Trump resists bipartisan calls to release Justice Department files on Jeffrey Epstein
The case has dogged Trump's second term from the start, ever since the attorney general, Pam Bondi, alluded to the existence of a list of Epstein's clients sitting on her desk in February. Bondi later said she misspoke and that no such list exists. But the president's MAGA base and Democrats alike are now calling for the entire Justice Department file of Epstein material to be released, an appeal so far rejected by Trump and his aides.
Trump's defensiveness over the file has put Republicans on Capitol Hill in the difficult position of appearing to protect Epstein's co-conspirators, as Democrats take advantage of the internal Republican divide with calls for a vote to release the documents. A poll conducted by the Economist/YouGov this month found that 83% of Trump's 2024 supporters want the government to release all material related to the Epstein case — 'past supporters,' as Trump referred to them Wednesday, calling them 'weaklings' and 'foolish' for pressing their interest in the case.
Epstein, a wealthy financier with a deep bench of powerful friends, died in a New York City prison in August 2019 facing federal charges over a child sex trafficking conspiracy. The charges followed reporting by the Miami Herald of a scandalous sweetheart deal brokered by federal prosecutors in Florida that had allowed Epstein to serve a months-long sentence and avoid federal charges that could have resulted in life imprisonment.
One of those prosecutors, Alexander Acosta, later became Labor secretary in Trump's first administration. He resigned amid a public outcry, weeks before Epstein's death.
The New York City medical examiner and the inspector general of the Justice Department have ruled Epstein's death a suicide. This month, the FBI released what it characterized as the 'full raw' footage from a camera near what it says was Epstein's prison cell at the time of his death. But suspicions of conspiracy were only turbocharged by the release of the tape, which Wired first reported had three minutes cut from the original footage, according to metadata of the file.
Epstein's known association with some of the world's most famous men, including Bill Gates, Bill Clinton and Prince Andrew, have fueled calls for their release. But it is Trump's highly public relationship with Epstein that has caused the story to resurface.
'Time to drop the really big bomb: @realDonaldTrump is in the Epstein files,' Elon Musk, Trump's largest donor in the 2024 presidential campaign and his close aide in the White House at the beginning of his term, wrote on X during their fallout last month. 'That is the real reason they have not been made public. Have a nice day, DJT!' (He later deleted the post.)
Photos of Trump and Epstein attending parties together have proliferated online. And Trump frequently acknowledged their friendship before entering politics. 'I've known Jeff for 15 years. Terrific guy,' Trump told New York magazine in 2002. 'He's a lot of fun to be with. It is even said that he likes beautiful women as much as I do, and many of them are on the younger side. No doubt about it — Jeffrey enjoys his social life.'
On Wednesday, Trump said Bondi should release only material from the Epstein files that 'she thinks is credible.' When asked whether he would support the appointment of a special counsel to examine the case, he replied, 'I have nothing to do with it.'
'I would say these files were made up by [former FBI Director James] Comey and [former President] Obama, made up by the Biden [administration], and we went through years of that with the Russia, Russia, Russia hoax,' he said.
On Wednesday, Maurene Comey, James Comey's daughter and a federal prosecutor who had worked on the Epstein case, was dismissed from the Justice Department. Comey said Thursday that the department gave her no reason for her firing.
In a briefing Thursday, White House Press secretary Karoline Leavitt reiterated the president's opposition to a special prosecutor.
'The president would not recommend a special prosecutor in the Epstein case,' she said. 'That's how he feels.'
Legitimate concerns have been raised over releasing documents from the case that could reference individuals who are not credibly suspected of wrongdoing. But those calling for the release of the entire file now say that the scale of Epstein's child sex trafficking ring, and the corruption around efforts to protect him over nearly two decades, are a matter of public interest.
'We want the entire file — we don't trust Bondi to say what's credible and what's not,' Rep. Jamie Raskin, a Democrat from Maryland and ranking member of the House Judiciary Committee, told MSNBC on Thursday. 'We can be the judge of that ourselves.'
On Capitol Hill, responding to Republican concerns over the optics of voting against the release, House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.) is considering a measure that would call for the files to be made public.
The measure would be nonbinding, a source familiar with the matter said.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Los Angeles Times
23 minutes ago
- Los Angeles Times
Fox News' Jesse Watters admits mistake in program claiming Newsom lied about Trump call
Fox News host Jesse Watters acknowledged Thursday that his program made a mistake in reporting on Gov. Gavin Newsom's phone conversation with President Trump during last month's immigration raids in Los Angeles. Newsom filed a $787 million defamation lawsuit against Watters and Fox News on June 27 after the host reported on comments Trump made about a phone call with the governor as tensions heated up over the raids and the president's decision to deploy the National Guard. Newsom's lawsuit said Watters lied on his primetime program about the timeline of his conversations with the president. After the lawsuit was filed in a Delaware court, Newsom's lawyers said they were prepared to drop the suit if the governor got a retraction and a formal on-air apology. The suit claims Fox News willfully distorted the facts about the Trump call to harm the governor politically. It remains to be seen if Watters' comments at the end of his Thursday program will suffice. A spokesman for Newsom didn't immediately respond to a request for comment. Watters' on-air persona is snarky and tongue-in-cheek and he did not deviate from it when he addressed the Newsom matter. He acknowledged he misunderstood Newsom's social media post on Trump's remarks and used the words 'I'm sorry.' But it was far from a fulsome apology. 'Fox News invited [Newsom] on the show to talk it out man to man but he said no,' Watters said. The dust-up began after Trump told reporters in the Oval Office on June 10 that he spoke to Newsom 'a day ago — called him up tell him you've got to do a better job, you're doing a bad job.' Trump's comment gave the impression that the two spoke on the same day 700 marines were deployed in Los Angeles. Newsom refuted the claim in a post on X. The governor had already said publicly he spoke to Trump after midnight Eastern time on June 7 and the National Guard was not discussed. They never spoke after that. 'There was no call,' Newsom posted on X. 'Not even a voicemail. Americans should be alarmed that a President deploying Marines onto our streets doesn't even know who he's talking to.' Newsom's lawyers allege in the complaint that by making the call seem more recent, Trump could suggest they discussed the deployment of troops to Los Angeles, which they had not. Trump sent Fox News anchor John Roberts a screen shot showing the June 7 date stamp of the phone call, which Watters showed on his program to assert that Newsom was lying when he said they did not speak. When Watters showed a clip of Trump's June 10 comments about the call on his program, it omitted the portion where the president said he spoke to Newsom the previous day. A banner at the bottom of the screen read: 'Gavin lied about Trump's call.' Watters told viewers Thursday he believed Newsom's X post asserted that the two had not spoken at all. ''Not even a voicemail' — we took that to mean there was no call ever,' Watters said. 'We thought the dispute was about whether there was a phone call at all when he said without qualification that there was no call,' the host continued. 'Now Newsom's telling us what was in his head when he wrote the tweet. He didn't deceive anybody on purpose so I'm sorry he wasn't lying. He was just confusing and unclear. Next time governor, why don't you say what you mean.' The $787 million figure in the lawsuit is the amount Fox News paid to Dominion Voting Systems to settle another defamation case in 2023. Fox agreed to pay the company, which said the network aired false claims that its voting equipment was manipulated to help President Biden win the 2020 election. Times staff writer Taryn Luna contributed to this report.


Axios
23 minutes ago
- Axios
Trump threatens to sue WSJ for story alleging racy letter to Epstein
President Trump threatened to sue the Wall Street Journal over a Thursday story describing a "bawdy" happy-birthday letter bearing Trump's name that the outlet says was given to Jeffrey Epstein. The latest: Trump said in a Thursday night Truth Social post that he personally warned the WSJ and owner Rupert Murdoch "that the supposed letter" was "a FAKE and, if they print it, they will be sued. Mr. Murdoch stated that he would take care of it but, obviously, did not have the power to do so." Trump said both he and White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt told WSJ editor-in-chief Emma Tucker that the letter at the center of the article was fake, but she "didn't want to hear that" and "instead, they are going with a false, malicious, and defamatory story anyway." Leavitt said on X the "WSJ refused to show us the letter and conceded they don't even have it in their possession when we asked them to verify the alleged document they're basing their ENTIRE fake story on." Driving the news: The letter, which the WSJ reports that it reviewed, was in a leather-bound album that Ghislaine Maxwell put together in 2003 for Epstein's birthday, according to the story. The WSJ reported that Department of Justice officials reviewed pages from the album years ago, but that it wasn't clear if the Trump DOJ looked at the documents for its report that concluded there's no evidence to suggest Epstein was killed or kept a " client list." Maxwell is serving a 20-year sentence in Florida after being found guilty of sex trafficking and other charges in 2021. Zoom in: The letter bearing Trump's name allegedly features a "bawdy" drawing of a naked woman, but the president told the Wall Street Journal he had nothing to do with the gift. "This is not me. This is a fake thing. It's a fake Wall Street Journal story," he told the outlet. The WSJ didn't immediately post an image of the letter or drawing. Representatives for the WSJ declined to comment further on the report. Meanwhile, the president announced on Thursday night that he has directed Attorney General Pam Bondi to release all relevant grand jury testimony in the Epstein case, subject to court approval. Zoom out: Trump has faced pressure from MAGA circles since the conclusion of his administration's review of the Epstein case. What they're saying: Many top MAGA influencers, even ones critical of Trump's handling of the Epstein matter, bashed the Journal story.


The Hill
23 minutes ago
- The Hill
Pocan, Van Orden trade insults on camera: ‘Are you drinking right now?'
Reps. Mark Pocan (D-Wisc.) and Derrick Van Orden (R-Wisc.) bickered on camera Wednesday during a Spectrum News interview. Pocan was discussing cuts to public broadcasting when Van Orden pulled up in his Harley-Davidson, revving the engine and interrupting the interview, according to the video shared by the outlet. 'Hey Derrick, classy as always, man. We love it. Thank you,' Pocan said after his colleague pulled up. 'Have you lost your mind? You know, people read this stuff,' Van Orden said, referring to the lawmaker's comments on the Republican spending package. 'I saw your drunken tweet at 1:30 in the morning last night,' Pocan shot back. The recent feud between the two started with a post on the social platform X on Wednesday morning. 'Wisconsin is getting $1,000,000,000 a year plus up to Medicade per year. If any Wisconsinite loses coverage it will be due to incompetence, mismanagement, and malice by @GovEvers,' Van Orden wrote. 'Seek mental health counseling,' he added. The message was written in a quote tweet of Pocan's post from New York cartoonist Paul Noth with an image and line that read, 'You no longer have Medicaid, so you have a big beautiful bill.' Democrats have been decrying the millions of Medicaid removals slated to come following the budget reconciliation. The tension seeped over into the Wednesday spat between Wisconsin lawmakers on air. 'Derrick, why don't you debate me? Why are you so afraid to debate anyone? Here, we can do this in the media. Why don't you want to debate the big, beautiful bill?' Pocan said. 'So, Mark Pocan has never had a job his entire life other than politics, and he doesn't understand,' Van Orden said. 'I've owned a small business for 37 years. Tony, you've owned a small business; that's a little work, isn't it?' Pocan fumed, turning to Rep. Tony Wied (R-Wisc.), who stood by during the verbal flare. 'He funnels over $500,000 a year of his campaign money to buy signs from his company,' Van Orden interrupted. Pocan then asked if he was intoxicated. 'Okay, look that up. Oh my God. Are you drinking right now, Derrick? That's the real question. All right,' the Wisconsin Democrat said. Their back-and-forth represents a larger divide among representatives in the House who are reeling from sweeping cuts to social services and new reforms lauded by the spending legislation.