King Charles Offers Rare Health Comment Amid Reports His Cancer Is ‘Incurable' After ‘Refusing' Chemotherapy
King Charles is making light of the topic of health amid his own internal crisis. The King just quipped with a veteran about his old age, and dropped a secret to living a long life.
In an event for a ceremony of keys outside Lancaster castle, Richard Brock had the opportunity to briefly talk to the Monarch. The 101-year-old D-Day veteran received some sage advice from Charles after saying that he looked 'fantastic' at his age. The King said, 'Keep drinking the whisky.'
More from StyleCaster
King Charles' Cancer Reportedly Incurable As Reports Claim He 'May Die' After He 'Refused Chemotherapy'
Princess Alexandra Subtly Took a Side in Charles & Harry's Feud Amid Reports There's 'No Turning Back' in Their Relationship
'He (the King) just told me I was amazing for my age,' Brock said of the conversation. His son Tony Brock also recalled the moment, 'He mentioned a nip of whisky and said to keep taking it.'The unexpected health advice comes right after royal insider Camilla Tominey reported that King Charles' cancer is incurable. 'The talk now is that he may die 'with' cancer, but not 'of' cancer following a rigorous treatment program,' she revealed in The Telegraph. She also confirmed that King Charles' 80th anniversary plans in 2028 are 'tentative' due to his ailing health.
Other sources were scared for the future of King Charles because of how he has been responding to treatments. 'Charles is indeed a sick man, and he does have cancer,' an insider told NewsNationNow. 'He also refused chemotherapy and decided on a less invasive treatment.'
It's the complete opposite of what a royal aide said King Charles's health. He is dealing 'incredibly well' with cancer, the anonymous insider told The Telegraph. 'The thing you learn about this illness is that you just manage it and that's what he does. Medical science has made incredible advances and I genuinely see no difference in him. As long as you just do what the doctors say, just live your life as normal as possible… that's exactly what he is doing.'
Charles' mortality has been put in the spotlight after Prince Harry dropped his bombshell interview where he pleaded for reconciliaton with his family. 'Life is precious. I don't know how much longer my father has,' the Duke of Sussex said in an interview with the BBC. 'He won't speak to me because of this security stuff, but it would be nice to reconcile.'
Best of StyleCaster
The 26 Best Romantic Comedies to Watch if You Want to Know What Love Feels Like
These 'Bachelor' Secrets & Rules Prove What Happens Behind the Scenes Is So Much Juicier
BTS's 7 Members Were Discovered in the Most Unconventional Ways
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
5 hours ago
- Yahoo
Researchers issue urgent warning over spread of dangerous disease carried by snails: 'Leading to outbreaks in new locations'
Harmful parasites carried by snails may be spreading, in part due to human-caused climate change, according to reporting from The Telegraph in May. Marginalized populations, including women and girls, may suffer disproportionately from increased prevalence. Schistosomiasis is a parasitic infection caused by snail-carried worms. Infection typically starts with making contact with the worms in freshwater, such as in a canal, river, or pond. Person-to-person transmission can continue when urine or feces containing the parasite's eggs contaminates a water source. Symptoms — including fever, chills, coughing, and aches — can manifest within a couple of months, per the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Chronic infections can lead to anemia, bloody stools, urinary problems, organ damage, and more. Historically, 90% of the schistosomiasis cases requiring treatment have been located in Africa, but infections have also been documented in Asia, the Americas, and the Middle East. While the London-based outlet has reported more recent spreading in parts of Europe may be largely tourism- and migration-driven, researcher Bonnie Webster also told the publication that transmissions may emerge in further locations due to shifting weather patterns. Rising global temperatures are driving more frequent and more intense flooding events, causing snails to appear in new wet settings and increasing water contamination. "Climate change will likely cause dramatic changes in transmission which need to be understood," Webster, who studies the disease at London's Natural History Museum, told The Telegraph. "Some areas will become drier and other areas will become flooded, creating new water bodies. This will lead to snails changing where they can be found and cause the prevalence of schistosomiasis to increase and spread, leading to outbreaks in new locations." Communities in low- and middle-income countries lacking sufficient sanitation infrastructure are already disproportionately impacted by this serious issue, and women and girls are additionally vulnerable to its effects. All people can become infected by these parasites, but one manifestation of the disease — female genital schistosomiasis, or FGS — can cause sexual, reproductive, and other health concerns for women and girls. Gendered labor dynamics can make this group additionally susceptible to infection through activities like washing laundry in contaminated water. Unlimit Health says that around 56 million women and girls in sub-Saharan Africa are infected with FGS, which can go undiagnosed and, especially when misdiagnosed as a sexually transmitted infection or otherwise left untreated, can lead to bleeding, pelvic pain, ulcers, miscarriage, and infertility. It may also contribute to increased risks of HIV and cervical cancer. Overall, schistosomiasis impacts hundreds of millions of people each year, resulting in up to 20,000 deaths annually, according to The Telegraph. Unfortunately, as Webster said, "Once one snail is infected, they can infect a whole population of humans." Do you worry about getting diseases from bug bites? Absolutely Only when I'm camping or hiking Not really Never Click your choice to see results and speak your mind. While treatments exist, potential drug resistance and current medical shortages could hamper attempts to curtail infections. Experts relayed to The Telegraph that recent substantial cuts to the United States Agency for International Development may also stymie research and response efforts for neglected tropical diseases like schistosomiasis. NTDs disproportionately impact marginalized populations. The World Health Organization says they affect over 1 billion people globally and that NTDs are "often related to environmental conditions." Of course, because of travel and climate change, many such infections may spread to more communities and farther regions. The CDC notes that prevention includes clean-up of contaminated areas, implementation of sanitation systems, and avoiding swimming, wading, and washing in unsafe water. A number of these measures require funding. Staying updated about how human-caused climate change can impact health and well-being everywhere can be key to organizing effective responses to rising global temperatures. Especially together in groups, friends and neighbors can make a difference by exploring these issues, raising awareness, supporting pro-environment policies, and taking on climate-conscious shifts at home to help address the extreme weather that imperils billions worldwide. Join our free newsletter for good news and useful tips, and don't miss this cool list of easy ways to help yourself while helping the planet.
Yahoo
17 hours ago
- Yahoo
America might finally make childbirth free—and moms could be the biggest winners
'This is how much it costs to give birth in America: $44,318.41.' That was the now-viral TikTok from a mom just days postpartum, scrolling through the itemized bill at home. Her insurance only covered $20,353.62—despite paying $2,500 a month for coverage for her family of five. This mom's story isn't an outlier. According to the Peterson-KFF Health System Tracker, privately insured families in the U.S. pay an average of $3,000 out-of-pocket for childbirth on average—just for having a baby. By 'choosing' to have a baby with a midwife in a birth center, I personally had to pay a $10k fee upfront. (Wanting midwifery care in a calm setting for my super fast labors didn't feel like a choice, but in America, it is.) Moms bear so many burdens for having babies. And one devastating cost that sets so many families back financially when they're just beginning life together is the price of childbirth, even with insurance. We're talking million-dollar NICU bills. $50k c-section charges. A financial punishment for doing the most critical work in a country: bringing the next generation of citizens into the world. But that may soon change. A bipartisan group of senators has introduced a bill that could be a game-changer for millions of American families. The Supporting Healthy Moms and Babies Act (S.1834) was announced on May 21, 2025, and aims to eliminate all out-of-pocket costs related to prenatal care, childbirth, and postpartum services for those with private health insurance. The bill's sponsors—Sens. Cindy Hyde-Smith (R-MS), Tim Kaine (D-VA), Josh Hawley (R-MO), and Kirsten Gillibrand (D-NY)—say the legislation is about protecting families from being buried in medical debt at one of the most vulnerable times in life. 'Bringing a child into the world is costly enough without piling on cost-share fees that saddle many mothers and families with debt,' Sen. Hyde-Smith said in a statement announcing the legislation. 'By relieving financial stresses associated with pregnancy and childbirth, hopefully more families will be encouraged to embrace the beautiful gift and responsibility of parenthood.' A companion bill is expected in the House, led by Rep. Jared Golden (D-ME), who told Vox, 'This idea is simple and powerful: Pregnancy and childbirth are normal parts of family life. So, insurance companies should treat it like the routine care it is and cover the cost—not stick people with huge medical bills.' While the average out-of-pocket cost is around $3,000, the financial burden can be far worse for many: 17% of privately insured moms face bills over $5,000 1% are hit with bills exceeding $10,000 17.5% of women with private insurance report problems paying medical bills Nearly 9% say they couldn't pay them at all These numbers are not just statistics—they represent real parents delaying care, going into debt, or struggling to recover financially in the fragile weeks after childbirth. If passed, the bill would expand the list of 'essential health benefits' under the Affordable Care Act to include full-spectrum maternity care. Medicaid already covers these services in full, and that's how 41% of births in the U.S. are paid for. But for the 178 million people on private insurance plans? Birth is still a budget-buster. The new legislation would require private insurers to pick up the tab. That means: Prenatal care (including appointments and ultrasounds) Labor and delivery Hospital stays Postpartum recovery and mental health care Neonatal and perinatal services Lactation support The estimated premium hike to cover it all? About $30 per year, according to Lawson Mansell, policy analyst at the Niskanen Center, who conducted the cost modeling for the bill. Mansell told Vox this proposal is the simplest way, on an administrative level, to make birth free. Related: Too many U.S. moms are in debt from giving birth. They deserve better. Beyond the financial relief, this bill has the potential to improve health outcomes for moms and babies. Research backs this up: A report by the Washington State Office of the Insurance Commissioner found that eliminating cost-sharing for prenatal services is associated with improved maternal and infant outcomes, including fewer preterm births and higher birth weights. So in addition to relieving the stress families face, covering prenatal care fully makes it more likely that moms actually get it. Another study published in BMC Public Health linked removing financial barriers under the Affordable Care Act to increased use of preventive care, such as mammography and Pap tests. While the study focused on these services, the findings suggest that eliminating financial barriers can encourage timely and consistent healthcare utilization. The bill's sponsors come from across the political spectrum—and so do its supporters. Everyone from the American Medical Association and the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists to anti-abortion groups like Americans United for Life and Susan B. Anthony Pro-Life America have voiced support. Even Planned Parenthood Action Fund commented they 'generally supports legislation to make the cost of maternal health care and parenting more affordable.' Related: The cost of giving birth is getting more expensive—and some families are getting hit with childbirth debt If the bill becomes law, the financial landscape of pregnancy would change dramatically—especially for those in the 'missing middle': families who earn too much for Medicaid but not enough to easily afford thousands in delivery fees. It would also offer immediate relief for parents managing multiple financial burdens at once: high rent, unpaid leave, child care costs, student loans. You know, new motherhood. Call your representatives. Especially if you have private insurance and have ever been slammed with a delivery bill. You can find contact info at and Share your story. Lawmakers have said constituent birth bill stories played a big role in shaping this legislation. Talk about it on social. If your childbirth costs shocked you, say so. Use hashtags like #MakeBirthFree and tag your reps. This moment is historic not just because it's bipartisan, but because it signals a new kind of family policy thinking: one where moms aren't expected to 'figure it out' in isolation, one giant bill at a time. As Yuval Levin of the American Enterprise Institute put it in a policy brief, 'Substantively and symbolically, bringing the out-of-pocket health care costs of childbirth to zero is an ambitious but achievable starting point for the next generation of pro-family policies.' Whether you're pregnant now or years past it, you probably remember your hospital bill—and you definitely remember how it made you feel. Exhausted. Angry. Maybe even ashamed. This new bill says: No more. And moms deserve that. Sources: Family-Friendly Policies for the 119th Congress. February 2025. AEI. Family-Friendly Policies for the 119th Congress. America might finally make childbirth free. May 2025. Vox. America might finally make childbirth free. Americans United for Life Applauds Bipartisan Innovative Policy Proposal. May 2025. America United for Life. Americans United for Life Applauds Bipartisan Innovative Policy Proposal to Make Maternal Healthcare More Affordable. AMA advocacy to improve maternal health. May 2025. AMA. AMA advocacy to improve maternal health. Impact of removing cost sharing. 2019. BMC Public Health. Impact of removing cost sharing under the affordable care act (ACA) on mammography and pap test use. New bipartisan proposal would remove childbirth costs. May 2025. Niskanen Center. New bipartisan proposal would remove childbirth costs and confusion for parents. Characteristics of Mothers by Source of Payment for the Delivery. May 2023. CDC. Characteristics of Mothers by Source of Payment for the Delivery: United States, 2021. About the Affordable Care Act. Us Department of Health an Human Services. About the Affordable Care Act. Out-of-pocket medical bills childbirth. National Library of Medicine. Out-of-pocket medical bills from first childbirth and subsequent childbearing. The Association of Childbirth with Medical Debt. National Library of Medicine. The Association of Childbirth with Medical Debt in the USA, 2019–2020. Sentators introduce bill to ease financial burden of pregnancy. Cindy Hyde-Smith. SENATORS INTRODUCE BIPARTISAN BILL TO EASE THE FINANCIAL BURDEN OF PREGNANCY, CHILDBIRTH. Women who Give Birth Incur Nearly $19,000 in Additional Health Costs. KFF. Women who Give Birth Incur Nearly $19,000 in Additional Health Costs, Including $2,854 More that They Pay Out of Pocket.
Medscape
20 hours ago
- Medscape
Autonomy in Practice: Trauma-Informed Pelvic Exams
'I just can't do it.' My patient, a 43-year-old woman with a history of childhood sexual abuse and young adult assault, sat across from me, her shoulders hunched. She'd avoided pelvic exams for years, despite her desire for cervical cancer screening. Even scheduling an appointment triggered panic and dissociation. Years of therapy — including eye movement desensitization and reprocessing (EMDR) — had helped, but not enough. Previous providers, even those she trusted, had 'gotten the job done' while ignoring her pleas to slow down or stop. Sadly, her experience is all too common. Why Trauma-Informed Exams Matter To many clinicians, pelvic exams are routine. But for patients with a history of trauma — sexual, medical, or both — pelvic exams can feel terrifying and impossible. Even well-intentioned can fall short if they move too quickly or miss subtle cues. Traditional models prioritize efficiency and focus on 'getting it done,' often at the expense of patient comfort and agency. And let's be honest: The legacy of medicine has not always inspired trust. For female patients, the impact of historic injustices like nonconsensual gynecologic procedures on enslaved women or the abuses of Dr Larry Nassar continue to reverberate — especially among marginalized communities. For many, mistrust of medical settings is not just personal, but generational. What the Literature Offers (and What It Doesn't) General guidance on trauma-informed care is plentiful but rarely offers concrete, actionable, step-by-step guidance on treating patients who have severe trauma responses with pelvic exams. Talli Rosenbaum's mindfulness-based pelvic floor physical therapy stands out as a specific protocol for working with clients with sexual pain. As a sexual medicine specialist, I also wanted to develop a process rooted in patient autonomy, explicit consent, and nonexploitation — skills that benefit patients in medical settings as well as in their sexual relationships. I designed my approach to: Equip patients with self-advocacy tools. Teach patients their rights, such as requesting an exam under anesthesia or their right to stop a medical procedure at any time. Coach patients on how to use clear, assertive language to communicate their needs effectively to medical providers. Teach patients their rights, such as requesting an exam under anesthesia or their right to stop a medical procedure at any time. Coach patients on how to use clear, assertive language to communicate their needs effectively to medical providers. Honor the body's wisdom. I've explored a variety of trauma-informed approaches, including Somatic Experiencing, Eugene Gendlin's Focusing, and Gina Ogden's 4-D Wheel, and these modalities sharpened my ability to notice subtle bodily signals. By recognizing these signals, providers can help their patients listen to the quiet voice of their body's discomfort before it escalates and needs to 'shout.' I've explored a variety of trauma-informed approaches, including Somatic Experiencing, Eugene Gendlin's Focusing, and Gina Ogden's 4-D Wheel, and these modalities sharpened my ability to notice subtle bodily signals. By recognizing these signals, providers can help their patients listen to the quiet voice of their body's discomfort before it escalates and needs to 'shout.' Make space for internal conflicts. Internal Family Systems language helps patients acknowledge the parts of themselves that seek healing alongside those that deeply fear vulnerability. My Protocol: Principles and Process Three core principles shape my patient encounters: No exam unless necessary for the patient's goals or questions. Proceed only if the exam aligns with your collaborative care plan and if the patient explicitly consents. The patient is in control of every step of the exam. Encourage self-advocacy and support and validate any request to slow down or pause the process at any point. No enduring is allowed. Although we cannot guarantee that a patient won't experience moments of discomfort, we can shift, adjust, or stop if anything feels mentally, emotionally, or physically uncomfortable. We do not want any patient 'white-knuckling it' through the exam. Share these core principles with your patient before any exam. Then, describe the exam in detail and ask the patient if there are any components they'd like to adjust or exclude. Stepwise, Patient-Led Approach Assessment and window of tolerance. Start in a talking office — not the exam room — to establish the patient's 'window of tolerance,' which is the range in which patients can engage without shutting down or becoming overwhelmed. Ask the patient, 'How will I know you're uncomfortable?' and 'How does your body let you know when it's not okay?' During medical exams, individuals with a history of trauma can unknowingly push through their body's early warning system. To avoid escalation, together we identify early signs of discomfort (eg, elevated heart rate, shallow breathing, muscle tension, mental haze) and plan on grounding techniques (eg, breathing exercises, humming, orienting) we can implement if or when they arise. Gradual exposure. Proceed step by step. First describe the exam, then have the patient imagine the exam, then enter the exam room, and continue to advance in that fashion. Each session progresses only as far as the patient's window of tolerance allows. Cultivating interoception. Treat early warnings as vital information. If a patient notices and reports a sensation of discomfort, welcome it as an important indicator that something in the environment needs to shift. If a patient gets the 'shakes' after accomplishing a difficult step, reframe this reaction as a sign of resilience, as the body has completed a stress cycle. Celebrate every act of self-advocacy and rehearse how to communicate needs to future providers, reinforcing the notion that the patient is the expert on their lived experience. Environmental adjustments. Encourage patients to bring a support person, a warm blanket, music, or even a stuffed animal. Simple changes like covering anatomical diagrams or putting fun socks on the footrests can make a substantial difference. What Success Looks Like After 15 sessions, a 39-year-old with lifelong medical anxiety who experienced panic during her first pelvic exam at 21 years of age went from viewing her anxiety as insurmountable to tolerating a full pelvic exam with the support of her partner. Thanks to this trauma-informed approach, we were able to complete the pelvic exam and identify a manageable muscular issue. Another patient, who'd experienced a psychogenic seizure during her first pelvic exam, completed a Pap smear by the seventh session. We discovered that her initial psychogenic seizure was probably due to a typical vasovagal response. As a result of our sessions, she now uses grounding tools with new providers — proudly advocating for herself in both medical and personal settings. At the end of our sessions, my female patients often tearfully ask, 'Why isn't it always this way?' Barriers and Realities Let's not sugarcoat it: The doctor-patient power imbalance is real and demands our constant vigilance. Furthermore, systemic barriers such as limited time, inadequate space, and liability-driven policies often make trauma-informed approaches challenging to implement in routine care. Although not every provider may be able to fully adopt a practice like this, we can all work to move the field toward more patient-led, trauma-informed care. Ultimately, the goal is a future where trauma-informed exams are the norm, not the exception. Takeaway for Clinicians Clinicians should screen for past traumas of all types and recognize that routine medical care is inherently vulnerable and boundary crossing; as such, trauma responses will inevitably arise. We all need to be prepared with tools and attitudes that can help our patients move through them. So, the next time you perform a pelvic exam: Slow down. Center consent and bodily autonomy. Listen to bodily cues, not just spoken words. Equip yourself with tools to help patients when trauma responses are activated. Empower patients to lead the process. Evaluate the necessity of your planned exams and always explain their rationale. Collaborate with the patient to create an environment for exams that feels empowering and safe. Let's move away from 'getting it done' and start 'getting it right.'
