
‘Amazing' plans for Dublin's Sheriff Street include offices and a hotel. Amazing for whom?
Nevertheless, Dublin 1 represents the beating heart of life in the capital, along with the Liberties in Dublin 8. These are areas that hold our stories, culture and character. Residents, businesses and social spaces can trace their roots across centuries, alongside the immigrant communities now contributing hugely to contemporary culture.
Dublin 1 and Dublin 8 offer examples of what bustling, diverse urban ecosystems actually look like when, as the urbanist Jane Jacobs put it, they encapsulate the 'sidewalk ballet' of functioning street life. Some of the few streets in the capital that can authentically claim to reflect the essential features of what Jacobs described as the 'marvellous order' under 'the seeming disorder', are in both postcodes, including Parnell Street in Dublin 1, and Meath Street in Dublin 8.
In a recent article in the Business Post, the chief executive of An Post and chair of the Dublin City Taskforce, David McRedmond, declared: 'Dublin 1 can become one of Europe's most happening neighbourhoods.' This statement ignores the area's existing vibrant culture and community. Happening for whom?
READ MORE
'If we transform the core, there are other amazing adjacent plans such as Ballymore's to completely rebuild the Sheriff St area from Amiens Street to Spencer Dock,' McRedmond wrote.
'Amazing' is subjective. These plans include large office blocks and a hotel, along with build-to-rent apartments. So, 'amazing' for whom?
Statements about rebuilding the Sheriff Street area can come across as insensitive because of the context of how the needs of the area were generally disregarded during the development of the IFSC. That left a legacy of existential fear within the community that it might be bulldozed once more.
In a follow-up interview with the Dublin Inquirer, McRedmond said he was referring to plans about public space, and would 'hate to think that anyone would feel in any way insecure about their homes'.
But, fundamentally, the future of this area should not be about more commercial development and expensive apartments, which few people in Dublin 1 can afford, but a grassroots approach that extends across public housing, amenities and facilities that meet the social, cultural and economic needs and aspirations of this unique part of the capital and those who live there. Underserved and under-resourced communities are not development opportunities.
Cities are also about streets. It's unfortunate that so much contemporary development across the city results in hostile architecture that sucks life out of places, when we could instead be focusing on streetscapes with a sense of place and human-scale architecture.
This cuts to the heart of conversations about 'regeneration' in Dublin 1. When it comes to 'potential', we have to differentiate between what is shared urban space presenting opportunities for all, and what looks like displacement through corporate gentrification. Ambitious plans with vision need to happen. For neighbourhoods, that's about listening, not declaring. In landmark buildings, it's about a coherent mission and purpose.
This brings us to the GPO on O'Connell Street. First of all, it is unfortunate that parts of the building – over 75 per cent of it currently vacant – have not already been utilised as short-term cultural use in a city starved of both community centres and spaces for artists and collectives to meet, work and create.
Secondly, the Government's recent communication about 'mixed-use' incorporating retail and offices raised more questions than it answered. If you don't actually have a plan, don't toss out something vague and random. It's no wonder the vacuum was then filled with outrage about the building's historic importance being undermined.
The GPO should become neither shopping mall nor commercial offices. It represents a brilliant opportunity to create a landmark engine of creativity for Dublin that can inspire and facilitate generations to come. By creating something that both reflects and hosts contemporary Dublin – while taking inspiration from the positive aspects of entities such as the Southbank Centre in London, Factory International in Manchester, Kulturbrauerei in Berlin, Viernulvier in Ghent (and I could go on) – an ambitious, inclusive project would transform cultural activity in the city, alongside the Dublin Port Company's plans for the Artist Campus. The building's historic significance can also be preserved and expressed with a museum of revolution on its ground floor, which could also include a people's canteen.
In tandem, Aldborough House – vacant, and on An Taisce's list of most-at-risk buildings, despite it being one of the finest Georgian buildings in the capital – should become a community and cultural space specifically for the communities of Dublin 1.
The GPO is O'Connell Street's gem. We should be aspiring to create a world-class centre of culture, for and by the people. Let our diverse communities lead neighbourhood development and let artists inform the opportunity the GPO presents – just as so many of them urged our republic from the realm of the imagination into reality.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Irish Times
38 minutes ago
- Irish Times
Cost concerns driving shift in employee benefits, survey says
Intensifying cost concerns are driving Irish employers to focusing on maximising value in employee benefits, according to the benefits trends survey carried out by consultants WTW. The survey found that 39 per cent of employers in Ireland are 'reallocating spend' in response to rising costs to get more value from spending on benefits such as pensions, health insurance and financial wellbeing programmes. This drive has led to the number of employers focusing on getting more value from vendors and service providers to rise to 56 per cent, and nearly two-thirds, 61 per cent, of Irish employers regard the increasing cost of benefits as a key business issue. Orlagh Farrington, the head of health and benefits Ireland at WTW said cost concerns are 'impacting businesses across Ireland' which she said is 'certainly evident' in their approach to the cost and value gained from employee benefits. READ MORE More than half of employers, 56 per cent, are looking to improve the value of their benefits spending or are eyeing a switch to better-value vendors across health, retirement and risk benefits and 15 per cent plan to increase employee contributions to retirement plans. Ms Farrington said the benefit trends survey shows that employers are seeking to find a balance between 'prudent expenditure with ensuring an offering that can attract and retain talent'. How the wealthy are buying up land to avoid inheritance tax Listen | 22:03 Among Irish employers, 61 per cent are aiming to expand benefits choice over the next three years, with the research showing they are 'becoming more aware of purpose and values, and wellbeing, in shaping their benefits packages,' she said. 'For example, in 2025, 27 per cent of businesses would describe their employee benefits as values driven, 29 per cent as employee wellbeing focused, and 44 per cent as market competitive.' That focus is set to 'evolve', she said, with the results pointing to companies shifting their focus towards benefits driven by values. The survey suggests that 41 per cent of business said their benefits will focused on value in the next three years, 44 per cent suggested their focus will be on wellbeing and just only 15 per cent said they would focus on market competitiveness. 'Overall, this evolution is one that indicates a strategic focus not only cost but also on future competitiveness,' Ms Farrington said. Almost half, 46 per cent, of employers in Ireland view mental health benefits as a priority area, the survey suggested. Additionally, 34 per cent of employers prioritise retirement benefits, with 29 per cent and 27 per cent focusing on financial wellbeing benefits and health benefits respectively.


Irish Times
an hour ago
- Irish Times
Paschal Donohoe to remain as Eurogroup chair for third term
Minister for Finance Paschal Donohoe will be re-elected as president of the Eurogroup , after those challenging him for the role pulled out of the race on the day of the vote. Spanish economy minister Carlos Cuerpo and Lithuanian finance minister Rimantas Šadžius had both put their names forward to challenge Mr Donohoe for the influential European Union (EU) role. The 20 finance ministers of euro zone countries are due to vote to elect a chair at a Eurogroup meeting on Monday afternoon. Shortly before the meeting was due to start both Mr Cuerpo and Mr Šadžius confirmed they were withdrawing their names from consideration. READ MORE Mr Cuerpo, who was seen as the main challenger to Mr Donohoe, found his candidacy did not have enough support to be successful. Mr Šadžius said he was pulling out to maintain a 'consensus' in the room. The Eurogroup usually meets once a month and brings together the finance ministers from the 20 euro zone countries to co-ordinate economic policy, with the president tasked with chairing the meetings. [ Paschal Donohoe well placed in Eurogroup job race despite Spanish challenge Opens in new window ] Mr Donohoe will be formally elected for a third term as chair when finance ministers meet on Monday afternoon. Heading into the contest the Fine Gael minister had more than a dozen of the 20 available votes locked up. Eleven votes are needed to be elected. It is understood both Germany and France had thrown their weight behind Mr Donohoe's re-election bid. Many ministers whose parties sit in the same European grouping as Fine Gael, the centre-right European People's Party (EPP), also support Mr Donohoe remaining in the job. How the wealthy are buying up land to avoid inheritance tax Listen | 22:03 Mr Donohoe was first elected to the influential role in 2020, beating candidates from Spain and Luxembourg. He was re-elected unopposed in 2022 for a second term. The president, who chairs the meetings of finance ministers, holds the role for two-and-a half years. The longest serving Eurogroup chair was former Luxembourg prime minister and European Commission president Jean-Claude Juncker, who was in the position from 2005 to 2013. The Eurogroup president also attends high-level international meetings, such as the Group of Seven (G7), where the leaders of France, Germany, the United States, Italy, Canada, the UK and Japan meet. The meetings are also attended by the head of the European Commission.


Irish Times
an hour ago
- Irish Times
Apartment sizes Q&A: What are the planned changes in restrictions?
New guidelines to allow for smaller apartments and higher numbers of small units in individual developments are due to go to Cabinet on Tuesday. Minister for Housing James Browne will bring a memo to Cabinet outlining the changes, which are aimed at reducing the cost per unit and increasing the supply of apartments in urban areas. What are the current restrictions on apartment sizes and the mix of units in a development? The number of one-bedroom apartments or studios within any apartment scheme is currently restricted to 50 per cent, with no more than 25 per cent of the entire scheme allowed to be studios. The minimum floor area for a studio (one person) is 37sq m; 45sq m for a one-bed (two people) unit, 63sq m for a two-bed (three people) unit, 73sq m for a two-bed (four people) and 90sq m for a three-bed (five people) apartment. READ MORE There is also a requirement for more than 50 per cent of the units in any one scheme to exceed these minimum floor areas by 10 per cent. How will these change? First of all, there will be no restriction on the mix of apartment type within one scheme. In terms of floor area, the minimum size of a studio apartment will be reduced to 32sq m while a new standard for a three-bedroom, four-person apartment of 76sq m will be introduced. The other units will not change. The requirement for over 50 per cent of units any one scheme to to exceed these minimum floor areas by 10 per cent will change too, with that requirement reduced to 25 per cent of all units. Any other changes besides size? Yes – fewer windows and lifts and less private open space. The current guidelines stipulate that 33 per cent of apartments in urban areas and 50 per cent in suburban areas must be 'dual aspect'. What does dual aspect mean you might ask? A dual-aspect dwelling is defined as one with openable windows on two external walls, which may be either on opposite sides of a dwelling or on adjacent sides of a dwelling where the external walls of a dwelling wrap around the corner of a building. Under the new guidelines, just 25 per cent of apartments in any scheme – urban or suburban – will have to be dual aspect. In terms of lifts, the current guidelines limit the number of units that can be provided per lift core to a maximum of 12 units. The new guidelines remove any limitation on the number of units per lift and stair core per floor, subject to compliance with building regulations. There will be no change to the sizes of balconies or private open spaces, but the number of them may be reduced where a communal open space is provided instead or where the value of that private space is negligible due to noise pollution. Some local authorities require communal spaces in their development plans, based on the size of the development. The new guidelines stipulate that these spaces will not be required on a mandatory threshold basis. When will these new guidelines be enforced? Local planning authorities will receive a circular letter when the guidelines are issued, and they will apply to all planning decisions made on applications lodged after the 2025 guidelines come into force.