
Mustapha rebuked for calling GRS a liability to PH
KOTA KINABALU (Aug 17): Pantai Dalit Assemblyman Datuk Jasnih Daya has criticised Parti Keadilan Rakyat (PKR) Sabah chairman Datuk Mustapha Sakmud for describing Gabungan Rakyat Sabah (GRS) as a liability to Pakatan Harapan (PH).
Jasnih, who is also Parti Gagasan Rakyat Sabah (Gagasan Rakyat) Pantai Dalit Division chief, said Mustapha's statement was baseless and potentially damaging to the unity of government coalition partners.
'I am not sure what the basis, motive or objective is for him to label GRS as a liability to PH,' he said in a Facebook post on Sunday.
He noted that he has many friends in PKR and PH, but such remarks are rare. He urged Mustapha to be more cautious when making public statements, stressing that reckless comments could backfire.
'Do not get carried away when giving statements, especially those that only highlight weaknesses and damage yourself. Most importantly, do not be a spoiler,' Jasnih said.
He also warned that excessive confidence could lead to arrogance, which would undermine a leader's credibility.
'Overconfidence leads to arrogance… and remember, no one is irreplaceable,' he said.
Jasnih further advised that differing views should be resolved internally through party channels and leadership structures, instead of being aired publicly in a way that fuels unnecessary polemics.
'If that is what you truly feel, discuss it properly with your leader. InshaAllah, if it is for the best… then we just carry it out,' he said.
He reiterated that political stability in Sabah must remain a top priority, as it is closely tied to development initiatives and the wellbeing of the people under the Sabah Maju Jaya (SMJ) policy.
Meanwhile, PKR Papar division's women's movement has called for a more mature and responsible political culture, urging leaders to prioritise the people's welfare over rhetoric.
Its chief, Shakila Ismail, was responding to remarks by Gagasan Rakyat Youth Kawang Division against Mustapha.
Shakila stressed that Mustapha's views should be regarded as part of a healthy and responsible political discourse, not as a political attack.
'Datuk Mustapha's perspective is part of a healthy political dialogue. It should not be seen as an attack, but as a reminder that political cooperation in Sabah must truly benefit the people, especially women, children, and rural communities,' she said.
She also cautioned against politicising the recent tragedy involving the late Zara Qairina Mahathir, a 13-year-old student from Papar.
'As leaders, the tragedy of the late Zara Qairina should never be used as a political tool. Instead, all Malaysians and the authorities must unite to uphold justice and implement institutional reforms to prevent such cases from happening again,' she said.
According to her, political leaders must show exemplary conduct by engaging in respectful, solution-focused politics rather than finger-pointing.
'We must lead by example, practising politics with wisdom and maturity, focusing on solutions and not rhetoric or blame. The people will judge leaders based on their actions, honesty, and sincerity in defending them,' she said.
In her statement, Shakila also outlined three key calls from the movement: prioritising welfare and safety with no compromise in protecting students, women and children; strengthening political cooperation to ensure stability and development in Sabah while safeguarding state rights under the Malaysia Agreement 1963 (MA63); and amplifying Sabah's voice at the national level through the Unity Government led by Prime Minister Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim.
'PKR Sabah women's movement remains principled yet firm. Politics must continue to serve as a platform to defend the people, not as a battleground that undermines public confidence,' she emphasised.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Sinar Daily
31 minutes ago
- Sinar Daily
Assault on Rafizi's son 'threatens openness of public debate' in Malaysia
SHAH ALAM – The recent attack on Pandan Member of Parliament (MP) Datuk Seri Rafizi Ramli's child could cast a 'chilling effect' on public commentators in Malaysia, instilling fear that retaliation could extend beyond individuals to their families. This climate of intimidation may silence voices that would otherwise expose scandals or criticise policies, leaving ordinary Malaysians as the true victims, deprived of open discourse and vital information. Former economy minister Datuk Seri Rafizi Ramli reveals that a threatening message was sent to his wife following the assault on their 12-year-old son on Aug 14. If such an attack could happen to a high-profile politician like Rafizi, then surely one would think, "if the 'big fish' is attacked, what about us, the 'small fish'?" Pacific Research Centre of Malaysia principal adviser and political analyst, Dr Oh Ei Sun, warned that the assault on Rafizi's 12-year-old son on Aug 13 could send a dangerous message to anyone engaged in public debate. 'When individuals make remarks about certain parties, personalities, or issues that touch upon vested interests, they may fear retaliation not only against themselves but also against their families,' he told Sinar Daily recently. Oh stated that the attack on Rafizi's son was not a random act like a theft. It involved deliberately injecting a syringe into a child, which sends an even stronger message of intimidation. He cautioned that such acts could gravely damage the quality, diversity and openness of public debate in Malaysia. Similarly, political analyst Associate Professor Dr Syaza Shukri from International Islamic University Malaysia (IIUM) echoed concerns about the wider implications of the attack. 'It reflects a troubling shift in Malaysia, where the line between political disagreement and real threats is increasingly blurred. If the attack is linked to corruption, it highlights that the problem remains entrenched and the fight is far from over,' she said. This latest incident comes against a backdrop of growing public mistrust in authorities, fuelled by controversial cases such as the death of Zara Qairina Mahathir, the disappearance of Datin Seri Pamela Ling Yueh and the death of 17-year-old student Muhammad Zaharif Affendi Muhd Zamrie. Oh pointed out that perceived bias and a lack of transparency in handling these cases have only deepened public doubts about the credibility of the authorities. According to Oh, the government now faces an urgent task in restoring public trust and protecting democratic space. 'One key step would be to strengthen the Whistleblower Protection Act, ensuring that those unable to report scandals directly to the authorities can approach the media without fear of reprisal while still being legally protected,' he said. Syaza also stressed that failure to catch the perpetrators soon could have a 'chilling effect' on politicians and commentators, making them more cautious about speaking out and discouraging open discourse. Despite the intimidation, Rafizi has vowed not to back down from pursuing a recent scandal exposed by whistleblowers. Police investigations continue and his family remains under heightened security.


New Straits Times
33 minutes ago
- New Straits Times
Dr M arrives at Shah Alam court for defamation proceedings against Anwar
SHAH ALAM: The arrival of Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad was no quiet affair at the Sultan Salahuddin Abdul Aziz Shah Court Complex as he attended proceedings linked to his RM150 million suit against prime minister Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim. The 100-year-old two-time former prime minister's presence set the lobby abuzz as he made his way to the upper floor of the complex. A crowd had been building up at the complex entrance since 8am in anticipation of Dr Mahathir's arrival. The main entrance was closed to the public, with access restricted to those who had court matters. Dr Mahathir will be attending case management proceedings at the civil High Court before judicial commissioner Datuk Donald Joseph Franklin. The trial is expected to begin tomorrow. The case was reassigned to Donald following the transfer of judicial commissioner Zaharah Hussain. In his suit, Dr Mahathir alleged that Anwar tarnished his reputation by accusing him of being racist and of enriching himself and his family members during his 22-year tenure as prime minister. He claimed that Anwar made the remarks during PKR's special national congress at the Melawati Stadium in Shah Alam on March 18, 2023. Anwar had allegedly referred to someone "who in the past had been in power for 22 years and an additional 22 months" as taking advantage of his position to enrich himself and his family. Anwar, who did not specify any name during the speech, also said this person later complained about the Malays losing everything after he was no longer in power. Dr Mahathir said he had never been accused or convicted of any wrongdoing involving abuse of power or misuse of funds, either during or after his time as prime minister. He argued that Anwar's remarks were unfounded and based only on media hearsay. Dr Mahathir said it was vital that Anwar, as prime minister, ensure his statements were grounded in fact and not rumours. He said that all his income had been audited to ensure there was no deceit in tax payments or in the source of his earnings. He is seeking RM100 million in exemplary damages and RM50 million in general damages, as well as a written apology and a special press conference for Anwar to publicly retract his remarks.


The Sun
2 hours ago
- The Sun
Stories that shaped us
THERE is a question that often arises when something big happens – a historic moment, a national milestone, a collective high. It usually begins like this: 'Where were you when...?' Most of the time, it is not about geography but memory – about anchoring ourselves to something larger, remembering not just what happened but how it made us feel. For me, one such moment was the night of the 1992 Thomas Cup finals. Malaysia versus Indonesia. Badminton, of course. It was a Saturday, and I was a 17-year-old schoolboy at Malay College Kuala Kangsar. I watched it from the common room of our hostel – surrounded by boys in kain pelikat, clutching pillows, Milo mugs and SPM notes – all eyes fixed on a grainy television screen, struggling to keep up with the speed of the shuttle. We won. We brought the cup home after 25 years. And for a few beautiful hours, everything else faded – prep class, homesickness, SPM trial stress – replaced by a kind of joy that felt bigger than sport, bigger than school; something national, something shared. That moment and others like it become personal chapters in a larger story: the story of how we remember Malaysia. Another such chapter came in May 2018, when Malaysians went to the polls in what would become one of the most significant general elections in our history. For the first time, the ruling coalition was changed. Not through force or upheaval but through the quiet, determined power of the vote. People queued in the heat, some for hours. Some travelled across borders, taking buses and flights home just to mark an X on a ballot. There was tension, yes. But there was also something else: hope. Hope that this country belonged to its people – that we were no longer just passengers but co-pilots, that power could change hands peacefully and that we, the rakyat, are the ones responsible for deciding the direction of this country moving forward. You didn't need to be in Putrajaya or Dataran Merdeka to feel it; you could have been watching from a living room in Penang or a mamak stall in Johor Bahru or a hostel room in Sarawak. It did not matter where you were because the moment still reached you. That is what makes these memories powerful. They become shared reference points in the timeline of our lives. Of course, not every Merdeka memory is tied to politics or spectacle. Sometimes, it is quieter – a flag being raised in your neighbourhood, a conversation over teh tarik about what independence really means, a late-night drive on empty roads, with patriotic songs playing softly on the radio. These small moments matter too because nationhood is built not just on events but on experience. It is not just the milestones we remember; it is the way they made us feel connected, even when we were far apart. And that is the thread I keep coming back to: our shared experiences. You and I may have grown up in different towns, spoken different dialects, attended different schools but the moment the Sidek brothers stepped onto the court or when the results rolled in after GE14, we were there – one in spirit. Yet, these memories, whether personal or collective, are slowly fading. We live in an era of fast timelines and short attention spans. Moments come and go, swallowed by algorithms and speed. The things that once glued us together are being replaced by smaller, more personalised stories – meaningful, yes, but often disconnected from the larger whole. That is why I believe now, more than ever, we need to start recording our stories, not for history books, but for each other. For the generations who did not grow up with the Thomas Cup or the Reformasi years or who never saw a transfer of power that felt truly earned. It does not have to be big, just honest. Write about where you were when something mattered. Tell your children what Merdeka meant to your parents. Share with a friend that memory you have always carried but never voiced, because if we don't pass these stories on, who will? So this Merdeka, ask someone: 'Where were you when...?' and listen carefully. Then share your own. Memories, like nationhood, live best when it is passed from hand to hand. Dr Nahrizul Adib Kadri is a professor of biomedical engineering at the Faculty of Engineering, and the principal of Ibnu Sina Residential College, Universiti Malaya. Comments: letters@