorism, violent crime, drug trafficking, and cyberattacks. We will continue to work closely with our law enforcement partners here in the U.S. and internationally to detect and counter potential dangers. All our work is focused on providing safer communities for our citizens every day." What Happens Next The protests will take place on June 28. Other anti-Trump protests are planned for June 14, Trump's birthday.


USA Today
23 minutes ago
- USA Today
Waymo suspends some Los Angeles service after cars torched in protests
Waymo suspends some Los Angeles service after cars torched in protests Show Caption Hide Caption National Guard and protesters clash over ICE raids Hundreds of demonstrators fought back with the National Guard and local authorities as ICE protests escalated. Waymo has temporarily suspended its ride hailing service in downtown Los Angeles after several of the company's self-driving cars were set on fire in immigration raid protests over the weekend. A Waymo spokesperson told USA TODAY on Monday morning, June 9, the company has removed its vehicles from downtown Los Angeles and is currently not serving the area "out of an abundance of caution." The spokesperson said the company is still operating in Los Angeles and is working in coordination with the Los Angeles Police Department. Members of the National Guard arrived in Los Angeles on June 8 after President Donald Trump ordered troops to quell protests against immigration crackdown in the city, a move that the state's Democratic governor has called unlawful. Footage shared on social media captured several Waymo driverless taxis engulfed in flames in the June 8 protests. Others were vandalized with messages against Trump and Immigration and Customs Enforcement, videos show. LAPD said around 9:15 p.m. EST that a portion of Los Angeles Street had been closed indefinitely after "multiple autonomous vehicles" had been set on fire. Live updates: Gov. Newsom blames Trump for unruly LA protests Video: Waymo cars set on fire during LA protests Protesters set Waymo cars on fire in Los Angeles anti-ICE protests Footage showed flames and thick smoke as demonstrators set Waymo cars on fire during an anti-ICE protest in Los Angeles on Sunday afternoon. Photos: Waymo cars engulfed in flames What are Waymo cars? Waymo cars are self-driving taxis operated by computers instead of humans. The company uses electric Jaguar I-PACE cars. According to Waymo, it completes more than 250,000 paid trips each week across four major U.S. cities: Phoenix, San Francisco, Los Angeles and Austin. Waymo said it is planning to expand to Atlanta, Miami and Washington, D.C. in 2026. The ride-hailing service is available through the Waymo One App, which allows customers to request a ride and indicate pick up and drop off locations. Is Waymo safe? Seeking solitude and safety, riders flock to robotaxis driven by computers Waymo, a subsidiary of Google's parent company Alphabet, launched service in Los Angeles in 2023 and operates 24/7 across 89 square miles of the city, according to its website. Why are people protesting in Los Angeles? People began protesting against immigration raids at several businesses in the downtown Los Angeles area on Friday, June 6. By that evening, more than 100 people gathered at the city's immigration services building and detention center, according to Reuters. Police declared the protest an unlawful assembly and ordered the crowd to disperse; shortly thereafter, at least 50 police officers in riot gear arrived. Protests continued into the next day, leading Trump to sign a presidential memorandum ordering at least 2,000 National Guard troops to Los Angeles. Timeline: LA protests went from small to substantial over three days. Here's what unfolded. Tensions escalated after the National Guard arrived in parts of Los Angeles on Sunday morning. Protesters continued to gather as the day wore on, and demonstrations eventually grew violent. LAPD said on X that it had placed officers across the city on "tactical alert" and later declared an unlawful assembly in a portion of downtown. By 11 p.m. local time Sunday, police said "a number of people have been arrested." California Gov. Gavin Newsom said around 9:30 p.m. local time on June 8 that he "formally requested the Trump Administration rescind their unlawful deployment of troops in Los Angeles county." Trump has referred to protesters as "troublemakers and insurrectionists" and commended the National Guard's efforts. This story has been updated with additional information. Contributing: Elizabeth Weise, USA TODAY Melina Khan is a national trending reporter for USA TODAY. She can be reached at

Miami Herald
27 minutes ago
- Miami Herald
To keep the middle class in California, should developers build homes to rent? Or own?
When you imagine a renter of affordable housing, Christopher McCormick is probably not who comes to mind. The 38-year-old software developer was on his way to work in early 2020 when he passed an affordable apartment building under construction in Emeryville, California. He was surprised to find that his annual income - $79,400 - qualified him for a below-market-rate one-bedroom unit. The rent was just $2,100 a month - nearly $600 less than similar market-rate apartments. He entered the lottery and, a few months later, moved in. McCormick's moderate-income apartment is part of California's effort to keep its middle class from moving away. The state has a goal to build 2.6 million new units by 2032 to meet demand and keep costs from further ballooning. Of those, 420,800 are meant to be affordable to moderate-income households, who make between 80% and 120% of the area median income - for a family of four, between $125,050 and $191,750 in Alameda County, and $159,550 and $234,250 in Santa Clara County. For the most part, the market doesn't build this kind of housing - which is why the state and local governments provide incentives to developers, such as allowing more density or less parking if they include below-market-rate units. Middle-income housing doesn't qualify for the same property tax exemptions that low-income housing does. Still, five years into its plan, developers in California have built only 22,316 moderate-income units. With high interest rates and rents not growing as some predicted, they say they need more incentives for this type of housing to pencil out financially. But there's disagreement on where government should intervene: Should it encourage more middle-income homes for people to rent, or to own? The answer, most housing experts would agree, is both. California needs more of all types of housing to climb its way out of its deep affordability crisis. Developers tend to favor building rental housing in high-cost areas because it offers steadier cash flow, lower legal risk, and stronger demand from renters who can't afford to buy. Moderate-income housing policy has followed this status quo, largely focusing on renters. Still, even generating support for rental housing incentives has proved an uphill battle. Two bills this legislative session sought to offer tax breaks for middle-income housing. The first, SB 336 from San Francisco Democratic Sen. Scott Wiener, would have extended a property tax exemption to buildings with units set aside for such renters - a benefit currently reserved for developers serving lower-income renters. On the for-sale side, AB 595, proposed by Democratic Assemblyman Juan Carrillo of Palmdale, would have created a new tax credit for home builders constructing income-restricted homes. Both bills died. As California faces a $12 billion budget shortfall, legislators balked at most measures that might drain city or state coffers. But the ideas aren't going away. A version of SB 336 has appeared before the Legislature almost every year since 2019. Many of its backers say it's the kind of structural fix that will help build moderate-income housing at scale. One of the major backers, unsurprisingly, is a Bay Area developer - Enrique Landa. His company, Associate Capital, is leading a major redevelopment of the 29-acre Potrero Power Station along San Francisco's waterfront, which will include 2,600 new homes - a third of them at below-market rents. The first building is set to open this fall, with all 105 apartments reserved for moderate-income renters. "We were only able to do this because we had a larger project that was able to cross-subsidize this effort," Landa said at a Senate hearing in May. "This wasn't a replicable path - but with this legislation, it could be." But there's a question of whether moderate-income housing offers enough of a discount to justify a major tax exemption. A recent Bay Area News Group investigation found that outside of extremely high-cost areas, such as San Mateo County and San Francisco, moderate-income units don't always provide a meaningful discount to market rates. Notably, 7% of the moderate-income housing units built in recent years around the Bay Area are vacant - double the vacancy for units targeted at renters making below 80% of the area median income. Rich Wallach, an affordable housing developer with Burbank Housing in Santa Rosa, said it's critical that any policy that would subsidize moderate-income housing include a provision that rents provide a significant discount. "The trick to not having vacant units sit is to undercut the market - not be at market," Wallach said. But other housing activists suspect there's something else at play that explains the somewhat higher vacancy at moderate-income units: an exodus to lower-cost regions. "Moderate-income families may reach a point in struggling with housing affordability where they just decide to leave the region," said Adam Briones, CEO of California Community Builders, which advocates for access to homeownership. "These are people who want to buy a home, and they absolutely cannot do it in the Bay Area." That's eventually what happened for McCormick, the Emeryville renter. "I was giving someone else money without building equity myself," McCormick said. When he looked into below-market-rate for-sale housing, he found a few options in Emeryville - most were condos, and with the homeowners association fee tacked onto a monthly mortgage payment, plus property taxes, he would have had to pay around $3,200 a month. It was more than he felt he could comfortably afford. So McCormick bought a house in the suburbs - of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. For his $310,000, five-bedroom house, he pays a monthly mortgage of $2,800. Briones sees stories like McCormick's as evidence the state needs to do more to help people buy - not just rent. "For a rental, the landlord retains the economic benefit," Briones said. "If we subsidize units for a homeowner, that helps to create generational wealth for a moderate-income household." Rental housing has been the focus of most federal subsidies since at least 1961, when the federal government created the Below Market Interest Rate Program to provide low-interest loans for multifamily rental developers in exchange for affordability restrictions. The focus was further entrenched when former President Ronald Reagan created the Low-Income Housing Tax Credit in 1986, which provided tax incentives to private developers building affordable housing. The program is still the primary tool for financing new affordable housing throughout the country. But before that, policymakers were thinking of ways to subsidize for-sale product. In 1955, New York passed the Mitchell-Lama program, which allowed for the creation of limited-profit housing companies. These companies could get low-interest-rate financing to cover up to 95% of a project's cost, plus major property tax breaks, which allowed developers to build housing middle-income New Yorkers could afford. In return for the incentives, developers were limited to a 6% profit on dividends (later increased to 7% in 1969.) The program produced over 130,000 units in New York City alone-half of them for-sale. Today, it'd be unimaginable for developers to envision a mere 6% return. In 2023, homebuilders reported an average gross profit margin of 20.7% in 2023, according to the National Association of Homebuilders. Alex Schafran, a housing policy researcher, said there are benefits to both renting and owning - but that right now the Bay Area's middle-income households are relegated to the rental market, because home-buying is only possible for the highest earners. "But everyone should have a real choice," he said. "Regardless of income." Copyright (C) 2025, Tribune Content Agency, LLC. Portions copyrighted by the respective providers.