Most Markets Rise As China-US Truce Extended, Inflation In Focus
Donald Trump's widely expected trade announcement avoids the reimposition of sky-high levies and allows officials from Washington and Beijing to continue talking into November to settle their standoff.
In an executive order, the White House reiterated its position that there are "large and persistent annual US goods trade deficits" and they "constitute an unusual and extraordinary threat to the national security and economy of the United States".
However, William Yang, an analyst at the International Crisis Group, said: "Beijing will be happy to keep the US-China negotiation going, but it is unlikely to make concessions."
With the president's tariffs set and talks with various trading partners ongoing, markets are now turning their focus back towards the possible economic outlook and the impact of Trump's trade war.
First up is the US consumer price index (CPI) later in the day, which could play a major role in the Federal Reserve's decision-making with regard to interest rates.
Bets on a cut have ramped up in recent weeks owing to signs that the world's number one economy is showing signs of slowing, with figures indicating that the labour market softened considerably in the past three months.
Expectations are for CPI to come slightly above June's reading, but analysts warned investors were walking a fine line with a forecast-topping print likely to dent rate cut hopes and a too-weak read stoking economic fears.
"I'd imagine, for equities at least, given the comfort blanket that the surge in September cut expectations has provided recently, that a hotter-than-expected figure could see some fairly sizeable downside," said Pepperstone's Michael Brown.
While there have been warnings that the tariffs will stoke inflation, National Australia Bank's Ray Attrill said: "The larger tariff impacts... probably will not be felt until August/September, with firms now only gaining some clarity on the degree of reciprocal tariffs.
"The current profit reporting season has noted firms on the whole were waiting for greater clarity on final tariff rates before adjusting prices."
Also on the agenda this week are wholesale prices and retail sales, with the Fed's favoured gauge of inflation at the end of the month. Bank officials are then set to make their decision in the middle of September.
Forecasts are for a reduction at that gathering and one more before the end of the year.
Asia's markets rally was led by Tokyo's Nikkei 225, which briefly soared almost three percent to hit a record high of 42,999.71 on renewed optimism over the Japanese economy after officials reached a deal to avert the worst of Trump's tariffs.
IwaiCosmo Securities said in a market commentary that "easing tensions over US-China trade talks, as well as speculation about the US's imminent lowering of (interest) rates" had helped boost investors' hopes about the recovery of Japanese companies.
The gains came as traders returned to work after a long weekend.
Hong Kong, Shanghai, Sydney, Taipei, Mumbai, Jakarta and Manila also advanced with London, Paris and Frankfurt.
Seoul, Singapore and Wellington dropped.
Tokyo - Nikkei 225: UP 2.2 percent at 42,718.17 (close)
Hong Kong - Hang Seng Index: UP 0.3 percent at 24,977.71
Shanghai - Composite: UP 0.5 percent at 3,665.92 (close)
London - FTSE 100: UP 0.3 percent at 9,152.11
Euro/dollar: DOWN at $1.1616 from $1.1617 on Monday
Pound/dollar: UP at $1.3440 from $1.3435
Dollar/yen: UP at 148.21 yen from 148.12 yen
Euro/pound: DOWN at 86.42 pence from 86.47 pence
West Texas Intermediate: UP 0.2 percent at $64.09 per barrel
Brent North Sea Crude: UP 0.3 percent at $66.82 per barrel
New York - Dow: DOWN 0.5 percent at 43,975.09 (close)
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
DW
30 minutes ago
- DW
What are secondary sanctions and do they work? – DW – 08/14/2025
Will Donald Trump's threat to use secondary sanctions slow Russian aggression or dampen its economy? Some see them as a powerful deterrent, while others think they are impossible to effectively enforce. After Russia launched a full-scale invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, the aggressor was hit with economic sanctions from the US, UK, European Union and others. These sanctions restricted domestic companies or individuals in how they trade and do business with Russia. The sanctions were an effort to make Russia change its course without resorting to direct military force. Since then, the sanctions have piled up. Russia's foreign assets have been frozen, and a majority of Russian banks have been cut off from the global banking system. To keep its economy going, Russia redirected trade to other countries like China, India, Turkey and the UAE. To move its oil around the world, the country turned to a fleet of "shadow tankers." To end this game of economic cat and mouse, and bring Russia to ceasefire talks, the US Senate is working to pass a bipartisan bill that threatens "secondary sanctions" on countries that still do business with Russia. Primary sanctions are placed on foreign countries or entities, but they restrict the behavior of the sanctioning country's own citizens and businesses by limiting or prohibiting them from engaging with the sanctioned parties. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video Secondary sanctions go a step further and extend to third-party countries, companies or individuals that do business with sanctioned parties. Even though these third-party entities aren't directly bound by the sanctioning country's laws, they are pressured to comply or face consequences should they do business in the sanctioning country. "Secondary sanctions do not attempt to force foreign subsidiaries to follow a sanctioning country's policies," according to John F. Forrer in a paper published by the Atlantic Council, a Washington, D.C.-based think tank. "The sanctioning country restricts its own firms and/or citizens from having commercial dealings with designated firms or individuals." The proposed US legislation would enable 500% tariffs on goods from any country that buys or sells Russian oil, uranium, natural gas and petroleum or petrochemical products. The United States is the biggest proponent of secondary sanctions. Their power stems from the importance of the US dollar on a global level and from the fear of losing access to the US market or its financial system. Since a significant amount of cross-border trade is in dollars or passes through the US banking system, this gives the country great leverage. For many countries, keeping this access is more important than doing business with sanctioned regimes. "While secondary sanctions can 'work' as part of the larger package, the intent, timing and credibility of the threat are important," said Lena Surzhko Harned, associate director of the Public Policy Initiative at Penn State Behrend. They are an important tool with symbolic power. "However, like all threats, it loses its power if it is not perceived as credible or other loopholes are found," Harned told DW. The Obama administration used secondary sanctions to target banks and other companies doing business in Iran in a successful effort to get the country to negotiate about limiting its nuclear program. More recently, the US has used secondary sanctions on Chinese firms trading with or handling financial transactions with North Korea. The US also introduced secondary sanctions against entities doing business with Venezuela, especially in the oil and financial sectors, in an effort to isolate the Nicolas Maduro regime. This past April, President Donald Trump imposed secondary tariffs on countries that import Venezuelan oil. This month, Trump issued an executive order, levying an additional 25% tariff on India over its purchases of Russian oil. Sidestepping Congress the president has threatened further secondary sanctions on buyers of Russian energy. Not every country is a pushover when it comes to secondary sanctions, and some find creative loopholes to avoid much of their economic impact. They rely on alternative currencies, such as the Chinese yuan or cryptocurrencies. Businesses or countries subject to sanctions can barter or use intermediaries or shell companies to conclude deals. Secondary sanctions are difficult to enforce and risk retaliation. They can also push like-minded countries closer together — and therefore further from US influence. There is a rift between academics and practitioners on secondary sanctions. Many experts think they are not an effective foreign policy tool, according to Forrer, an associate professor and director of the Institute for Corporate Responsibility at the George Washington University's School of Business. "Many researchers view secondary sanctions as having all the worst attributes of economic sanctions, plus the added onerousness of potentially instigating new conflicts with allies and adversaries who object to the imposition of restrictions and economic hardship on their own industries and citizens," argued Forrer. In the end, it is difficult to say what exactly makes a country change course with so many parallel variables to take into account. "Secondary sanctions should be considered an option when designing economic sanctions, but only under a very particular set of circumstances," concluded Forrer. "As with any economic sanction, if deployed incorrectly, they can do more harm than good." "Not to use secondary sanctions against third parties is a waste of a potentially useful tool," agreed Harned, but warned, "to expect them to be a silver bullet is a misguided mistake."
Int'l Business Times
an hour ago
- Int'l Business Times
Alaska: A Source Of Russian Imperial Nostalgia
Alaska, the US state that will host the meeting between Vladimir Putin and Donald Trump on Friday, is a source of imperial nostalgia and often less-than-serious territorial claims in Russia. The territory that Russia sold to the United States in 1867 is now a symbol of the entwined history of the countries, whose relations have been severely damaged since Russia launched its offensive in Ukraine in 2022. To some experts, the summit in Alaska evoked memories of the thaw between the Soviet Union and the United States during the Cold War. "It's a classically orchestrated summit, like in the era of detente," Russian political scientist Fyodor Lukyanov said on Telegram. "Its symbolic significance is the absence of intermediaries: the powers, so to speak, decide for themselves," he added, saying that China is "not close" to Alaska and that Europe is "as far away as possible". But beyond being a unique meeting place, Alaska also fuels Russian memories of the Tsarist empire, the historic predecessor of the Soviet Union. "For Russia, Alaska symbolises the peak of an expansion," Alexander Baunov, senior fellow at the Carnegie Russia Eurasia Center, said on the centre's website. It was "when the Russian continental empire had, for the only time, succeeded in crossing an ocean like the European empires", Baunov said. A Russian colony since the 18th century, Alaska was eventually sold to the United States for $7.2 million in 1867 by Tsar Alexander II. The remote territory was economically very difficult for the Russians to exploit and at the time its sale was welcomed by the Imperial Court as the country was struggling economically. But the transaction later came to be seen as a regrettable bargain after what formerly was a fur trading hub turned out to house crucial natural resources: gold and oil. In recent years, the price at which Alaska was sold, considered by some to be ridiculously low, and the legal validity of the transaction have become regularly recurring debates in Russia. In July 2022, in the midst of patriotic fervour in Russia and as tensions soared between Moscow and Washington following the offensive against Ukraine, the Alaska issue resurfaced. The speaker of the Duma, the lower house of the Russian Parliament, Vyacheslav Volodin, spoke of "lands to be returned", describing Alaska as a "disputed territory". Russia's authorities are apparently not interested in reclaiming it. In 2014, Vladimir Putin, asked by a pensioner about the possibility, replied: "My dear, why do you need Alaska?" adding the territory was "too cold". Still, the idea of reclaiming Alaska is an endless source of memes widely circulating on Russian social media. One of the most famous claims that "our soul" suffered from the loss of Alaska because "it's where our bears live". The recapture of Alaska is even mentioned in a 1990s hit by a rock band Putin likes, Lyube, with the lyrics: "Stop messing around, America... And give back our Alaskan lands." US President Donald Trump meets his Russian counterpart Vladimir Putin in Alaska on Friday AFP Some Russians mourn the loss of Alaska because 'it's where our bears live' AFP
Int'l Business Times
2 hours ago
- Int'l Business Times
Asian Markets Mixed As Bitcoin Surges To New High
Bitcoin hit a new peak during early Asian trading on Thursday, as the yen surged after the US Treasury Secretary said he expects Japan to hike interest rates. The cryptocurrency rose above its previous July record, briefly exceeding $124,500 before retreating. Bitcoin's value has recently soared, fuelled by US regulatory changes under US President Donald Trump, a strong backer of the crypto sector. "The crypto market is enjoying a period of highly favorable fundamentals," said Samer Hasn, senior market analyst at Japan's currency rose significantly against the dollar, climbing to its highest level since late July after US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said that he had told the Bank of Japan (BoJ) governor that it was "behind the curve" in its fight against inflation. "So they're going to be hiking and they need to get their inflation problem under control," Bessent told Bloomberg TV. Bessent said that the Bank of Japan (BoJ) was "behind the curve" in its fight against inflation, telling Bloomberg he had discussed the issue with the institution's governor, Kazuo Ueda. "So they're going to be hiking and they need to get their inflation problem under control," he added. The Bank of Japan, which has long maintained a negative interest rate policy, began monetary tightening in 2024. However, it left rates unchanged at the end of July and is expected by observers to maintain the status quo at its next monetary policy meeting in September. Bessent "may be trying to weaken the dollar through his comments," according to Hideo Kumano of Dai-Ichi Life Research Institute, as cited by Bloomberg. Bessent and President Donald Trump are pushing Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell to lower rates as quickly as possible. Hopes of rate cuts following soft inflation data released Tuesday had boosted stock markets, with the broad-based S&P 500 index and the tech-heavy Nasdaq reaching new summits this week. Tokyo's Nikkei hit a record as it closed 1.3 percent higher on Wednesday. Tokyo - Nikkei 225: DOWN 1.3 percent at 42,698.81 Hong Kong - Hang Seng Index: DOWN 0.1 percent at 25,597.85 Shanghai - Composite: UP 0.2 percent at 3,690.88 Euro/dollar: UP at $1.1706 from $1.1704 on Wednesday Pound/dollar: FLAT at $1.3577 from $1.3577 Dollar/yen: DOWN at 146.43 yen from 147.40 yen Euro/pound: UP at 86.22 pence from 86.21 pence West Texas Intermediate: UP 0.3 percent at $62.86 per barrel Brent North Sea Crude: UP 0.4 percent at $65.86 per barrel New York - Dow: UP 1.0 percent at 44,922.27 (close) London - FTSE 100: UP 0.2 percent at 9,165.23 (close)
